Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION WITH LINEAR PROGRAMMING BASED ON TRAPEZOIDAL FUZZY NUMBERS

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 634 - 650, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.519005

Abstract

In today's developing financial markets, various
complex techniques are used in the creation of portfolios that will provide the
best return to the investors. In this study, a portfolio selection model that
includes investment data and expert opinions is proposed. This model consists
of two stages. In the first stage, the weight of the criteria in the portfolio
selection problem was determined by the Constrained Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy
Process method proposed by Enea and Piazza. In the second stage, the model
proposed by Lai and Hwang was used to solve the problem of fuzzy linear
programming to be formed by using the determined criteria weights. These two
methods in the literature use triangular fuzzy numbers to solve the problem.
The methods used in this study were developed for trapezoidal fuzzy numbers
(TrFNs) and an alternative method for portfolio selection problems was
proposed.

References

  • AHLATCIOGLU, B. (2005). Fuzzy Approaches to Portfolio Selection, Master Thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Banking and Insurance.
  • ARIK, O. A. and TOKSARI, M. D. (2018), Multi-objective fuzzy parallel machine scheduling problems under fuzzy job deterioration and learning effects, International Journal of Production Research, 56(7), 2488–2505.
  • CHANG, D. Y. (1996), Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.
  • DENIZ, D. and OKUYAN, H. A. (2018), The Comparison of The Empirical Results Of Traditional And Modern Portfolio Management: BIST Application, Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 5(3), 467–482.
  • DENIZ, D., SAKARYA, S., and OKUYAN, H. A. (2018), Portfolio Diversification Contribution of Precious Metal: Case of BIST, Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 5(2), 366-382.
  • DONG, J. and WAN, S.P. (2018), A new trapezoidal fuzzy linear programming method considering the acceptance degree of fuzzy constraints violated, Knowledge-Based Systems, 148, 100–114.
  • EBRAHIMNEJAD, A. (2018), A method for solving linear programming with interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy variables. RAIRO - Operations Research, 52(3), 955–979.
  • ENEA, M. and PIAZZA, T. (2004). Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3(1), 39–62.
  • GHAZANFAR AHARI, S., GHAFFARI-NASAB, N., MAKUI, A., and GHODSYPOUR, S. H. (2011), A Portfolio Selection Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study of Iranian pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2(2), 225–236.
  • HWANG, C. L., and YOON, K. (1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • KIM, J. and KIM, J. (2018), Optimal Portfolio for LNG Importation in Korea Using a Two-Step Portfolio Model and a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process, Energies, 11(11), 3049.
  • LAI, Y.J. and HWANG, C.L. (1992), A new approach to some possibilistic linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49(2), 121–133.
  • LIAGKOURAS, K. (2019), A New Three-Dimensional Encoding Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm with Application to the Portfolio Optimization Problem, Knowledge-Based Systems, 163, 186-203.
  • LIU, Q. and GAO, X. (2016), Fully Fuzzy Linear Programming Problem with Triangular Fuzzy Numbers, Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 13(7), 4036–4041.
  • NAKAMURA, K. (1984), Some extensions of fuzzy linear programming. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 14(3), 211–229.
  • SADJADI, S. J., SEYEDHOSSEINI, S. M., and HASSANLOU, K. (2011), Fuzzy multi period portfolio selection with different rates for borrowing and lending, Applied Soft Computing, 11(4), 3821–3826.
  • SEO, F. and SAKAWA, M. (1988), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Regional Planning: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • TALESHIAN, F. and FATHALI, J. (2016), A Mathematical Model for Fuzzy p-Median Problem with Fuzzy Weights and Variables, Advances in Operations Research, 2016, 1–13.
  • TANAKA, H. and ASAI, K. (1984), Fuzzy linear programming problems with fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 13(1), 1–10.
  • TIRYAKI, F. and AHLATCIOGLU, B. (2009), Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Information Sciences, 179(1–2), 53–69.
  • TOPALOGLU, E. E. (2018), Determination of the Relationship Between Financial Risks and Firm Value: An Application on Istanbul Stock Exchange Companies, Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 5(2), 287-301.
  • WANG, B., LI, Y., WANG, S. and WATADA J. (2018), A Multi-Objective Portfolio Selection Model with Fuzzy Value-at-Risk Ratio, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(6), 3673-3687.
  • XIAO, Y.Z. and FU, S. (2015), Grey-correlation Multi-attribute Decision-making Method Based on Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers. Mathematics and Statistics, 3(4), 95–100.
  • YAGHOOBI, T. (2018), Prioritizing key success factors of software projects using fuzzy AHP, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 30(1), e1891.
  • YU, J., GAN, M., NI, S. and CHEN, D. (2018), Multi-objective models and real case study for dual-channel FAP supply chain network design with fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(2), 389–403.
  • YUCEL, A. and GUNERI, A. F. (2011), A weighted additive fuzzy programming approach for multi-criteria supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6281–6286.

YAMUK BULANIK SAYILARA DAYALI DOĞRUSAL PROGRAMLAMA İLE PORTFÖY OPTİMİZASYONU

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 634 - 650, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.519005

Abstract

Günümüzün gelişmekte olan finansal piyasalarında, yatırımcılara en iyi
getiriyi sağlayacak portföylerin oluşturulmasında çeşitli karmaşık teknikler
kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, yatırıma ilişkin verilerin ve uzman
görüşlerinin de dikkate alındığı bir portföy seçim modeli önerilmiştir. Model iki
aşamadan oluşmaktadır. İlk aşamada portföy seçim problemindeki kriterlerin
ağırlığı, Enea ve Piazza tarafından önerilen Kısıtlı Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi
Süreci yöntemiyle belirlenmiştir. İkinci aşamada, Lai ve Hwang tarafından
önerilen model, belirlenen kriterlerin ağırlıkları kullanılarak oluşturulan
bulanık doğrusal programlama problemini çözmek için kullanıldı. Literatürdeki
bu iki yöntem ile üçgen bulanık sayılar kullanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada,
kullanılan bu iki yöntem yamuk bulanık sayılar için geliştirilmiş ve portföy
seçim problemleri için alternatif bir yöntem önerilmiştir.

References

  • AHLATCIOGLU, B. (2005). Fuzzy Approaches to Portfolio Selection, Master Thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Banking and Insurance.
  • ARIK, O. A. and TOKSARI, M. D. (2018), Multi-objective fuzzy parallel machine scheduling problems under fuzzy job deterioration and learning effects, International Journal of Production Research, 56(7), 2488–2505.
  • CHANG, D. Y. (1996), Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.
  • DENIZ, D. and OKUYAN, H. A. (2018), The Comparison of The Empirical Results Of Traditional And Modern Portfolio Management: BIST Application, Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 5(3), 467–482.
  • DENIZ, D., SAKARYA, S., and OKUYAN, H. A. (2018), Portfolio Diversification Contribution of Precious Metal: Case of BIST, Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 5(2), 366-382.
  • DONG, J. and WAN, S.P. (2018), A new trapezoidal fuzzy linear programming method considering the acceptance degree of fuzzy constraints violated, Knowledge-Based Systems, 148, 100–114.
  • EBRAHIMNEJAD, A. (2018), A method for solving linear programming with interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy variables. RAIRO - Operations Research, 52(3), 955–979.
  • ENEA, M. and PIAZZA, T. (2004). Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3(1), 39–62.
  • GHAZANFAR AHARI, S., GHAFFARI-NASAB, N., MAKUI, A., and GHODSYPOUR, S. H. (2011), A Portfolio Selection Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study of Iranian pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2(2), 225–236.
  • HWANG, C. L., and YOON, K. (1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • KIM, J. and KIM, J. (2018), Optimal Portfolio for LNG Importation in Korea Using a Two-Step Portfolio Model and a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process, Energies, 11(11), 3049.
  • LAI, Y.J. and HWANG, C.L. (1992), A new approach to some possibilistic linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49(2), 121–133.
  • LIAGKOURAS, K. (2019), A New Three-Dimensional Encoding Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm with Application to the Portfolio Optimization Problem, Knowledge-Based Systems, 163, 186-203.
  • LIU, Q. and GAO, X. (2016), Fully Fuzzy Linear Programming Problem with Triangular Fuzzy Numbers, Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 13(7), 4036–4041.
  • NAKAMURA, K. (1984), Some extensions of fuzzy linear programming. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 14(3), 211–229.
  • SADJADI, S. J., SEYEDHOSSEINI, S. M., and HASSANLOU, K. (2011), Fuzzy multi period portfolio selection with different rates for borrowing and lending, Applied Soft Computing, 11(4), 3821–3826.
  • SEO, F. and SAKAWA, M. (1988), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Regional Planning: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • TALESHIAN, F. and FATHALI, J. (2016), A Mathematical Model for Fuzzy p-Median Problem with Fuzzy Weights and Variables, Advances in Operations Research, 2016, 1–13.
  • TANAKA, H. and ASAI, K. (1984), Fuzzy linear programming problems with fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 13(1), 1–10.
  • TIRYAKI, F. and AHLATCIOGLU, B. (2009), Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Information Sciences, 179(1–2), 53–69.
  • TOPALOGLU, E. E. (2018), Determination of the Relationship Between Financial Risks and Firm Value: An Application on Istanbul Stock Exchange Companies, Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 5(2), 287-301.
  • WANG, B., LI, Y., WANG, S. and WATADA J. (2018), A Multi-Objective Portfolio Selection Model with Fuzzy Value-at-Risk Ratio, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(6), 3673-3687.
  • XIAO, Y.Z. and FU, S. (2015), Grey-correlation Multi-attribute Decision-making Method Based on Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers. Mathematics and Statistics, 3(4), 95–100.
  • YAGHOOBI, T. (2018), Prioritizing key success factors of software projects using fuzzy AHP, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 30(1), e1891.
  • YU, J., GAN, M., NI, S. and CHEN, D. (2018), Multi-objective models and real case study for dual-channel FAP supply chain network design with fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(2), 389–403.
  • YUCEL, A. and GUNERI, A. F. (2011), A weighted additive fuzzy programming approach for multi-criteria supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6281–6286.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Serkan Akbaş 0000-0001-5220-7458

Türkan Erbay Dalkılıç 0000-0003-2923-599X

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Submission Date January 29, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 6 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Akbaş, S., & Erbay Dalkılıç, T. (2019). PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION WITH LINEAR PROGRAMMING BASED ON TRAPEZOIDAL FUZZY NUMBERS. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 6(3), 634-650. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.519005

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author(s) bear full responsibility for the ideas and arguments presented in their articles. All scientific and legal accountability concerning the language, style, adherence to scientific ethics, and content of the published work rests solely with the author(s). Neither the journal nor the institution(s) affiliated with the author(s) assume any liability in this regard.