Liderin Kültürel Zekasının Astların Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ile İş Doyumu Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Liderin Kültürel Zekasının Astların Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ile İş Doyumu Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı liderin kültürel zekâsı ile astların örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve iş doyumu arasındaki ilişkileri araştırmaktır. Çok düzeyli bir bakış açısıyla değişkenler arasındaki karmaşık ilişkileri açıklamak üzere, uluslararası askerî bir örgütte çalışan 31 liderden ve bu liderlere bağlı 96 asttan veriler toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, liderin kültürel zekâsının astların örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve iş doyumu ile ilişkili olduğunu öne süren görüşü desteklemiştir. Genel olarak, liderin yüksek seviyedeki motivasyonel ve davranışsal kültürel zekâ bileşenlerinin astların örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ve liderden kaynaklanan iş doyumuyla ilişkili olduğu görülmüştür. Ancak, liderin üstbilişsel ve bilişsel kültürel zekâ bileşenleri ile astların örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve liderden kaynaklanan iş doyumu arasındaki ilişkiler bir dereceye kadar zayıf ve anlamsız çıkmıştır. Uygulamaya ve araştırmaya yönelik pratik önerilere tartışma kısmında yer verilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Liderlik, kültürel zekâ, kültürlerarası etkinlik, iş doyumu, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı

Kaynakça

1. Aditya, R. ve House, R.J. (2002). Interpersonal acumen and leadership across cultures: Pointers from the GLOBE Study. İçinde R. E. Riggio ve S. E. Murphy (Ed.), Multiple intelligences and leadership (ss. 215–240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Ang, S. ve Van Dyne, L. (2008). Conceptualization of cultural intelligence: Definition, distinctiveness, and nomological network. İçinde S. Ang ve L. Van Dyne (Ed.), Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications (ss. 3–15). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
3. Ang, S., Van Dyne, L. ve Koh, C. (2006). Personality correlates of the four- factor model of cultural intelligence. Group and Organization Management, 31, 100-123.
4. Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C.K.S., Ng, K.Y., Templer, K.J., Tay, C. ve Chandrasekar, N.A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335–371.
5. Avery, G.C. (2004). Understanding leadership: Paradigms and cases. London: Sage.
6. Ayman, R. (2004). Situational and contingency approaches to leadership. İçinde J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo ve R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Leadership (ss. 148-170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Bartolo, K. ve Furlonger, B. (2000). Leadership and job satisfaction among aviation fire fighters in Australia. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(1), 87-93.
8. Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and management applications. 3rd Ed., New York: Free Press.

9. Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.
10. Bliese, P.D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. İçinde K. J. Klein ve S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (ss. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Clark, B.D. ve Matze, M.G. (1999). A core of global leadership: Relational competence. İçinde W. H. Mobley (Ed.), Advances in Global Leadership (ss. 127–161). Vol. 1. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
12. Deng, L. ve Gibson, P. (2008). A qualitative evaluation on the role of cultural International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3, 181-197. in
13. cross-cultural leadership effectiveness.
14. Dickson, M.W., Den Hartog, D.N. ve Mitchelson, J.K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 729–768.
15. Dubrin, A. (2010). Leadership: Research findings, practice and skills. 6th Edition, Mason, OH: South-Western.
16. Earley, P.C. ve Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. PaloAlto: Stanford University Press.
17. Gerstner, C.R. ve Day, D.V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader– member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827–844.
18. Green, S.G., Anderson, S.E. ve Shivers, S.L. (1996). Demographic and organizational influence on leader–member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 203–214. Greguras,
19. G.J. ve Ford, J. (2006). An examination of the
20. multidimensionality of supervisor and subordinate erceptions of leader
21. member exchange. Journal of Occupational & Organizational
22. Psychology, 79(3), 433-465.
23. Groves, K. ve Feyerherm, A. (2011). Leader cultural intelligence in context: Testing the moderating effects of team cultural diversity on leader and team performance. Group and Organization Management. 01 Kasım 2011 1059601111415664.full.pdf+html adresinden alınmıştır.
24. http://gom.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/08/06/
25. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2011). Kültürel zekânın öz-yeterlilik, görev performansı ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile ilişkisi. 19. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, 26-28 Mayıs, Çanakkale, 584-589.
26. Hitt, M.A., Beamish, P.W., Jackson, S.E. ve Mathieu, J.E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399.
27. Hogan, R., Curphy, G.J. ve Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493-504.
28. Hofmann, D.A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723–744.
29. Hofstede G. (1980). Cultural consequences: International differences in work related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Hofstede G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories Academy of Management Executive, 7(1), 81–94.
31. House, R.J., Wright, N.S. ve Aditya, R.N. (1997). Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory. İçinde P.C. Earley ve M. Eros (Ed.), New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology (ss. 535–625). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Hughes, R.L., Ginnett, R.C. ve Curphy, G.J. (2002). Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience. 4th Ed., Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
33. Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J.D. ve Morgeson, F.D. (2007). Leader–member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269–277.
34. James, L.R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219–229.
35. Javidan, M. ve House, R.J. (2001). Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from Project GLOBE. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 289– 305.
36. Kaltenbaugh, L.P. (2009). A study on job satisfaction among campus recreation administrators at four-year public and private institutions. Recreational Sports Journal, 33(2), 89-101.
37. Kim, Y.J. ve Van Dyne, L. (2011). Cultural intelligence and international leadership potential: The ımportance of contact for members of the majority. Journal of Applied Psychology. 01 Kasım 2011 tarihinde http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00468.x pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
38. Livermore, D. (2010). Leading with cultural intelligence: The new secret to success. New York: American Management Association.
39. Locke, E.A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. İçinde M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (ss. 1297–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.
40. Luthans, F. (1988). Successful vs. effective real managers. The Academy of Management Executive, 2, 127-132.
41. Luthans, F. (1995). Organizational behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Maas, C.J.M. ve Hox, J.J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 85–91.
43. MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M. ve Rich, G.A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 115–134.
44. Mok, M. (1995). Sample size requirements for two-level designs in educational research. Multilevel Modeling Newsletter, 7, 11–15.
45. Moon, T. (2010). Emotional intelligence correlates of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(8), 876- 898.
46. Ng, K.Y., Van Dyne, L. ve Ang, S. (2011). Cultural intelligence: A review, reflections, and recommendations for future research. İçinde A. M. Ryan, F.T.L. Leong ve F. Oswald (Ed.), Conducting multinational research projects in organizational psychology. American Psychological Association. 01 Kasım 2011 tarihinde http://soonang.com/wp- content/uploads/2011/09/2011-Ng-Van-Dyne-Ang-book-chapter.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
47. Northouse, P.G. (2001). Leadership: Theory and practice. 2nd Ed., London: Sage Publications Ltd.
48. Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
49. Peterson, M.F. ve Hunt, J.G. (1997). International perspectives on international leadership, The Leadership Quarterly, 8(3), 203–231.
50. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Moorman, R.H. ve Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leadership behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.
51. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B. ve Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563.
52. Purvanova, R.K., Bono, J.E. ve Dzieweczynski, J. (2006). Transformational leadership, performance. Human Performance, 19(1), 1-22. and
53. organizational citizenship
54. Raudenbush, S.W. ve Bryk, T.A. (2002). Hierarchical linear model: Applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Riggio, R.E. ve Cole, E.J. (1992). Agreement between subordinate and superior ratings of supervisory performance and effects on self and subordinate Organizational Psychology, 65, 151–158. satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and
56. Rockstuhl, T. ve Ng, K-Y. (2008). The effects of cultural intelligence on interpersonal trust in multicultural teams. İçinde S. Ang ve L. Van Dyne (Ed.), Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications (ss. 206-220). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
57. Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L. ve Annen, H. (2011a). Beyond IQ and EQ: The role of cultural Intelligence (CQ) on cross- border leadership effectiveness in a globalized world. Journal of Social Issues. content/uploads/2011/09/Forthcoming-JSI_final_paper_CQ__cross- border_leadership.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
58. http://soonang.com/wp
59. Rockstuhl, T., Şahin, F., Gürbüz, S., ve Ang, S. (2011b). International military officer potential: Cultural capital and cultural intelligence. Paper Presented at the 53rd International Military Testing Association Conference, Bali, Indonesia, October 31–November 03.
60. Scarpello, V. ve Vandenberg, R. J. (1987). The satisfaction with my supervisor scale: Its utility for research and practical applications. Journal of Management, 13(3), 447-466.
61. Seiler, S. (2007). Effective Intercultural Leadership-A Holistic Approach. Paper Presented at the 49th International Military Testing Association Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, October 8–12.
62. Smith, C.A., Organ, D.W. ve Near, J.P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
63. Spector, P.E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the job satisfaction survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 693-713.
64. Spector, P.E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
65. Spector, P.E. (2000). Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice. 2nd Edition, New York: Wiley.
66. Sternberg, R.J. ve Detterman, D.K. (1986). What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
67. Tarique, I. ve Takeuchi, R. (2008). Developing cultural intelligence: The roles of international nonwork experiences. İçinde S. Ang ve L. Van Dyne (Ed.), Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications (ss. 56-70). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
68. Tay, C., Westmen, M. ve Chia, A. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of cultural intelligence among short-term business travelers. İçinde S. Ang ve L. Van Dyne (Ed.), Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications (ss. 126–144). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
69. Templer, K.J., Tay, C. ve Chandrasekar, N.A. (2006). Motivational cultural intelligence, realistic job preview, realistic living conditions preview, and cross-cultural adjustment. Group and Organization Management, 31, 154–173.
70. Teven, J.J. (2007). Effects of supervisor social influence, nonverbal immediacy, and biological sex on subordinates' perceptions of job satisfaction, liking, and supervisor credibility. Communication Quarterly, 55(2), 155-177.
71. Triandis, H.C. (1993). The contingency model in cross-cultural perspective. İçinde M. M. Chemers ve R. Ayman (Ed.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (ss. 167–188). San Diego: Academic Press.
72. Tsui, A.S. ve O’Reilly, C.A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior–subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402–423.
73. Walker, D.M., Walker, T. ve Schmitz, J. (2003). Doing business internationally: The guide to cross-cultural success. 2nd Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
74. Ward, C., Fischer, R., Lam, F.S.Z., ve Hall, L. (2009). The convergent, discriminant and incremental validity of the scores of a self-report measure of cultural intelligence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(1), 85-105.
75. Williams, M.L. ve Podsakoff, P.M. (1992). Effects of group-level and ındividual-level variation in leader behaviours on subordinate attitudes and Organizational Psychology, 65(2), 115-129. Journal of Occupational &
76. Yrle, A.C., Hartman, S. ve Galle, W.P. (2002). An investigation of relationships between communication style and leader-member exchange. Journal of Communication Management, 6, 257–268.
77. Yukl, G. ve Van Fleet, D.D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. İçinde M.D. Dunnette ve L.M. Hough (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (ss.147-197). Vol. 3, Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
78. Yukl, G. (2008). Leadership in organizations. 7th Eds., New Jersey: Prentice Hall.