Kuantum Teorisinin Yorumu ve Doğanın Rolü

Öz

Kuantum teorisi olağanüstü derecede başarılı bir fizik teorisidir. Ama klasik fiziğin altında yatan mekanik Doğa Kavramı bu teoriyi nasıl etkilemektedir? Dikkat çekici bir şekilde, kuantum teorisinin oluşturulmasından yaklaşık 90 yıl sonra hala bu sorulara açık cevaplar bulamıyoruz. Bu makalede, bilim insanlarının yoluna çıkan engellerin doğası ve bunları aşmak için kuantum teorisinin matematiği birkaç basit fiziksel fikirden yeniden yapılandırmaya çalışması anlatılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kuantum teorisi,Kuantum teorisinin temelleri,Doğa,Klasik fizik

Kaynakça

1. Accardi, L. (1981). Topics in Quantum Probability, Phys. Rep. 77, 169.
2. Bell, J.S. (1964). On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox, Physics 1, 195.
3. Bohr, N. (1935). ‘‘Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?’’ Phys. Rev. 48, 696.
4. Bohr, N. (1937). Philosophy of Science 4.
5. Bohr, N. (1963). Essays 1958-1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Interscience Publishers, ch. 1.
6. Davies E.B. & Lewis, J.T. (1970). An operational approach to quantum probability, Commun. Math. Phys. 17, 239.
7. de Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of Probability, Vol. 1. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
8. de Laplace P.S. (1886). Essai Philosophique sur les Probabilites, in Academy des Sciences, Oeuvres Complotes de Laplace, Vol. 7, Gauthier-Villars, Paris.

9. Earman, J. (1986). A primer on determinism, Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 32, D. Reidel.
10. Einstein, A. (1951). in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Physicist, P. A. Schilpp, ed., Tudor, New York, p. 669.
11. Gell-Mann, M. (1979). In The Nature of the Physical Universe: the 1976 Nobel Conference (Wiley, New York, 1979), p. 29.Goyal, P., Knuth K.H. & Skilling, J. (2009). The origin of complex quantum amplitudes, in Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods, ed. P. Goggans, A.I.P.
12. Hardy, L. (2003). Probability theories in general and quantum theory in particular, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 34B, 381.
13. Heisenberg, W. (1971). Physics and Beyond. Translated from the German original.
14. Janotta, P. & Hinrichsen, H. (2014). Generalized probability theories: What determines the structure of quantum physics? arXiv:1402.6562.
15. Lear, T. (1988). Aristotle: The Desire to Understand, Cambridge University Press.
16. Leibniz, G. (1956). in H. G. Alexander, ed., The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence, New York: Barnes and Noble.
17. Leucippus, (1999). Fragment 569 - from Fr. 2 Actius I, 25, 4, in The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus. Fragments, A Text and Translation with Commentary, C.C.W. Taylor, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
18. Pauli, W. (1994). Writings on Physics and Philosophy, Springer.
19. Russell, B. (1956). Our knowledge of the external world, New York: Menton Books.
20. Schwinger, J. (1951). Theory of quantized fields I. Physical Review 82, 914-27.
21. Spekkens, R.W. (2007). Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: A toy theory, Phys. Rev. A 75, 032110.
22. Spinoza, B. (1985). Ethics, Proposition 29, Part 1, in The Collected Writings of Spinoza, E. Curley, trans., Princeton University Press, Vol. 1, Princeton.
23. Stapp, H. (2001). Quantum theory and the role of mind in nature. Found. Phys. 31, 1465-1499.
24. Tomonaga, S. (1946). On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields. Progress of Theoretical Physics 1: 27-42.
25. Vaidman, L. (2014). Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Stan. Enc. Phil., E. N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-manyworlds/.
26. Wheeler, J.A. (1990). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links, in Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, ed. W. H. Zurek, Addison-Wesley.