Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches

Sinem Kızılaslan

doi:10.65775/livenarch.1869103

EN TR

Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches

Öz

Public spaces are an important resource for the continuity of community life. However, it should be borne in mind that this resource is not unlimited. While public spaces offer equal rights of use to the whole community, the responsibilities for the maintenance and protection of these areas do not constitute a direct legal obligation for individuals. This situation paves the way for the spread of behaviours that create disorder and pollution in public spaces, such as littering. Littering is a multidimensional phenomenon addressed differently across disciplines, which makes it difficult to evaluate existing studies within a holistic framework and to identify effective solutions. This study aims to develop a comprehensive conceptual framework by comparatively analysing how littering behaviour in public spaces is addressed within environmental criminology, vandalism, and environmental psychology. In doing so, the study synthesizes fragmented literature and clarifies the boundaries, focal points, and explanatory approaches of each discipline. Based on this synthesis, the study proposes an integrated perspective for defining littering behaviour in relation to physical environment, individual factors, and its legal status, and for developing more effective prevention strategies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

littering, environmental criminology, vandalism, environmental psychology, public space

Kamusal Mekânda Yere Çöp Atma Davranışının Farklı Kuramsal Yaklaşımlar Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Kamusal alanlar, toplumsal yaşamın sürekliliği açısından önemli kaynaklardır. Ancak, bu kaynağın sınırsız olmadığı unutulmamalıdır. Kamusal alanlar tüm topluma eşit kullanım hakları sunsa da, bu alanların bakımı ve korunmasına ilişkin sorumluluklar bireyler için doğrudan yasal bir yükümlülük teşkil etmemektedir. Bu durum, kamusal alanlarda düzensizliğe ve yere çöp atma gibi kirliliğe yol açan davranışların yaygınlaşmasına zemin hazırlamaktadır. Çöp atma eylemi, farklı disiplinler tarafından değişik açılardan ele alınan çok boyutlu bir olgudur; bu durum, mevcut çalışmaların bütüncül bir çerçevede değerlendirilmesini ve etkili çözüm yollarının belirlenmesini zorlaştırmaktadır. Bu çalışma; kamusal alanlarda çöp atma davranışının çevresel kriminoloji, vandalizm ve çevre psikolojisi disiplinleri bünyesinde nasıl ele alındığını karşılaştırmalı olarak inceleyerek kapsamlı bir kavramsal çerçeve geliştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma bu doğrultuda, dağınık haldeki literatürü sentezlemekte; her bir disiplinin sınırlarını, odak noktalarını ve açıklayıcı yaklaşımlarını netleştirmektedir. Söz konusu senteze dayalı olarak çalışma; çöp atma davranışını fiziksel çevre, bireysel faktörler ve yasal statü bağlamında tanımlamaya ve daha etkili önleme stratejileri geliştirmeye yönelik bütüncül bir bakış açısı sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

yere çöp atma, çevresel kriminoloji, vandalizm, çevresel psikoloji, kamusal mekân

Kaynakça

Bates, E. (2013). Vandalism: A crime of place? (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The University of Edinburgh, Scotland.
Bottoms, A. E., & Wiles, P. (2002). Environmental criminology. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (pp. 620-656). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Branthingam, P. J., & Branthingam, P. L. (1981). The dimension of crime. In P. J. Branthingam & P. L. Branthingam (Eds.), Environmental Criminology (pp. 7-26). Beverly Hills: SAGE.
Campbell, F. (2007). People who litter. ENCAMS Research Report.
Cialdini, R., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
Cicerali, E. E., & Cicerali, L. K. (2016). Çevre ve suç: Şehir güvenliğini artırmada çevre psikolojisi yaklaşımı. Paper presented at Istanbul Security Conference TASAM. Retrieved from (PDF) Çevre ve suç: Şehir güvenliğini artırmada çevre psikoloji yaklaşımı (ENVIRONMENT AND PSYCHOLOGY: INCREASING URBAN SECURITY VIA INPUT FROM PSYCHOLOGY)
Coffield, F. (1991). Vandalism and graffiti: The state of the art. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
Cohen, S. (1984). Sociological approaches to vandalism. In C. Levy-Leboyer (Ed.), Vandalism: Behaviour and motivations (pp.51-61). Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Costello, B. J., & Laub, J. H. (2020). Social control theory: The legacy of Travis Hirschi’s causes of delinquency. Annual Review of Criminology, 3(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041527

Cresswell, T. (2015). Place: An introduction (2nd ed.). England: Wiley Blackwell.
Faizi, M., Hosseini, S.-B., & Asl, S. R. (2008). Identification of environmental design methods and techniques for preventing vandalism. Environmental Sciences, 6(1), 9-20.
Gau, J. M., & Pratt, T. C. (2010). Revisiting broken windows theory: Examining the sources of the discriminant validity of perceived disorder and crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 758-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.05.002
Goldstein, A. P. (1996). The Psychology of Vandalism. New York: Plenum Press.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons: the population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science, 162(3869), 1243-1248.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. CA, USA:University of California Press.
Kenline, G. A. (1976). Vandalism-an overview. Paper presented at the Vandalism and Outdoor Recreation Symposium, Berkeley, California. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=l4npIz2suQMC&oi=fnd&pg=
Kızılaslan, S. (2024). Normatif çerçeveleme kapsamında bir yaya kaldırımı peyzaj tasarımı örneği. İdealkent, 46(16), 2577-2602. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1448502
Kim, S., LaGrange, R. L., & Willis, C. L. (2012). Place and crime: Integrating sociology of place and environmental criminology. Urban Affairs Review, 49(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087412465401
Krauss, R. M., Freedman, J. L., & Whitcup, M. (1996). Field and laboratory studies of littering. In A. P. Goldstain (Ed.), The Psychology of Vandalism (pp. 273-290). New York and London: Plenum Press.
Lefebvre, H. (2019). Mekânın Üretimi (I. Ergüden, Trans.). İstanbul: Sel Publishing. (Original work published 1974)
Mori, Y., Nakamata, T., Kuwayama, R., Yuki, S., & Ohnuma,S. (2024). Developing the littering behavior model focusing on implementation intention: A challenge to anti environmental behavior. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 26, 776–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-01909-7
Newman, O. (1973). Defensible space. New York: Collier Books.
Nejadsadeghi, E., Khosravani, F., Morovati, M., Heravi, M., Moein, H., Dowlatabad, A., Motlagh A., & Ghasemi, A. (2024) Study of pollution status in urban environment caused by attitude and waste littering behaviour of citizens. Scientific Reports 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76238-8
Ostrom, E. (1992). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. National Resources Journal, 32(2), 415-417.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1999). Disorder and decay: The concept and measurement of perceived neighborhood disorder. Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 412-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808749903400304
Salaieva, K., & Lukashevych, S. (2022). Criminological research on modern vandalism in Ukraine. Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences, 2(6), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.6.2022.10
Sarıtaş, E. (2009). Türk Ceza Hukuku'nda mala zarar verme suçu ve kriminolojik açıdan vandalism (Unpublished master's thesis). İstanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
Schultz, P., Bator, R., Large, L. B., Bruni, C., & Tabanico, J. J. (2013). Littering in context: personal and environmental predictors of littering behavior. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 35-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511412179 Sidebottom, A., & Wortley, R. (2016). Environmental criminology. In A. R. Piquero (Ed.), The Handbook of Criminological Theory (pp. 156-181). NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
Sokolov, A., Kukhta, M., Kornienko, M., Kondratyeva, Y., & Kukhta, A. (2017). Design as means of countering vandalism. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 19, 396-403.
Stephenson, C. (2015). Littering: The Cinderella of criminology. Aberystwyth University Student Law and Criminology Journal, 2, 205-242. Retrieved from https://www.aber.ac.uk › publications › auslcj2015
Tittle, C. R. (2016). Introduction: Theory and contemporary criminology. In A. R. Piquero (Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 1-17). NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Vilalta, C. J., Lopez, P., Fondevila, G., & Siordia, O. (2019). Testing broken windows theory in Mexico City. Social Science Quarterly, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12760
Weinmayr, M. (1969). Vandalism by design: A critique. Landscape Architecture Magazine, 286.
Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. Retrieved Jan 06, 2026, from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/
Wilson, B., Delmas M., & Rajagopal, D. (2025). Behavioral interventions for waste reduction: A systematic review of experimental studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1561467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1561467
Wortley, R., & Mazerolle, L. (2008). Environmental criminology and crime analysis: Situating the theory, analytic approach and application. In R. Wortley & L. Mazerolle (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis. UK: Willan.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Mimarlık (Diğer)

Bölüm

İnceleme Makalesi

Yazarlar

Sinem Kızılaslan ^*
0000-0002-0168-6994
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Temmuz 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

21 Ocak 2026

Kabul Tarihi

1 Mayıs 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.65775/livenarch.1869103

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA67XG52HS

APA

Kızılaslan, S. (2026). Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches. Livenarch+ Journal, 3(2), 174-192. https://doi.org/10.65775/livenarch.1869103

AMA

1.Kızılaslan S. Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches. LivenARCH+. 2026;3(2):174-192. doi:10.65775/livenarch.1869103

Chicago

Kızılaslan, Sinem. 2026. “Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches”. Livenarch+ Journal 3 (2): 174-92. https://doi.org/10.65775/livenarch.1869103.

EndNote

Kızılaslan S (01 Temmuz 2026) Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches. Livenarch+ Journal 3 2 174–192.

IEEE

[1]S. Kızılaslan, “Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches”, LivenARCH+, c. 3, sy 2, ss. 174–192, Tem. 2026, doi: 10.65775/livenarch.1869103.

ISNAD

Kızılaslan, Sinem. “Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches”. Livenarch+ Journal 3/2 (01 Temmuz 2026): 174-192. https://doi.org/10.65775/livenarch.1869103.

JAMA

1.Kızılaslan S. Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches. LivenARCH+. 2026;3:174–192.

MLA

Kızılaslan, Sinem. “Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches”. Livenarch+ Journal, c. 3, sy 2, Temmuz 2026, ss. 174-92, doi:10.65775/livenarch.1869103.

Vancouver

1.Sinem Kızılaslan. Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches. LivenARCH+. 01 Temmuz 2026;3(2):174-92. doi:10.65775/livenarch.1869103

Evaluating the Behavior of Littering in Public Spaces within Different Theoretical Approaches

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kamusal Mekânda Yere Çöp Atma Davranışının Farklı Kuramsal Yaklaşımlar Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster