SİHA’ların Kullanımında Etik Boyut
Öz
incelenmiştir. Adil savaş teorisi bağlamında ve normatif etik çizgisinde irdelenen konunun uzun vadeli olası sonuçları ele alınmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Silahlı İnsansız Hava Aracı , Dronlar , Yapay Zekâ , Etik , Adil Savaş
Kaynakça
- Adams , R., & Barrie, C. (2013). The Bureaucratization of War: Moral Challenges Exemplified by the Covert Lethal Drone. Ethics and Global Politics, 6(4), 245-260.
- Adams, T. K. (2001). Future Warfare and the Decline of Human Decisionmaking. Parameters, 41(57), 5-19.
- Alkire, B., Kallimani, J. G., Wilson , P. A., & Moore, L. R. (2010). Applications for Navy Unmanned Aiircraft Systems. Santa Monica:CA: RAND.
- Amarjot, S., & Nick, K. (2017). Scatternet Hybrid Deep Learning Network for Object Classification. Scatternet Hybrid Deep Learning Network for Object Classification. Cambridge: MLSP.
- Boyle, M. J. (2013, 1). The Costs and Consequences of Drone Warfare. International Affairs, 89(1), 1-29.
- Christian Enemark, “. ,. (2015). Armed unmanned aircraft and military ethics. . Australia : Australia Senate Foreign Affairs.
- Clinic, S. I. (2012). Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, And Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Attacks in Pakistan. California: Stanford School of Law.
- Dalziel, N. (2014). “Drone Strikes: Ethics and Strategy”. New Zealand International Review, 2-6.
- European Comission Directorate General for Research and Innovation. (2018). “Statement on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and ‘Autonomous’ Systems”. Brussels: European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies.
- European Commission. (2019, 4 8). Artificial Intelligence: Commission Takes Forward Its Work on Ethics Guidelines. 10 21, 2021 tarihinde Europa: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-19-1893_en.htm adresinden alındı.