Duygusal Yaratıcılık Ölçeği: Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanması

Öz

Bu çalışmada Duygusal Yaratıcılık Ölçeği'nin Türkiye'deki geçerlilik ve güvenirliği incelenmiştir. ‘‘Duygusal Yaratıcılık Ölçeği” üç alt boyuttan, otuz maddeden ve beşli Likert ölçeğinden oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması sürecine başlamadan önce, ilk olarak sorumlu yazardan e-posta yoluyla izin talep edilmiştir. Ölçek için gerekli izin alındıktan sonra, beş ayrı uzman orijinal ölçek maddelerini İngilizceden Türkçeye çevirmiştir. Daha sonra doktora öğrencilerinden oluşan bir panel ile çeviri süreci devam etmiştir. Daha sonra iki uzman Türkçe formu tekrar İngilizceye çevirmiş ve maddelerin dilsel açıdan anlaşılabilirliğini değerlendirmek üzere otuz katılımcının yer aldığı bir pilot çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bir dil uzmanının yardımı ve pilot çalışmadan elde edilen girdilerle nihai Türkçe form oluşturulmuştur. Türkçe formun son hali, bir Türk dili uzmanının yardımı ve pilot çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlarla hazırlanmıştır. Ölçeğin Türkçe geçerliğini değerlendirmek için yapısal eşitlik modelinin doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmış, güvenirliğini test etmek amacıyla iç tutarlılık katsayısı değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik değerlerine göre ölçeğin Türk kültürüne uygun olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Duygusal yaratıcılık
• duygu
• ölçek uyarlama

Emotional Creativity Inventory: Adaptation to Turkish Culture

Öz

This study examined the validity and reliability of the Emotional Creativity Scale in Turkey. ''Emotional Creativity Scale'' consists of three sub-dimensions, thirty items and a five-point Likert scale. Before starting the process of adapting the scale to Turkish culture, permission was first requested from the corresponding author via e-mail. After obtaining the necessary permission for the scale, five different experts translated the original scale items from English to Turkish. Then, the translation process continued with a panel of doctoral students. Two experts then translated the Turkish form back into English and a pilot study was conducted with thirty participants to assess the linguistic comprehensibility of the items. With the help of a language expert and input from the pilot study, the final Turkish form was created. The final Turkish form was prepared with the help of a Turkish language expert and the results obtained from the pilot study. Confirmatory factor analysis of the structural equation model was applied to assess the Turkish validity of the scale, and internal consistency coefficient values were calculated to test its reliability. According to the reliability and validity values, it was concluded that the scale is suitable for Turkish culture.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Emotional creativity
• emotion
• scale adaptation

Kaynakça

1. Abduqodirova, D., & Pardaboyeva, M. (2024). The role of emotional creativity in students' decision-making. In Internatıonal Conference of Natural and Social-Humanitarian Sciences 1(7), 27-30.
2. Abraham, A. (2013). The promises and perils of the neuroscience of creativity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00246
3. Ahmadi, F., Ahmadi, J., & Delshad, R. (2015). The relationship between emotional and cognitive creativity and metacognitive skill. GMP Review, 18(1), 456-461.
4. Alabedi, N. (2017). The emotional creativity and orientation towards life for university’s students [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. AL-Qadisiya University.
5. Averill, J. R. (1999). Individual differences in emotional creativity: Structure and correlates. Journal of Personality, 67(2), 331-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00058
6. Averill, J. R. (2005). Emotions as mediators and as products of creative activity. In Creativity Across Domains (pp. 243-262). Psychology Press.
7. Averill, J. R., & Thomas-Knowles, C. (2005). Emotional creativity. Handbook of Positive Psychology, 172-185.
8. Bakhtiyari K., Alizadeh H., & Rezaee O. (2014). Investigation of relationship between “cognitive creativity and emotional intelligence” and “personality dimensions and academic success” in high school teachers. Reef Resources Assessment and Management Technical Paper, 40, 81–991.

9. Banich, M. T., Mackiewicz, K. L., Depue, B. E., Whitmer, A. J., Miller, G. A., & Heller, W. (2009). Cognitive control mechanisms, emotion and memory: A neural perspective with implications for psychopathology. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(5), 613-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.010
10. Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modeling adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
11. Blanchard-Fields, F. (2007). Everyday problem solving and emotion: An adult developmental perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00469.x
12. Blanchard-Fields, F. (2009). Flexible and adaptive socio-emotional problem solving in adult development and aging. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 27(5), 539-550. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-2009-0516
13. Blatný, M., Květon, P., Jelínek, M., Šolcová, I., Zábrodská, K., Mudrák, J., & Machovcová, K. (2018). The influence of personality traits on life satisfaction through work engagement and job satisfaction among academic faculty members. Studia Psychologica, 60(4), 274-286. https://doi.org/10.21909/sp.2018.04.767
14. Bledow, R., Rosing, K., & Frese, M. (2013). A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 432-450. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0894
15. Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034272
16. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2021). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. Pegem.
17. Cábelková, Strielkowski, Rybakova ve Molchanova, 2020. Čábelková, I., Strielkowski, W., Rybakova, A., & Molchanovа, A. (2020). Does playing video games increase emotional creativity?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2177. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072177
18. Coltheart, M. (2016). Cognitive neuropsychology and the study of reading. In Attention and performance XI (pp. 3-37). Routledge.
19. Carmeli A., McKay A. S., & Kaufman J. C. (2014). Emotional intelligence and creativity: The mediating role of generosity and vigor. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 290–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jocb.53
20. De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Baas, M. (2011). Group creativity and innovation: A motivated information processing perspective. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017986
21. Fuchs, G. L., Kumar, V. K., & Porter, J. (2007). Emotional creativity, alexithymia, and styles of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701397313
22. Frolova, S. V., & Novoselova, K. I. (2015). Emotional creativity as a factor of individual and family psychological wellbeing. International Annual Edition of Applied Psychology: Theory, Research, and Practice, (2), 30-43. Gutbezahl, J., & Averill, J. R. (1996). Individual differences in emotional creativity as manifested in words and pictures. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0904_4
23. Hopp, H., Troy, A. S., & Mauss, I. B. (2011). The unconscious pursuit of emotion regulation: Implications for psychological health. Cognition and Emotion, 25(3), 532-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.532606
24. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
25. Ivcevic, Z., Brackett, M. A., & Mayer, J. D. (2007). Emotional intelligence and emotional creativity. Journal of Personality, 75(2), 199-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00437.x
26. Joormann, J., & Quinn, M. E. (2014). Cognitive processes and emotion regulation in depression. Depression and Anxiety, 31(4), 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22264
27. Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1
28. King, L. A., & Emmons, R. A. (1990). Conflict over emotional expression: Psychological and physical correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.864
29. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
30. Kuška, M., Trnka, R., Mana, J., & Nikolai, T. (2020). Emotional creativity: A meta-analysis and integrative review. Creativity Research Journal, 32(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1751541
31. Kuzucu, Y. (2006). Duyguları fark etmeye ve ifade etmeye yönelik bir psiko-eğitim programının, üniversite öğrencilerinin duygusal farkındalık düzeylerine, duyguları ifade etme eğilimlerine, psikolojik ve öznel iyi oluşlarına etkisi. (Yayın No. 205150) [Doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
32. Limonero, J. T., Tomás-Sábado, J., & Fernández-Castro, J. (2012). Resilient coping strategies and emotion regulation: Predictors of life satisfaction. Behavioral Psychology, 20(1), 183-189.
33. Malhotra, R. K. (2013). Sample size considerations for diagnostic tests: Application to sensitivity and specificity. Methods of Clinical Epidemiology, 79-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37131-8_7
34. Marcoulides, G. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (Eds.). (2001). New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601858
35. Martsksvishvili, K., Abuladze, N., Sordia, N., & Neubauer, A. (2017). Emotional creativity inventory: Factor structure, reliability and validity in a georgian-speaking population. Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century, 11(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.33225/ppc/17.11.31
36. Moltafet, G., Sadati Firoozabadi, S. S., & Pour-Raisi, A. (2018). Parenting style, basic psychological needs, and emotional creativity: A path analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1446748
37. Morgan, E. S., & Scheibe, S. (2014). Reconciling cog- nitive decline and increased well-being with age: The role of increased emotion regulation efficiency. In P. Verhaeghen & C. Hertzog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of emotion, social cognition, and everyday problem solving during adulthood (pp. 155– 171). Oxford University Press.
38. Oriol, X., Amutio, A., Mendoza, M., Da Costa, S., & Miranda, R. (2016). Emotional creativity as predictor of intrinsic motivation and academic engagement in university students: The mediating role of positive emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01243
39. Phelps, E. A. (2006). Emotion and cognition: insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57(1), 27-53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070234
40. Roberts, R. D., Schulze, R., O'Brien, K., MacCann, C., Reid, J., & Maul, A. (2006). Exploring the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) with established emotions measures. Emotion, 6(4), 663. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.663
41. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
42. Salovey, P., Woolery, A., & Mayer, J. D. (2001). Emotional intelligence: Conceptualization and measurement. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal Processes, 279-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998557.ch11
43. Soroa, G., Balluerka, N., Hommel, B., & Aritzeta, A. (2015). Assessing interactions between cognition, emotion, and motivation in creativity: The construction and validation of EDICOS. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.05.002
44. Scheibe, S., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Emotional aging: Recent findings and future trends. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp132
45. Schutte, N. S., Manes, R. R., & Malouff, J. M. (2009). Antecedent-focused emotion regulation, response modulation and well-being. Current Psychology, 28, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-009-9044-3
46. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). Pearson. Tavşancıl E (2006). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (3. Basım). Nobel.
47. Trnka, R. (2023). Emotional creativity: Emotional experience as creative product. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Emotions (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 321-339). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031240.022
48. Trnka, R., Zahradnik, M., & Kuška, M. (2016). Emotional creativity and real-life involvement in different types of creative leisure activities. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 348-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195653
49. Urry, H. L., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Emotion regulation in older age. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388395
50. Vater, A., & Schröder–Abé, M. (2015). Explaining the link between personality and relationship satisfaction: Emotion regulation and interpersonal behaviour in conflict discussions. European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1993
51. Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
52. Zenasni, F., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical study. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01080.x