Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Walking as a Critical Spatial Practice: Mapping Perceptions of the “Other” in Urban Space

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 24 - 41, 31.01.2025

Öz

This article turns the lens to spatial practices which create environments for new kinds of relationships between the body and its surroundings and offer alternative ways of understanding and engaging with the city. It centers on the act of walking as an everyday critical practice that is both performative and explorative. The approach differentiates itself from existing literature by critically examining the walking act and exploring temporary, perceptual and experiential potentials of understanding and narrating the city through the perspective of “the other.” The objective of this article is to investigate and discuss “other” spatial data about the city, its inhabitants, and their movements to enhance spatial awareness by employing critical spatial practice. This process enables the revelation of “other” languages, informed by the body’s movements and interactions within the city.
The intent is achieved by presenting “the walking act” as a critical everyday activity, discussing it theoretically, examining various walking styles and walkers, and conducting a case study on the Marmaray line in Istanbul. Based on these discussions, the article develops an“other” description of “critical walking.” The case study involves walking and synchronously mapping elements related to “the other.” Unlike conventional architectural representations, this mapping is open-ended, without rigid boundaries. The article explores and maps “others” within the city, aiming to uncover an alternative language to make sense of urban spaces.

Kaynakça

  • Altunok, N. (2023). A spatial conception based on walking: Critical walk (Unpublished master’s thesis). Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul.
  • Altunok, N., & Dursun Çebi, P. (2021). Discovering “another” language: Walking in the city. Livenarch-VII: Other Architect/ure(s), Trabzon, Türkiye.
  • Andreotti, L., & Costa, X. (1996). Situationists: Art, politics, urbanism. Barcelona: Actar.
  • Baudelaire, C. (1995). The painter of modern life and other essays. London: Phaidon Press.
  • Benjamin, W. (2003). The arcades project. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
  • Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893
  • Careri, F. (2002). Walkscapes: Walking as an aesthetic practice. Barcelona: Editorial Gustavo Gili.
  • Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Debord, G. (Ed.). (1981). Introduction to a critique of urban geography. Berkeley, CA: Bureau of Public Streets.
  • Direk, Z., Gökyaran, E., Granade Şahin, G., Aygün, Ö., Savaşçın, Z., & Zengin, N. (2017). Dünyanın teni: Merleau-Ponty felsefesi üzerine incelemeler. Istanbul: Metis.
  • Gros, F., & Ulutaşlı, A. (2017). Yürümenin felsefesi. Istanbul: Kolektif Kitap.
  • Le Breton, D., & Yerguz, İ. (2003). Yürümeye övgü. Istanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.
  • McDonough, T. (1994). Situationist space. October, 67, 59–77. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/778967
  • Özcivanoğlu, S. (2019). Map-making as a walking-based spatial practice in architecture [Unpublished master's thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
  • Petrescu, D. (2015). Architecture of walking. In P. Blundell Jones & M. Meagher (Eds.), Architecture and movement: The dynamic experience of buildings and landscapes, 112-120. New York: Routledge.
  • Rendell, J. (2006). Art and architecture: A place between. New York: I.B. Tauris.
  • Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2018). Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: WalkingLab. New York: Routledge.
  • Şenel, A. (2013). Mapping as performance: An alternative to authoritative representations of Istanbul. Urbanistica Tre i Quaderni, 3, Urban Representations.
  • Tümerdem, M. (2018). Istanbul walkabouts: A critical walking research of Northern Istanbul [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Istanbul Technical University.
  • Yücel, A. (2005). Mimarlıkta dil ve anlam: Seminer. Istanbul: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası İstanbul Büyükkent Şubesi.
Yıl 2025, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 24 - 41, 31.01.2025

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Altunok, N. (2023). A spatial conception based on walking: Critical walk (Unpublished master’s thesis). Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul.
  • Altunok, N., & Dursun Çebi, P. (2021). Discovering “another” language: Walking in the city. Livenarch-VII: Other Architect/ure(s), Trabzon, Türkiye.
  • Andreotti, L., & Costa, X. (1996). Situationists: Art, politics, urbanism. Barcelona: Actar.
  • Baudelaire, C. (1995). The painter of modern life and other essays. London: Phaidon Press.
  • Benjamin, W. (2003). The arcades project. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
  • Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893
  • Careri, F. (2002). Walkscapes: Walking as an aesthetic practice. Barcelona: Editorial Gustavo Gili.
  • Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Debord, G. (Ed.). (1981). Introduction to a critique of urban geography. Berkeley, CA: Bureau of Public Streets.
  • Direk, Z., Gökyaran, E., Granade Şahin, G., Aygün, Ö., Savaşçın, Z., & Zengin, N. (2017). Dünyanın teni: Merleau-Ponty felsefesi üzerine incelemeler. Istanbul: Metis.
  • Gros, F., & Ulutaşlı, A. (2017). Yürümenin felsefesi. Istanbul: Kolektif Kitap.
  • Le Breton, D., & Yerguz, İ. (2003). Yürümeye övgü. Istanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.
  • McDonough, T. (1994). Situationist space. October, 67, 59–77. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/778967
  • Özcivanoğlu, S. (2019). Map-making as a walking-based spatial practice in architecture [Unpublished master's thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
  • Petrescu, D. (2015). Architecture of walking. In P. Blundell Jones & M. Meagher (Eds.), Architecture and movement: The dynamic experience of buildings and landscapes, 112-120. New York: Routledge.
  • Rendell, J. (2006). Art and architecture: A place between. New York: I.B. Tauris.
  • Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2018). Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: WalkingLab. New York: Routledge.
  • Şenel, A. (2013). Mapping as performance: An alternative to authoritative representations of Istanbul. Urbanistica Tre i Quaderni, 3, Urban Representations.
  • Tümerdem, M. (2018). Istanbul walkabouts: A critical walking research of Northern Istanbul [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Istanbul Technical University.
  • Yücel, A. (2005). Mimarlıkta dil ve anlam: Seminer. Istanbul: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası İstanbul Büyükkent Şubesi.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mimari Tasarım
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Nilsu Altunok 0009-0002-7401-6059

Pelin Dursun Çebi 0000-0002-4047-7140

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ocak 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 2 Kasım 2024
Kabul Tarihi 10 Ocak 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Altunok, N., & Dursun Çebi, P. (2025). Walking as a Critical Spatial Practice: Mapping Perceptions of the “Other” in Urban Space. Livenarch+ Journal, 2(1), 24-41.