Metaverse’in Hukuki Sorunları: Uluslararası Kamu Hukuku Perspektifi̇

Öz

Metaverse’nin gelişi, inkar edilemez bir şekilde uluslararası hukuk yaptırımı alanında sayısız karmaşıklık sunmaktadır. Metaverse’nin ulusötesi doğası göz önüne alındığında, ulusal yasal çerçevelerin sanal eylemlere uygulanmasının karmaşık ve zorlu bir süreç haline geldiği açıktır. Geleneksel ulusal sınırları aşma yeteneği ile Metaverse’nin özü, ulusal yasaların doğrudan uygulanmasının önünde önemli engeller oluşturmaktadır. Sanal faaliyetlerin düzenlenmesi, uluslararası kamu hukuku himayesinde kapsamlı ve evrensel olarak uygulanabilir bir çerçevenin oluşturulmasını zorunlu kılmaktadır. Ortaya çıkan ek bir endişe, teknolojik gelişmelerin mevzuatın potansiyel olarak yerini almasıyla ilgilidir. Metaverse aleminde, hızlı bir teknolojik ilerleme hızı gözlemlenebilir. Uluslararası hukuk alanı, bu dönüşümlerin dinamik doğası göz önüne alındığında, sanal etkinlikleri yerleşik uluslararası normlara ve ilkelere uygun olarak etkin bir şekilde düzenlemenin zorlu zorluğuyla karşı karşıyadır. Uluslararası hukuk sisteminin sanal faaliyetler alanına uyum sağlama zorunluluğu yadsınamaz, çünkü bu alanda ortaya çıkan çok yönlü endişelerin ele alınması çok önemlidir. Bu makale, uluslararası andlaşmaların ve yasal yapıların güncellenmesi, uluslararası düzenleyici kurumların oluşturulması ve küresel işbirliği ve uyumun teşvik edilmesiyle ilgili çağdaş süreçle ilgilidir. Metaverse, evrim sürecinden geçerken uluslararası hukukun buna göre uyum sağlaması ve sanal alemdeki davranışları etkin bir şekilde düzenlemesi zorunludur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Metaverse
• Uluslararası Hukuk
• Egemenlik
• Ulusal Güvenlik
• İnsan Hakları.

LEGAL ISSUES OF THE METAVERSE: A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE

Öz

The advent of the Metaverse undeniably presents a myriad of complexities in the realm of international law enforcement. Given the inherent transnational nature of the Metaverse, it becomes apparent that the application of national legal frameworks to virtual actions becomes a complex and challenging endeavor. The very essence of the Metaverse, with its ability to transcend traditional national boundaries, poses significant obstacles to the straightforward application of domestic laws. The regulation of virtual activities necessitates the establishment of a comprehensive and universally applicable framework under the auspices of public international law. One additional concern that arises pertains to the potential displacement of legislation by technological advancements. In the realm of the Metaverse, one can observe a rapid pace of technological progress. The realm of international law grapples with the formidable challenge of effectively regulating virtual activities in accordance with established international norms and principles, given the dynamic nature of these transformations. The imperative for the international legal system to adapt to the realm of virtual activities is undeniable, as it is crucial for addressing the multifaceted concerns that arise in this domain. The subject matter at this article to the contemporary process of updating international agreements and legal structures, the formation of international regulatory bodies, and the encouragement of global cooperation and harmonization. As the Metaverse undergoes its evolutionary process it is imperative for international law to adapt accordingly and effectively regulate conduct within the virtual realm.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Metaverse
• international law
• sovereignty
• national security
• human rights.

Etik Beyan

There is no requirement of Ethics Committee Approval for this study.

Kaynakça

1. Acer Y and Kaya İ, Uluslararası Hukuk (12th edn, Seçkin 2021)
2. Aksar Y, Teoride ve Uygulamada Uluslararası Hukuk I (4th edn, Seçkin, 2017)
3. Alexe A, End of the Free World (Aldo Press 2009)
4. Bantekas I, ‘Criminal jurisdiction of states under international law’ (2011), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Last accessed 18 February 2023
5. Beriş H E, ‘Egemenlik Kavraminin Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Geleceği Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme’ (2008) 63(01) Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 55-80
6. Bodin J, On Sovereignty (6th edn, Cambridge University Press 2003)
7. Boyle K, ‘Stock-taking on human rights: The world conference on human rights, Vienna 1993’ (1995) 43(1) Political Studies 79-95
8. Brown C, Sovereignty, Rights and Justice: International Political Theory Today (Polity Press 2002)

9. Cai C, ‘Enforcing a New national Security - China’s National Security Law and International Law’ (2017) 10 (1) Journal of East Asia and International Law 65-90
10. Charamba K, ‘Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights in the Dawn of a Metaverse’ (2022) 30 (1) University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review 110-149
11. Charter of the United Nations’ (1945) 31(8) American Bar Association Journal 388-399
12. De Lafayette M, ‘Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen 1789’ Last Accessed 20 February 2023
13. Donnely J and Dunne T and Wheeler N J, (eds.), ‘The Social Construction of International Human Rights’ in T. Dunne and N. J. Wheeler, (eds), Human Rights in Global Politics (Cambridge University Press 1999) 71-102
14. Dopplick R et al., ‘United Nations and International Organizations’ (2018) 52, Year in Review: An Annual Survey of International Legal Developments and Publications of the ABA / Section of International Law 479-496
15. Dwivedi Y K et al., ‘Metaverse Beyond the Hype: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Emerging Challenges, Opportunities, and Agenda for Research, Practice and Policy’ (2022) 66 International Journal of Information Management 1-55
16. Epps V, International Law (4th edn, Carolina Academic Press, 2009)
17. Fernandez C B and Hui P, ‘Life, the Metaverse and Everything: An Overview of Privacy, Ethics, and Governance in Metaverse’, (2022), 2022 IEEE 42nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW) 272-277
18. Gent E , ‘Lessons from a Second Life> Before Meta, Philip Rosedale Created an Online Universe’ (2022) 59(1), IEEE Spectrum 19 Last accessed 20 February 2023
19. High P, ‘Technology’s Role In Driving Progress In Black Lives Matter’ FORBES www.forbes.com/sites/peterhigh/2020/07/30/technologys-role-in-driving-progressin-black-lives-matter/?sh=2a485b 1b687e> Last Accessed 29 August 2023
20. Huber M, ‘Island of Palmas case (Netherlands, USA)’ (Reports of International Arbitral Awards, 1928, 2.829-71) < https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_II/829-871.pdf> Last Accessed 26 March 2023
21. ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’ Last Accessed 18 April 2023
22. ‘International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights’ Last Accessed 18 May 2023
23. Joshua J, ‘Information Bodies: Computational Anxiety in Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash’(2017) 19(1) Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 17-47
24. Kapani M, Kamu Hürriyetleri (7th edn, Yetkin 1993)
25. Kostenko O V, ‘Electronic Jurisdiction, Metaverse, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Personality, Digital Avatar, Neural Networks: Theory, Practice, Perspective’ (2022) 1(73) World Science 1-13
26. Krasner S, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton University Press 2001) 105-109
27. Lac Lanoux Arbitration (France v. Spain), 24 I.L.R. 101, 1957.
28. Lambrecht A and Tucker C , ‘Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study into Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads’ (2019) 66(7) Management Science 2966-2981
29. Lemley M A. & Eugene V, ‘Law, Virtual Reality, and Augmented Reality’ (2018) 166 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1051-1138
30. Ludlow P and Wallace M , The Second Life Herald: The Virtual Tabloid That Witnessed the Dawn of the Metaverse (MIT press 2009)
31. Maftei J, ‘Sovereignty in International Law’ (2015)11 (1) Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica 54-65
32. Mills A, ‘Rethinking jurisdiction in international law’ (2013) 84(1) British Yearbook of International Law 187-239
33. Milmo D, ‘Rohingya Sue Facebook for £150bn over Myanmar Genocide’ The Guardian (6 December 2021) Last accessed 13 June 2023.
34. Murray M D , ‘Ready Lawyer One: Lawyering in the Metaverse’ SSRN Last accessed 19 February 2023
35. ‘National Security Law of 1947’ Last Accessed 20 May 2023
36. ‘North Atlantic Treaty; Documents Relating to the North Atlantic Treaty’ (1949) U.S. Govt. Print. Off.
37. Og, T M P, ‘Prospects For The Development Of Private Law Relations In The Metaverse’ (2023) 5(7) The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology 64-69
38. Phillpott D and Jackson R J, ‘Westphalia, Authority and International Society’ in Robert J. Jackson (ed), Sovereignty at the Millennium( Blackwell Pub 1999)144-167
39. Rich L A, ‘New Technology and Old Law: Rethinking National Security’ (2015) 2(4) Texas A&M Law Review 581-596
40. Ryngaert C, ‘The Concept of Jurisdiction in International Law’ (2015) 1-3 Last accessed 18 February 2023
41. Sancar M, “Devlet Aklı” Kıskacında Hukuk Devleti (3 edn, İletişim Press 2004)
42. Shackelford S, ‘From Nuclear War to Net War: Analogizing Cyber Attacks in International Law’ (2009) 27(1) Berkeley Journal of International Law 192-252
43. Stephenson N, Snow Crash, (Bantam Books, 1992)
44. Sur M, Uluslararası Hukukun Esasları (16th edn, Beta 2022)
45. Teson F R , ‘State Contracts and Oil Expropriations: The Aminoil-Kuwait Arbitration’ (1984) 24(2) Virginia Journal of International Law 323-360
46. ‘The Constitution of 1791, Title II of the Division of the Kingdom and of the Status of Citizens’ Last Accessed 16 February 2023
47. ‘The Constitution of 1791’ Last Accessed 20 February 2023
48. ‘The Facebook Papers: What Do They Mean from a Human Rights Perspective?’ Amnesty International (4 November 2021) Last accessed 13 June 2023
49. UN General Assembly, ‘Universal declaration of human rights’ (1948) 302(2) UN General Assembly 14, 14-25
50. UN General Assembly, ‘Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action’ (12 July 1993), A/CONF. 157
51. ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ Last Accessed 18 April 2023
52. US Congress, ‘Declaration of independence 1776’ Last Accessed 20 February 2023
53. Yadin G,‘Virtual Reality Intrusion’ (2016) 53 Willamette L Rev 63-106