Yıl 2019, Cilt 5 , Sayı 2, Sayfalar 210 - 221 2019-12-31

SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE
SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE

Sevil DEMİRCİ [1] , Semih ERTÜRK [2] , Uğur ÜZEL [3]


Surface quality behaviour was investigated for one step production system compared to traditional painting process. This study was conducted to compare and analyse the effect of one step production cycle on surface quality when compared with traditional production system. Sample plates were prepared by traditional painting process with acrylic solvent based paint and one step production cycle with polyurethane (PU) coating systems. Surface quality of plates were analysed regarding scratch resistance, thermal aging resistance and orange peeling formation. Test methods were determined according to Fiat painted plastic part qualification norms. Test results revealed that gloss loss, roughness values and orange peeling formation affinity were less for one step production system with PU than conventional system with solvent based acrylic paint. This study contributes to revealing surface quality performance for the methods of producing painted parts that are more resistant to scratch, thermal conditions and having much fewer surface defects like orange peeling.


Surface quality behaviour was investigated for one step production system compared to traditional painting process. This study was conducted to compare and analyse the effect of one step production cycle on surface quality when compared with traditional production system. Sample plates were prepared by traditional painting process with acrylic solvent based paint and one step production cycle with polyurethane (PU) coating systems. Surface quality of plates were analysed regarding scratch resistance, thermal aging resistance and orange peeling formation. Test methods were determined according to Fiat painted plastic part qualification norms. Test results revealed that gloss loss, roughness values and orange peeling formation affinity were less for one step production system with PU than conventional system with solvent based acrylic paint. This study contributes to revealing surface quality performance for the methods of producing painted parts that are more resistant to scratch, thermal conditions and having much fewer surface defects like orange peeling.

  • Referans 1: Mitzler J., Dykhuis M., Reuter S., Schelter D. (2014). One Surface, Three Effects. Kunststoffe International, 9, 41-44.
  • Referans 2: Mitzler J., Dykhuis M., Moch t., Gerndorf R. (2014). An Affordable Alternative to Conventionally Painted Parts. Kunststoffe International, 10, 85-88.
  • Referans 3: Kienzl W., Fischer M., Steinbichler G., Plinke S., Kralicek M. (2016). High Quality Interior Components at Low Unit Cost. Kunststoffe International, 12, 43-45.
  • Referans 4: Hanson A. R. (2006). Measurement Good Practice Guide No.94. Teddington: Crown.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0002-3555-4607
Yazar: Sevil DEMİRCİ (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: TOFAŞ TÜRK OTOMOBİL FABRİKASI A.Ş.
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0002-0002-4075
Yazar: Semih ERTÜRK
Kurum: Tofaş Türk Otomobil Fabrikası A.Ş., R&D Material Engineering Department
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0001-5819-6841
Yazar: Uğur ÜZEL
Kurum: Tofaş Türk Otomobil Fabrikası A.Ş., R&D Material Engineering Department
Ülke: Turkey


Destekleyen Kurum TOFAŞ TÜRK OTOMOBİL FABRİKASI A.Ş.
Teşekkür We would like to thank to TOFAŞ Türk Otomobil Fabrikası A.Ş. and VOTTELER Lackfabrik GmbH & Co. KG for their support and motivation. All tests were conducted at Tofaş Türk Otomobil Fabrikası A.Ş. R&D Material Engineering Department Laboratory
Tarihler

Yayımlanma Tarihi : 31 Aralık 2019

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { klujes626588, journal = {Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi}, issn = {2458-7494}, eissn = {2458-7613}, address = {}, publisher = {Kırklareli Üniversitesi}, year = {2019}, volume = {5}, pages = {210 - 221}, doi = {10.34186/klujes.626588}, title = {SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE}, key = {cite}, author = {DEMİRCİ, Sevil and ERTÜRK, Semih and ÜZEL, Uğur} }
APA DEMİRCİ, S , ERTÜRK, S , ÜZEL, U . (2019). SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi , 5 (2) , 210-221 . DOI: 10.34186/klujes.626588
MLA DEMİRCİ, S , ERTÜRK, S , ÜZEL, U . "SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE". Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 5 (2019 ): 210-221 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/klujes/issue/51429/626588>
Chicago DEMİRCİ, S , ERTÜRK, S , ÜZEL, U . "SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE". Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 5 (2019 ): 210-221
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE AU - Sevil DEMİRCİ , Semih ERTÜRK , Uğur ÜZEL Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - doi: 10.34186/klujes.626588 DO - 10.34186/klujes.626588 T2 - Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 210 EP - 221 VL - 5 IS - 2 SN - 2458-7494-2458-7613 M3 - doi: 10.34186/klujes.626588 UR - https://doi.org/10.34186/klujes.626588 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE %A Sevil DEMİRCİ , Semih ERTÜRK , Uğur ÜZEL %T SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE %D 2019 %J Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi %P 2458-7494-2458-7613 %V 5 %N 2 %R doi: 10.34186/klujes.626588 %U 10.34186/klujes.626588
ISNAD DEMİRCİ, Sevil , ERTÜRK, Semih , ÜZEL, Uğur . "SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE". Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 5 / 2 (Aralık 2020): 210-221 . https://doi.org/10.34186/klujes.626588
AMA DEMİRCİ S , ERTÜRK S , ÜZEL U . SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019; 5(2): 210-221.
Vancouver DEMİRCİ S , ERTÜRK S , ÜZEL U . SURFACE QUALITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND ONE STEP PRODUCTION CYCLE. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019; 5(2): 221-210.