Dijital Kimlik ve Sosyal Medyada İdeal Benlik Sunumu: Gösteri Toplumunda Bir Z Kuşağı Çalışması

Öz

Gösteri Toplumu, Guy Debord tarafından ortaya atılan ve modern toplumda gerçekliğin yerini imgelerin aldığı bir kuramdır. Bu kuram, bireylerin kendilerini sürekli olarak izleyiciye sunma çabasıyla yaşadıkları dünyayı bir “gösteriye” dönüştürdüklerini savunmaktadır. Gösteri Toplumu'nun dijital çağdaki en somut yansıması ise günümüzde özellikle gençlerin ve genç yetişkinlerin yoğun olarak kullandığı sosyal medya platformlarıdır. Kullanıcılar bu alanlarda yaşamlarını görünür ve onaylanabilir hale getirmek için sürekli olarak yeniden inşa etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Z kuşağı bireylerinin sosyal medyada benlik inşa süreçleri ile görünüm temelli farkındalık düzeylerini ortaya koymaktır. Özellikle görselliğin ön plana çıktığı bu dijital mecralarda, genç bireylerin kimlik sunumlarını nasıl gerçekleştirdikleri incelenmiştir. Çalışma nicel yöntemle yürütülürmüştür ve iki geçerli psikometrik ölçek kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS 30.0 programıyla analiz edilmiştir. Betimsel istatistikler, korelasyon, t-testi ve ANOVA testleri uygulanmıştır. Araştırmaya yaşları 18-27 arasında değişen 300 kişi katılmıştır. Çalışmanın istatiksel analizi sonucunda kadınların erkeklere kıyasla daha yüksek düzeyde görünüm farkındalığı ve dijital kimlik inşası gerçekleştirdiğini; yüksek gelir gruplarının ise sosyal medyada daha estetik ve performatif kimlik sunumları yaptığını ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gösteri Toplumu
• Sosyal Medya
• İdeal Benlik
• Benlik Sunumu
• Z Kuşağı

Digital Identity and Ideal Self-Presentation on Social Media: A Generation Z Study within the Society of the Spectacle

Abstract

The Society of the Spectacle is a theory proposed by Guy Debord, which asserts that in modern society, reality is replaced by images. This theory argues that individuals transform the world they live in into a “spectacle” through their continuous efforts to present themselves to an audience. The most concrete reflection of the Society of the Spectacle in the digital age is social media platforms, which are especially used intensively by young people and young adults today. On these platforms, users constantly reconstruct their lives to make them visible and socially approved. The aim of this study is to reveal the processes of self-construction and appearance-based awareness levels of Generation Z individuals on social media. The study examines how young individuals construct their identities in these digital spaces, where visuality is particularly emphasized. The research was conducted using a quantitative method and employed two valid psychometric scales. The data were analyzed using SPSS 30.0 software. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, independent samples t-tests, and ANOVA were conducted. The study was carried out with 300 participants aged between 18 and 27. Statistical analyses revealed that female participants exhibited significantly higher levels of appearance awareness and digital identity construction compared to male participants. It was also found that individuals in the high-income group engaged in more aesthetic and performative identity presentations on social media.

Keywords

• Society of the Spectacle
• Social Media
• Ideal Self
• Self-Presentation
• Generation Z

Kaynakça

1. Akkaş, İ., & Aksakal, İ. (2023). Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Dijital Kimlik Kullanımı ve Benlik Sunumu Üzerine Bir İnceleme. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(1), 177-194.
2. Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew research center, 31(2018), 1673-1689.
3. Anderson, M., Faverio, M., & Gottfried, J. (2023). Teens, social media and technology 2023. Pew Research Center, 11.
4. Andrejevic, M. (2011). Estrangement 2.0. World Picture, 6(Winter), 1-14.
5. Autry Jr, A. J., & Berge, Z. (2011). Digital natives and digital immigrants: getting to know each other. Industrial and commercial training, 43(7), 460-466.
6. Aydın, A. F. (2020). Gösteri toplumunun yeni panoptikonu olarak sosyal medya. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(3), 2573-2594.
7. Bakić-Mirić, N. (2018). Social media: A critical introduction.
8. Bandura, A. (2023). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective on human nature. John Wiley & Sons.

9. Baudrillard, J. (2019). Simulacra and simulations (1981). In Crime and Media (pp. 69-85). Routledge.
10. Baudrillard, J., & Glaser, S. F. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (Vol. 312). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan press.
11. Bourdieu, P. (2019). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. In Social Stratification, Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, Second Edition (pp. 499-525). Routledge.
12. Boyatzis, R., & Dhar, U. (2022). Dynamics of the ideal self. Journal of Management Development, 41(1), 1-9.
13. Boyd, D. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
14. Çankal, S. (2024). Dijital Platformlarda Kimlik İnşası Ve Sunumu: Z Kuşağı Üyeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (61), 325-342.
15. Çetinkaya, A., Metin, A., Erbiçer, E. S., & Yavuz, E. (2022). Adaptation of appearance-related social media consciousness scale into Turkish: A validity and reliability study on adolescents. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 8(1), 63-70.
16. Debord, G. (1995). The society of the spectacle (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). NY: Zone Books.(Original work published 1967).
17. Debord, G. (2024). The society of the spectacle. PM Press.
18. Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew research center, 17(1), 1-7.
19. Ding, G., Meng, X., & Fan, X. (2024). Exploring the impact of internet usage on individuals’ social status discordance: evidence from China. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 11(1), 22.
20. Dittmar, H. (2008). Consumer culture, identity and well-being: The search for the 'good life' and the 'body perfect'. Psychology Press.
21. Felita, P., Siahaja, C., Wijaya, V., Melisa, G., Chandra, M., & Dahesihsari, R. (2016). Pemakaian media sosial dan self concept pada remaja. Manasa, 5(1), 30-41.
22. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes (Human relations, Bd. 7). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
23. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2), 117-140.
24. Giddens, A. (2023). Modernity and self-identity. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 477-484). Routledge.
25. Goffman, E. (2023). The presentation of self in everyday life. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 450-459). Routledge.
26. Goodman, E., Huang, B., Schafer-Kalkhoff, T., & Adler, N. E. (2007). Perceived socioeconomic status: a new type of identity that influences adolescents’ self-rated health. Journal of adolescent Health, 41(5), 479-487. Gorea, M. (2021). Becoming your “authentic” self: How social media influences youth’s visual transitions. Social Media+ Society, 7(3), 20563051211047875.
27. Gündüz, U. (2017). The effect of social media on identity construction. Mediterranean journal of social sciences, 8(5).
28. Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A. M., & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 91-98.
29. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340. Higgins, E. T., & Nakkawita, E. (2021). Self-discrepancy and regulatory focus. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.
30. Jakaza, E. (2022). Identity construction or obfuscation on social media: a case of Facebook and WhatsApp. African Identities, 20(1), 3-25.
31. Kaakinen, M., Sirola, A., Savolainen, I., & Oksanen, A. (2020). Shared identity and shared information in social media: Development and validation of the identity bubble reinforcement scale. Media Psychology, 23(1), 25-51.
32. Kavut, S. (2020). Kimliğin dönüşümü: Dijital kimlikler. Selçuk İletişim, 13(2), 987-1008.
33. Kaya, S. (2021). Sosyal Medya Kullanıcılarının Dijital Kimlik İnşası Sürecinde Kültürel Faaliyet ve Sanat ile İlgili Paylaşımlarının Rolü. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 11(4), 1403-1419.
34. Kellner, D. (2003). Media spectacle. Routledge.
35. Leo, Y., Fleury, E., Alvarez-Hamelin, J. I., Sarraute, C., & Karsai, M. (2016). Socioeconomic correlations and stratification in social-communication networks. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 13(125), 20160598.
36. Li, Z., & Samsurijan, M. S. (2025). Impact of social media platforms on the construction of social networks among the middle class. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(3), 2285-2299.
37. Lup, K., Trub, L., & Rosenthal, L. (2015). Instagram# instasad?: exploring associations among instagram use, depressive symptoms, negative social comparison, and strangers followed. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(5), 247-252.
38. Manovich, L. (2019). The aesthetic society: Instagram as a life form. Data Publics, Routledge, forthcoming, 2, 19.
39. Maree, J. G. (2022). The psychosocial development theory of Erik Erikson: critical overview. The influence of theorists and pioneers on early childhood education, 119-133.
40. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969.
41. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1987). Possible selves: The interface between motivation and the self-concept.
42. Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society, 13(1), 114-133.
43. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.
44. Miyamoto, S. F. (2023). Self, motivation, and symbolic interactionist theory. In Human nature and collective behavior (pp. 271-285). Routledge.
45. Muscanell, N. L., & Guadagno, R. E. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 107-112.
46. Onjewu, A. K. E., Godwin, E. S., Azizsafaei, F., & Appiah, D. (2025). The influence of technology use on learning skills among generation Z: A gender and cross-country analysis. Industry and Higher Education, 39(2), 139-157.
47. Ökten, M. S. (2024). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal medyada kimlik inşasına yönelik ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 93-101.
48. Öngören, B., Durdu, Z., Dongaz, Ö. İ., Bayar, B., & Bayar, K. (2021). Görünümle İlişkili Sosyal Medya Bilinç Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Karya Journal of Health Science, 2(2), 33-38
49. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in human behavior, 29(4), 1841-1848.
50. Rafiq, A., & Linden, B. (2024). Social Media and Self-Concept Among Postsecondary Students: A Scoping Review. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking.
51. Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3, pp. 184-256). McGraw-Hill.
52. Sabatini, F., & Sarracino, F. (2015). Keeping up with the e-Joneses: Do online social networks raise social comparisons?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.08863.
53. Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39(2), 145-168. Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2018). Generation Z: A century in the making. Routledge.
54. Sheldon, P. (2008). Student favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 23(2).
55. Siljanovska, L., & Stojcevska, S. (2018). A critical analysis of interpersonal communication in modern times of the concept “Looking Glass Self (1902)” by Charles Horton Cooley. Seeu Review, 13(1), 62-74.
56. Strimbu, N., & O’Connell, M. (2019). The Relationship Between Self-Concept and Online Self-Presentation in Adults. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0328.
57. Tifferet, S., & Vilnai-Yavetz, I. (2014). Gender differences in Facebook self-presentation: An international randomized study. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 388-399.
58. Tiggemann, M., & Anderberg, I. (2020). Social media is not real: The effect of ‘Instagram vs reality’images on women’s social comparison and body image. New media & society, 22(12), 2183-2199.
59. Tovar, M., Rosillo, M., & Spaniardi, A. (2023). Social Media’s influence on identity formation and self expression. In Teens, screens, and social connection: An evidence-based guide to key problems and solutions (pp. 49-61). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
60. Treviño Benavides, T. B., Alcorta Castro, A. T., Garza Marichalar, S. A., Peña Cisneros, M., & Baker Suárez, E. C. (2023). Understanding Generation Z and Social Media Addiction. In Social Media Addiction in Generation Z Consumers: Implications for Business and Marketing (pp. 39-44). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
61. Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and social interest. The journal of individual Psychology, 71(2), 103-113.
62. Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy--and completely unprepared for adulthood--and what that means for the rest of us. Simon and Schuster.
63. Twenge, J. M., & Martin, G. N. (2020). Gender differences in associations between digital media use and psychological well-being: Evidence from three large datasets. Journal of adolescence, 79, 91-102.
64. Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2016). The Interrelated Roles of Mass Media and Social Media in Adolescents’ Development of an Objectified Self-Concept. Communication Research, 43, 1116 - 1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215600488.
65. Vartanian, L. R. (2012). Self-discrepancy theory and body image. Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance, 2(1), 711-717.
66. Vieth, A. Z., Strauman, T. J., Kolden, G. G., Woods, T. E., Michels, J. L., & Klein, M. H. (2003). Self-System Therapy (SST): A Theory-Based Psychotherapy for Depression. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(3), 245. Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M. J., Brown, R., ... & Bond, M. H. (2016). Beyond the ‘east–west’dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 966.
67. Vițelar, A. (2019). Like me: Generation Z and the use of social media for personal branding. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 7(2), 257-268.
68. Wheeler, L. (2024). A brief history of social comparison theory. In Social Comparison (pp. 3-21). Routledge. Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in human behavior, 24(5), 1816-1836.
69. Zheng, A., Duff, B., Vargas, P., & Yao, M. (2020). Self-Presentation on Social Media: When Self-Enhancement Confronts Self-Verification. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20, 289- 302.