Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNDEN OLUŞAN KADIN VE ERKEK VOLEYBOL OYUNCULARININ BAZI FİZİKSEL UYGUNLUK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ VE BİRBİRİYLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 15 - 18, 30.08.2020

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı üniversite düzeyindeki kadın ve erkek voleybol oyuncularının bazı fiziksel ve performansla ilişkili özeliklerini belirlenmesi ve birbirleriyle karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışma bir üniversitenin voleybol takımında oynayan 18-21 yaş aralığında 10 kadın, 9 erkek oyuncu ile gerçekleştirildi. Fiziksel özellik olarak boy uzunluğu, vücut ağırlığı ve Bede Kitle İndeksi (BKİ), performansla ilişkili özelliklerden esneklik, kassal endurans, anaerobik ve aerobik kapasite seçildi. Esneklik otur-uzan testi ile, aerobik kapasite Cooper testi ile, anaerobik güç dikey sıçrama testi, kassal endurans ise şınav ve mekik testi ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Kadın ve erkek voleybolcular arasında boy uzunluğu, vücut ağırlığı, anaerobik güç ve aerobik performans açısından erkek oyuncular lehine anlamlı fark bulunurken (p<0.05), BKİ, esneklik ve kassal endurans değerleri açısından anlamlı fark bulunmadı (p>0.05). Sonuç: Bu çalışma üniversite düzeyindeki voleybol oyuncuların fiziksel ve fizyolojik karakteristikleri incelenmesi için spor profesyonellerine yararlı bilgiler içermektedir.

Teşekkür

Çalışmaya özverili katılımlarından dolayı her iki takımda oynayan öğrencilere teşekkür ederiz.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Sporis G, Jukic I, Ostojic SM, Milanovic D. Fitness profiling in soccer: physical and physiologic characteristics of elite players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2009;23(7):1947-53.
  • 2. Ostojic SM, Mazic S, Dikic N. Profiling in basketball: Physical and physiological characteristics of elite players. Journal of strength and Conditioning Research. 2006;20(4):740.
  • 3. Ziv G, Lidor R. Physical characteristics, physiological attributes, and on-court performances of handball players: A review. European Journal of Sport Science. 2009;9(6):375-86.
  • 4. Lidor R, Ziv G. Physical and physiological attributes of female volleyball players-a review. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010;24(7):1963-73.
  • 5. Fleck S, Case S, Puhl J, Van Handle P. Physical and physiological characteristics of elite women volleyball players. Canadian journal of applied sport sciences Journal Canadien des Sciences Appliquees au Sport. 1985;10(3):122-6.
  • 6. Koley S, Singh J, Sandhu JS. Anthropometric and physiological characteristics on Indian inter-university volleyball players. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2010;5(3):389-99.
  • 7. Smith D, Roberts D, Watson B. Physical, physiological and performance differences between Canadian national team and universiade volleyball players. Journal of sports sciences. 1992;10(2):131-8.
  • 8. Kausar A, Mudassir S, Badaam KM, Shete AN, Khan S. Cardiorespiratory Fitness of University Volleyball Players and Sedentary Young People in Marathwada Region of Maharashtra Province in India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(7):CC20-CC1.
  • 9. Wells KF, Dillon EK. The sit and reach—a test of back and leg flexibility. Research Quarterly American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation. 1952;23(1):115-8.
  • 10. Meredith MD, Welk G. Fitnessgram: Test administration manual: Human Kinetics Publishers; 2003.
  • 11. Kinesiology CPM. Determining The Anaerobic Power Output Differences Between The Genders In Untrained Adults.
  • 12. Baumgartner TA, Oh S, Chung H, Hales D. Objectivity, reliability, and validity for a revised push-up test protocol. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2002;6(4):225-42.
  • 13. Taware GB, Bhutkar MV, Surdi AD. A profile of fitness parameters and performance of volleyball players. Journal of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University. 2013;2(2):48-59.
  • 14. Duncan M, Woodfield L, Al-Nakeeb Y. Anthropometric and physiological characteristics of junior elite volleyball players. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006;40(7):649-51.
  • 15. Ferris DP, Signorile JF, Caruso JF. The relationship between physical and physiological variables and volleyball spiking velocity. J Strength Cond Res. 1995;9(1):32-6.
  • 16. Tsunawake N, Tahara Y, Yukawa K, Katsuura T, Harada H, Kikuchi Y. Characteristics of body shape of female athletes based on factor analysis. Applied Human Science. 1995;14(1):55-61.
  • 17. Lopes TJA, Simic M, Alves D, Bunn PDS, Rodrigues AI, Terra B, et al. Physical Performance Measures of Flexibility, Hip Strength, Lower Limb Power and Trunk Endurance in Healthy Navy Cadets: Normative Data and Differences Between Sex and Limb Dominance. Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2018.
  • 18. Maud PJ, Shultz BB. Gender comparisons in anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity tests. British journal of sports medicine. 1986;20(2):51-4.
  • 19. Mayhew J, Salm PC. Gender differences in anaerobic power tests. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology. 1990;60(2):133-8.
  • 20. Marangoz İ, Baştürk D. The Relationship Among Somatotype Structures, Leg Volume, Leg Mass, Anaerobic Strength and Flexibility of Elite Male Athletes in Different Branches. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2018;6(7):130-7.
  • 21. Govind B, Milind V, Surdi A. A Profile of Fitness Parameters and Performance of Volleyball Players. JKIMSU. 2013;2(2):48-59.

DETERMINATION AND COMPARISON OF SOME PHYSICAL FITNESS CHARACTERISTICS OF WOMEN AND MALE VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS, WHICH CONSIST OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 15 - 18, 30.08.2020

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine some physical fitness characteristics of male and female volleyball players, consisting of university students, and to compare them with each other.
Materials and methods: The study was carried out with 10 female and 9 male players between 18-21 years of age playing in the volleyball team of a university. Physical properties were height length, body weight, and Body Mass Index (BMI), muscular endurance, flexibility, anaerobic and aerobic capacity were selected from performance-related features. Flexibility was assessed by sit-and-reach test, aerobic capacity by Cooper test, anaerobic power by vertical jump test, and muscular endurance by push-up and shuttle test.
Results: There was no significant difference between male and female volleyball players in terms of height, body weight, anaerobic power and aerobic performance in favor of male players (p<0.05), but no significant difference in terms of BMI, flexibility and muscular endurance values (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study will contribute to the literature on the physical fitness characteristics of university students playing in the faculty volleyball team.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Sporis G, Jukic I, Ostojic SM, Milanovic D. Fitness profiling in soccer: physical and physiologic characteristics of elite players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2009;23(7):1947-53.
  • 2. Ostojic SM, Mazic S, Dikic N. Profiling in basketball: Physical and physiological characteristics of elite players. Journal of strength and Conditioning Research. 2006;20(4):740.
  • 3. Ziv G, Lidor R. Physical characteristics, physiological attributes, and on-court performances of handball players: A review. European Journal of Sport Science. 2009;9(6):375-86.
  • 4. Lidor R, Ziv G. Physical and physiological attributes of female volleyball players-a review. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010;24(7):1963-73.
  • 5. Fleck S, Case S, Puhl J, Van Handle P. Physical and physiological characteristics of elite women volleyball players. Canadian journal of applied sport sciences Journal Canadien des Sciences Appliquees au Sport. 1985;10(3):122-6.
  • 6. Koley S, Singh J, Sandhu JS. Anthropometric and physiological characteristics on Indian inter-university volleyball players. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2010;5(3):389-99.
  • 7. Smith D, Roberts D, Watson B. Physical, physiological and performance differences between Canadian national team and universiade volleyball players. Journal of sports sciences. 1992;10(2):131-8.
  • 8. Kausar A, Mudassir S, Badaam KM, Shete AN, Khan S. Cardiorespiratory Fitness of University Volleyball Players and Sedentary Young People in Marathwada Region of Maharashtra Province in India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(7):CC20-CC1.
  • 9. Wells KF, Dillon EK. The sit and reach—a test of back and leg flexibility. Research Quarterly American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation. 1952;23(1):115-8.
  • 10. Meredith MD, Welk G. Fitnessgram: Test administration manual: Human Kinetics Publishers; 2003.
  • 11. Kinesiology CPM. Determining The Anaerobic Power Output Differences Between The Genders In Untrained Adults.
  • 12. Baumgartner TA, Oh S, Chung H, Hales D. Objectivity, reliability, and validity for a revised push-up test protocol. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2002;6(4):225-42.
  • 13. Taware GB, Bhutkar MV, Surdi AD. A profile of fitness parameters and performance of volleyball players. Journal of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University. 2013;2(2):48-59.
  • 14. Duncan M, Woodfield L, Al-Nakeeb Y. Anthropometric and physiological characteristics of junior elite volleyball players. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006;40(7):649-51.
  • 15. Ferris DP, Signorile JF, Caruso JF. The relationship between physical and physiological variables and volleyball spiking velocity. J Strength Cond Res. 1995;9(1):32-6.
  • 16. Tsunawake N, Tahara Y, Yukawa K, Katsuura T, Harada H, Kikuchi Y. Characteristics of body shape of female athletes based on factor analysis. Applied Human Science. 1995;14(1):55-61.
  • 17. Lopes TJA, Simic M, Alves D, Bunn PDS, Rodrigues AI, Terra B, et al. Physical Performance Measures of Flexibility, Hip Strength, Lower Limb Power and Trunk Endurance in Healthy Navy Cadets: Normative Data and Differences Between Sex and Limb Dominance. Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2018.
  • 18. Maud PJ, Shultz BB. Gender comparisons in anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity tests. British journal of sports medicine. 1986;20(2):51-4.
  • 19. Mayhew J, Salm PC. Gender differences in anaerobic power tests. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology. 1990;60(2):133-8.
  • 20. Marangoz İ, Baştürk D. The Relationship Among Somatotype Structures, Leg Volume, Leg Mass, Anaerobic Strength and Flexibility of Elite Male Athletes in Different Branches. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2018;6(7):130-7.
  • 21. Govind B, Milind V, Surdi A. A Profile of Fitness Parameters and Performance of Volleyball Players. JKIMSU. 2013;2(2):48-59.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Meltem Koç 0000-0001-6456-8779

Özge İpek Dongaz 0000-0001-9984-7460

Banu Bayar 0000-0001-8686-1861

Kılıçhan Bayar 0000-0002-8090-5859

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Ağustos 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 25 Temmuz 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Koç M, İpek Dongaz Ö, Bayar B, Bayar K. ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNDEN OLUŞAN KADIN VE ERKEK VOLEYBOL OYUNCULARININ BAZI FİZİKSEL UYGUNLUK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ VE BİRBİRİYLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Karya J Health Sci. 2020;1(1):15-8.