Çok Boyutlu Mevcut Kontrol Ölçeği geliştirme ve geçerlilik çalışması

Yıl 2023, , 106 - 116, 02.05.2023

Melike Eğer Aydoğmuş

https://doi.org/10.57127/kpd.26024438m000081X

Öz

Yaygın olarak kullanılan kontrol algısı ölçeklerinin, kolay kolay değişmeyen genel kontrol inançlarına ya da bireysel tepkiler üzerindeki kontrole odaklandığı görülmektedir. Bu ölçeklerin temel yaşam alanlarının tümünü temsil etmediği ve hitap ettikleri yetişkin gruplarının sınırlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Dahası araştırmalar, sağlıkla ilgili durumları genel kontrol inançlarından ziyade mevcut kontrol algısının daha geçerli şekilde yordadığını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı her kesimden yetişkine hitap edecek ve yaşamın temel alanlarında algılanan mevcut kontrolü kapsayacak bir algılanan genel kontrol ölçeği geliştirebilmektir. Alanyazın temel alınarak sağlık, kişilerarası ilişkiler, kişisel gelişim, ekonomik durum ve toplumsal olaylar olmak üzere beş temel yaşam alanı ve alt maddeleri belirlenmiştir. Beş akademisyenin yardımıyla ölçeğin kapsam geçerliliği tamamlanmış, bir pilot çalışma ile ölçek ilk şeklini almıştır. Daha sonra, yaş ortalaması 30.5 olan 281’i kadın 376 gönüllü, Demografik Bilgi Formu, Çok Boyutlu Mevcut Kontrol Ölçeği (ÇBMKÖ), Alan Genel Algılanan Kontrol Ölçeği, Genel Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği ve Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeğini çevrimiçi şekilde tamamlamıştır. Analiz sonuçları ölçeğin yapı, kriter ve yakınsak geçerliliklerini karşıladığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca ölçeğin Cronbach alpha değeri ( = .89) ve iki hafta aralıklı test-tekrar test korelasyonu yüksek (r = .69) bulunmuştur. Bulgular birçok kesimden yetişkine uygulanabilecek iyi derecede psikometrik özelliklere sahip bir mevcut kontrol ölçeği geliştirilebilmesine imkân sağlamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

psikometri, ölçek geliştirme, çok boyutlu algılanan kontrol, genel mevcut kontrol

Development and validation of the Multidimensional Current Control Scale

Öz

The most commonly used perceived control scales focus on persistent general control beliefs or the control over personal reactions. These scales are not applicable to various adult groups and fail to represent main life domains. In addition, previous research shows that current control feelings explain health outcomes better than general control beliefs. This study aimed to develop a general current control scale based on the degree of perceived control at five main life domains, targeting various adult groups. Five main life domains (i.e., health, interpersonal relations, personal growth, economy, and societal issues) and their subsections were determined based on the perceived control literature. Five academics assessed the scale’s content validity, and its feasibility was tested via a pilot study. 376 participants (281 females, mean age 30.5) completed Demographic Information Form, the Multidimensional Current Control Scale (MCCS), the Domain General Perceived Control Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Psychological Wellbeing Scale online. Results show that the scale has a good degree of factor, convergent, and criterion validity. In addition, the scale has high internal reliability (a = .89) and test-retest reliability scores (r = .69) with a two-week interval. These findings helped us develop a multidimensional current control scale targeting various adult groups with good psychometric characteristics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

psychometrics, scale development, multidimensional perceived control, general current control

Kaynakça

• Auerbach, S. M. & Pegg, P. O. (2002). Appraisal of desire for control over healthcare: Structure, stability, and relation to health locus of control and to the ‘big five’ personality traits. Journal of Health Psychology, 7(4), 393-408.
• Aypay, A. (2010). Genel Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği’nin (GÖYÖ) Türkçe’ye Uyarlama Çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 113-132.
• Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
• Bandura, A., Pastorelli, C., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (1999). Self-efficacy pathways to childhood depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 258.
• Barrett, J. B. & Buckley, C. (2009). Gender and perceived control in the Russian Federation. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(1), 29-49.
• Bennett, N., Spoth, R., & Borgen, F. (1991). Bulimic symptoms in high school females: Prevalence and relationship with multiple measures of psychological health. Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 13-28.
• Bono, J. E. & Judge, T. A. (2003). Core self‐evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of personality, 17(S1), S5-S18.
• Burger, J. M. (1992). Desire for control and academic performance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des sciences du comportement, 24(2), 147.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (12th ed.). Pegem Akademi.
• Carton, J. S. & Nowicki, S. (1994). Antecedents of individual differences in locus of control of reinforcement: A critical review. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 120(1), 31-81.
• Chapman, M., Skinner, E. A., & Baltes, P. B. (1990). Interpreting correlations between children's perceived control and cognitive performance: Control, agency, or means€ nds beliefs? Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 246.
• Claassens, L., Widdershoven, G. A., Van Rhijn, S. C., Van Nes, F., Van Groenou, M. B., Deeg, D. J. H., & Huisman, M. (2014). Perceived control in health care: Aa conceptual model based on experiences of frail older adults. Journal of Aging Studies, 31, 159-170.
• Clements-Croome, D. (Ed.). (2006). Creating the productive workplace. Taylor & Francis.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (1st ed.). Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
• Dağ, İ. (1991). Rotter’in İç-Dış Kontrol Odağı Ölçeği (RİDKOÖ)’nin üniversite öğrencileri için güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(26), 10-16.
• Dağ, İ. (2002). Kontrol Odağı Ölçeği (KOÖ): Ölçek geliştirme, güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17(49), 77-90.
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being. In Assessing well-being (pp. 247-266). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Eryılmaz, A. (2007). Alan Genel Algılanan Kontrol Ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Psikoloji Öğrencileri Lisans-üstü Öğrencileri Kongresi Bildiri Metinleri, İzmir Eko-nomi Üniversitesi Yayınları, (15), 62-68.
• Esmark, C. L., Noble, S. M., Bell, J. E., & Griffith, D. A. (2016). The effects of behavioral, cognitive, and decisional control in co-production service experiences. Marketing Letters, 27(3), 423-436.
• Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429.
• Fisher, K. & Johnstion, M. (1996). Experimental manipulation of perceived control and its effect on disability. Psychology and Health, 11(5), 657-669.
• Frazier, P. A. (2003). Perceived control and distress following sexual assault: A longitudinal test of a new model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1257.
• Frazier, P. A., Mortensen, H., & Steward, J. (2005). Coping strategies as mediators of the relations among perceived control and distress in sexual assault survivors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 267.
• Frazier, P., Berman, M., & Steward, J. (2001). Perceived control and posttraumatic stress: A temporal model. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 10, 207-223.
• Frazier, P. & Caston, J. (2015). Event controllability moderates the relation between perceived control and adjustment to stressors. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 20(6), 526-540.
• Frazier, P., Keenan, N., Anders, S., Perera, S., Shallcross, S., & Hintz, S. (2011). Perceived past, present, and future control, and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 749.
• Furnham, A. (1986). Economic locus of control. Human Relations, 39, 29-43.
• Garant, V. & Alain, M. (1995). Perception de controle, desire de controle et sante psychologique. Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 27, 251-267.
• Grob, A., Flammer, A., & Wearing, A. J. (1995). Adolescents' perceived control: Domain specificity, expectations, and appraisal. Journal of Adolescence, 18(4), 403-425.
• Gwaltney, C. J., Metrik, J., Kahler, C. W., & Shiffman, S. (2009). Self-efficacy and smoking cessation: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(1), 56.
• Halpert, R. & Hill, R. (2011). 28 Measures of locus of control: Including validity and reliability data, evaluative commentary, abstracts of studies using the measures, and related references. Teach Internal Control, 1-96.
• Hatton, D. C., Gilden, E. R., Edwards, M. E., Cutler, J., Kron, J., & McAnulty, J. H. (1989). Psychophysiological factors in ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 33(5), 621-631.
• Heatherton, T. F. & Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: Past, present, and future. Psychological In quiry, 7(1), 90-98.
• Infurna, F. J., Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Long-term antecedents and outcomes of perceived control. Psychology and Aging, 26(3), 559.
• Infurna, F. J., Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2013). Level and change in perceived control predict 19-year mortality: Findings from the Americans’ changing lives study. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1833.
• Irwin, H. J. (2000). Belief in the paranormal and a sense of control over life. European Journal of Parapsychology, 15, 68-78.
• Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 693.
• Lachman, M. E. & Firth, K. M. P. (2004). The adaptive value of feeling in control during midlife. University of Chicago Press.
• Lachman, M. E., & Weaver, S. L. (1998). Sociodemographic variations in the sense of control by domain: Findings from the MacArthur studies of midlife. Psychology and Aging, 13(4), 553.
• Lang, F. R. & Heckhausen, J. (2001). Perceived control over development and subjective well-being: Differential benefits across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 509.
• Langer, E. J. & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(2), 191.
• Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
• Leone, C. & Burns, J. (2000). The measurement of locus of control: Assessing more than meets the eye? The Journal of Psychology, 134(1), 63-76.
• Litt, M. D. (1988). Self-efficacy and perceived control: Cognitive mediators of pain tolerance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 149.
• Logan, H., Baron, R. S., Keeley, K., Law, A., & Stein, S. (1991). Desired and felt control as mediators of stress in a dental setting. Health Psychology, 10, 352-359.
• Lown, J. M. (2011). Development and validation of a financial self-efficacy scale. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 22(2), 54.
• Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439-457.
• Mirowsky, J. & Ross, C. E. (2007). Life course trajectories of perceived control and their relationship to education. American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1339-1382.
• Moulding, R. & Kyrios, M. (2007). Desire for control, sense of control and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31(6), 759-772.
• Ng, T. W., Sorensen, K. L., & Eby, L. T. (2006). Locus of control at work: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(8), 1057-1087.
• Pallant, J. F. (2000). Development and validation of a scale to measure perceived control of internal states. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75(2), 308-337.
• Pagnini, F., Bercovitz, K., & Langer, E. (2016). Perceived control and mindfulness: Implications for clinical practice. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 26(2), 91.
• Paulhus, D. (1983). Sphere-specific measures of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1253.
• Peterson, C. & Stunkard, A. J. (1992). Cognates of personal control: Locus of control, self-efficacy, and explanatory style. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 1(2), 111-117.
• Presson, P. K. & Benassi, V. A. (1996). Locus of control orientation and depressive symptomatology: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 201-212.
• Rezaei, A., & Jeddi, E. M. (2020). Relationship between wisdom, perceived control of internal states, perceived stress, social intelligence, information processing styles and life satisfaction among college students. Current Psychology, 39(3), 927-933.
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
• Ross, C. E. & Mirowsky, J. (2002). Age and the gender gap in the sense of personal control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 125-145.
• Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal vs. external control of reinforcement. Psycohological Monographs 80, 1-28.
• Rotter, J. B. (1990). Internal vs. external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45(4), 489-493.
• Sadri, G. & Robertson, I. T. (1993). Self-efficacy and work-related behaviour: A review and meta-analysis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42(2), 139-152.
• Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs, 1(1), 35-37.
• Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549-570.
• Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2013). Everything under control? The effects of age, gender, and education on trajectories of perceived control in a nationally representative German sample. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 353.
• Strube, M. J., Hanson, J. S., & Newman, L. (2003). Virtues and vices of personal control. In E. C. Chang & L. J. Sanna (Eds.), Virtue, vice, and personality: The complexity of behavior (pp. 71-88). American Psychological Association.
• Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self‐control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-324.
• Telef, B. B. (2013). Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(28-3), 374-384.
• Thompson, S. C. (1981). Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 89.
• Wallston, K. A., Strudler Wallston, B., & DeVellis, R. (1978). Development of the multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales. Health Education Monographs, 6(1), 160-170.
• Wallston, K. A., Wallston, B. S., Smith, S., & Dobbins, C. J. (1987). Perceived control and health. Current Psychology, 6(1), 5-25.
• Wanberg, C. R. & Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 132.
• Warburton, W. A., Williams, K. D., & Cairns, D. R. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 213-220.
• Watson, D. C. (1998). The relationship of self-esteem, locus of control, and dimensional models to personality disorders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 399-420.
• Whitley, B. E. & Kite, M. E. (2013). Principles of research in behavioral science. Routledge.
• Wilkinson, E. J. & Camove, A. S. (1992). Anxiety and desire for control. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 21, 71-73.
• Worthington, R. L. & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The counseling psychologist, 34(6), 806-838.
• You, S., Hong, S., & Ho, H. Z. (2011). Longitudinal effects of perceived control on academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(4), 253-266.
• Zheng, L., Miao, M., & Gan, Y. (2020). Perceived control buffers the effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic on general health and life satisfaction: The mediating role of psychological distance. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 12(4), 1095-1114.
• Zimmerman, M. A. & Zahniser, J. H. (1991). Refinements of sphere‐specific measures of perceived control: Development of a sociopolitical control scale. Journal of Community Psychology, 19(2), 189-204.