Shakespeare'in V. Henry Adlı Oyununda İngiliz Milliyetçiliği Kavramı ve Kral V. Henry'nin Yansıtılışı

Yıl 2017, Sayı: 33, 197 - 206, 30.06.2017

Berna Köseoğlu

Öz

W. Shakespeare’in en öne çıkan tarihsel oyunlarından biri olan V. Henry, Kral V. Henry dönemi boyunca gerçekleşen İngiliz siyasi olaylarını, gerçek ve kurguyu bir araya getirerek gözler önüne sermektedir. Oyun boyunca, ülkenin gelişimi için ulusal ruhun ve vatanseverliğin önemini vurgulayan V. Henry’nin ifadeleri aracılığıyla İngiliz kimliği vurgulanmaktadır. Oyunda Kralın özellikleri dikkate alındığında, eylemlerinin, kararlarının ve stratejilerinin elde edilen siyasi başarılarda ne kadar önemli bir rol oynadığı açıktır. Bu çalışmada, eserde düşmanları yenmek ve ülkede huzuru sağlamak için V. Henry tarafından uygulanan taktikler incelenecektir, bu sebeple bu makalenin amacı Kral V. Henry’nin zekasının ve İngiliz kimliğine bağlılığın İngiliz ulusunun zaferleri üzerindeki etkisini tartışmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Shakespeare, Tarihsel Oyun, Henry V, İngiliz Kimliği, Vatanseverlik

Shakespeare’s Henry V: The Idea of Englishness and the Representation of the King, Henry V

Öz

Henry V, one of the most significant historical plays of W. Shakespeare, reveals the politics of England during the period of the King, Henry V by bringing fact and fiction together. Throughout the play, the idea of Englishness is stressed through the expressions of Henry V, who emphasizes the importance of national spirit and patriotism for the development of the country. Considering the characteristics of the King in the play, it is clear that his actions, decisions and strategies play a very significant role in the political glories achieved. In this study, the tactics employed by Henry V in the work to overcome the enemies and to establish peace in the country will be analysed, therefore the aim of the article is to discuss the impact of the intelligence of the King, Henry V and the devotion to English identity upon the victories of the English nation in Henry V.

Anahtar Kelimeler

History Play, Henry V, Englishness, Patriotism

Kaynakça

• Shakespeare, William (1599). (1994). Henry V. Ed. Sir Arthur Quiller-Couch and John Dover Wilson. London: Wordsworth. Secondary Sources:
• Barr, Niall (2011). British History: The Threat of Invasion 1066-1789: An Overview. BBC. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/ normans/invasion_threat_01.shtml
• Campbell, Lily B (1978). Shakespeare’s “Histories”: Mirrors of Elizabethan Policy. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library.
• Champion, Larry S (1990). ‘The Noise of Threatening Drum’: Dramatic Strategy and Political Ideology in Shakespeare and the English Chronicle Plays. Newark: U of Delaware P and London.
• Corbet, Anthony (2015). Edward IV, England’s Forgotten Warrior King: His Life, His People, and His Legacy. Bloomington: I Universe.
• Holderness, Graham (2000). Shakespeare: The Histories. London: St Martin’s. Howard, Jean E. and Phyliss Rackin (1997). Engendering A Nation: A Feminist Account of Shakespeare’s English Histories. London: Routledge.
• Hunt, Maurice (2014). The ‘Breaches’ of Shakespeare's The Life of King Henry the Fifth. College Literature, 41(4), 7-24.
• Iser, Wolfgang (1993). Staging Politics: The Lasting Impact of Shakespeare’s Histories. (David Henry Wilson, Trans.). New York: Columbia UP.
• Jones, Robert C (1991). These Valiant Dead: Renewing the Past in Shakespeare’s Histories. Iowa City: U of Iowa P.
• Leggatt, Alexander (1988). Shakespeare’s Political Drama: The History Plays and the Roman Plays. New York: Routledge.
• Pearlman, Elihu (1992). William Shakespeare: The History Plays. New York: Twayne.
• Pudney, Eric (2015). Mendacity and Kingship in Shakespeare’s Henry V and Richard III. European Journal of English Studies, 19(2), 163-175.
• Saccio, Peter (1977). Shakespeare’s English Kings: History, Chronicle, and Drama. New York: Oxford UP.
• Smart, David A (1939). Coronet. (Vol. 5) No. 6. Chicago: Smart.
• Spiekerman, Tim (2012). The Making of A Politician: Shakespeare's Prince Hal at Work and Play. Perspectives on Political Science, 41(4), 201-206.