The Relationship between the Justice and Merit of School Administrators on the One Hand and the Loyalty and Effort of Teachers on the Other

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 99 - 117, 01.02.2013

Asım Özdemir

Öz

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between work effort and organizational loyalty of teachers and merit of administrators and perceived organizational justice at primary schools. The data were obtained through scales that was administrated to 315 teachers in 42 state primary schools in Ankara. Research showed that the justice perceived at schools via “Organizational Justice Scale”, the merit perceived in administrators via “Ability Scale”, the loyalty perceived in teachers via “Affective Commitment Scale” and the effort perceived in teachers is calculated via “Work Effort Scale”. In the analyses of the data, means, standard deviation, Pearson Moments Product Correlation Coefficient and regression analysis were used.The results of the research showed that perceived organizational justice and merit in administrators are related to institutional loyalty and work effort in teachers. The results of regression analysis indicated that merit and procedural justice estimate loyalty; distributing justice,merit, and organizational justice estimate effort.

Anahtar Kelimeler

organizational justice , merit , organizational loyalty , work effort , teacher

Okul Yöneticilerindeki Adalet ve Liyakat ile Öğretmenlerdeki Sadakat ve Gayret Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, ilköğretim okullarında algılanan örgütsel adalet, yöneticilerdeki liyakat ile öğretmenlerde kurumsal sadakat ve iş gayreti arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir. Veriler Ankara'da 42 resmi ilköğretim okulunda 315 öğretmene uygulanan anketlerin sonucunda elde edilmiştir.Araştırmada okullarda algılanan adalet “Örgütsel Adalet Ölçeği” ile yöneticilerdeki algılanan liyakat “Yetenek Ölçeği” ile öğretmenlerdeki sadakat “Duygusal Bağlılık Ölçeği” ile öğretmenlerdeki gayret ise “İş Gayreti Ölçeği” ile belirlenmiştir. Verilerin analizinde ortalama,standart sapma, Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon Katsayısı ve Regresyon Analizi teknikleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları algılanan örgütsel adaletin ve yöneticilerdeki liyakatin öğretmenlerdeki kurumsal sadakat ve iş gayreti ile ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Regresyon analizi sonuçları liyakatin ve işlemsel adaletin sadakatin yordayıcısı; adalet dağıtımının, liyakatin ve kişiler arası adaletin ise gayretin yordayıcısı olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

örgütsel adalet , liyakat , kurumsal sadakat , iş gayreti , öğretmen

Kaynakça

• Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology , 2, 267-299.
• Adler, A. P., & Adler, P. (1988). Intense loyalty in organizations: A case study of college. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(3), 401-417.
• Alvesson, M. (2000). Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledgeintense companies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(8), 1101-1123.
• Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In Kramer R.M. and Tyler, T. (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 246-260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Bies, R. J. & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard and M.H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations , 1, 43-55.
• Black, J. S., & Porter, L. L. (2000). Management: Meeting new challenges. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
• Blau, P. (1964). Exchance and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
• Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(1), 533-5
• Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 86, 278-321.
• Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2011). Justice, trust, and Trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal , 54(6), 1183-1206.
• Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386400.
• Cremer, D. D. (2005). Procedural and distributive justice effects moderated by organizational identification. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(1), 4
• Cropanzano, R., & Stein, J. H. (2009). Organizational justice and behavioral ethics, promises and prospects. Bunines Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 198-223. Demirel, Y. ve Seçkin, Z. (2011). Örgütsel adaletin bilgi paylaşımı üzerine etkisi. Bilig, 56, 99-119.
• Dipaola, M. F., & Hoy, W.K. (2005). Social characteristics that foster organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of School Leadership, 15, 3083
• Doğan, H. (2002). İşgörenlerin adalet algılamalarında örgüt içi iletişim ve işlemsel bilgilendirmenin rolü. Ege Akademik Bakış, 2(2), 71-78.
• Dirks, K. T. & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.
• Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Appliced Psychology, 82, 812-820.
• Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F.,Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, L. I., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee refention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565-573.
• Erel, E. (2012). Safahatta emek ve gayret kavramları üzerine. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. The Journal of International Social Research, 5(21).
• Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• French, J. R. P. & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row.
• George, J. M., & Bettenhause, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior sales performance and turnover: A group level analysis in a service contex. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 698-709.
• Goldner, A (1960) . The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Rewiev, 25, 161-178.
• Greenberg, J. (1987). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 55-61.
• Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational Justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432.
• Hochwarter, W. A., Witt, L. A., Treadway, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (2006) .The interaction of social skill and organizational support on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychholohy, 91(2), 482-489.
• Hogan, R. (2009). Kişilik ve kurumların kaderi (Çev. S. Y. Kölay). Ankara: Remzi.
• Hoy, W. K. ve Miskel, C. G. (2010). Eğitim yönetimi (Çev. Edit. S. Turan). Ankara: Nobel.
• Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel.
• Khan, S. M., & Niazi, M. A. K. (2010). Link between organizational justice and employee job performance in the work places. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Reserarch in Buniness, 2(3), 121-132.
• Kuvaas, B., & Dysvik, A. (2009). Perceived investment in employee development, intrinsic motivation and work performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 19, 217-236.
• Lambert, E. (2003). The impact of organizational justice on correctional staff. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 155-168
• Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg and R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange : Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55).
• Liao,W. C., & Wei, T. (2006). Organizational justice, motivation to learn, and training outcomes. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(5), 545-556.
• Mathieu, J., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A Review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
• Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123-136.
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trusts. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-736.
• McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and prosedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-636.
• Meyer, J., Stanley, D., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2001). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: Metaanalysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A Three component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61
• Adalet ve Liyakat ile Sadakat ve Gayret Arasındaki İlişki 117