Araştırma Makalesi

THE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL MAT EXERCISES VERSUS REFORMER PILATES AND HAMMOCK YOGA ON PAIN, ENDURANCE, BALANCE, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD CHRONIC BACK PAIN

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1 30 Nisan 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

THE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL MAT EXERCISES VERSUS REFORMER PILATES AND HAMMOCK YOGA ON PAIN, ENDURANCE, BALANCE, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD CHRONIC BACK PAIN

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study to examine the effects of traditional mat exercises, Reformer Pilates (RP) and Hammock Yoga (HY) approaches on pain, endurance, balance, disability, and quality of life of individuals who had Chronic low back pain (LBP). Method: 60 individuals who had Chronic LBP were participated and randomly attended into 3 groups as RP group (n=20, mean age:31.85±8.89 years), HY group (n=20, mean age:29.90±6.70 years), and mat group (n=20, mean age:30.40±8.21 years). All exercise training was applied twice a week for 4 weeks (45 minutes). The pain was evaluated with VAS and McGill, endurance was evaluated with plank tests and single leg hip bridge test, static balance was assessed with standing on single leg, and dynamic balance was assesed with the Star Excursion Balance Test. The Oswestry Disability Questionnaire and World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-Bref) were used for disability and quality of life measurements, respectively. Results: Improvements were observed on a group basis in all evaluated parameters (p<0.05). In the mat group, the McGill score improved more than the HY group, and Oswestry and WHOQOL-Bref improved more than the HY and RP groups (p<0.05). The performance of standing on single leg improved in the HY group more than the mat group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Traditional mat exercises can be preferred primarily to reduce disability and improve the quality of life in individuals with Chronic LBP in a short time. The HY can be added to the content of individual exercise programs for the development of balance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Posadzki P, Lizis P, Hagner-Derengowska M. Pilates for low back pain: a systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):85-89.
  2. Barros BSd, Imoto AM, O’Neil J, et al. The management of lower back pain using pilates method: assessment of content exercise reporting in RCTs. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(11):2428-2436.
  3. Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):482-491.
  4. Krismer M, Tulder M. Strategies fοr preventiοn and management οf musculοskeletal cοnditiοns. Lοw back pain (nοnspecific). Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatοl. 2007;21:77-91.
  5. Urits I, Burshtein A, Sharma M, et al. Low back pain, a comprehensive review: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23:1-10.
  6. Owen PJ, Miller CT, Mundell NL, et al. Which specific modes of exercise training are most effective for treating low back pain? Network meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(21):1279-1287.
  7. Patrick N, Emanski E, Knaub MA. Acute and chronic low back pain. Med Clin North Am. 2014;98(4):777-789.
  8. Edit V, Eva S, Maria K, et al. Psychosocial, educational, and somatic factors in chronic nonspecific low back pain. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:587-592.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Fizyoterapi, Rehabilitasyon

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Kasım 2023

Kabul Tarihi

26 Aralık 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çiftçi, M., & Usgu, S. (2024). THE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL MAT EXERCISES VERSUS REFORMER PILATES AND HAMMOCK YOGA ON PAIN, ENDURANCE, BALANCE, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD CHRONIC BACK PAIN. Karya Journal of Health Science, 5(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1384349
AMA
1.Çiftçi M, Usgu S. THE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL MAT EXERCISES VERSUS REFORMER PILATES AND HAMMOCK YOGA ON PAIN, ENDURANCE, BALANCE, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD CHRONIC BACK PAIN. Karya J Health Sci. 2024;5(1):1-7. doi:10.52831/kjhs.1384349
Chicago
Çiftçi, Merve, ve Serkan Usgu. 2024. “THE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL MAT EXERCISES VERSUS REFORMER PILATES AND HAMMOCK YOGA ON PAIN, ENDURANCE, BALANCE, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD CHRONIC BACK PAIN”. Karya Journal of Health Science 5 (1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1384349.
EndNote
Çiftçi M, Usgu S (01 Nisan 2024) THE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL MAT EXERCISES VERSUS REFORMER PILATES AND HAMMOCK YOGA ON PAIN, ENDURANCE, BALANCE, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD CHRONIC BACK PAIN. Karya Journal of Health Science 5 1 1–7.
IEEE
[1]M. Çiftçi ve S. Usgu, “THE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL MAT EXERCISES VERSUS REFORMER PILATES AND HAMMOCK YOGA ON PAIN, ENDURANCE, BALANCE, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD CHRONIC BACK PAIN”, Karya J Health Sci, c. 5, sy 1, ss. 1–7, Nis. 2024, doi: 10.52831/kjhs.1384349.
ISNAD
Çiftçi, Merve - Usgu, Serkan. “THE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL MAT EXERCISES VERSUS REFORMER PILATES AND HAMMOCK YOGA ON PAIN, ENDURANCE, BALANCE, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD CHRONIC BACK PAIN”. Karya Journal of Health Science 5/1 (01 Nisan 2024): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1384349.
JAMA
1.Çiftçi M, Usgu S. THE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL MAT EXERCISES VERSUS REFORMER PILATES AND HAMMOCK YOGA ON PAIN, ENDURANCE, BALANCE, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD CHRONIC BACK PAIN. Karya J Health Sci. 2024;5:1–7.
MLA
Çiftçi, Merve, ve Serkan Usgu. “THE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL MAT EXERCISES VERSUS REFORMER PILATES AND HAMMOCK YOGA ON PAIN, ENDURANCE, BALANCE, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD CHRONIC BACK PAIN”. Karya Journal of Health Science, c. 5, sy 1, Nisan 2024, ss. 1-7, doi:10.52831/kjhs.1384349.
Vancouver
1.Merve Çiftçi, Serkan Usgu. THE EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL MAT EXERCISES VERSUS REFORMER PILATES AND HAMMOCK YOGA ON PAIN, ENDURANCE, BALANCE, DISABILITY, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD CHRONIC BACK PAIN. Karya J Health Sci. 01 Nisan 2024;5(1):1-7. doi:10.52831/kjhs.1384349

Cited By