Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

VERGİDEN KAÇINMADAN VERGİ KAÇAKÇILIĞINA GEÇİŞ: VERGİ SIĞINAĞI ÖRNEK OLAYI

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 1524 - 1541, 02.08.2023
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1281599

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri New York Güney Bölgesi Temyiz Mahkemesi’nde 21 Eylül 2016 tarihinde sonuçlanan “vergi sığınağı” konulu davadan yola çıkılarak hem vergiden kaçınma aracı hem de davanın konusu olan vergi sığınaklarının anlaşılması ve önlenmesi konusunda birtakım görüşlerin ortaya konması amaçlanmıştır. Dava dosyası, kamuya açık nitelikte bir dava olduğundan, avukatınca tarafımıza sağlanmıştır. Davada, yıllarca vergi ve hukuk danışmanlığı yapmış, işin ayrıntılarını bilen ve bu yıllar boyunca kendisine devletin üst kurumlarında çevre edinmiş olan davalının, “vergiden kaçınma” amacıyla geliştirdiği vergi sığınaklarının, amacını aşarak “vergi kaçırma”ya nasıl dönüştüğü, dava dosyası üzerinden anlatılmaya çalışılmıştır.

References

  • ABD, New York Güney Bölgesi Temyiz Mahkemesi dava dosyası, dosya numarası 14‐2437‐cr, karar tarihi: 21 Eylül 2016.
  • ABD, Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı (1999). The problem of corporate tax shelters discussion, analysis and legislative proposals, <https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/131/Report-Corporate-Tax-Shelters-1999.pdf>.
  • Bennedsen, M. ve Zeume, S. (2018). Corporate tax havens and transparency. The Review of Financial Studies, 31 (4), 1221-1264. <https://academic.oup.com/rfs/article/31/4/ 1221/4587527>.
  • Burke, K. ve Mccouch, G. (2008). COBRA strikes back: Anatomy of a tax shelter. Tax Lawyer, 62 (1), 8-23. <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1148371>.
  • Chyz, J. (2013). Personally tax aggressive executives and corporate tax sheltering. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 56, 311-328.
  • Graham, J. ve Tucker, A. (2006). Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 81, 563–594.
  • Hanlon, M. ve Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 126-141.
  • Herber, B. (1979). Modern public finance. Forth Edition, Richard D. Irwin, Inc. Homewood1.
  • Incardona, J., Kannan, Y., Premuroso, R., Higgs, J. ve Huang, I. (2014). Taxing audit markets and reputation: An examination of the U.S. tax shelter controversy. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23 (1), 18-31.
  • Lisowski, P. (2010). Seeking shelter: Empirically modeling tax shelters using financial statement ınformation. Accounting Review, 85 (5), 1693-1720.
  • Nesbitt, W., Outlay, E. ve Persson, A. (2022). A reexamination of investors' reaction to tax shelter news: Evidence from the Luxembourg tax leaks. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 1-19.
  • OECD (2008). Report on abuse of charities for money-laundering and tax evasion, <https://www.oecd.org/tax/exchange-of-tax-information/ 42232037.pdf>.
  • Öztürk, S. ve Ülker, Ö. (2016). Vergi cennetlerinin küresel finansal kriz üzerine ekonomik etkileri: Vergi kaçırma, vergiden kaçınma ve kara para aklamadaki rolü. Niğde Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 9 (1), 237-254.
  • Pehlivan, O. (2016). Kamu maliyesi. Trabzon: Derya Kitabevi.
  • Romanov, D. (2006). The corporation as a tax shelter: evidence from recent Israeli tax changes, Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1939-1954.
  • Tobin, G. ve Walsh, K. (2013). What makes a country a tax haven? An assessment of international standards shows why Ireland is not a tax haven. The Economic and Social Review, 44 (3): 401-424. <https://www.esr.ie/article/view/78>.
  • Wilson, J. (2014). Tax havens in a world of competing countries. CESifo DICE Report, 4, 32-39.
  • 213 Sayılı Vergi Usul Kanunu (VUK), Kabul Tarihi: 04/01/1961, Yayımlandığı Resmî Gazete Tarihi: 10/1/1961.

TRANSITION FROM TAX AVOIDANCE TO TAX EVASION: THE CASE OF THE TAX SHELTER

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 1524 - 1541, 02.08.2023
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1281599

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to present some views on understanding and preventing both tax avoidance tool and tax shelter, which is the subject of the case, based on the case on "tax shelter", which was concluded on September 21, 2016 at the United States Court of Appeals for the Southern District of New York. Since the case file is a "public" case, it was provided to us by his lawyer. In the case, it has been tried to explain how the defendant who knows the intricacies of the job and has an environment in the high-level institutions of the state and has been tax and legal consultant and develops the shelters; how "tax avoidance" turned into "tax evasion" by exceed its purpose.

References

  • ABD, New York Güney Bölgesi Temyiz Mahkemesi dava dosyası, dosya numarası 14‐2437‐cr, karar tarihi: 21 Eylül 2016.
  • ABD, Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı (1999). The problem of corporate tax shelters discussion, analysis and legislative proposals, <https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/131/Report-Corporate-Tax-Shelters-1999.pdf>.
  • Bennedsen, M. ve Zeume, S. (2018). Corporate tax havens and transparency. The Review of Financial Studies, 31 (4), 1221-1264. <https://academic.oup.com/rfs/article/31/4/ 1221/4587527>.
  • Burke, K. ve Mccouch, G. (2008). COBRA strikes back: Anatomy of a tax shelter. Tax Lawyer, 62 (1), 8-23. <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1148371>.
  • Chyz, J. (2013). Personally tax aggressive executives and corporate tax sheltering. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 56, 311-328.
  • Graham, J. ve Tucker, A. (2006). Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 81, 563–594.
  • Hanlon, M. ve Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 126-141.
  • Herber, B. (1979). Modern public finance. Forth Edition, Richard D. Irwin, Inc. Homewood1.
  • Incardona, J., Kannan, Y., Premuroso, R., Higgs, J. ve Huang, I. (2014). Taxing audit markets and reputation: An examination of the U.S. tax shelter controversy. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23 (1), 18-31.
  • Lisowski, P. (2010). Seeking shelter: Empirically modeling tax shelters using financial statement ınformation. Accounting Review, 85 (5), 1693-1720.
  • Nesbitt, W., Outlay, E. ve Persson, A. (2022). A reexamination of investors' reaction to tax shelter news: Evidence from the Luxembourg tax leaks. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 1-19.
  • OECD (2008). Report on abuse of charities for money-laundering and tax evasion, <https://www.oecd.org/tax/exchange-of-tax-information/ 42232037.pdf>.
  • Öztürk, S. ve Ülker, Ö. (2016). Vergi cennetlerinin küresel finansal kriz üzerine ekonomik etkileri: Vergi kaçırma, vergiden kaçınma ve kara para aklamadaki rolü. Niğde Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 9 (1), 237-254.
  • Pehlivan, O. (2016). Kamu maliyesi. Trabzon: Derya Kitabevi.
  • Romanov, D. (2006). The corporation as a tax shelter: evidence from recent Israeli tax changes, Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1939-1954.
  • Tobin, G. ve Walsh, K. (2013). What makes a country a tax haven? An assessment of international standards shows why Ireland is not a tax haven. The Economic and Social Review, 44 (3): 401-424. <https://www.esr.ie/article/view/78>.
  • Wilson, J. (2014). Tax havens in a world of competing countries. CESifo DICE Report, 4, 32-39.
  • 213 Sayılı Vergi Usul Kanunu (VUK), Kabul Tarihi: 04/01/1961, Yayımlandığı Resmî Gazete Tarihi: 10/1/1961.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Güler Ferhan Ünal Uyar 0000-0003-4394-934X

Tutcu Burçin 0000-0003-1427-0741

Duygu Doğan 0000-0002-3442-9003

Publication Date August 2, 2023
Submission Date April 12, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Ünal Uyar, G. F., Burçin, T., & Doğan, D. (2023). VERGİDEN KAÇINMADAN VERGİ KAÇAKÇILIĞINA GEÇİŞ: VERGİ SIĞINAĞI ÖRNEK OLAYI. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 10(2), 1524-1541. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1281599

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author(s) bear full responsibility for the ideas and arguments presented in their articles. All scientific and legal accountability concerning the language, style, adherence to scientific ethics, and content of the published work rests solely with the author(s). Neither the journal nor the institution(s) affiliated with the author(s) assume any liability in this regard.