Türkiye'de Engelli Bireylere Yönelik Veri Toplama Sürecine Güncel Bir Bakış

Öz

Dünya ile paralel olarak Türkiye'de de sosyal politikaların arttığı görülmekte ve dezavantajlı gruplara ilişkin data toplama süreci önemli hale gelmektedir. Toplumun azımsanmayacak bir parçasını oluşturan ve yaşadığı sorunlar açısından sosyal politikaya en fazla ihtiyaç duyan gruplar arasında yer alan engelli bireylere yönelik data toplama sürecinin değerlendirilmesi, hem ihtiyaçların tespitinin sağlıklı bir şekilde yapılması hem de sosyal politikaların etkililiğinin doğru bir şekilde tespit edilmesi açısından büyük bir öneme sahiptir. Dolayısıyla, bu makale Türkiye'de engelli bireylere ilişkin veri toplama sürecinin var olan literatür ve güncel gelişmeler ışığında incelenmesini amaçlamaktadır. Her yıl Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı tarafından düzenli olarak toplanan veriler ile güncelleştirilerek geniş bir içerikle sunulan Engelli ve Yaşlı İstatistik Bülteni engelli bireylere yönelik var olan durumun betimlenmesinde önemli görülmektedir. Eğitim ve istihdam gibi en temel alanlarda spesifik verilerin dahil edildiği istatistik bültenleri sosyal politikalar açısından elzemdir. Bu makalede Türkiye'de engellilere yönelik veri toplama süreci, politika önerileri ve çıkarımlar açısından tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Engellilik
• Veri toplama
• Sosyal politika
• Dezavantajlı gruplar

A Current View of Data Collection on People With Disabilities in Türkiye

Öz

Social policies are increasing worldwide, and collecting data on disadvantaged groups is becoming critical. Evaluating the data collection process for people with disabilities (PWD), who constitute a significant part of society, is critical in terms of both identifying their needs healthily and determining the effectiveness of social policies accurately. Therefore, this article aims to examine the data collection process regarding PWD in Türkiye in the light of existing literature and current developments. Disability and Aging Statistical Bulletin, which is updated with data regularly collected by the Ministry of Family and Social Services every year and presented with comprehensive content, is considered important in describing the current situation for PWD. Statistical bulletins, which include specific data in the most basic areas, such as education and employment, are essential for social policies. This article discusses the data collection process for PWD in Türkiye, including policy recommendations and implications.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Disability
• Data collection
• Social policy
• Disadvantaged groups

Kaynakça

1. Akter, S. (2012). The role of microinsurance as a safety net against environmental risks in Bangladesh. The Journal of Environment & Development, 21(2), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496512442505
2. Alexiadou, E. A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Disability Employment: Incorporating a Human Rights Approach. In Law and Artificial Intelligence: Regulating AI and Applying AI in Legal Practice (pp. 135-148). The Hague: TMC Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-523-2_7
3. Banks, L. M., Eide, A. H., Hunt, X., Abu Alghaib, O., & Shakespeare, T. (2024). How representative are organisations of persons with disabilities? Data from nine population-based surveys in low-and middle-income countries. Disability & Society, 39(10), 2511-2527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2023.2215397
4. Bulut, F. (2020). Engellilere yönelik yerel yönetim çalişmalari: Ümraniye Belediyesi Örneği. Akademik Matbuat, 4(2), 41-60. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/matbuat/issue/58410/802837
5. Çakır, H. (2021). Engelli kadin istihdami: İşkur aktif istihdam politikalari üzerine bir analiz. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 8(16), 151-173. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/akademik-hassasiyetler/issue/64679/940756
6. Çevik, C., & Özkul, B. (2022). Çalışma yaşamında dezavantajlı gruplar ve eşitsizlikler. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(3), 611-618. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ikcusbfd/issue/72902/1016794
7. Conte, C. (2020). Disability in EU asylum law. In Research Handbook on EU Disability Law (pp. 359-377). Edward Elgar Publishing.
8. Cunningham, S., Russell, A. M., Lidington, E., & Shiely, F. (2025). Lack of data collection in clinical trials prevents us from evaluating inclusion of people with disabilities. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 111715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111715

9. Daly, P., & Whelan, D. (2021). Disability in employment equality law: A reappraisal of the reasonable accommodation duty and issues arising in its implementation. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 28(6), 744-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X211035268
10. Ditchman, N., Kosyluk, K., Lee, E. J., & Jones, N. (2016). How stigma affects the lives of people with intellectual disabilities: An overview. Intellectual disability and stigma: Stepping out from the margins, 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52499-7_3
11. Durğun, A., & Merde, E. (2023). Türkiye'de yaşlılara yönelik sosyal politika ve sosyal hizmet analizi. Sosyal ve Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi (SKAD), 9(18), 38-62. https://doi.org/10.25306/skad.1265458
12. Geiger, B. B., Van Der Wel, K. A., & Tøge, A. G. (2017). Success and failure in narrowing the disability employment gap: comparing levels and trends across Europe 2002–2014. BMC public health, 17, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4938-8
13. Gołata, E. (2021). Labour market inequalities across disability statuses, sex and age. Wiadomości Statystyczne. The Polish Statistician, 66(11), 1-26. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=999079
14. Jansen-van Vuuren, J., & Aldersey, H. M. (2020). Stigma, acceptance and belonging for people with IDD across cultures. Current developmental disorders reports, 7, 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-020-00206-w
15. Khan, N., Korac‐Kakabadse, N., Skouloudis, A., & Dimopoulos, A. (2019). Diversity in the workplace: An overview of disability employment disclosures among UK firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1669
16. Lejeune, A. (2023). Fighting for sheltered workshops or for inclusive workplaces? Trade unions pursuing disability rights in Belgium. Disability & Society, 38(2), 228-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1921702
17. Lysaght, R., Šiška, J., & Koenig, O. (2015). International employment statistics for people with intellectual disability—The case for common metrics. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 12(2), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12113
18. Magrin, M. E., Marini, E., & Nicolotti, M. (2019). Employability of disabled graduates: Resources for a sustainable employment. Sustainability, 11(6), 1542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061542
19. Ministry of Family and Social Services. (2023, April). Disability and Ageing Statistical Bulletin. Retrieved from: https://aile.gov.tr/media/135432/eyhgm_istatistik_bulteni_nisan_23.pdf
20. Ministry of Family and Social Services. (2025). Publication/Source. Retrieved from: https://www.aile.tr/eyhgm-en/yayin-kaynak/
21. Mitra, S., Chen, W., Hervé, J., Pirozzi, S., & Yap, J. (2022). Invisible or mainstream? Disability in surveys and censuses in low-and middle-income countries. Social Indicators Research, 163(1), 219-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02879-9
22. Priestley, M., & Grammenos, S. (2021). How useful are equality indicators? The expressive function of ‘stat imperfecta’in disability rights advocacy. Evidence & Policy, 17(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16141001670976
23. Revillard, A. (2023). The disability employment quota, between social policy and antidiscrimination. Global social policy, 23(1), 92-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181221138558
24. Sciulli, D., de Menezes, A. G., & Vieira, J. C. (2012). Unemployment duration and disability: evidence from Portugal. Journal of labor research, 33, 21-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-011-9120-y
25. Smythe, T., Adelson, J. D., & Polack, S. (2020). Systematic review of interventions for reducing stigma experienced by children with disabilities and their families in low‐and middle‐income countries: State of the evidence. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 25(5), 508-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13388
26. Şen, M. (2018). Türkiye’de engellilere yönelik istihdam politikaları: sorunlar ve öneriler. Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi, 8(2), 129-152. https://doi.org/10.32331/sgd.493016
27. Urvaylıoğlu, A. E., & Gedik, E. (2021). Investigation of the social policies in terms of elderly health. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 8(16), 265-282. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/akademik-hassasiyetler/issue/64679/950377
28. Van der Zwan, R., & de Beer, P. (2021). The disability employment gap in European countries: What is the role of labour market policy?. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(4), 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287211002435
29. Vornholt, K., Villotti, P., Muschalla, B., Bauer, J., Colella, A., Zijlstra, F. & Corbière, M. (2018). Disability and employment–overview and highlights. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 27(1), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1387536
30. Waltz, M., & Schippers, A. (2021). Politically disabled: barriers and facilitating factors affecting people with disabilities in political life within the European Union. Disability & Society, 36(4), 517-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1751075