Tıp Fakültesi 5. ve 6. Sınıf Öğrencilerinde Flört Şiddetinin Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2018, , 168 - 174, 15.08.2018

Bilgehan Açıkgöz Banu Açıkgöz Ali Rıza Karakoyun Nehir Aslan Yüksel Fatih Akca Ayşe Semra Demir Akca , Ferruh Niyazi Ayoğlu

https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.285138

Cited By: 6

Abstract

Giriş:

Şiddet, yaşamımızın gerçeklerinden
biridir ve en önemli sosyal sorunların başında gelmektedir. Şiddet fiziksel,
cinsel veya duygusal özellikte olabilmektedir. Şiddet, flört ilişkisinde
tecavüz, dövme, tehdit etme, cinsel taciz ve duygusal kötüye kullanma gibi
farklı şekillerde gerçekleşebilir.  Flört
şiddeti de üzerinde yeterince araştırılma yapılmamış bir alandır. Bu çalışmada
Tıp Fakültesi 5. ve 6. sınıf öğrencileri arasında flört şiddetinin sıklığı ve
türünün belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.

Gereç:

Tanımlayıcı
özellikteki bu araştırmada; Mayıs-Haziran 2014 tarihleri arasında Bülent Ecevit
Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi’nde öğrenim gören dönem 5 ve 6 sınıf öğrencisi 105
kişiden çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 88(%83,8)’inde yapılmıştır.
Araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan anket formuyla öğrencilerin
sosyo-demografik özellikleri, flört içinde şiddet uygulama ve maruz kalma
durumları sorgulanmıştır.

Bulgular:

Çalışmaya katılan 88 kişinin yaş ortancası 24 yıl ve
33(%37,5)’ü erkektir. Öğrencilerin 69 (%78.4)’unun daha önce veya şimdi flört
ilişkisi olmuştur. İlk flört yaş ortancası 17 (min:10, max:24)’dir. Daha önce
flört yaşayanların 15(%22)’i flört şiddetine maruz kalmamış ve
uygulamamıştır. Fiziksel 10(% 14,7)’u, 51(%75.0)’i duygusal, 9(%13.2)’u cinsel
flört şiddetine maruz kalmıştır. Şiddet uygulayanların ise 16(%20,6)’sı
fiziksel, 45(%66,2)’i duygusal, 5(%7,4)’i cinsel şiddet uygulamıştır. En sık maruz kalınan (%33,0) ve uygulanan (%28,4) şiddet
şekli ise sesini yükselterek konuşmadır.

Sonuç:

Bu çalışmada en sık uygulanan ve maruz kalınan şiddet şeklinin
partnerine karşı sesini yükseltmek, en sık görülen şiddet tipinin duygusal
şiddet olduğu belirlenmiştir.  Şiddet ve
şiddeti etkileyen faktörlerin ortaya konulabilmesi için daha detaylı, uzun
süreli ve değişik gruplarda yapılan çalışmalara gereksinim vardır ve şiddetin
niteliksel ve niceliksel boyutunun birlikte değerlendirilmesi gerekmektedir. 

Keywords

Flört, şiddet, tıp öğrencisi

Evaluation of Violence in Flirtous Relationships among 5th and 6th Grade Students in a Faculty of Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Violence is one of the
realities  of  life , and 
it  is one of the most important
social problems in  life. Violence can be
physical, sexual or emotional. Violence
can occur in different ways in flirt affairs, such as rape, beat , threat,
sexual harassment, and abuse of emotion. There has not been enough
research  carried out  on the violence of flirt. In this study, it
was aimed to determine the frequency and type of  the violence of  flirt among 
5th and 6th grade students of faculty of medicine.

 

Material:

This 
descriptive study  was  carried out with  105 
(83.8%) 5th and 6th grade students, studying at Faculty of Medicine
of  Bulent Ecevit University , accepted
to participate in the study, between May and June 2014.With the questionnaire
form prepared by  the researchers, the
socio-demographic characteristics of the students, their conditions of
committing   violence and being  exposed  
to violence were questioned.

 

Findings :

The median age of 88 students  ,participated in the study, is 24 years, and
33 (37.5%)  of those are male. 69 (78.4%) of these 
students  either   previously 
flirted  or were  flirting at that moment . The median age of first flirts  is 17 (min: 10, max: 24). 15 (22%) of those who flirted previously weren’t  exposed   to violence and didn’t
commit violence.  10 (% 14,7) of the
students were exposed to  physical
violence of flirt, 51 (75,0%) of those were
exposed to  emotional violence of
flirt, and 9 (13,2%) of those were exposed to sexual violence of flirt.
Regarding the students who committed violence of flirt;  16 (20.6%) of those committed physical
violence, 45 (66.2%) of those committed emotional violence, 5 (7.4%) of those
committed sexual violence. The violence of flirt, most frequently being   exposed (33.0%) and committed (28.4%), is to
talk by raising voice.

 

Conclusion:

It was determined in this study that
raising  voice against  partner is the  most frequently being exposed violence
of flirt; and emotional violence  is  the
most frequently committed violence of flirt. Studies ,more detailed,
long-term, and with different  groups,
are required to be  performed in order to
identify violence  and  the factors that affect violence , and the
qualitative and quantitative dimension of violence must be evaluated together.

Keywords

Flirt, violence, medical students

References

• 1. World Report on Violence and Health, Genava, World Health Organization, 2002 :9-10.
• 2. Prothrow-Stith D. A major step forward in violence prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(2): 109-11.
• 3. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, et al; WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women Study Team. Lancet. 2006;368 :1260-9.
• 4. Güler Ç, Akın L, Halk Sağlığı Temel Bilgiler 2.baskı. 3. Cilt Hacettepe Yayınları 2012;1841.
• 5. 8. Ulusal Halk Sağlığı Kongre Kitabı II, 1. Baskı Dicle Üniversitesi Basımevi, Bir grup üniversite öğrencisinin “Flört şiddeti” konusundaki görüşleri 2002;757.
• 6. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, National Institute of Justice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Washington, DC 2000.
• 7. Makin-Byrd KN. Developmental model of partner vıolence: a longıtudınal study. Pennsylvania State University, The Graduate School Department of Psychology, Pensilvanya, 2009.
• 8. Hatipoğlu U.S Başkent Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinde Flört Şiddeti Prevalansı Anketi Uzmanlık Tezi Ankara, 2010.
• 9. Malik S, Sorenson S, Aneshensel C. Community and dating violence among adeloscents: Perpetration and victimization Journal of Adeloscent Health 1997;21: 291-302.
• 10. Halpern C, Spriggs A, Martin S, et al. Patterns of intimate partner violence victimization from adolescence to young adulthood in a nationally representative sample, Journal of Adolescent Health 2009;45:508–516.
• 11. Leary K, Slep AS, Avery-Leaf S,et al. Gender differences in dating aggression among multiethnic high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2008: 42:473–479.
• 12. Straus MA. Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 2008, 30:252–275.
• 13. Sanderson M, Coker AL, Roberts RE, et al. Acculturation, ethnic identity and dating violence among Latino ninth-grade students, Preventive Medicine 2004:39:373–383.
• 14. Rivera-Rivera L, Allen-Leigh B, Rodríguez-Ortega G, et al. Prevalence and correlates of adolescent dating violence: Baseline study of a cohort of 7960 male and female Mexican public school students, Preventive Medicine, 2007: 44: 477–484.
• 15. Schiff M, Zeira A. Dating violence and sexual risk behaviors in a sample of at-risk Israeli youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2005:29:1249–1263.
• 16. Ackarda DM, Neumark-Sztainerb D. Date violence and date rape among adolescents: associations with disordered eating behaviors and psychological health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2002: 26:455–473.
• 17. Muñoz-Rivas M, J. Graña, K. O’Leary, et al. Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: prevalence, justification, and health consequences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2007:40: 298–304.
• 18. Saewyc EM, Brown D, Plane M, et al. Gender Differences in Violence Exposure among University Students Attending Campus Health Clinics in the United States and Canada. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2009: 45 (6);587-594.
• 19. Coker AL. Severe dating violence and quality of life among south carolina high school students. Am J Prev Med, 2000: 19(4); 220-227.
• 20. Howard D, Qıu YBS, Boekeloo B. Personal and social contextual correlates of adolescent dating violence. Journal Of Adolescent Health 2003:33;9–17.
• 21. Gover AR. Risky lifestyles and dating violence: A theoretical test of violent victimization. Journal of Criminal Justice 2004: 32(2);171– 180.
• 22. Foshee VA, Benefield Ennett ST, Bauman KE, et al. Longitudinal predictors of serious physical and sexual dating violence victimization during adolescence. Preventive Medicine, 2004:39;1007–1016.
• 23. Wekerle C, Wolfe DA. Dating violence in mid-adolescence: theory, significance, and emerging prevention initiatives. Clinical Psychology Review 1999:19(4) ; 435–456.
• 24. Ernst AA, Weiss SJ, Hall J, et al. Adult intimate partner violence perpetrators are significantly more likely to have witnessed intimate partner violence as a child than nonperpetrators. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2009:27;641–650.
• 25. Foshee VA, Linder F, MacDougall JE, et al. Gender differences in the longitudinal predictors of adolescent dating violence, Preventive Medicine. 2001:32;128–141.
• 26. Moorea TM, Stuart GL. A review of the literature on marijuana and interpersonal violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2005:10;171–192.
• 27. Rickert VI. Vaughan RD, Constance MW. Adolescent dating violence and date rape. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2002:14:495-500.