BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Savunma Planlamasının Ekonomiye Etkileri ve Savunma Bütçeleri

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 75 - 96, 01.03.2010

Öz

Kaynakça

  • ABD Savunma Bakanlığı, 2001. Quadrennial Defense Review 2001. http://www.comw.org/qdr (Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2010).
  • ABD Savunma Bakanlığı, 2006. Quadrennial Defense Review 2006. http://www.comw.org/qdr (Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2010).
  • ABD Savunma Bakanlığı, 1979. Report of the Working Group on Defense Planning and Resource Management. Defense Resource Management Study.
  • Bennett, Bruce W., 2003. Chapter II, Responding to Asymmetric Threats. Stuart Johnson, Martin Libicki ve Gregory F. Treverton (der.), New Challenges, New Tools for Defense Decisionmaking. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • Blechman, Barry M. ve Edward R. Fried, 1976. Controlling the Defense Budget, Foreign Affairs. s.233-249.
  • Conetta, Carl, 2002. The Pentagon’s New Budget, New Strategy, and Briefing Report #12. Cambridge, MA: Commonwealth Institute. http://www.comw.org/pda/0206newwar.html (Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2010).
  • Conetta, Carl, 2007. Toward a Sustainable US Defense Posture: An Option to Save $60+ Billion over the Next Five Years. Project on Defense Alternatives Briefing Memo #42. www.comw.org/pda (Erişim Tarihi: 23.12.2009).
  • Davis, Paul K., David Gompert ve Richard Kugler, 1996. Adaptiveness in National Defense: The Basis of a New Framework. Issue Paper National Defense Research Institute.
  • Dunnigan, James F., 1996. Digital Soldiers: The Evaluation of High-tech Weapons and Tomorrwo’s Brave New Battlefield. New York: Saint Martin’s Press.
  • Dülger, Mehmet, 2004. Türkiye'de Güvenlik Sektörü Gözetimi Siyasetinin Parlamenter Boyutu, Güvenlik Sektörünün Parlamenter Gözetimi, Kitap Tanıtım Toplantısı, Ankara.
  • Gansler, Jacques S., 1988. Building Reform in Weapons Acquisition. William P. Snyder ve James Brown, Defense Policy In The Reagan Administration. Pennslyvania: Diane Publishing Co.
  • Giray, Filiz, 2004. Savunma Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt 5, Sayı 1, 181-199. http://www.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/edergi/makale/865.pdf 10.06.2009). (Erişim Tarihi:
  • Graham, William, 1987. Session I: An Overview of the Role of Science and Technology in Shaping National Security Policy. W.Thomas Wander ve Kenneth N.Luango (der.), Science and Security: The Future of Arms Control Colloqium Proceedings, USA: AAAS Publication, No.87-17.
  • Gray, Colin S, 2008a. Coping with Uncertainty: Dilemmas of Defense Planning. Comparative Strategy 27: 324-331.
  • Gray, Colin S., 2008b. Modern Strateji. Çev.:Handan Öz. Truva Yayınları.
  • Gunzinger, Mark, 1997. Beyond the Bottom-up Review. (4), 95-139. Sommervilk, Mary A. (der.), Essays on Strategy XIV. Washington, DC: NDU Press.
  • Harshberger, Edward R. ve Russ Shaver, 1994. Modernizing Airpower Projection capabilities: Looking to Get More out of Less in Defense Planning. Davis, Paul K. (der.), New Challenges for Defense Planning: Rethinking How Much is Enough? Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • Hartley, Keith, 2003. Defence and Peace Economics: Some Future Issues. Defence and Peace Economics, Volume 14, Issue 6. page 475.
  • Ippolito, Dennis S., 1996. Federal Budget Policy and Defense Strategy. Working Report. Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College.
  • KARAGÖL, Erdal, 2005. Defence Expenditures and External Debt in Turkey, Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 16, No.2.
  • Katzenstein, Peter J., 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia Uni. Press.
  • Kirkpatrick, David L.I., 2004. Trends in the costs of Waepon Systems and Consequences, Defence and Peace Economics, Cilt 15 (3), 259-273.
  • Knowles J., 2009. Congress Passes FY2010 Defense Policy Bill. Washington Report. The Journal of Electronic Defense. November.
  • Korkmazyürek, Haluk, 2009. Stratejik Savunma Yönetimi Ders Notları. Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Savunma Yönetimi Doktora Programı.
  • Korkmazyürek, Haluk ve Harun Şeşen, 2008. Savunma Yönetiminde Yeni Planlama Yaklaşımları: Kavramsal Bir Analiz, KHO Bilim Dergisi, Cilt.18, Sayı:1, 54-78.
  • Lewis, Kevin, 1994. Chapter 5: The Dicipline Gap & Other Reasons For Humility And Realism in Defense Planning. Davis, Paul K. (der.), New Challenges for Defense Planning: Rethinking How Much is Enough? Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • Maior, G. ve M. Matei, 2003. Bridging the Gap in Civil-Military Relations in Southeastern Mediterranean Quarterly, Vol.14, No.2, Spring, 60-76. Romania’s
  • Defense-Planning Case,
  • Maoz, Zeev 2003. The Domestic Politics of Regional Security: Theoretical Perspectives and Regional Patterns in the Middle East, Journal of Strategic Studies, 19(3), 19-49.
  • Nelson, Daniel N., 2001. Beyond Defense Planning. Defense Studies, Ağustos, Cilt 1, Sayı.3, 25-36.
  • Nofi, Albert A., 2006. Recent Trends in Thinking about Warfare. Virginia: CNA Yayınları No: CRM D0014875.A1/Final.
  • Perkins, D.H., 2007, East Asian Economic Growth and its Implications for Regional Security. Asia-Pacific Review, Vol.14, No.1.
  • Pfeiffer, Holger, 2008. Defence and Force Planning in Historical Perspective: NATO as a Case Study, Baltic Security&Defense Review, Cilt 10.
  • Scowcroft, Brent, 1987. Session I: An Overview of the Role of Science and Technology in Shaping National Security Policy. W.Thomas Wander ve Kenneth N.Luango (der.), Science and Security: The Future of Arms Control Colloqium Proceedings, USA: AAAS Publication, No.87-17.
  • Shekhawat, V.S., 2006. Challenges in Defence Planning. Strategic Analysis, Vol. 30, No. 4, Oct-Dec 2006, 689-707. SIPRI Yearbook, 2002, http://yearbook2002.sipri.org/files/ SIPRIYB02summary.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 14.11.2009). SIPRI Yearbook, 2008. http://yearbook2008.sipri.org/files/ SIPRIYB08summary.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 14.11.2009). SIPRI Yearbook, 2009. SIPRIYB09summary.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 25.01.2010). http://yearbook2009.sipri.org/files/
  • Sköns, Elisabeth, 2005. Military Expenditure, Disarmament Forum, Three, Investıng in Security.
  • Smaldone, J.P., 2006. African Military Spending: Defense versus Development? African Security Review.Vol 15, No 4.
  • Stanley, Williams, 1994. Assessing the Affordability of Fighter Aircraft Force Modernization. Davis, Paul K. (der.), New Challenges for Defense Planning: Rethinking How Much is Enough? Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • Topcu, Mustafa Kemal, 2002. The Choice of Interest Rates in Project Management: The Case of Time Varying Interest Rates. Ankara, Bilkent Üniversitesi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Topcu, Mustafa Kemal, 2010. The Case of Time Varying Interest Rates in Project Evaluation. Defence and Peace Economics (Yayım aşamasında).
  • Ward, Michael D., Davis, David R. ve Corey L.Lofdahl, 1995. A Century of Tradeoffs: Defense and Growth in Japan and United States. International Studies Quarterly, 39, 27-50.
  • Younossi, Obaid, Mark V. Arena, Robert S. Leonard, Charles Robert Roll, Jr., Arvind Jain ve Jerry M. SollingerIs, 2007. Weapon System Cost Growth Increasing?: A Quantitative Assessment of Completed and Ongoing Programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

SAVUNMA PLANLAMASININ EKONOMİYE ETKİLERİ VE SAVUNMA BÜTÇELERİ

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 75 - 96, 01.03.2010

Öz

Savunma planlamacıların temel görevi, belirli stratejik amaç ve politik tehditler altında, insan ve malzeme kaynaklarını organize etme ve yönetmeyi dengelemek için gerekli kapasiteleri sağlamaktır. hedeflenmektedir. Bugüne kadar yapılan araştırma ve çalışmalarda, kaynak sıkıntısı olmadan planlamaya başlanmış ve önceliklendirme safhasında bütçe kısıtı devreye girmiştir. Savunmanın ağırlığını ekonomilerinde hafife alınmayacak derecede hisseden ülkelerde, savunma planlamasının ekonomik etkileri, araştırmacılar için gündemden düşmeyen bir çalışma alanı olmuştur. Artan savunma maliyetleri, değişen tehdit ortamı ve uluslararası iş birlikleri savunma harcamalarını artıran başlıca sebepler arasında sayılmaktadır. Toplumun refahından ödün verilerek ayrılan savunma harcamaları bu çalışmanın da odağını teşkil etmektedir. Bu çerçevede savunma planlama anlayışındaki değişikliklerin savunma harcamalarına, dolayısıyla ekonomiye etkisi araştırılmış ve ayrıca savunma planlamacılarına holistik bir bakış açısı sunulmaya çalışılmıştır

Kaynakça

  • ABD Savunma Bakanlığı, 2001. Quadrennial Defense Review 2001. http://www.comw.org/qdr (Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2010).
  • ABD Savunma Bakanlığı, 2006. Quadrennial Defense Review 2006. http://www.comw.org/qdr (Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2010).
  • ABD Savunma Bakanlığı, 1979. Report of the Working Group on Defense Planning and Resource Management. Defense Resource Management Study.
  • Bennett, Bruce W., 2003. Chapter II, Responding to Asymmetric Threats. Stuart Johnson, Martin Libicki ve Gregory F. Treverton (der.), New Challenges, New Tools for Defense Decisionmaking. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • Blechman, Barry M. ve Edward R. Fried, 1976. Controlling the Defense Budget, Foreign Affairs. s.233-249.
  • Conetta, Carl, 2002. The Pentagon’s New Budget, New Strategy, and Briefing Report #12. Cambridge, MA: Commonwealth Institute. http://www.comw.org/pda/0206newwar.html (Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2010).
  • Conetta, Carl, 2007. Toward a Sustainable US Defense Posture: An Option to Save $60+ Billion over the Next Five Years. Project on Defense Alternatives Briefing Memo #42. www.comw.org/pda (Erişim Tarihi: 23.12.2009).
  • Davis, Paul K., David Gompert ve Richard Kugler, 1996. Adaptiveness in National Defense: The Basis of a New Framework. Issue Paper National Defense Research Institute.
  • Dunnigan, James F., 1996. Digital Soldiers: The Evaluation of High-tech Weapons and Tomorrwo’s Brave New Battlefield. New York: Saint Martin’s Press.
  • Dülger, Mehmet, 2004. Türkiye'de Güvenlik Sektörü Gözetimi Siyasetinin Parlamenter Boyutu, Güvenlik Sektörünün Parlamenter Gözetimi, Kitap Tanıtım Toplantısı, Ankara.
  • Gansler, Jacques S., 1988. Building Reform in Weapons Acquisition. William P. Snyder ve James Brown, Defense Policy In The Reagan Administration. Pennslyvania: Diane Publishing Co.
  • Giray, Filiz, 2004. Savunma Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt 5, Sayı 1, 181-199. http://www.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/edergi/makale/865.pdf 10.06.2009). (Erişim Tarihi:
  • Graham, William, 1987. Session I: An Overview of the Role of Science and Technology in Shaping National Security Policy. W.Thomas Wander ve Kenneth N.Luango (der.), Science and Security: The Future of Arms Control Colloqium Proceedings, USA: AAAS Publication, No.87-17.
  • Gray, Colin S, 2008a. Coping with Uncertainty: Dilemmas of Defense Planning. Comparative Strategy 27: 324-331.
  • Gray, Colin S., 2008b. Modern Strateji. Çev.:Handan Öz. Truva Yayınları.
  • Gunzinger, Mark, 1997. Beyond the Bottom-up Review. (4), 95-139. Sommervilk, Mary A. (der.), Essays on Strategy XIV. Washington, DC: NDU Press.
  • Harshberger, Edward R. ve Russ Shaver, 1994. Modernizing Airpower Projection capabilities: Looking to Get More out of Less in Defense Planning. Davis, Paul K. (der.), New Challenges for Defense Planning: Rethinking How Much is Enough? Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • Hartley, Keith, 2003. Defence and Peace Economics: Some Future Issues. Defence and Peace Economics, Volume 14, Issue 6. page 475.
  • Ippolito, Dennis S., 1996. Federal Budget Policy and Defense Strategy. Working Report. Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College.
  • KARAGÖL, Erdal, 2005. Defence Expenditures and External Debt in Turkey, Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 16, No.2.
  • Katzenstein, Peter J., 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia Uni. Press.
  • Kirkpatrick, David L.I., 2004. Trends in the costs of Waepon Systems and Consequences, Defence and Peace Economics, Cilt 15 (3), 259-273.
  • Knowles J., 2009. Congress Passes FY2010 Defense Policy Bill. Washington Report. The Journal of Electronic Defense. November.
  • Korkmazyürek, Haluk, 2009. Stratejik Savunma Yönetimi Ders Notları. Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Savunma Yönetimi Doktora Programı.
  • Korkmazyürek, Haluk ve Harun Şeşen, 2008. Savunma Yönetiminde Yeni Planlama Yaklaşımları: Kavramsal Bir Analiz, KHO Bilim Dergisi, Cilt.18, Sayı:1, 54-78.
  • Lewis, Kevin, 1994. Chapter 5: The Dicipline Gap & Other Reasons For Humility And Realism in Defense Planning. Davis, Paul K. (der.), New Challenges for Defense Planning: Rethinking How Much is Enough? Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • Maior, G. ve M. Matei, 2003. Bridging the Gap in Civil-Military Relations in Southeastern Mediterranean Quarterly, Vol.14, No.2, Spring, 60-76. Romania’s
  • Defense-Planning Case,
  • Maoz, Zeev 2003. The Domestic Politics of Regional Security: Theoretical Perspectives and Regional Patterns in the Middle East, Journal of Strategic Studies, 19(3), 19-49.
  • Nelson, Daniel N., 2001. Beyond Defense Planning. Defense Studies, Ağustos, Cilt 1, Sayı.3, 25-36.
  • Nofi, Albert A., 2006. Recent Trends in Thinking about Warfare. Virginia: CNA Yayınları No: CRM D0014875.A1/Final.
  • Perkins, D.H., 2007, East Asian Economic Growth and its Implications for Regional Security. Asia-Pacific Review, Vol.14, No.1.
  • Pfeiffer, Holger, 2008. Defence and Force Planning in Historical Perspective: NATO as a Case Study, Baltic Security&Defense Review, Cilt 10.
  • Scowcroft, Brent, 1987. Session I: An Overview of the Role of Science and Technology in Shaping National Security Policy. W.Thomas Wander ve Kenneth N.Luango (der.), Science and Security: The Future of Arms Control Colloqium Proceedings, USA: AAAS Publication, No.87-17.
  • Shekhawat, V.S., 2006. Challenges in Defence Planning. Strategic Analysis, Vol. 30, No. 4, Oct-Dec 2006, 689-707. SIPRI Yearbook, 2002, http://yearbook2002.sipri.org/files/ SIPRIYB02summary.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 14.11.2009). SIPRI Yearbook, 2008. http://yearbook2008.sipri.org/files/ SIPRIYB08summary.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 14.11.2009). SIPRI Yearbook, 2009. SIPRIYB09summary.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 25.01.2010). http://yearbook2009.sipri.org/files/
  • Sköns, Elisabeth, 2005. Military Expenditure, Disarmament Forum, Three, Investıng in Security.
  • Smaldone, J.P., 2006. African Military Spending: Defense versus Development? African Security Review.Vol 15, No 4.
  • Stanley, Williams, 1994. Assessing the Affordability of Fighter Aircraft Force Modernization. Davis, Paul K. (der.), New Challenges for Defense Planning: Rethinking How Much is Enough? Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • Topcu, Mustafa Kemal, 2002. The Choice of Interest Rates in Project Management: The Case of Time Varying Interest Rates. Ankara, Bilkent Üniversitesi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Topcu, Mustafa Kemal, 2010. The Case of Time Varying Interest Rates in Project Evaluation. Defence and Peace Economics (Yayım aşamasında).
  • Ward, Michael D., Davis, David R. ve Corey L.Lofdahl, 1995. A Century of Tradeoffs: Defense and Growth in Japan and United States. International Studies Quarterly, 39, 27-50.
  • Younossi, Obaid, Mark V. Arena, Robert S. Leonard, Charles Robert Roll, Jr., Arvind Jain ve Jerry M. SollingerIs, 2007. Weapon System Cost Growth Increasing?: A Quantitative Assessment of Completed and Ongoing Programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Toplam 42 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mustafa Kemal Topcu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2010
Gönderilme Tarihi 27 Temmuz 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2010 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

IEEE M. K. Topcu, “SAVUNMA PLANLAMASININ EKONOMİYE ETKİLERİ VE SAVUNMA BÜTÇELERİ”, Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 9, sy. 1, ss. 75–96, 2010, doi: 10.17134/sbd.64805.