Arsenic Removal Technologies: Mapping Global Research Activities (1970-2019)

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 42 - 53, 31.05.2022

Kemal Aktas , İ. Ethem Karadirek , Duygu Hazal Goktepe Meltem Asiltürk , Ayça Erdem

https://doi.org/10.34088/kojose.955299

Abstract

Arsenic contamination in drinking water poses worldwide threat to public health and requires emergency actions in some parts of the world. Several technologies have been used to overcome arsenic contamination issues and to meet the arsenic concentration limitations for public health. In this study, research tendencies on arsenic removal technologies were evaluated. A total of 4083 publications, published between 1970 and 2019, on arsenic removal from drinking water, groundwater and wastewater were retrieved from Web of Science (WoS) database. A bibliometric analysis was carried out and word frequency along with visualization map analysis were used to provide a quantitative analysis, and an overview on the current research trends and research prospects. The results showed that annual output of the “arsenic removal” subject increased significantly after the year 2000. “Article” was the most preferable publication type, and “Journal of Hazardous Materials” had the highest publication number. The most productive country in terms of number of total articles on arsenic removal was China. Also, the South-East Asian countries highly contributed to the literature. “Adsorption” was found to be the most frequently researched arsenic removal technology and nanotechnology plays a significant role in the adsorption development.

Keywords

Arsenic, Bibliometric, Contamination, Water, Removal, Research Trends

Supporting Institution

The Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, Akdeniz University

Project Number

FDK-2018-3844

Thanks

Authors also would like to thank Dr. Hassan Javed, Rice University researcher for insightful contribution.

References

• [1] Woolson E.A., 1975. Bioaccumulation of Arsenicals. In: Arsenical Pesticides. American Chemical Society.
• [2] Goldberg S., Johnston C.T., 2001. Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling. J Colloid Interface Sci., 234, pp. 204–216.
• [3] Ahuja S., 2008. Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: Mechanism, Analysis, and Remediation. Wiley, New Jersey.
• [4] Choong T.S.Y., Chuah T.G., Robiah Y., et al. 2007. Arsenic toxicity, health hazards and removal techniques from water: an overview. Desalination, 217, pp. 139–166.
• [5] IARC. 1987. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; Overall Evaluation of Carcinogenicity: An updating of IARC Monographs Volumes 1 to 42, pp. 100-106.
• [6] Stolz J.F., Oremland R.S., 1999. Bacterial respiration of arsenic and selenium. FEMS Microbiol., 23, pp. 615–627.
• [7] Mandal B.K., Suzuki K.T., 2002. Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta, 58, pp. 201–235.
• [8] Smith A.H., Hopenhayn-Rich C., Bates M.N., et al. 1992. Cancer risks from arsenic in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect, 97, pp. 259–267.
• [9] Abbas G., Murtaza B., Bibi I., et al. 2018. Arsenic uptake, toxicity, detoxification, and speciation in plants: Physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects. Int J. Environ Res. Public Health, 15, pp 1.
• [10] Smith A.H., Lingas E.O., Rahman M., 2000. Contamination of Drinking Water by Arsenic in Bangladesh: A Public Health Emergency. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78: Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency. World Health Organ. Bull., 78, pp. 1093.
• [11] Stauber J.L., Florence T.M., Davies C.M., et al. 1996. Methylation study of a population environmentally exposed to Arsenic in Drinking water. Environ. Health Perspect., 91, pp. 620–628.
• [12] Chen C.J., Chen C.W., Wu M.M., Kuo T.L., 1992. Cancer potential in liver, lung, bladder and kidney due to ingested inorganic arsenic in drinking water. Br J Cancer, 66, pp. 888–892.
• [13] Berg M., Tran H.C., Nguyen T.C., et al. 2001. Arsenic contamination of groundwater and drinking water in Vietnam: A human health threat. Environ Sci Technol., 35, pp. 2621–2626.
• [14] Hopenhayn-Rich C., Biggs M.L., Fuchs A., et al. 1996. Bladder cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Argentina. Epidemiology, 7(2), pp. 117–124.
• [15] Abejón R., Garea A., 2015. A bibliometric analysis of research on arsenic in drinking water during the 1992-2012 period: An outlook to treatment alternatives for arsenic removal. J. Water Process Eng., 6, pp. 105–119.
• [16] World Health Organization (WHO). 1993. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. Volume 1: Recommendations, 2nd edition. Geneva.
• [17] European Union (EU). 1998. Council Directive 98/83/EC on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Brussels.
• [18] United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Arsenic and Clarifications to Compliance and New Source Contaminants Monitoring.
• [19] Mohan D., Pittman C.U., 2007. Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents-A critical review. J Hazard Mater., 142, pp. 1–53.
• [20] Qu X., Alvarez P.J.J., Li Q., 2013. Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res., 47, pp. 3931–3946.
• [21] Ali I., 2012. New generation adsorbents for water treatment. Chem Rev., 112, pp. 5073–5091.
• [22] Wong W., Wong H.Y., Badruzzaman A.B.M., et al. 2017. Recent advances in exploitation of nanomaterial for arsenic removal from water: A review. Nanotechnology, 28, pp. 1–31.
• [23] Reuters Thomson. 2008. White Paper Using Bibliometrics: A guide to evaluating research performance with citation data.
• [24] Fu H.Z., Ho Y.S., Sui Y.M., Li Z.S., 2010. A bibliometric analysis of solid waste research during the period 1993-2008. Waste Management, 30, pp. 2410-2417.
• [25] Persson O., Danell R., Schneider W.J., 2009. How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis, in: Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies. Danish National Research Database ID: 2398320558.
• [26] Van Eck J.N., Waltman L., 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, pp. 523-538.
• [27] Hu J., Ma Y., Zhang L., et al. 2010. A historical review and bibliometric analysis of research on lead in drinking water field from 1991 to 2007. Sci Total Environ., 408, pp. 1738–1744.
• [28] Garfield E., 1972. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), pp. 471-479.
• [29] Ma J., Fu Z.H., Ho S.Y., 2013. The top-cited wetland articles in science citation index expanded: characteristics and hotspots. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70(3), pp. 1039-1046.
• [30] Chandra V., Park J., Chun Y., et al. 2010. Water-Dispersible Magnetite-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites for Arsenic Removal. ACS Nano, 4, pp. 3979–3986.
• [31] Kurniawan T.A., Chan G.Y.S., Lo W.H., Babel S., 2006. Physico-chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals. Chemical Engineering Journal, 118, pp. 83-98.
• [32] Yavuz C.T., Mayo J.T., Prakash A., et al. 2006. Low-Field Magnetic Separation of Monodisperse Fe3O4 Nanocrystals. Science, (80) 314, pp. 964–967.
• [33] Mulligan C.N., Yong R.N., Gibbs B.F., 2001. Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Engineering Geology, 60, pp. 193-207.
• [34] Ali I., Gupta V.K., 2007. Advances in water treatment by adsorption technology. Nat Protoc., 1, pp. 2661–2667.
• [35] Kanel S.R., Manning B., Charlet L., Choi H., 2005. Removal of arsenic (III) from groundwater by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environ Sci Technol., 39, pp. 1291–1298.
• [36] Khin M.M., Nair A.S., Babu V.J, Murugan R., 2012. Ramakrishna S. A review on nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Energy & Environmental Science, 5, pp. 8075-8109.
• [37] Sun J., Wang H.M., Ho S.Y., 2012. A historical review and bibliometric analysis of research on estuary pollution. Mar Pollut Bull, 64, pp. 13-21.
• [38] Chappell R.W., Abernathy O.C., Calderon L.R., 2001. Arsenic exposure and Health Effects IV (First Edition). Elsevier, Amsterdam.
• [39] Argos, M., Kalra, T., Rathouz, P.J., Chen, Y., et. al. 2010. Arsenic exposure from drinking water, and all-cause and chronic-disease mortalities in Bangladesh (HEALS): A prospective cohort study. Lancet, 376, pp. 252–258.
• [40] Singh R., Singh S., Parihar P., Singh P.V., Prasad M.S., 2015. Arsenic contamination, consequences, and remediation techniques: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 112, pp. 247-270.
• [41] Zyoud S.H., Hanush D.F., 2020. Mapping of climate change research in the Arab world: a bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, pp. 3523-3540.
• [42] Gupta A.K., Gupta M., 2005. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials, 26(18), pp. 3995-4021.
• [43] Bowell R.J., 1994. Sorption of arsenic by iron oxides and oxyhydroxides in soils. Appl Geochem., 9, pp. 279-286.
• [44] Jang M., Chen W., Cannon S.F., 2008. Preloading Hydrous Ferric Oxide into Granular Activated Carbon for Arsenic Removal. Environ Sci Technol., 42, pp. 3369-3374.
• [45] Yean S., Cong L., Yavuz C., Mayo J., Yu W., Kan A., Colvin V., Tomson M., 2005. Effect of magnetite particle size on adsorption and desorption of arsenite and arsenate. Journal of Material Research, 20, pp. 3255–3264.
• [46] Smedley P.L., Kinniburgh D.G., 2002. A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochemistry, 17, pp. 517–568.
• [47] Yan X.P., Kerrich R., Hendry M.J., 2000. Distribution of arsenic (III), arsenic(V) and total inorganic arsenic in porewaters from a thick till and clay-rich aquitard sequence, Saskatchewan, Canada. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 64, pp. 2637–2648.
• [48] Brookins D.G. 1988. Eh–pH Diagrams for Geochemistry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
• [49] Chowdhury S.R., Yanful E.K., 2010. Arsenic and chromium removal by mixed magnetite-maghemite nanoparticles. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, pp. 2238–47.
• [50] Lata S., Samadder R.S., 2016. Removal of arsenic from water using nano adsorbents and challenges: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 166, pp. 387-406.
• [51] Zhao S., Zou L., Tang C.Y., Mulcahy D., 2012. Recent developments in forward osmosis: Opportunities and challenges. J Membr Sci., 396, pp. 1-21.
• [52] Uddin M., Mozumder M., Islam M., Deowan S., Hoinkis J., 2007. Nanofiltration membrane process for the removal of arsenic from drinking water. Chem Eng Technol., 30, pp. 1248-1254.
• [53] Chiu W.T., Ho Y.S., 2007. Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics, 7, pp. 3-17.
• [54] Li L.L., Ding G., Feng N., Wang H.M., Ho S.H., 2009. Global stem cell research trend: Bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80 (1), pp. 39-58.
• [55] Sanchez J.A.A., Munoz J.F.V., Urena L.J.B., Agugliaro F.M., 2019. Innovation and technology for sustainable mining activity: A worldwide research assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, pp. 38-54.