Verbal Valency in Lekh Dothraki

Öz

Lekh Dothraki (Dothraki Language) is one of the constructed languages in the fictional world of Game of Thrones. Developed by David J. Peterson, it exhibits linguistic features that combine elements of natural languages with fictional creations. This study uses both descriptive and contrastive approaches. From a descriptive perspective, it analyzes the valential behaviors of Dothraki verbs in terms of argument number and valency alternation. As a result of these analyses, it reveals that Dothraki verbs govern one, two, or three arguments, mark these arguments with case inflection in the surface structure, and assign semantic functions to them in the deep structure. Regarding valency alternation, the language employs seven morphosyntactic techniques to retain (durativization, dynamicization, particle use, and reversivization), increase (causativization), and decrease (passivization and reflexivization) argument number. From a contrastive perspective, this study also compares the valency properties of Dothraki verbs with those of natural languages in terms of avalent verbs, labile verbs, and morphosyntactic differences. Building on the descriptive and contrastive analyses, this study concludes that Dothraki behaves similarly to natural languages.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Lekh Dothraki
• Game of Thrones
• verbal valency
• descriptive linguistics
• contrastive analysis

Lekh Dothraki’de Eylemsel İstem

Öz

Lekh Dothraki (Dothraki Dili), kurgusal Game of Thrones evrenindeki yapay dillerden biridir. David J. Peterson tarafından geliştirilen dil, doğal dillerdeki ögeleri kurgusal yaratımlarla birleştiren dilsel özellikler sergilemektedir. Bu çalışmada hem betimlemeli hem de karşıtsal yaklaşım kullanılmıştır. Betimlemeli bir bakış açısıyla Dothraki’deki eylemlerin istemsel davranışları, üye sayısı ve istem değiştirimi açısından incelenmiştir. Bu incelemelerin sonucunda Dothraki’deki eylemlerin bir, iki veya üç üye yönettiği, bu üyeleri yüzey yapıda durum işletimiyle işaretlediği ve derin yapıda onlara anlamsal işlevler yüklediği görülmüştür. İstem değiştirimiyle ilgili olarak dil; üye sayısını korumak (sürerlileştirme, dinamikleştirme, parçacık kullanımı ve tersine çevirme), artırmak (ettirgenleştirme) ve azaltmak (edilgenleştirme ve dönüşlüleştirme) için yedi biçimbilgisel veya sözdizimsel yöntem kullanmaktadır. Karşıtsal bir bakış açısıyla bu çalışma; aynı zamanda istemsiz eylemler, değişken eylemler ve biçimbilgisel veya sözdizimsel farklılıklar açısından Dothraki’deki eylemlerin istem özelliklerini doğal dillerinkilerle karşılaştırmaktadır. Betimlemeli ve karşıtsal incelemelere dayanarak bu çalışmada Dothraki’nin doğal dillere benzer şekilde davranış sergilediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Lekh Dothraki
• Game of Thrones
• eylemsel istem
• betimlemeli dilbilim
• karşıtsal çözümleme

Kaynakça

1. Benioff, D. & Weiss, D. B. (2011). Game of Thrones [Television series]. USA.
2. Brabent. (2011). Dothraki grammar: Wiki info compilation (ver 1.01). Retrieved February 2, 2025, from https://theswissbay.ch/pdf/Books/Linguistics/Mega%20linguistics%20pack/Conlangs/Dothraki%20Grammar%20-%20Wiki%20Info%20compliation%20(Brabent)%20(ver%201.01).pdf
3. Carpenter, H. (1981/2023). The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien: Revised and Expanded Edition. HarperCollins Publishers.
4. Centre for the Greek Language (CGL). (n.d.). Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek. Retrieved February 28, 2025, from https://www.greek-language.gr/greekLang/modern_greek/tools/lexica/triantafyllides/search.html?lq=%CF%83%CE%B2%CE%AE%CE%BD%CF%89&dq=
5. Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
6. Crystal, D. (1980/2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (6th ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
7. Destruel, M. (2014). Shekh ma shieraki anni: Typology of a fictional language created for artistic purposes.
8. Lingua Frankly, 2(1). Retrieved from January 14, 2025, from https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/lingua/article/view/5406

9. Dik, S. C. (1980). Studies in Functional Grammar. Academic Press.
10. Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2000). Introduction. In R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (Eds.), Changing
11. Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity (p. 1-28). Cambridge University Press.
12. Doğan, N. (2011). Türkiye Türkçesi Fiillerinde İsteme Göre Anlam Değişiklikleri [Changes of Meaning according to Valency in Turkiye Turkish Verbs] [Unpublished master's thesis]. Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkiye.
13. Doll, K. (2021). Power and vulnerability in fictional languages: linguistic injury in Game of Thrones. The Ashen Egg, 9, 6-12.
14. Ene, B. (2024). Language as a tool of influence: A discourse analysis of Daenerys Targaryen’s speeches in Dothraki and High Valyrian in Game of Thrones. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Philologia, 69(2), 137-157.
15. Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In B. Emmon & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (p. 1-88). Holt, Rinehard and Winston Inc.
16. Fillmore, C. J.(2003). Valency and semantic roles: the concept of deep structure case. In V. Ágel, et al. (Eds.) Dependency and Valency - An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (p. 457-475). Walter de Gruyter.
17. Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C. (2005). Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge.
18. Haspelmath, M. (1993). More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In B. Comrie & M.
19. Polinsky (Eds.) Causatives and Transitivity (p. 87-120). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
20. Haspelmath, M. & Hartmann, I. (2015). 3. Comparing verbal valency across languages. In A. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Volume 1 Introducing the Framework, and Case Studies from Africa and Eurasia (p. 41-72). De Gruyter Mouton.
21. Herbst, T. & Schüller, S. (2008). Valency. In Introduction to Syntactic Analysis: A Valency Approach (p. 108-147). Gunter Narr Verlag.
22. Iberg, S. (2018). A game of languages: The use of subtitles for invented languages in game of thrones. In Linguistic and cultural representation in audiovisual translation (p. 184-199). Routledge.
23. Isnaini, A. W. (2024). Anha dothrak chek asshekh: The rendering operations of the invented language Dothraki into Bahasa Indonesia in Game of Thrones Season 6. CrossOver Journal of Adaptation Studies, 4(1), 72-94.
24. Kahane, S. & Osborne, T. (2015). Translators’ Introduction. In S. Kahane & T. Osborne (Trans.), Elements of Structural Syntax [Éléments de Syntaxe Structurale] (p. xxix-lxxiii). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
25. Karaman, B. I. (2008). On contronymy. International Journal of Lexicography, 21(2), 173-192.
26. Klavans, J. L. (1995/2018). On Clitics and Cliticization: The Interaction of Morphology, Phonology, and Syntax. Garland Publishing.
27. Littauer, R. (2016). The Dothraki language dictionary (ver 3.11). Retrieved from February 2, 2025, from https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files2/3b86b110cf0744a64cb79d0e3ee76308.pdf
28. Melton, C. E. (2020). Dothraki relative clause structure. Fiat Lingua, FL-000065-00. Retrieved February 17, 2025, from https://fiatlingua.org/2020/02/
29. Meluzzi, C. (2019). Real communities for invented languages. Dothraki and Klingon on the web. American Language Journal, 3(2), 16-29.
30. Oxford University Press. (OUP). (2025). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Retrieved February 23, 2025, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/fall_1?q=fall
31. Peterson, D. J. (2013). Master dialogue document for Dothraki. Retrieved January 24, 2025, from https://dedalvs.com/work/game-of-thrones/game_of_thrones_master_dialogue.pdf
32. Peterson, D. J.(2014). Living Language Dothraki: A Conversational Language Course. Created by David J. Peterson. Based on the Hit Original HBO® Series. Living Language.
33. Peterson, D. J. (2015). The Art of Language Invention. From Horse-Lords to Dark Elves, the Words Behind World Building. Penguin Books.
34. Rebane, G. (2019). ‘There is no word for thank you in Dothraki’: Language ideologies in Game of Thrones. In G. Rebane & R. Junkerjirgen (Eds.), Multilingualism in Film (p. 169-196). Peter Lang.
35. Sanders, N. (2020). A primer on constructed languages. In J. Punske, N. Sanders, and A. V. Fountain (Eds.), Language Invention in Linguistics Pedagogy (p. 6-26). Oxford University Press.
36. Tak, J. Y. & Lyuh, I. (2024). More than a language itself: The speech act of refusal in constructed languages. Journal of Universal Language, 25(2), 93-117.
37. Tesnière, L. (1965/2015). Elements of Structural Syntax [Éléments de Syntaxe Structurale]. (T. Osborne & S. Kahane, Trans.). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
38. Türk Dil Kurumu (TDK) [Turkish Language Association]. (2022). Güncel Türkçe Sözlük [Modern Turkish Dictionary]. Retrieved February 23, 2025, from https://sozluk.gov.tr/
39. Van Valin, R. D. & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge University Press.
40. Vinodh, S. (2019). Me nem nesa: A phonological analysis of Dothraki. Fiat Lingua, FL00005F-00. Retrieved February 17, 2025, from https://fiatlingua.org/2019/08/
41. Wyse, T. (2019). To what extent is the constructed language Klingon similar to natural languages: An investigation into nominal and verbal morphology [Unpublished bachelor’s thesis]. University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.