Kurumsal ve Teknik Çevre Ayrımında Yönetim Kurulu Fonksiyonu ve Yapısı: Kuramsal Bir Çerçeve

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 127 - 144, 01.03.2010

Mert Aktaş

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

KURUMSAL VE TEKNİK ÇEVRE AYRIMINDA YÖNETİM KURULU FONKSİYONU VE YAPISI: KURAMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVE

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, kurumsal çevre ve teknik çevre ayrımında yönetim kurulu fonksiyonu ve yapısını incelemektir. Stratejik yönetim yazınında yönetim kurulu yapısı ve demografisi ile ilgili birçok farklı koşulbağımlılıklar ortaya konulmuştur. Bu araştırma ise teknik çevre ve kurumsal çevre ayrımını ve yönetim kurulu fonksiyonu ve yapısının belirleyicisi olarak öne sürmektedir. Bu araştırma tartışmalarını, koşulbağımlılık kuramına, kurumsal kurama ve kaynak bağımlılığı kuramına dayandırmıştır. Sonuç olarak da teknik çevre ve kurumsal çevrenin yönetim kurulu fonksiyonu ve yapısını nasıl ve ne şekilde etkilediğine ilişkin öneriler ve bir model ortaya konulmuştur

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgüt kuramı, örgüt çevresi, yönetim kurulu

Kaynakça

• Boeker, W. ve Goodstein, J. 1991. Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 805-826. 34
• Daily, C. ve Dalton, D. 1993. Board of directors leadership and structure: Control and performance implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 17: 65-81.
• Daily, C. M. 1996 Governance patterns in bankruptcy organizations, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 355-375.
• Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., Johnson, J. L. 1998. Meta- analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 269-290.
• Dalton, D. ve Kesner, I. 1983. Inside/outside succession and organizational size: The pragmatics of executive replacement. Academy of Management Journal, 26: 736-742.
• DiMaggio, P. J. ve Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147-160 36
• Donaldson, Lex. 1995. American anti-management theories of organizations: a critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Fennel,M,E. ve Alexander,J,A. 1987.Organizational boundary spanning in institutionalized environments.Academy of Management Journal. 30(3): 456-476.
• Forbes, D. & Milliken, F. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24: 489-505.
• Goodstein, ,J.,Gautnam,K., Boeker,W. 1994. The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal. 15(3):241-250.
• Hirsch,P,M. 1975. Organizational effectiveness and the institutional environment. Administrative Science Quarterly. 20(3): 327-344.
• Huse, M. 1990 Board composition in small enterprises, Entrepreneurship & Reg ional Development, 2: 363- 373.
• Huse, M. 2000. Boards of directors in SMEs: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12: 271-290.
• Kerr, N,L. Ve Tindale,R,S.2004. Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology. 55:623-655.
• Kesner,I,F.1988. Directors' characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender.Academy of Management Journal.31(1): 66-84.
• Li,J.1994. Ownership structure and board composition: A multi-country test of agency theory predictions. Managerial and Decision Economics. 15(4): 359-368.
• Luoma, P. and Goodstein, J. 1999. Stakeholders and corporate boards: institutional influences on board composition and structure, Academy of Management Journal, 42: 553- 563.
• Lynall, M,D., Golden,B,R.,Hillman,A,J. 2003. Board composition from adolesence to maturity. Academy of Management Review,28(3): 416- 431.
• Meyer J. W. & Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340-63
• Milliken, F. J. and Martin, L. L. 1996. Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups, Academy of Management Review, 21: 402-433. Osborn,R,N.ve
• Hunt,J,G.1974. Environment and organizational
• effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly. 19 (2):231-246. Palmer, D, A. Ve Biggart, N, W.2002. Organizational
• institutions.Joel,A,C.Baum (Der) The Blackwell Companion to
• Organizations. Oxford:Blackwell, 259,280.
• Pearce, J. A. and Zahra, S. A. 1991 The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: associations with corporate performance, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 135-153.
• Pearce, J. A. ve Zahra, S. A 1991. The relative power of CEOs and Boards of Directors: associations with corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2): 135- 153.
• Pettigrew, A. 1992. On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 163-183. 40
• Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
• Pfeffer, J. 1972. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 218-228.
• Pfeffer, J. 1973 Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: Administrative Science Quarterly, 18: 349-364. of organization environmental linkages,
• Scott, W. R. 1992.Organizations Rational Natural and Open Systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Smith, K,G.,Mitchell,G,R., Summer,C,E. 1985. Top level management priorities in different stages of organizational life cycle. Academy of Management Journal. 28(4):799-820.
• Tolbert, P. S. 1985. Institutional environments and resource dependence: Sources of administrative structure in institutions of higher learning. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 1-13.
• Üsdiken, B. 2006. Kaynak Bağımlılığı Kuramı. A.S. Sargut ve Ş. Özen (Der). Örgüt Kuramları,Ankara,İmge
• Yıldırım, Ö ve Üsdiken, B. 2005. Boards of directors in firms within family business groups: Evidence from Turkish ‘Holding’ companies. 21. EGOS Kollokyumu, Berlin, 30 Haziran-2 Temmuz 2005.
• Zajac, E. J. & Westphal, J. D. 1996. Who shall succed? How CEO/Board preferences affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39:64-90.