Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Semptom bazlı sınıflamanın ötesinde: Obsesif kompulsif bozukluk tanısı alan kişilerin öznelliğinin Lacanyen Söylem Analizi perspektifiyle incelenmesi

Yıl 2024, , 114 - 124, 25.04.2024
https://doi.org/10.57127/kpd.26024438m0000111

Öz

İstenmeyen düşünce ve tekrarlı davranışlar oldukça farklı görünümlere sahiptir; ancak semptom bazlı sınıflama sisteminde bu denli farklı belirtilere sahip kişilerin tamamı obsesif-kompulsif bozukluk (OKB) tanısı altında sınıflandırılmaktadır. Psikoterapi araştırmaları üzerinde etkisi giderek artan sosyal inşacı bakış açısı, psikoterapi alanının birebir çalışma alanı olması nedeniyle bireylerin öznelliğine vurgu yapmaktadır. Öte yandan, psikoterapi ve dilin kullanımı üzerine yapılan çalışmalar artsa da özellikle obsesif-kompulsif bozukluk ile etiketlenen kişilerin öznelliği henüz söylemsel, eleştirel ve dil temelli bir bakış açısının kombinasyonu içinde incelenmemiştir. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, insanların öznelliğine ve söylemsel pratiklerine özel bir vurgu yaparak, terapötik süreçte semptom temelli tanıyı eleştirel bir bakış açısı içinde incelemektir. Bu amaçla, amaçlı örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen ve OKB tanısı almış olan altı katılımcı ile görüşmeler yürütülmüştür. Nitel analiz çerçevesi içinde, eleştirel ve Lacanyen Söylem Analizi perspektiflerinden yararlanılmıştır. Bu yaklaşımın kavramları göz önüne alınarak yürütülen analiz sonuçlarına göre tüm katılımcılar, OKB ismi altında aynı teşhis ile sınıflandırılmış olmalarına rağmen, temel gösterenleri, konumları ve Başka ile ilişkileri oldukça farklılaşmıştır. Ayrıca kişilerin farklılaşan (öznel) söylemleri ve cinsiyet farklılıkları Lacanyen psikanalitik alanyazın ışığında tartışılan diğer önemli konular olarak belirmiştir. Bulgular, bireylerin semptomlarının benzerliklerine göre kategorize edilmelerinin yerine, öznellikleri ve psikolojik yapıları içinde dikkatle dinlenmeleri gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Mevcut çalışma tanısal bir tartışma ve klinik çıkarımlara ilişkin öneriler sunmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Avdi, E., & Georgaca, E. (2018). Researching the discursive construction of subjectivity in psychotherapy. In O. Smoliak & T. Strong (Eds.), Therapy as discourse: Practice and research (pp. 45-69). Palgrave Macmillian. Balnaves, M. & Caputi, P. (2001). Introduction to quantitative research methods: An investigative approach. Sage.
  • Baltacı, S. & Gençöz, F. (2019). Psikolojide Lacanyen söylem analizi yaklaşımı: Madde bağımlılığı ve yasa ilişkisinin terapi sürecinde incelenmesi örneği. AYNA Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(1), 38-62.
  • Bannister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor, M., & Tindall, C. (1994). Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide. Open University Press.
  • Berrios, G. E. & Hauser, R. (1988). The early development of Kraepelin’s ideas on classification: A conceptual history. Psychological Medicine, 18(4), 813-821.
  • Billig, M. (2006). A psychoanalytic discursive psychology: From consciousness to unconsciousness. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 17-24.
  • Davison, G. C. & Neale, J. M. (2004). Abnormal Psychology (7th ed.). I. Dağ (Trans.). Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
  • Dor, J. (1998). Introduction to the reading of Lacan: The unconscious structured like a language. Other Press.
  • Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229.
  • Evans, D. (2006). An introductionary dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. Routledge.
  • Fink, B. (1996). The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. New Jersey.
  • Fink, B. (1997). A clinical introduction to Lacanian psychoanalysis: Theory and technique. Harvard University Press.
  • Freud, S. (1905). The psychopathology of everyday life. In I. Smith (Ed. and Trans.), Freud-complete works (p. 1213). Hogarth Press (2010).
  • Futrell, J. L. (2014). Beyond symptom accumulation: A Lacanian clinical approach to obsession a case study and theoretical exposition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Duquesne University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (3620360).
  • Gagua, N. & Baltacı, S. (2017). Histeri ve obsesyon nevrozunda cinsiyetlenme üzerine. AYNA Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 4(3), 1-10.
  • Gallagher, C. (2010). Religion and obsessional neurosis. http://www.lacaninireland.com/web/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Religion-and-Obsessional-Neurosis-Cormac-Gallagher.pdf
  • Gallagher, C. (2011). Psychological object or speaking subject: From diagnosis to case representation. http://www. lacaninireland.com/web/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/ Psychological-Object-or-Speaking-Subject.pdf
  • Georgaca, E. (2000). Reality and discourse: A critical analysis of the category of ‘delusions’. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 73, 227-242.
  • Georgaca, E. (2005). Lacanian psychoanalysis and the subject of social constructionist psychology: Analysing subjectivity in talk. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 14, 74-94.
  • Georgaca, E., & Avdi, E. (2009). Evaluating the talking cure: The contribution of narrative, discourse and conversation analysis to psychotherapy assessment. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 6, 233-247.
  • Gherovici, P., & Webster, J. (2014). Observations from working with female obsessionals. The European Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2. http://www.journalpsychoanalysis.eu/observations-from-working-with-female-obsessionals/#_ftnref1
  • Harper, D. J. (1999). Deconstructing paranoia: An analysis of the discourses associated with the concept of paranoid delusion (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester England.
  • Hepworth, J., & Griffin, C. (1990). The ‘discovery’ of anorexia nervosa: Discourse of the late 19th century. Text, 10(4), 321-338.
  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). John Benjamins.
  • Lacan, J. (1953/2013). On the names-of-the-father (1953-1963). B. Fink (Trans.). Polity Press.
  • Lacan, J. (1961/2010). Identification: The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book IX 1961-1962. (C. Gallagher, Trans.). www.lacaninireland.com/web/translations/sem inars/
  • Lacan, J. (1962/2014). The seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book X: Anxiety (A. R. Price, Trans.). Polity Press (Original work published 1962-1963).
  • Lacan, J. (1964/1998). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis: The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI 1964. (J. A. Miller, Ed., & A. Sheridan, Trans.). Norton.
  • Lacan, J. (1966/2006). Écrits: The first complete edition in English (B. Fink, Trans). Norton. (Original work published 1966).
  • Lara Junior, N., Kist, A. U., Correa Oliveira, F., & Boardmann, J. (2017). A contribution: On the ‘prescriptive place’ to Lacanian Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 13.
  • Lutz, W., & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods for psychotherapy research: Introduction. In W. Lutz & S. Knox (Eds.), Quantitative and qualitative methods in psychotherapy research (pp. 1-6). Routledge.
  • Miller, D. (2005). Obsession: A name of the super-ego. The Symptom, 6. www.lacan.com/symptom6_articles/obsession-nameofsuperego.html
  • Miller, J. A. (2003). H20: Suture in obsessionality. The Symptom, 4. http://www.lacan.com/suturef.htm
  • Negro, M. A. (2014). From the superego to the act: Analysis of the modalities if the subjective position in discourse. In I. Parker, & D. Pavón-Cuéllar (Eds.), Lacan, discourse, event: New psychoanalytic approaches to textual indeterminacy (pp. 101-108). Routledge.
  • Parker, I. (1998). Social constructionism, discourse and realism. Sage.
  • Parker, I. (2005a). Lacanian discourse analysis in psychology: Seven theoretical elements. Theory & Psychology, 15(2), 163-182.
  • Parker, I. (2005b). Discourse. In Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research (pp. 88-105). Open University Press.
  • Parker, I., Georgaca, E., Harper, D., McLaughlin, T., & Stowell-Smith, M. (1995). Deconstructing psychopathology. Sage.
  • Pavón-Cuéllar, D. (2014). From the word to event: Limit, possibilities and challenges of Lacanian Discourse Analysis. In I. Parker, & D. Pavón-Cuéllar (Eds.), Lacan, discourse, and event: New psychoanalytic approaches to textual indeterminacy (pp. 325-337). Rout-ledge.
  • Pavón-Cuéllar, D., & Parker, I. (2014). Introduction: Lacanian theory, discourse analysis and the question of the ‘event’. In I. Parker, & D. Pavon-Cuéllar (Eds.), Lacan, discourse, event: New psychoanalytic approaches to textual indeterminacy (pp. 1-14). Routledge.
  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage.
  • Romanowicz, M., & Moncayo, R. (2014). How could Lacanian theory contribute to DSM-5? Discussion of diagnosis of bipolar disorder and the controversy around grief versus clinical depression. European Journal of Psychoanalysis. journal-psychoanalysis.eu/how-could-lacanian-theory-contribute-to-dsm-5-discussion-of-diag nosis-of-bipolar-disorder-and-the-controversy-around-grief-versus-clinical-depression-3/
  • Soler, C. (2006). What Lacan said about women: A psychoanalytic study. Other Press.
  • Strauss, M. (2014). On female obsessional neurosis. The European Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2. www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/on-the-female-obsessional-neurosis/
  • Vanheule, S. (2001). Inhibition: ‘I am because I don’t act’. The Letter, 23, 109-126.
  • Verhaeghe, P. (2008). On being normal and other disorders: A manual for clinical psychodiagnostics (2nd ed). Other Press.
  • Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (2001). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. SAGE Publications.
  • Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Press.

Beyond symptom classification: Analyzing subjectivity of people diagnosed with obsessive compulsive disorder through Lacanian Discourse Analysis perspective

Yıl 2024, , 114 - 124, 25.04.2024
https://doi.org/10.57127/kpd.26024438m0000111

Öz

Intrusive thoughts and repetitive behaviors are manifested in numerous forms, however regarding the symptom-based system, people with such diverse forms of symptoms are diagnosed under the same category, named obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The social constructivist approach, that have an increasingly substantial impact on psychotherapy research, emphasizes the subjectivity of individuals since the therapeutic field focuses on one-to-one work. Although studies on psychotherapy and the use of language are expanding, to the best knowledge of authors the subjectivity of people diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder has not yet been studied using a combination of qualitative, discursive, critical, and language-based perspectives. The main purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the symptom-based diagnosis in the therapeutic process, with a particular emphasis on the subjectivity of people with OCD symptoms and their discursive practices. For this aim, interviews were conducted with six participants who were diagnosed with OCD and selected via the purposive sampling method. As for the qualitative analysis, critical and Lacanian Discourse Analysis perspectives were utilized. Considering the concepts of this perspective, the analysis revealed that though all participants were diagnosed under the same category, namely OCD, their basic signifiers, positioning, and relationships with the Other were quite distinct. Furthermore, differentiated patient discourses and gender differences emerged as crucial issues that were discussed in the light of Lacanian psychoanalytic literature. These findings suggested that individuals should be carefully listened to within their own subjectivity and psychological structures instead of being broadly categorized on the basis of symptom similarity. Based on the findings, the current study presents a diagnostic debate and key clinical implications.

Kaynakça

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Avdi, E., & Georgaca, E. (2018). Researching the discursive construction of subjectivity in psychotherapy. In O. Smoliak & T. Strong (Eds.), Therapy as discourse: Practice and research (pp. 45-69). Palgrave Macmillian. Balnaves, M. & Caputi, P. (2001). Introduction to quantitative research methods: An investigative approach. Sage.
  • Baltacı, S. & Gençöz, F. (2019). Psikolojide Lacanyen söylem analizi yaklaşımı: Madde bağımlılığı ve yasa ilişkisinin terapi sürecinde incelenmesi örneği. AYNA Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(1), 38-62.
  • Bannister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor, M., & Tindall, C. (1994). Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide. Open University Press.
  • Berrios, G. E. & Hauser, R. (1988). The early development of Kraepelin’s ideas on classification: A conceptual history. Psychological Medicine, 18(4), 813-821.
  • Billig, M. (2006). A psychoanalytic discursive psychology: From consciousness to unconsciousness. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 17-24.
  • Davison, G. C. & Neale, J. M. (2004). Abnormal Psychology (7th ed.). I. Dağ (Trans.). Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
  • Dor, J. (1998). Introduction to the reading of Lacan: The unconscious structured like a language. Other Press.
  • Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229.
  • Evans, D. (2006). An introductionary dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. Routledge.
  • Fink, B. (1996). The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. New Jersey.
  • Fink, B. (1997). A clinical introduction to Lacanian psychoanalysis: Theory and technique. Harvard University Press.
  • Freud, S. (1905). The psychopathology of everyday life. In I. Smith (Ed. and Trans.), Freud-complete works (p. 1213). Hogarth Press (2010).
  • Futrell, J. L. (2014). Beyond symptom accumulation: A Lacanian clinical approach to obsession a case study and theoretical exposition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Duquesne University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (3620360).
  • Gagua, N. & Baltacı, S. (2017). Histeri ve obsesyon nevrozunda cinsiyetlenme üzerine. AYNA Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 4(3), 1-10.
  • Gallagher, C. (2010). Religion and obsessional neurosis. http://www.lacaninireland.com/web/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Religion-and-Obsessional-Neurosis-Cormac-Gallagher.pdf
  • Gallagher, C. (2011). Psychological object or speaking subject: From diagnosis to case representation. http://www. lacaninireland.com/web/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/ Psychological-Object-or-Speaking-Subject.pdf
  • Georgaca, E. (2000). Reality and discourse: A critical analysis of the category of ‘delusions’. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 73, 227-242.
  • Georgaca, E. (2005). Lacanian psychoanalysis and the subject of social constructionist psychology: Analysing subjectivity in talk. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 14, 74-94.
  • Georgaca, E., & Avdi, E. (2009). Evaluating the talking cure: The contribution of narrative, discourse and conversation analysis to psychotherapy assessment. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 6, 233-247.
  • Gherovici, P., & Webster, J. (2014). Observations from working with female obsessionals. The European Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2. http://www.journalpsychoanalysis.eu/observations-from-working-with-female-obsessionals/#_ftnref1
  • Harper, D. J. (1999). Deconstructing paranoia: An analysis of the discourses associated with the concept of paranoid delusion (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester England.
  • Hepworth, J., & Griffin, C. (1990). The ‘discovery’ of anorexia nervosa: Discourse of the late 19th century. Text, 10(4), 321-338.
  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). John Benjamins.
  • Lacan, J. (1953/2013). On the names-of-the-father (1953-1963). B. Fink (Trans.). Polity Press.
  • Lacan, J. (1961/2010). Identification: The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book IX 1961-1962. (C. Gallagher, Trans.). www.lacaninireland.com/web/translations/sem inars/
  • Lacan, J. (1962/2014). The seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book X: Anxiety (A. R. Price, Trans.). Polity Press (Original work published 1962-1963).
  • Lacan, J. (1964/1998). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis: The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI 1964. (J. A. Miller, Ed., & A. Sheridan, Trans.). Norton.
  • Lacan, J. (1966/2006). Écrits: The first complete edition in English (B. Fink, Trans). Norton. (Original work published 1966).
  • Lara Junior, N., Kist, A. U., Correa Oliveira, F., & Boardmann, J. (2017). A contribution: On the ‘prescriptive place’ to Lacanian Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 13.
  • Lutz, W., & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods for psychotherapy research: Introduction. In W. Lutz & S. Knox (Eds.), Quantitative and qualitative methods in psychotherapy research (pp. 1-6). Routledge.
  • Miller, D. (2005). Obsession: A name of the super-ego. The Symptom, 6. www.lacan.com/symptom6_articles/obsession-nameofsuperego.html
  • Miller, J. A. (2003). H20: Suture in obsessionality. The Symptom, 4. http://www.lacan.com/suturef.htm
  • Negro, M. A. (2014). From the superego to the act: Analysis of the modalities if the subjective position in discourse. In I. Parker, & D. Pavón-Cuéllar (Eds.), Lacan, discourse, event: New psychoanalytic approaches to textual indeterminacy (pp. 101-108). Routledge.
  • Parker, I. (1998). Social constructionism, discourse and realism. Sage.
  • Parker, I. (2005a). Lacanian discourse analysis in psychology: Seven theoretical elements. Theory & Psychology, 15(2), 163-182.
  • Parker, I. (2005b). Discourse. In Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research (pp. 88-105). Open University Press.
  • Parker, I., Georgaca, E., Harper, D., McLaughlin, T., & Stowell-Smith, M. (1995). Deconstructing psychopathology. Sage.
  • Pavón-Cuéllar, D. (2014). From the word to event: Limit, possibilities and challenges of Lacanian Discourse Analysis. In I. Parker, & D. Pavón-Cuéllar (Eds.), Lacan, discourse, and event: New psychoanalytic approaches to textual indeterminacy (pp. 325-337). Rout-ledge.
  • Pavón-Cuéllar, D., & Parker, I. (2014). Introduction: Lacanian theory, discourse analysis and the question of the ‘event’. In I. Parker, & D. Pavon-Cuéllar (Eds.), Lacan, discourse, event: New psychoanalytic approaches to textual indeterminacy (pp. 1-14). Routledge.
  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage.
  • Romanowicz, M., & Moncayo, R. (2014). How could Lacanian theory contribute to DSM-5? Discussion of diagnosis of bipolar disorder and the controversy around grief versus clinical depression. European Journal of Psychoanalysis. journal-psychoanalysis.eu/how-could-lacanian-theory-contribute-to-dsm-5-discussion-of-diag nosis-of-bipolar-disorder-and-the-controversy-around-grief-versus-clinical-depression-3/
  • Soler, C. (2006). What Lacan said about women: A psychoanalytic study. Other Press.
  • Strauss, M. (2014). On female obsessional neurosis. The European Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2. www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/on-the-female-obsessional-neurosis/
  • Vanheule, S. (2001). Inhibition: ‘I am because I don’t act’. The Letter, 23, 109-126.
  • Verhaeghe, P. (2008). On being normal and other disorders: A manual for clinical psychodiagnostics (2nd ed). Other Press.
  • Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (2001). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. SAGE Publications.
  • Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Press.
Toplam 48 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Klinik Psikoloji
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Sinem Baltacı 0000-0002-0037-9909

Sevda Sarı 0000-0003-0117-8380

Tülin Gençöz 0000-0002-2827-7461

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Nisan 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Eylül 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024

Kaynak Göster

APA Baltacı, S., Sarı, S., & Gençöz, T. (2024). Beyond symptom classification: Analyzing subjectivity of people diagnosed with obsessive compulsive disorder through Lacanian Discourse Analysis perspective. Journal of Clinical Psychology Research, 8(1), 114-124. https://doi.org/10.57127/kpd.26024438m0000111