Zihin Kuramı ile Çalışma Belleği Arasındaki İlişkide Üstbilişin Aracı Rolü

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırmada, zihin kuramı ile çalışma belleği arasındaki ilişkide üstbilişin aracı rolü incelenmiştir. Yöntem: Araştırmanın bağımsız değişkeni çalışma belleği; bağımlı değişkeni zihin kuramı, aracı değişkeni ise üstbiliştir. Araştırma genel tarama modeli ile Konya il merkezinde bulunan, 5 yaş grubunda olan ve Millî Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı bağımsız anaokuluna devam eden 300 çocuk ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak Genel Bilgi Formu, Üstbilişsel Bilgi Görüşme Formu (McKI), Zihin Kuramı Görev Bataryası (TOMTB) ve Çalışma Belleği Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Verilerin analizinde ölçümler arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiş Üstbilişsel Bilgi Görüşme Formu (McKI) ile Zihin Kuramı Görev Bataryası (TOMTB); Çalışma Belleği Ölçeği ile Zihin Kuramı Görev Bataryası (TOMTB); Çalışma Belleği Ölçeği ile Üstbilişsel Bilgi Görüşme Formu (McKI) puanı arasında pozitif yönlü istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki olduğu görülmüştür (p<0.05). Aracı model kurulduğunda, zihin kuramının çalışma belleği üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı etkisi olmadığı; üstbilişin çalışma belleği üzerinde pozitif yönlü anlamlı etkisi olduğu; zihin kuramı ve üstbilişin çalışma belleği puanlarındaki değişimi anlamlı şekilde açıkladığı görülmektedir. Sonuç:Bu sonuçlar zihin kuramının, üstbiliş yoluyla çalışma belleği üzerinde anlamlı etkisinin olduğu yönündeki temel hipotezi desteklemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Üstbiliş
• Çalışma Belleği
• Zihin Kuramı

The Mediating Role of Metacognition in the Relationship between the Theory of Mind and Working Memory

Öz

Objective: In this study, the mediating role of metacognition in the relationship between ToM and working memory was examined. Methods: The independent variable of the study is working memory, the dependent variable is ToM, and the mediating variable is metacognition. The study was conducted using a general survey model with 300 children in the age group of 5 years who attend an independent kindergarten affiliated with the Ministry of National Education in Konya city center. General Information Form, Metacognitive Knowledge Interview Form (McKI), Theory of Mind Task Battery (TOMTB), and Working Memory Scale were used as data collection tools. Results: In the analysis of the data, the relationships between the measurements were examined. It was seen that there was a statistically significant positive relationship between the scores of the Metacognitive Knowledge Interview Form (McKI) and the Theory of Mind Task Battery (TOMTB); between the Working Memory Scale and the Theory of Mind Task Battery (TOMTB); and between the Working Memory Scale and the Metacognitive Knowledge Interview Form (McKI) (p<0.05). When the mediation model was established, it was seen that the theory of mind had no statistically significant effect on working memory; metacognition had a significant positive effect on working memory; and theory of mind and metacognition significantly explained the change in working memory scores. Conclusion: These results support the main hypothesis that the theory of mind has a significant effect on working memory through metacognition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Metacognition
• Working Memory
• Theory Of Mind

Kaynakça

1. Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009). Studies of adults can inform accounts of theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014098
2. Aydın, U., & Özgeldi, M. (2019). Unpacking the roles of metacognition and theory of mind in turkish undergraduate students’ academic achievement: A test of two mediation models. Croatian Journal of Education, 21(4), 1333-1365. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v21i4.3303
3. Bensalah, L., Caillies, S., & Anduze, M. (2016). Links among cognitive empathy, theory of mind, and affective perspective taking by young children. The Journal Of Genetic Psychology, 177(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2015.1106438
4. Capodieci, A., Re, A. M., Fracca, A., Borella, E., & Carretti, B. (2019). The efficacy of a training that combines activities on working memory and metacognition: Transfer and maintenance effects in children with ADHD and typical development. Journal Of Clinical And Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(10), 1074-1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2019.1651827
5. Carruthers, P. (2014). Two concepts of metacognition. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128(2), 138–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033877
6. Cornoldi, C., Carretti, B., Drusi, S., & Tencati, C. (2015). Improving problem solving in primary school students: The effect of a training programme focusing on metacognition and working memory. British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12083
7. Cowan, N. (2014). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 197-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9246-y
8. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

9. Dörr, L., & Perels, F. (2019). Improving metacognitive abilities as an important prerequisite for self-regulated learning in preschool children. International Electronic Journal Of Elementary Education, 11(5), 449-459. https://doi.org/10.26822/İejee.2019553341
10. Ergül, C., Çağla, Ö.Y., & Ergül, D. (2018). The validity and reliability of the working memory scale developed for 5-10 age group children. Theory and Practice in Education, 14(2), 187-214. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.427280
11. Fritz, M.S., & MacKinnon, D.P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
12. Gordon, A. C., & Olson, D. R. (1998). The relation between acquisition of a theory of mind and the capacity to hold in mind. Journal Of Experimental Child Psychology, 68(1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1997.2423
13. He, J., Guo, D., Zhai, S., Shen, M., & Gao, Z. (2019). Development of social working memory in preschoolers and its relation to theory of mind. Child Development, 90(4), 1319-1332. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13025
14. Hutchins, T., & Prelock, P. (2010). Technical Manual For The Theory Of Mind Task Battery.
15. Jahromi, L. B. , & Stifter, C. A. (2008). Individual differences in preschoolers' self-regulation and theory of mind. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54(1), 125-150. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2008.0007
16. Jena, A. K., Das, J., Bhattacharjee, S., Gupta, S., Barman, M., Devi, J., & Debnath, R. (2019). Cognitive development of children in relation to inhibition control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. Journal on Educational Psychology, 3(2), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.13.2.16100
17. Keleş Ertürk, C., & Tepeli, K. (2023a). Validity and reliability study of metacognitive knowledge interview form (MCKI) for 3–5 year children. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 10(4). 2480-2493.
18. Keleş Ertürk, C., & Tepeli, K. (2023b). Validity and reliability of Theory Of Mind Task Battery (TOMTB) for 3-5 year old children. International Journal of Anatolian Social Sciences, 7(3), 627-639. https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.1322818
19. Kim, H.-Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 37(44). https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
20. Kontos, S., & Nicholas, J. G. (1986). Independent problem solving in the development of metacognition. The Journal Of Genetic Psychology : Research And Theory On Human Development, 147(4), 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1986.9914524
21. Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions In Psychological Science, 9(5), 178-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00088
22. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2007). Knowledge about the mind: Links between theory of mind and later metamemory. Child Development, 78(1), 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00990.x
23. MacKinnon, D.P., Cheong, J., & Pirlott, A.G. (2012). Statistical mediation analysis. H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K.J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, vol. 2. research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp.313–331). Washington DC, USA: American Psychological Association, https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-018
24. Marulis, L. M., Palincsar, A. S., Berhenke, A. L., & Whitebread, D. (2016). Assessing metacognitive knowledge ın 3–5 year olds: The development of a Metacognitive Knowledge Interview (McKI). Metacognition And Learning, 11(3), 339-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9157-7
25. McElwain N.L, Ravindran N., Emery H.T., & Swartz R. (2019). Theory of mind as a mechanism linking mother–toddler relationship quality and child–friend interaction during the preschool years. Social Development. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12377
26. McNamara, D. S., & Scott, J. L. (2001). Working memory capacity and strategy use. Memory & Cognition, 29, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195736
27. Mohamed, A. H. H. (2012). The relationship between metacognition and self-regulation in young children. Procedia-Social And Behavioral Sciences, 69, 477-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Sbspro.2012.11.436
28. Muris, P., Mayer, B., Vermeulen, L., & Hiemstra, H. (2007). Theory-of-mind, cognitive development, and children's interpretation of anxiety-related physical symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2121-2132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.02.014
29. Oberauer, K.(2005). Executive Functions, working memory, verbal ability, and theory of mind— does ıt all come together? W. Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler, & B. Sodian (Eds.), Young children’s cognitive development interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability, and theory of mind (pp.285-299). New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (ISBN 0-8058-4906-8).
30. Ochilova, V. R. (2021). Metacognition and its history. Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 1(3), 18-44. https://doi.org/10.37547/social-fsshj-01-03-04
31. Pack, Y. H., Choi, N. Y., & Kim, B. (2023). Impact of cognitive load and working memory on preschoolers’ learning effectiveness. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09898-2
32. Perner, J., & Lang, B. (1999). Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01362-5
33. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
34. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
35. Qin, X. (2024). Sample size and power calculations for causal medication analysis: A tutorial and Shiny App. Behavior Research Methods, 56, 1738–1769. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02118-0
36. Rivero-Contreras, M., Saldana, D., & Micai, M. (2023). An introduction to theory of mind: Fundamental concepts and issues.T. Lopez-Soto, A.Garcia-Lopez, F.J. Salguero-Lamillar (Eds.), The theory of mind under scrutiny psychopathology, neuroscience, philosophy of mind and artificial intelligence (pp.11-33). Cham: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46742-4
37. Sato, M. (2022). Metacognition. S.Li, P. Hiver, M.Papi (Eds.). The routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 95-110). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546-8 Simms, N.K., Frausel, R.R., Richland, L. E. (2018). Working memory predicts children's analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 160-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.005
38. Sodian, B. (2005). Theory of mind—The case for conceptual development. W.Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler, B. Sodian (Eds.). Young children’s cognitive development interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability, and theory of mind (pp. 95-130). New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (ISBN 0-8058-4906-8).
39. Symeonidou, M., Mizokawa, A., Kabaya, S., Doherty, M. J., & Ross, J. (2024). Contrasting one’s share of the shared life space: Comparing the roles of metacognition and inhibitory control in the development of theory of mind among Scottish and Japanese children. Developmental Science, 27(e13417). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13417 Ullman, J. B. (2013). Structural equation modeling B. G. Tabachnick, S. Linda (Eds.).Using multivariate statistics (pp. 681-785). Boston, USA: Pearson (ISBN 9780134790541).
40. Vugs, B., Hendriks, M., Cuperus, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). Working memory performance and executive function behaviors in young children with SLI. Research In Developmental Disabilities, 35(1), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.022
41. Wellman, H. M. (1990). The Child's Theory Of Mind. USA: The MIT Press (ISBN 0-262-23153-0).
42. Wellman, H. M. (2014). Making minds: How theory of mind develops. New York, USA: Oxford University Press (ISBN 978–0–19–933491–9).
43. Whitebread, D., Bingham, S., Grau, V., Pasternak, D. P., & Sangster, C. (2007). Development of metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children: Role of collaborative and peer-assisted learning. Journal Of Cognitive Education And Psychology, 6(3), 433-455. https://doi.org/10.1891/194589507787382043
44. Whitebread, D.,& O'Sullivan, L. (2012). Preschool children's social pretend play: Supporting the development of metacommunication, metacognition and self-regulation. International Journal Of Play, 1(2), 197-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2012.693384
45. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257