SİHA’ların Kullanımında Etik Boyut
Öz
incelenmiştir. Adil savaş teorisi bağlamında ve normatif etik çizgisinde irdelenen konunun uzun vadeli olası sonuçları ele alınmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Silahlı İnsansız Hava Aracı, Dronlar, Yapay Zekâ, Etik, Adil Savaş
Kaynakça
- Adams , R., & Barrie, C. (2013). The Bureaucratization of War: Moral Challenges Exemplified by the Covert Lethal Drone. Ethics and Global Politics, 6(4), 245-260.
- Adams, T. K. (2001). Future Warfare and the Decline of Human Decisionmaking. Parameters, 41(57), 5-19.
- Alkire, B., Kallimani, J. G., Wilson , P. A., & Moore, L. R. (2010). Applications for Navy Unmanned Aiircraft Systems. Santa Monica:CA: RAND.
- Amarjot, S., & Nick, K. (2017). Scatternet Hybrid Deep Learning Network for Object Classification. Scatternet Hybrid Deep Learning Network for Object Classification. Cambridge: MLSP.
- Boyle, M. J. (2013, 1). The Costs and Consequences of Drone Warfare. International Affairs, 89(1), 1-29.
- Christian Enemark, “. ,. (2015). Armed unmanned aircraft and military ethics. . Australia : Australia Senate Foreign Affairs.
- Clinic, S. I. (2012). Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, And Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Attacks in Pakistan. California: Stanford School of Law.
- Dalziel, N. (2014). “Drone Strikes: Ethics and Strategy”. New Zealand International Review, 2-6.
- European Comission Directorate General for Research and Innovation. (2018). “Statement on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and ‘Autonomous’ Systems”. Brussels: European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies.
- European Commission. (2019, 4 8). Artificial Intelligence: Commission Takes Forward Its Work on Ethics Guidelines. 10 21, 2021 tarihinde Europa: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-19-1893_en.htm adresinden alındı.