BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Böcek Kökenli Protein Kaynaklarının Yem Değeri Ve Kanatlıların Beslenmesinde Kullanılabilme Olanakları

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3, 272 - 278, 29.10.2016

Öz

Bu derlemede, böcek kökenli protein kaynaklarının besin maddesi içeriği, sindirilebilirlikleri, fonksiyonel özellikleri ve kanatlı beslemede kullanılabilme olanakları tartışılmıştır. Önümüzdeki yıllarda, piliç eti ve yumurta tüketiminin önemli miktarda artacağı ve buna bağlı olarak yoğun üretimle birlikte yem hammaddelerine olan gereksiniminde aynı düzeyde artış göstereceği tahmin edilmektedir. Günümüzde, genetik kapasiteleri en üst düzeye çıkmış olan etlik piliç ve yumurta tavuklarının besin maddesi ihtiyaçlarının düşük kalitedeki yem ham maddeleri ile karşılanması mümkün değildir. Bu anlamda, balık unu gibi hayvansal kökenli sınırlı protein kaynakları yerine ikame edilebilecek esansiyel amino asitlerce zengin, sindirilebilirliği yüksek yeni protein kaynaklarına ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bilimsel çalışmaların sonuçları; un kurdu, karasinek ve büvelek sineğinin metionin, lizin ve sistin içeriklerinin balık unundan daha düşük, diğer amino asit içeriklerinin balık ununa yakın olduğunu gösterirken, böcek kökenli protein kaynaklarının kanatlı rasyonlarında kullanımının da mümkün olabileceği yönündedir. Ancak, böcek üretim alanlarının mikrobiyal bir bulaşmaya kaynak oluşturabileceği ve böceklerin ürettiği toksinlerin böcek kökenli yemlerde de bulunabilecek olmasından dolayı bu yemi tüketen hayvanlarda alerjik ve toksik etki oluşturmasından endişe edilmektedir. Bu nedenle, böcek kökenli yemlerin kanatlı beslemede yem olarak değerlendirilmesi, konuyla ilgili daha çok bilimsel çalışma yapılmasına ve bu çalışmaların sonuçları doğrultusunda toplumun hassasiyetleri de dikkate alınarak düzenlenecek mevzuat çerçevesinde kullanılmasına bağlı olmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Böcek proteini, ekonomi, kanatlı, performans, yem değeri.

 

Feed Value of Insect Based Protein Sources and the Possibilities of Using in Poultry Nutrition

 

ABSTRACT: In this review, the nutrient content of insect based protein sources, digestibility, functional features and the possibilities of using in poultry nutrition were discussed. It is expected that chicken meat and egg consumption will increase in the near future, and the amount of feed material requirements will increase at the same level in accordance with the intensive production to meet the needs.

Today, it is impossible to meet the nutrient requirements of broiler and laying hens that reached maximum genetic capacity with the low quality feed materials. In this sense, new protein sources with high essential amino acid content and high digestibility instead of fish meal. Scientific studies  showed that methionine, lysine and cysteine contents of the black soldier fly, common housefly and mealworm were lower than fish meal and the amino acid profile of the black soldier fly, common housefly and mealworm was close to fish meal. At the same time, it is possible to use insect origin protein sources in poultry diets. However, insect production areas can create a source of microbial contamination. Moreover, insect origin feeds can contain insect produced toxins that create an allergic and toxic effect on animals.  Therefore, the using insect origin protein sources as feed in poultry should depend on regulations prepared with scientific based studies and the sensitivity of society.

Key words: Economy, feed value, insect protein, performance, poultry. 

Kaynakça

  • Agunbiade, J.A., Adeyemi, O.A., Ashiru, O.M., Awojobi, H.A., Taiwo, A.A., Oke, D.B., Adekunmisi, A. A. 2007. Replacement of fish meal with maggot meal in cassava based layers’ diets. Japanese Poultry Science, 44:278-282.
  • Amao, O.A., Oladunjoye, I.O., Togun, V.A., Olubajo, K. and Oyaniyi, O. 2010. Effects of westwood (Cirina forda) larva meal on the laying performance and egg characterisitics of laying hen in a tropical environment. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9: 450-454.
  • Anonymous, 2013. Edible insects future prospects for food and feed security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Insect as Animal Feed. pp:89-97.
  • Anonymous,2015. Alltech® global feed survey. http://www.alltech.com/sites/default/files/global-feed-survey-2015.pdf. (Erişim tarihi:01.03.2016).
  • Atteh, J.O., Ologbenla, F.D.1993. Replacement of fish meal with maggot in broiler diets: effects on performance and nutrient retention. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 20:44-49.
  • Awoniyi, T.A.M., Aletor V.A., Aina, J.M. 2003. Performance of broiler-chickens fed on maggot meal in place of fish meal. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2:271-274.
  • Bamgbose A.M. 1999. Utilization of maggot meal in cockerel diets. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 69:1056-1058.
  • Chiba, L.I. 2014. Animal Nutrition Handbook. Section 18: Diet formulation and feed ingredient. PP:481-531. Third Revision.
  • Finke, M.D. 2013. Complete nutrient content of four species of feeder insects. Zoo Biology, 32:27-36.
  • Harikrishnan, R., Kim J.S., Balasundaram, C., Heo M.S. 2012. Dietary supplementation with chitin and chitosan on haematology and innate immune response in Epinephelusbruneus against Philasteridesdicentrarchi. Experimental Parasitology, 131:116-124.
  • Huis, A.V. 2013. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annual Review of Entomology, 58: 563-583.
  • Hwangbo, J., Hong,, E.C., Jang, A., Kang, H.K., Oh, J.S., Kim, B.W., Park, B.S. 2009. Utilization of house fly-maggot, a feed supplement in the production of broiler chickens. Journal of Environmental Biology, 30:609-614.
  • Jozefiak, D., Engberg, R. M. 2015.Insect as poultry feed. 20th European symposium on Poultry Nutrition, 24-27 August, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Khempaka, S., Chitsatchapong, C., Molee, W.2011. Effect of chitin and protein constituents in shrimp head meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal microbial populations, volatile fatty acids, and ammonia production in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Resources, 20:1-11.
  • Makkar, H.P.S., Tran, G., Heuzé, V., Ankers, P. 2014. State of the art on use of insects as animal feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 197:1-33.
  • Munyuli Bin Mushambanyi, T., Balezi, N. 2002. Utilisation des blattes et des termites comme substituts potentiels de la farine de viande dans l’alimentation des poulets de chair au Sud-Kivu, République Démocratique du Congo. Tropicultura, 20: 10-16.
  • Pretorius, Q., 2011. The evaluation of larvae of Musca domestica (common house fly) as protein source for broiler production, Stellenbosch University, MSc Thesis, 95 p, Stellenboch, South Africa.
  • Ramos-Elorduy, J., González, E.A., Hernández, A.R., Pino, J.M. 2002. Use of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera : Tenebrionidae) to recycle organic wastes and as feed for broiler chickens. Journal of Economic Entomology, 95: 214-220.
  • Ratcliffe, N., Azambuja, P., Mello, C.B. 2014. Recent advances in developing insect natural products as potential modern day medicines. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alter. Medicine, pp:21-35 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/904958ID:904958: Erişim tarihi:1.2.2016).
  • Ravindran, V., Blair, R. 1993. Feed resources for poultry production in Asia and the Pacific. World’s Poulty Science Journal, 49: 219–235.
  • Rumpold ,B.A., Schlüter, O.K. 2013. Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, 57: 802-823 (DOI 10.1002/ mnfr.201200735).
  • Sanchez-Muros, M.J., Barroso, F.G., Manzano-Aguglıaro F. 2014. Insect meal as renewable source of food for animal feeding: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65: 16-27.
  • Téguia, A., Mpoam, M., Okourou, Mb J.A. 2002. The production performance of broiler birds as affected by the replacement of fish meal by maggot meal in the starter and finisher diets. Tropiculture, 20:187-192.
  • Tekeli, A. 2014. Hayvan beslemede alternatif bir protein kaynağı olarak böceklerin kullanımı. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 1: 531-538.
  • Türkiyem-Bir, 2012. Yem hammaddeleri besin değerleri. www. yem.org.tr. (Erişim tarihi 12 Mart 2014).
  • Veldkamp, T., Bosch, G. 2015. Insects: a protein-rich feed ingredient in pig and poultry diets. Animal Frontier, 5: 45-50.
  • Verbeke, W., Spranghers, T., De Clercq, P., De Smet, S., Sas, B., Eeckhout, M. 2015. Insects in animal feed: Acceptance and its determinants among farmers, agriculture sector stakeholders and citizens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 204: 72-87.
  • Wang, D., Zhai, S.W., Zhang, C.X., Bai, Y.Y., An, S.H. and Xu, Y.N. 2005. Evaluation on nutritional value of field crickets as a poultry feedstuff. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 18: 667-670.
  • Zuidhof, M.J., Molnar, C.L., Morley, F.M., Wray, T.L., Robinson, F.E., Khan, B.A., Al-Ani, L., Goonewar Dene, L.A. 2003: Nutritive value of house fly (Musca domestica) larvae as a feed supplement for turkey poults. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 105: 225-230.
Yıl 2016, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3, 272 - 278, 29.10.2016

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Agunbiade, J.A., Adeyemi, O.A., Ashiru, O.M., Awojobi, H.A., Taiwo, A.A., Oke, D.B., Adekunmisi, A. A. 2007. Replacement of fish meal with maggot meal in cassava based layers’ diets. Japanese Poultry Science, 44:278-282.
  • Amao, O.A., Oladunjoye, I.O., Togun, V.A., Olubajo, K. and Oyaniyi, O. 2010. Effects of westwood (Cirina forda) larva meal on the laying performance and egg characterisitics of laying hen in a tropical environment. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9: 450-454.
  • Anonymous, 2013. Edible insects future prospects for food and feed security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Insect as Animal Feed. pp:89-97.
  • Anonymous,2015. Alltech® global feed survey. http://www.alltech.com/sites/default/files/global-feed-survey-2015.pdf. (Erişim tarihi:01.03.2016).
  • Atteh, J.O., Ologbenla, F.D.1993. Replacement of fish meal with maggot in broiler diets: effects on performance and nutrient retention. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 20:44-49.
  • Awoniyi, T.A.M., Aletor V.A., Aina, J.M. 2003. Performance of broiler-chickens fed on maggot meal in place of fish meal. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2:271-274.
  • Bamgbose A.M. 1999. Utilization of maggot meal in cockerel diets. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 69:1056-1058.
  • Chiba, L.I. 2014. Animal Nutrition Handbook. Section 18: Diet formulation and feed ingredient. PP:481-531. Third Revision.
  • Finke, M.D. 2013. Complete nutrient content of four species of feeder insects. Zoo Biology, 32:27-36.
  • Harikrishnan, R., Kim J.S., Balasundaram, C., Heo M.S. 2012. Dietary supplementation with chitin and chitosan on haematology and innate immune response in Epinephelusbruneus against Philasteridesdicentrarchi. Experimental Parasitology, 131:116-124.
  • Huis, A.V. 2013. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annual Review of Entomology, 58: 563-583.
  • Hwangbo, J., Hong,, E.C., Jang, A., Kang, H.K., Oh, J.S., Kim, B.W., Park, B.S. 2009. Utilization of house fly-maggot, a feed supplement in the production of broiler chickens. Journal of Environmental Biology, 30:609-614.
  • Jozefiak, D., Engberg, R. M. 2015.Insect as poultry feed. 20th European symposium on Poultry Nutrition, 24-27 August, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Khempaka, S., Chitsatchapong, C., Molee, W.2011. Effect of chitin and protein constituents in shrimp head meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal microbial populations, volatile fatty acids, and ammonia production in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Resources, 20:1-11.
  • Makkar, H.P.S., Tran, G., Heuzé, V., Ankers, P. 2014. State of the art on use of insects as animal feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 197:1-33.
  • Munyuli Bin Mushambanyi, T., Balezi, N. 2002. Utilisation des blattes et des termites comme substituts potentiels de la farine de viande dans l’alimentation des poulets de chair au Sud-Kivu, République Démocratique du Congo. Tropicultura, 20: 10-16.
  • Pretorius, Q., 2011. The evaluation of larvae of Musca domestica (common house fly) as protein source for broiler production, Stellenbosch University, MSc Thesis, 95 p, Stellenboch, South Africa.
  • Ramos-Elorduy, J., González, E.A., Hernández, A.R., Pino, J.M. 2002. Use of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera : Tenebrionidae) to recycle organic wastes and as feed for broiler chickens. Journal of Economic Entomology, 95: 214-220.
  • Ratcliffe, N., Azambuja, P., Mello, C.B. 2014. Recent advances in developing insect natural products as potential modern day medicines. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alter. Medicine, pp:21-35 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/904958ID:904958: Erişim tarihi:1.2.2016).
  • Ravindran, V., Blair, R. 1993. Feed resources for poultry production in Asia and the Pacific. World’s Poulty Science Journal, 49: 219–235.
  • Rumpold ,B.A., Schlüter, O.K. 2013. Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, 57: 802-823 (DOI 10.1002/ mnfr.201200735).
  • Sanchez-Muros, M.J., Barroso, F.G., Manzano-Aguglıaro F. 2014. Insect meal as renewable source of food for animal feeding: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65: 16-27.
  • Téguia, A., Mpoam, M., Okourou, Mb J.A. 2002. The production performance of broiler birds as affected by the replacement of fish meal by maggot meal in the starter and finisher diets. Tropiculture, 20:187-192.
  • Tekeli, A. 2014. Hayvan beslemede alternatif bir protein kaynağı olarak böceklerin kullanımı. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 1: 531-538.
  • Türkiyem-Bir, 2012. Yem hammaddeleri besin değerleri. www. yem.org.tr. (Erişim tarihi 12 Mart 2014).
  • Veldkamp, T., Bosch, G. 2015. Insects: a protein-rich feed ingredient in pig and poultry diets. Animal Frontier, 5: 45-50.
  • Verbeke, W., Spranghers, T., De Clercq, P., De Smet, S., Sas, B., Eeckhout, M. 2015. Insects in animal feed: Acceptance and its determinants among farmers, agriculture sector stakeholders and citizens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 204: 72-87.
  • Wang, D., Zhai, S.W., Zhang, C.X., Bai, Y.Y., An, S.H. and Xu, Y.N. 2005. Evaluation on nutritional value of field crickets as a poultry feedstuff. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 18: 667-670.
  • Zuidhof, M.J., Molnar, C.L., Morley, F.M., Wray, T.L., Robinson, F.E., Khan, B.A., Al-Ani, L., Goonewar Dene, L.A. 2003: Nutritive value of house fly (Musca domestica) larvae as a feed supplement for turkey poults. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 105: 225-230.
Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Kasım Özek

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Ekim 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Özek, K. (2016). Böcek Kökenli Protein Kaynaklarının Yem Değeri Ve Kanatlıların Beslenmesinde Kullanılabilme Olanakları. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(3), 272-278.
AMA Özek K. Böcek Kökenli Protein Kaynaklarının Yem Değeri Ve Kanatlıların Beslenmesinde Kullanılabilme Olanakları. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi. Ekim 2016;19(3):272-278.
Chicago Özek, Kasım. “Böcek Kökenli Protein Kaynaklarının Yem Değeri Ve Kanatlıların Beslenmesinde Kullanılabilme Olanakları”. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 19, sy. 3 (Ekim 2016): 272-78.
EndNote Özek K (01 Ekim 2016) Böcek Kökenli Protein Kaynaklarının Yem Değeri Ve Kanatlıların Beslenmesinde Kullanılabilme Olanakları. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 19 3 272–278.
IEEE K. Özek, “Böcek Kökenli Protein Kaynaklarının Yem Değeri Ve Kanatlıların Beslenmesinde Kullanılabilme Olanakları”, KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 19, sy. 3, ss. 272–278, 2016.
ISNAD Özek, Kasım. “Böcek Kökenli Protein Kaynaklarının Yem Değeri Ve Kanatlıların Beslenmesinde Kullanılabilme Olanakları”. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 19/3 (Ekim 2016), 272-278.
JAMA Özek K. Böcek Kökenli Protein Kaynaklarının Yem Değeri Ve Kanatlıların Beslenmesinde Kullanılabilme Olanakları. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016;19:272–278.
MLA Özek, Kasım. “Böcek Kökenli Protein Kaynaklarının Yem Değeri Ve Kanatlıların Beslenmesinde Kullanılabilme Olanakları”. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 19, sy. 3, 2016, ss. 272-8.
Vancouver Özek K. Böcek Kökenli Protein Kaynaklarının Yem Değeri Ve Kanatlıların Beslenmesinde Kullanılabilme Olanakları. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016;19(3):272-8.