AKRAN MENTÖRLÜĞÜ MODELİNİN HEMŞİRELİK ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN PERİFERİK İNTRAVENÖZ KATETER UYGULAMASINDA BİLGİ, BECERİ, ÖZGÜVEN, MEMNUNİYET VE KORKU ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: RANDOMİZE KONTROLLÜ ÇALIŞMA

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, periferik intravenöz kateter uygulamasının öğretiminde akran mentörlüğü modelinin hemşirelik öğrencilerinin bilgi, beceri, özgüven, memnuniyet ve korku semptomlarına etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapıldı. Yöntem: Randomize kontrollü, paralel gruplu ve tek merkezli bir çalışmadır. Verilerin analizinde Shapiro-Wilk Testi, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Testi, Mann-Whitney U Testi kullanıldı. Verilerin etki değeri için Eta kare değeri kullanıldı. Bulgular: Öğrencilerin periferik intravenöz kateter uygulamasında bilgi ve becerileri değerlendirildiğinde, akran mentörlüğü modeli grubundaki öğrenciler (n=50) ile standart öğretim modelindeki öğrencilerin (n=51) bilgi ve beceri puan ortalamaları arasında istatistiksel olarak fark bulunmadı (p=0.389). Periferik intravenöz kateter uygulamasında öğrencilerin memnuniyet puanları değerlendiğinde gruplar arasında orta düzeyin altında etki değeri olan anlamlı bir farklılık bulundu (p=0.048, η2=0.038). Öğrencilerin özgüven puanları değerlendiğinde gruplar arasında orta düzey etki değeri olan anlamlı bir farklılık bulundu (p=0.004, η2=0.078). Kontrol grubu ve deney grubu karşılaştırıldığında Kontrol grubundaki öğrencilerin, deney grubundaki öğrencilere göre kendilerini daha fazla gergin hissettiği belirlendi (p=0.004). Sonuç: Bu çalışmada periferik intravenöz kateter uygulamasında öğrencilere beceri kazandırılmasında akran mentörlüğü modelinin standart öğretim modeli kadar etkili olduğu, öğrencilerin özgüven ve memnuniyetlerinin daha yüksek olduğu bulundu.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mentörlük
• Hemşirelik Öğrencisi
• İntravenöz Kateter
• Bilgi
• Beceri

THE EFFECT OF PEER MENTORING MODEL USED TO TEACH PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CATHETER PLACEMENT ON KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, SELF-CONFIDENCE, SATISFACTION AND FEAR OF NURSING STUDENTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of peer mentoring model used to teach peripheral intravenous catheter placement on knowledge, skills, self-confidence, satisfaction and symptoms of fear of nursing students. Method: This is a controlled, randomized, parallel group and single center study. The Shapiro-Wilk Test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, Mann-Whitney U Test were used for the analysis of the data. The EtaSquared value was used for the effect value of the data. Results: When peripheral intravenous catheter knowledge and skills of students were evaluated, there was no statistical difference between the knowledge and skill mean scores of the students in the peer mentoring model group (n=50) and the students in the traditional teaching model (n=51) (p=0.389). When the scores for satisfaction about peripheral intravenous catheter insertion procedures were analysed, a significant difference was found between the groups with an effect value below the medium level (p=0.048, η2=0.038). When the students' self-confidence scores were evaluated, a significant difference was found the groups with an effect value the medium level (p=0.004, η2=0.078). The students in the control group experienced more often symptom of feeling tense compared to the students in the experimental group (p=0.004). Conclusion: This study found that the peer mentoring model was as effective as the traditional teaching model in gaining skills of peripheral intravenous catheter placement, and the students' self-confidence and satisfaction were higher.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mentoring
• Nursing Students
• Intravenous Catheter
• Knowledge
• Skills

Teşekkür

The researchers would like to thank all the students who voluntarily participated in this study and to the educators who created the conditions for it to take place.

Kaynakça

1. Mamhidir AG, Kristofferzon ML, Hellström- Hyson E, Persson E, Martensson G. Nursing preceptors’ experiences of two clinical education models. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014;14(4):427-433.
2. Şendir M, Çelik S, Dişsiz M, et al. A new approach in nursing education and practice: Integration of nursing education and practice. JAREN. 2018;4(2):92-99.
3. Stenberg M, Carlson, E. Swedish student nurses' perception of peer learning as an educational model during clinical practice in a hospital setting: an evaluation study. BMC Nurs. 2015;14(48):2-7.
4. Akın Korhan E, Uzelli Yılmaz D, Ceylan B, Akbıyık A, Tokem Y. Hemşirelikte psikomotor becerilerin öğretiminde senaryo temelli öğrenme: Bir deneyim paylaşımı. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;3(3):11-16.
5. McWilliams LA, Malecha A, Langford R. Clutter P. Comparisons of cooperative-based versus independent learning while using a haptic intravenous simulator. Clin Simul Nurs. 2017;13(4):154-160.
6. Khorshid L, Eşer İ, Sarı D, Zaybak A, Yapucu Ü, Gürol G. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinde invaziv ve invaziv olmayan islemleri yapmaya baglı korku semptom ve belirtilerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences. 2002;5(2):1-10.
7. Unver V, Akbayrak N, Tosun N. Efficiency of the Peer Tutoring model in Skills Training. Health Med. 2011;5(5):1091-1099.
8. El-Sayed SH, Metwally FG, Abdeen MA. Effect of peer teaching on the performance of undergraduate nursing students enrolled in nursing administration course. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2013;13(3):156-166.

9. Ravanipour M, Bahreini M, Ravanipour M. Exploring nursing students' experience of peer learning in clinical practice. J Educ Health Promot. 2015;4:1-7.
10. Goldsmith M, Stewart L, Ferguson L. Peer learning partnership: An innovative strategy to enhance skill acquisition in nursing students. Nurs Educ Today. 2006;26(2):123-130.
11. Stone R, Cooper SJR, Cant RP. The value of peer learning in undergraduate nursing education: A systematic review. ISRN Nursing. 2013;3:1-10.
12. Bagnasco A, Sampietro P, Siri A, Sasso L. Peer learning in the clinical education of nursing students: Outcomes evaluation of a structured program in Italy. HJNS. 2012;4(4):4-14.
13. Öztürk D, Baykara GZ. Akran eğitiminin hemşirelik becerilerinin öğretimine etkisi. KUHEAD. 2019;1(4):295-300.
14. Sibiya MN, Ngxongo TSP, Beepat SY. The influence of peer mentoring on critical care nursing students’ learning outcomes. Int J Workplace Health Manag. 2018;11(3):130-142.
15. Lewinski AA, Mann T, Flores D, Vance A, Bettger PJ Hirschey R. Partnership for development: A peer mentorship model for PhD students. J Prof Nurs. 2017;33:363-369.
16. Raymond JM, Sheppard K. Effects of peer mentoring on nursing students’perceived stress, sense of belonging, self-efficacy and loneliness. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2018;8(1):17-23.
17. Sü S, Özlük B, Demirören N. Effects of mentoring in reducing clinical stress levels of nursing students during experiences in their first clinical practice. JHS. 2018;15(1):280-292.
18. Field M, Burke MJ, McAllister D, Lloyd D. Peer assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students. Med Educ. 2007;41(4):411-418.
19. Hudson JN, Tonkin AL. Clinical skills education: outcomes of relationships between junior medical students, senior peers and simulated patients. Med Educ. 2008;4(9):901-908.
20. Christiansen A, Bell A. Peer learning partnerships: exploring the experience of pre-registration nursing students. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(5-6):803-810.
21. Essa RM, Al-Battawi JI, El demerdash DE, Ahmed HAE. Effect of application of peer learning strategy on obstetric and gynecological nursing students' clinical performance. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2018;8(3):144-154.
22. Özkütük N, Orgun F, Akçakoca B. Türkiye’de hemşirelik eğitimi veren yükseköğretim kurumlarına ilişkin güncel durumun incelenmesi. Yükseköğretim Dergisi. 2018;8(2):150-157.
23. YÖK Hemşirelik Lisans Eğitimi Çalıştay Raporu http://www.hemed.org.tr/images/stories/Hemsirelik_Lisans_Egitimi_Calistayi_SonucRaporu.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2020.
24. Sezer H, Şahin H. Beceri Eğitiminde Koçluk: Öğrenci Nasıl Algılıyor? Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2017;(48):62-69.
25. Craven RF, Hirnle CJ. Fundamentals of Nursing, 6th ed. Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2009:529-530.
26. Potter PA, Perry AG, Stockert P, Hall A. Medication administration. In: Fundamental of Nursing. 9th ed. Elsevier: St. Louis, 2017:670-674.
27. Büyüköztürk Ş. Eta kare referans aralıkları. Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. 2011:44.
28. Lim S, Lim XM, Wen CCJ, Dong CY, Mikkonen K, Wentao Z. Peer mentoring programs for nursing students: A mixed methods systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2022.
29. Wong C, Stake-Doucet N, Lombardo C, Sanzone L, Tsimicalis A. An integrative review of peer mentorship programs for undergraduate nursing students J Nurs Educ. 2016;55(3):141-149.
30. Ntho TA, Pienaar AJ, Sehularo LA. Peer-mentees' challenges in an undergraduate peer-group clinical mentoring programme in a nursing education institution. Health SA. 2020;13(25):1435.
31. Harrison HF, Kinsella EA, DeLuca S. et al. We know what they’re struggling with: student peer mentors’ embodied perceptions of teaching in a health professional education mentorship program. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2022;27:63-86.
32. Bulut H, Hisar F, Demir SG. Evaluation of mentorship programme in nursing education: a pilot study in Turkey. Nurse Educ Today. 2010;30(8):756-762.
33. Palsson Y, Martensson G, Swenne CL, Adel E, Engström M. A peer learning intervention for nursing students in clinical practice education: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;51:81-87.
34. Himes D, Ravert P. Situated peer coaching and unfolding cases in the fundamentals skills laboratory. IJNES. 2012;9(1):265-272.
35. Chojecki P, Lamarre J, Buck M, St-Sauveur I, Eldaoud N, Purden M. Perceptions of a peer learning approach to pediatric clinical education. IJNES. 2010;7(1):1-14.
36. Kachaturoff M, Caboral-Stevens M, Gee VM Lan. Effects of peer-mentoring on stress and anxiety levels of undergraduate nursing students: an integrative review J Prof Nurs. 2020;36(4):223-228.