FATHER EDUCATION PROGRAM: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Öz

Father education programs are defined as the trainings organized for the father to take a more active role in the development of the child, to have better time with his child, to establish healthy relationships and to develop fatherhood skills. With the father psycho-education program prepared, it is thought that fathers can have more sensitive relationships with their children and develop father-child interactions. Based on these views, the aim of the study is to strengthen and improve the father-child communication of the father psycho-education program. An experimental design with pre-test-post-test control group was used in the study. The universe of the research consists of fathers who live in Northern Cyprus and have children aged 3-6. The sample was determined using easily accessible sample variation, which is one of the purposeful sampling methods. Before the pretest application, it was especially preferred by the researcher that both groups have similar demographic structure. Accordingly, a total of 19 fathers, 10 fathers in the experimental group and 9 fathers in the control group, with children aged 3-6 years, participated in the study. In collecting the quantitative data of the study, the Personal Information Form created by the researcher to collect general information about the fathers and the Child-Parent Relationship Scale were used to measure the father-child relationship. The father psycho-education program prepared by the researcher consists of 8 sessions, once a week. Each session lasts 120 minutes. According to the results of the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test conducted to examine parent-child communication before and after the Father Psycho-Education Program of the experimental group fathers, it was concluded that the father psycho-education program significantly improved father-child communication (p <0.05). According to the results of the Mann Whitney U-Test, which was conducted to examine the relationship between the father-child relationship between fathers who participated in the father psycho-education program and the fathers who did not attend such training, the parent-child communication of the fathers who participated in the father psycho-education program was significant compared to the fathers who did not participate in such a training program improved (p <0.05). According to the information obtained from the interview form applied to fathers, it is that the Father Psycho-Education Program has an important effect on strengthening father-child communication and increasing father participation.According to the findings, it was revealed that the applied father psycho-education program positively increased the father-child interaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• father education
• parent education
• child development

Kaynakça

1. Akgün, R. & Polat Uluocak, G. (2010). Evlilikte etkili iletişim ve problem çözme: Bir toplum merkezindeki kadınlarla gerçekleştirilen grup çalışması. Aile ve Toplum Eğitim, Kültür ve Araştırma Dergisi, 6 (23), 9-22.
2. Atan, A. & Buluş, M. (2018). Aile iletişim becerileri psikoeğitim programının 5-6 yaş çocukların sosyal duygusal uyumuna etkisi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 44 (44), 213-230
3. Bater, L. R. & Jordan, S. S. (2017). Child routines and self-regulation serially mediate parenting practices and externalizing problems in preschool children. Child and Youth Care Forum, 46 (2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9377-7
4. Bronfenbrenner, U. & Morris, P.A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed, 793-828). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
5. Chow, H. P. (2004). The effects of ethnic capital and family background on school performance: A case study of Chinese-Canadian adolescents in Calgary. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 50 (3), 321-326. Demir, E. K. & Şendil, G. (2007). Ebeveyn tutum ölçeği (ETÖ). Yüksek lisans tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
6. Deniz, İ. (2003). İletişim becerileri eğitiminin ilköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin iletişim becerisi düzeylerine etkisi. Yüksek lisans tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara
7. Çağdaş, A. & Seçer, Z. Ş. ( 2005). Anne-baba eğitimi. Konya: Eğitim Kitabevi.
8. Graham, R. A. & Weems, C. F. (2015). Identifying moderators of the link between parent and child anxiety sensitivity: the roles of gender, positive parenting, and corporal punishment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43 (5), 885–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9945-y

9. Günalp, A. (2007). Farklı anne baba tutumlarının okul öncesi eğitim çağındaki çocukların özgüven duygusunun gelişimine etkisi (Aksaray ili örneği). Doktora tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
10. Güneş, N. (2017). 0-6 yaş arası çocukların gelişim düzeyleri ile annelerinin aile işlevleri ve yaşam doyumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
11. Hancock, T., Kaiser, A. P. & Delaney, E.M. (2002). Teaching parents of preschoolers at high risk: strategies to support language and positive behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22 (4), 191-212.
12. Haviland, W. A., Prins, H. E. L., Walrath, D. & McBride, B. (2006). Cultural anthropology: The human challenge (11th Ed.). New York: Thomson & Wadsworth.
13. Health Service Executive (2011). Child welfare and protection practice handbook. Dublin: Author.
14. Fox, R.A., Duffy K. M. & Keller M.K. (2006). Training community based professionals to imlement an emprically supported parenting program. Early Child Development and Care, 176 (1), 19-31.
15. Karahan, F., Sardoğan, M. E., Güven, M. Ç., Özkamalı, E. & Dicle, A. N. (2006). İnsan ilişkileri ve iletişim dersi’nin öğretmen adaylarının çatışma çözme ve empatik beceri düzeylerine etkisi. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 23, 127-136.
16. Karaırmak, Ö. (2016). Psikolojik sağlamlık, risk faktörleri ve koruyucu faktörler. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3 (26), 129-142.
17. McKay, M. Davis, M. & Fanning, P. (2010). İletişim becerileri. (Çev: Özgür Gelbal). Ankara: HYB Basım Yayın.
18. Mutlu, H. (2018). Baba destek eğitim programının aile işlevleri üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir. Önder, A. (2003). Ailede iletişim. İstanbul: Morpa Kültür Yayınları
19. Özkan, T. (2014). Çocuğu okul öncesi eğitim kurumuna devam eden babalara uygulanan baba katılım programının baba-çocuk ilişkisi üzerine etkisi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
20. Özmert, E. N. (2006). Erken çocukluk gelişiminin desteklenmesi-III: Aile. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi, 49 (3), 256-273.
21. Repetti, R. L., Taylor, S. E. & Seman, T. E. (2002). Risky families: family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychol Bull, 128, 330-336. Senemoğlu, N. (2004). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
22. Taşkın, A.G.N. (2011). Çocukların Gelişiminde Katkıları Unutulanlar: Babalar. Eğitime Bakış Dergisi, 7 (20), 43.
23. Şimşek, B. (2017). 7-9 yaş aile eğitim programının aile tutumlarına etkisi. Yüksek lisans tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. İzmir.
24. Sorakin, Y., Altınay, Z., & Cerkez, Y. (2019). Father Psycho-education Program for Developing Interaction with Children: Disability Program Development. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 66 (5), 528-540.