Generalizing the Law Merchant Story

Sayı: 46 1 Nisan 2007
Bruce L. Benson
PDF İndir
TR EN

Generalizing the Law Merchant Story

Abstract

Lex Mercatoria, or the “Law Merchant,” provides classical liberals and libertarians with an important example of effective law without coercive state authority. Within the legal and classical liberal literaturse, Lex Mercatoria usually refers to the privately produced, privately adjudicated and privately enforced body of customary law that governed virtually every aspect of commercial transactions in Europe and the Middle East by the end of the eleventh century. Many writers suggest that this system of law was largely displaced in Europe by the end of the seventeenth century, but beginning in the mid-1950s, Lex Mercatoria also began to be applied to certain aspects of modern international commercial law (De Ly 1992: 1). The argument presented below, however, is that the historical Law-Merchant story has considerable more relevance today than its implications for international commercial activity.. The fact is that a law merchant arises any time that a commercial system begins to evolve, so many of the events underlying the emergence of commerce after the “dark ages” of medieval Europe are being replayed as Eastern Europe emerges from the dark ages of communist rule. The same is true in parts of Asia as a commercial sector attempts to emerge in the face of ongoing totalitarian political control, and in various parts of Latin American where economies are attempting to escape the effects of long periods of political turmoil and totalitarian governments. Furthermore, the emergence of a law merchant is likely to be necessary for the successful evolution of a commercial society into a strong and healthy market economy.

Kaynakça

  1. B. Benson (1989) “The Spontaneous Evolution of Commercial Law,” Southern Economic Journal, 55, 644-661.
  2. B. Benson (1995) “An Exploration of the Impact of Modern Arbitration Statutes on the Development of Arbitration in the United States,” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 11, 479-501.
  3. B. Benson (1999) “To Arbitrate or to Litigate: That is the Question,” European Journal of Law and Economics, 8: 91-151.
  4. B. Benson (2005) “The Spontaneous Evolution of Cyber Law: Norms, Property Rights, Contracting, Dispute Resolution, and Enforcement without State Involvement.” Journal of Law, Economics and Policy, 1: 269-348.
  5. B. Benson (2006) “Contractual Nullifi cation of Economically-Detrimental State-Made Laws,” Review of Austrian Economics, 9: 149-187.
  6. H. Berman, (1983) Law and Revolution: The Formation of Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  7. H. Berman and F. Dasser (1990) “The “New” Law Merchant and the “Old”: Sources, Content, and Legitimacy.” ed. Thomas E. Carbonneau, ed. Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration: A Discussion of the New Law Merchant. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Juris Publications. L. Bernstein (1992) “Opting Out of the Legal System: Extralegal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry,” Journal of Legal Studies, 21, 115-158.
  8. W. Bewes (1923) The Romance of the Law Merchant: Being an Introduction to the Study of International and Commercial Law With Some Account of the Commerce and Fairs of the Middle Ages. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  9. R. Cooter (1994) “Structural Adjudication and the New Law Merchant: a Model of Decentralized Law,” International Review of Law and Economics, 14, 215-231.
  10. H. de Soto (1989) The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World, New York: Harper & Row.

Kaynak Göster

APA
L. Benson, B. (2007). Generalizing the Law Merchant Story. Liberal Düşünce Dergisi, 46, 187-202. https://izlik.org/JA96YN66AG