Effect of Pylon Shapes on Seismic Response of a Long-Span Steel Box-Girder Cable-Stayed Bridge

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 120 - 127, 30.11.2021

Sonjoh Chebelem Hakan Erdoğan

https://doi.org/10.34088/kojose.915243

Öz

In recent decades, the demand for complex and economical engineering structures with great aesthetics has been on the rise and the cable stayed bridges also take their share of this interest. Besides many advantages cable-stayed bridges are quite flexible, hence susceptible mainly to dynamic actions such as impact loads, wind effects and seismic excitations. In this context, this study focused on the effect of A and H shape reinforced concrete pylons on the seismic behavior of a long span steel triple box-girder cable-stayed bridge that was presumed to be located in an earthquake-prone region in Turkey. The 3D models of the bridge were constructed using SAP2000 software and the time history analysis have been carried out considering cable sag, large displacement effects. The seismic responses of the bridges are compared in terms of axial force on cables, deflections on the pylons and the deck

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cable-Stayed Bridge, Pylon Type, Time-History Analysis, Seismic Response, Steel Box-Girder

Kaynakça

• [1] Fleming J.F., Egeseli E.A., 1980. Dynamic Behaviour of a Cable-Stayed Bridge. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 8, pp. 1-16.
• [2] Nazmy A.S., Abdel-Ghaffar A.M., 1990. Non-linear Earthquake-Response Analysis of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges: Theory. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 19(1), pp. 45-62.
• [3] Wilson, J.C., Gravelle W., 1991. Modelling of a Cable-Stayed Bridge for Dynamic Analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 20, pp. 707-721.
• [4] Nazmy A.S., Abdel–Ghaffar A., 1992. Effects of Ground Motion Spatial Variability on the Response of Cable–Stayed Bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21(1), pp. 1–20.
• [5] Betti R., Abdel–Ghaffar A., Niazy A., 1993. Kinematic Soil–Structure Interaction for Long–Span Cable Supported Bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 1993, 22, pp. 415–430.
• [6] Filiatrault A., Tinawi R., Massicotte B., 1993. Damage to Cable–Stayed Bridge During 1988 Saguenay Earthquake. I: Pseudostatic Analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering, 119(5), pp. 1432–1449.
• [7] Ali H., Ghaffar A., 1995. Seismic passive control of cable–stayed bridges. Journal of Shock and Vibration, 2(4), pp. 259–272.
• [8] Zheng J., Takeda T., 1995. Effects of Soil–Structure Interaction on Seismic Response of PC Cable–Stayed Bridge. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 14(6), pp. 427–437.
• [9] Tuladhar R., Dilger W., Elbadry M., 1995. Influence of Cable Vibration on Seismic Response of Cable – Stayed Bridges. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 22(5), pp. 1001–1020.
• [10] Ren W., Obata M., 1999. Elastic–Plastic Seismic Behaviour of Long–Span Cable–Stayed Bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 4(3), pp. 194-203.
• [11] Tuladhar R., Dilger W., 1999. Effect of Support Conditions on Seismic Response of Cable – Stayed bridges. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 26(5), pp. 631–645.
• [12] Raheem S.E.A., Hayashikawa T., 2003. Parametric Study on Steel Tower Seismic Response of Cable-Stayed Bridges under Great Earthquake Ground Motion. Structural Engineering / Earthquake Engineering, 20(1), pp. 25–41.
• [13] Soneji B.B., Jangid R., 2008. Influence of Soil–Structure Interaction on the Response of Seismically Isolated Cable–Stayed Bridge. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 28(4), pp.245–257.
• [14] Zhang L., Luo W., Li F., Chang Z., 2011. Seismic Response Analysis of Cable-Stayed Bridge Considering the Interaction of the Soil-Pile Superstructure. American Society of Civil Engineers, Third International Conference on Transportation Engineering (ICTE), Chengdu, China, 23-25 July, pp. 1957-1962.
• [15] Çetindemir O., Akbaş B., Fahjan Y.M., Shen J., 2011. Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges and Modeling Issues,” 2nd Symposium on Bridges and Viaducts, Eskişehir, Turkey, 28-30 September.
• [16] Camara A., Astiz M., 2012. Pushover Analysis for the Seismic Response Prediction of Cable–Stayed Bridges under Multi–Directional Excitation. Engineering Structures, 41, pp. 444–455.
• [17] Soyluk K., Sicacik E., 2012. Soil–Structure Interaction Analysis of Cable–Stayed Bridges for Spatially Varying Ground Motion components. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 35, pp. 80–90.
• [18] Valdebenito G.E., Aparicio A.C., Alvarez J.J., 2012. Seismic Response of Cable-Stayed Bridges for Different Layout Conditions: A Comparative Analysis. Proceedings of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Lisboa, Portugal 24-28 September, pp. 10020-10029.
• [19] Camara A., Astiz M., Ye A.J., 2014. Fundamental Mode Estimation for Modern Cable–Stayed Bridges Considering the Tower Flexibility. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 19(6), 04014015.
• [20] Camara A., Astiz M., 2014. Analysis and Control of Cable–Stayed Bridges Subject to Seismic Action. Structural Engineering International, 24(1), pp. 27–36.
• [21] Camara A., Efthymiou E., 2016. Deck–tower Interaction in the Transverse Seismic Response of Cable–Stayed Bridges and Optimum Configurations. Engineering Structures, 124, pp. 494–506.
• [22] Naderian H., Cheung M.S., Shen Z.Y., Dragomirescu E., 2016. Seismic Analysis of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges by an Integrated Finite Strip Method. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21(3), 04015068.
• [23] Zhong J., Jeon J., Ren W., 2018. Risk assessment for a Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge Subjected to Multiple Support Excitations. Engineering Structures, 176, pp. 220-230.
• [24] Wang X., Fang J., Zhou L., Ye A., 2019. Transverse Seismic Failure Mechanism and Ductility of Reinforced Concrete Pylon for Long Span Cable-Stayed Bridges: Model Test and Numerical Analysis, Engineering Structures, 189, pp. 206-221.
• [25] Martins A.M.B., Simões L.M.C., João H.J.O., Negrão, 2019. Optimization of Concrete Cable-Stayed Bridges under Seismic Action, Computers & Structures, 222, pp. 36-47.
• [26] Xie W., Sun L., 2021. Transverse Seismic Response and Failure Mode of Towers of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Full-Model: Tests and Simulations, Engineering Failure Analysis, 122, 105224.
• [27] Shah S.G., Desai. J.A., Solanki. C.H., 2010. Effect of Pylon Shape on Seismic Response of Cable Stayed Bridge with Soil Structure Interaction. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 1(3), pp. 667-682.
• [28] Shah N.D., Desai J.A., Patil H.S., 2011. Effect of Pylon Shape on Analysis of Cable-Stayed Bridges. Journal of Engineering Research and Studies, 2(1), pp. 104-109.
• [29] Sharath R., Ingle R.K., 2019. Pylon Shape Analysis of Cable-Stayed Bridges. In: Rao A., Ramanjaneyulu K. (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Volume 1. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 11. Springer, Singapore.
• [30] Polepally G., Pasupuleti V.D.K., Dongre A., 2020. Comparison of Different Types of Pylon Shapes on Seismic Behaviour of Cable-Stayed Bridges. In: Babu K., Rao H., Amarnath Y. (eds) Emerging Trends in Civil Engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 61. Springer, Singapore.
• [31] Okyar M., Pinar A., Tezcan D., Kamaci, Z., 2008. Late Quaternary Seismic Stratigraphy and Active Faults of the Gulf of Izmit (NE Marmara Sea). Marine Geophysical Research, 29, pp. 89-107.
• [32] CSI, SAP2000 Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California.