Psikolojik dayanıklılık ve kaygı arasındaki ilişkide üstbilişler ve başa çıkma yollarının durumsal aracılık rolü

Yıl 2022, , 1 - 15, 08.04.2022

Nurbanu Perişan Volkan Koç

https://doi.org/10.5455/kpd.26024438m000053

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amaçlarından biri kaygı, psikolojik dayanıklılık, başa çıkma yolları ve patolojik üstbilişler arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir. Araştırmanın ikinci amacı ise psikolojik dayanıklılık ve kaygı arasındaki ilişkide patolojik üstbilişlerin ve başa çıkma yollarının durumsal aracılık rollerini değerlendirmektir. Çalışma kapsamında 18-65 yaşları arasında 292’si kadın (%65.6), 153’ü erkek (%34.4) toplam 445 kişiden veri toplanmıştır. Katılımcılara, Demografik Bilgi Formu, Durumluk-Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri, Yetişkinler için Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Ölçeği, Başa Çıkma Yolları Envanteri ve ÜstBiliş Ölçeği-30 uygulanmıştır. Kaygı, psikolojik dayanıklılık, başa çıkma yolları ve patolojik üstbilişler arasındaki ilişkileri değerlendirmek için korelasyon analizi, değişkenlerin kaygıyı yordama güçlerini görmek için hiyerarşik regresyon analizi ve patolojik üstbilişler ile başa çıkma yollarının durumsal aracılık rollerini değerlendirmek için durumsal aracılık analizi yapılmıştır. Korelasyon analizine göre patolojik üstbilişler ve başa çıkma yolları arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır. Diğer ilişkilere ait korelasyon katsayılarının .10 ile .61 arasında değiştiği görülmektedir. Regresyon analizine göre psikolojik dayanıklılık, patolojik üstbilişler ve başa çıkma yolları değişkenleri kaygıya ait varyansın %58’ini açıklamaktadır. Son olarak patolojik üstbilişlerin, psikolojik dayanıklılık ve kaygı arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık ettiği ve bu aracılık ilişkisinde duygusal başa çıkmanın düzenleyici rolünün olduğu görülmektedir. Mevcut çalışmanın sonuçlarına bir bütün olarak bakıldığında psikolojik dayanıklılığın, üstbilişsel süreçlerin ve başa çıkma yollarının kaygının önemli açıklayıcıları oldukları ve özellikle terapötik müdahalelerde söz konusu değişkenlerin çalışılmasının önemli olabileceği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kaygı, psikolojik dayanıklılık, başa çıkma, üstbiliş, anxiety, psychological resilience, coping, metacognition

The moderated mediation role of metacognitions and ways of coping in the relationship between psychological resilience and anxiety

Öz

One of the purposes of this study was to examine the relationships between anxiety, psychological resilience, ways of coping, and pathological metacognition. The second purpose was to evaluate the moderated mediating role of pathological metacognition and ways of coping in the relationship between psychological resilience and anxiety. Within the scope of the study, data was collected from 445 individuals of whom 292 (65.6%) were females and 153 (34.4%) were males. The participants completed Demographic Information Form, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Resilience Scale for Adults, the Ways of Coping Inventory and the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30. Correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationships between anxiety, psychological resilience, ways of coping, and pathological metacognitions; hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to see the predictive power of the variables on anxiety and moderated mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the moderated mediator roles of pathological metacognitions and ways of coping. According to the correlation analyses, there was no statistically significant relationship between pathological metacognitions and ways of coping. Correlation coefficients related to other relationships ranged between .10 and .61. According to the regression results psychological resilience, pathological metacognitions, and ways of coping explained 58% of the variance of anxiety. Finally, the findings indicated that pathological metacognitions had a mediating role in the relationship between psychological resilience and anxiety, and that emotional coping moderated this mediation. Taking all the findings of the current study together, it can be argued that psychological resilience, pathological metacognitions, and ways of coping are important factors in explaining anxiety and that working on these variables especially in a therapeutical context can be beneficial.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kaygı, psikolojik dayanıklılık, başa çıkma, üstbiliş, anxiety, psychological resilience, coping, metacognition

Kaynakça

• Avero, P., Corace, K. M., Endler, N. S. ve Calvo, M. G. (2003). Coping styles and threat processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(4), 843-861.
• Bahtiyar, B. ve Gençöz, T. (2018). The association between metacognition and social anxiety: Moderator role of coping strategies. T.C. Maltepe Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 57-78.
• Basım, N. ve Çetin, F. (2011). Yetişkinler için psikolojik dayanıklılık ölçeğinin güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik çalış-ması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 22(2), 104-114.
• Brailovskaia, J., Schönfeld, P., Zhang, X. C., Bieda, A., Kochetkov, Y. ve Margraf, J. A. (2018). Cross-cultural study in Germany, Russia, and China: Are resilient and social supported students protected against depression, anxiety, and stress? Psychological Reports, 121(2), 265-281.
• Booth, J. W. ve Neill, J. T. (2017). Coping strategies and the development of psychological resilience. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 20, 47-54.
• Cisler, J. M. ve Olatunji, B. O. (2012). Emotion regulation and anxiety disorders. Current Psychiatry Re-ports, 14(3), 182-187.
• Connor-Smith, J. K. ve Compas, B. E. (2002). Vulnerabi-lity to social stress: Coping as a mediator or moderator of sociotropy and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(1), 39-55.
• Corcoran, K. M. ve Segal, Z. V. (2008). Metacognition in depressive and anxiety disorders: Current directions. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 1(1), 33-44.
• Crăciun, B. (2013). Coping strategies, self-criticism and gender factor in relation to quality of life. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 466-470.
• Cüceloğlu, D. (1991). İnsan ve davranışı (2. baskı). Remzi Kitabevi.
• Dağ, İ. (1999). Psikolojinin ışığında kaygı. Doğu Batı, 6, 167-174.
• Davey, G. C. ve Wells, A. (Ed.). (2006). Worry and its psychological disorders: Theory, assessment and treatment. John Wiley & Sons.
• Dragan, M., Dragan, W. Ł., Kononowicz, T. ve Wells, A. (2012). On the relationship between temperament, metacognition, and anxiety: Independent and mediated effects. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 25(6), 697-709.
• Dragan, M. ve Dragan, W. (2014). Temperament and anxiety: The mediating role of metacognition. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(2), 246-254.
• Dunlosky, J. ve Metcalfe, J. (2008). Metacognition. Sage. Ebner, K. ve Singewald, N. (2017). Individual differences in stress susceptibility and stress inhibitory mechanisms. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 14, 54-64.
• Fletcher, D. ve Sarkar, M. (2013). Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. European Psychologist, 18(1), 12-23.
• Folkman, S. ve Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21(3), 219-239.
• Folkman, S. ve Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Ways of coping questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Foster, J. R. (1997). Successful coping, adaptation and resilience in the elderly: An interpretation of epidemiologic data. Psychiatric Quarterly, 68(3), 189-219.
• Friborg, O., Hjemdal, O., Rosenvinge, J. H. ve Martinus-sen M. (2003). A new rating scale for adult resilience: What are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12(2), 65-76.
• Gençöz, F., Gençöz, T. ve Bozo, Ö. (2006). Hierarchical dimensions of coping styles: A study conducted with Turkish university students. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(5), 525-534.
• Genet, J. J. ve Siemer, M. (2011). Flexible control in processing affective and non-affective material predicts individual differences in trait resilience. Cognition & Emotion, 25(2), 380-388.
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2. baskı). Guilford Publications.
• Kaplan, H. B. (2002). Toward an understanding of resi-lience. Resilience and Development: Positive Life Adaptations içinde (s. 17-83). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Kay, S. (2016). Emotion regulation and resilience: Over-looked connections. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 411-415.
• Lazarus, R. S. ve Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
• Leahy, R., Wupperman, P., Edwards, E., Shivaji, S. ve Molina, N. (2018). Metacognition and emotional schemas: Effects on depression and anxiety. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 12(1), 25-37.
• Lewis, K. M., Byrd, D. A. ve Ollendick, T. H. (2012). Anxiety symptoms in African-American and Caucasian youth: Relations to negative life events, social support, and coping. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(1), 32-39.
• Mak, W. W. S., Ng, I. S. W. ve Wong, C. C. Y. (2011). Resilience: Enhancing well-being through the positive cognitive triad. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(4), 610-617.
• Matthews, G., Lin, J. ve Wohleber, R. (2017). Persona-lity, stress and resilience: A multifactorial cognitive science perspective. Psihologijske Teme, 26(1), 139-162.
• Matthews, G., Panganiban, A. R., Wells, A., Wohleber, R. W. ve Reinerman-Jones, L. E. (2019). Metacognition, hardiness, and grit as resilience factors in Un-manned Aerial Systems (UAS) operations: A simulation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 640.
• Mayordomo, T., Viguer, P., Sales, A. Satorres, E. ve Meléndez, J. C. (2016) Resilience and coping as predictors of well-being in adults. The Journal of Psycho-logy, 150(7), 809-821.
• Newman, M. G., Llera, S. J., Erickson, T. M., Przewors-ki, A. ve Castonguay, L. G. (2013). Worry and generalized anxiety disorder: A review and theoretical synthesis of evidence on nature, etiology, mechanisms, and treatment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 275-297.
• Öner, N. ve Le Compte, A. (1985). Durumluk-sürekli kaygı envanteri elkitabı. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
• Öz, F. ve Yılmaz, B. E. (2009). Ruh sağlığının korunmasında önemli bir kavram: Psikolojik sağlamlık. Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Hemşirelik Dergisi, 16(3), 82-89.
• Öztürk, M. O. ve Uluşahin A. (2014). Ruh sağlığı ve bozuklukları (12. baskı). Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri.
• Parsons, S., Kruijt, A. W. ve Fox, E. (2016). A cognitive model of psychological resilience. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 7(3). 296-310.
• Piryaei, S. ve Khademi, M. (2014). The moderating role of metacognition in relationship of perceived job stress and negative affect. European Psychiatry, 29(1), 1.
• Qiu, L., Su, J., Ni, Y., Bai, Y., Zhang, X., Li, X. ve Wan, X. (2018) The neural system of metacognition accompanying decision-making in the prefrontal cortex. PLoS Biology, 16(4), e2004037.
• Quiles, C., Prouteau, A. ve Verdoux, H. (2015). Associations between self-esteem, anxiety and depression and metacognitive awareness or metacognitive knowledge. Psychiatry Research, 230(2), 738-741.
• Scherer-Dickson, N. (2004). Current developments of metacognitive concepts and their clinical implications: Mindfulness based cognitive therapy for depression. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 17(2), 223-234.
• Sica, C., Steketee, G., Ghisi, M., Chiri, L. R. ve Fran-ceschini, S. (2007), Metacognitive beliefs and strategies predict worry, obsessive–compulsive symptoms and coping styles: A preliminary prospective study on an Italian non‐clinical sample. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14(4), 258-268.
• Sill, C. L., Cohan, S. L. ve Stein, M. B. (2006). Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(4), 585-599.
• Siva, A. N. (1991). İnfertilite'de stresle başetme, öğrenilmiş güçlülük ve depresyonun incelenmesi (Yayınlan-mamış doktora tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Sladek, M. R., Doane, L. D., Luecken, L. J. ve Eisenberg, N. (2016). Perceived stress, coping, and cortisol reactivity in daily life: A study of adolescents during the first year of college. Biological psychology 117, 8-15.
• Smith, G. D. ve Yang, F. (2017). Stress, resilience and psychological well-being in Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 49, 90-95.
• Smith, M. M., Saklofske, D. H., Keefer, K. V. ve Tremblay, P. F. (2016). Coping strategies and psychological outcomes: The moderating effects of personal resiliency. The Journal of Psychology, 150(3), 318-332.
• Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L. ve Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Tosun, A. ve Irak, M. (2008). Üstbiliş ölçeği-30′un Türkçe uyarlaması, geçerliği, güvenirliği, kaygı ve obsesif-kompülsif belirtilerle ilişkisi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 19(1), 67-80.
• Van der Hallen, R., Jongerling, J. ve Godor, B. P. (2020). Coping and resilience in adults: A cross-sectional network analysis. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 33(5), 479-496.
• Vesell, L., Waller, K., Dowden, J. ve Fotso, J. C. (2015). Psychosocial support and resilience building among health workers in Sierra Leone: Interrelations between coping skills, stress levels and interpersonal relations-hips. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-8.
• Visu‐Petra, L., Miclea, M. ve Visu‐Petra, G. (2013). Individual differences in anxiety and executive functioning: A multidimensional view. International Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 649-659.
• Vollrath, M., Alnaes, R. ve Torgersen, S. (1996). Differential effects of coping in mental disorders: A prospective study in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Clini-cal Psychology, 52(2), 125-135.
• Wells, A. (1995). Meta-cognition and worry: A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(3), 301-320.
• Wells, A. (1997). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: A practice manual and conceptual guide. Wiley.
• Wells, A. (2005). The metacognitive model of GAD: Assessment of meta-worry and relationship with DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(1), 107-121.
• Wells, A. (2007). Cognition about cognition: metacognitive therapy and change in generalized. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 14(1), 18-25.
• Wells, A. (2008). Metacognitive therapy: Cognition app-lied to regulating cognition. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36(6), 651-658.
• Wells, A. (2011). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. Guilford Press.
• Wells, A. ve Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: Properties of the MCQ 30. Behaioral Research and Theory, 42(4), 385-396.
• Wu, Y., Yu, W., Wu, X., Wan, H., Wang, Y. ve Lu, G. (2020). Psychological resilience and positive coping styles among Chinese undergraduate students: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychology, 8, Article 79.
• Yi, F., Li, X., Song, X. ve Zhu, L. (2020). The underlying mechanisms of psychological resilience on emotional experience: Attention-bias or emotion disengagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1993.