The Strategic Channel Initiatives of the U.S., Israel, and Turkey: Global Power Competition and Geopolitical Implications

Öz

This article examines the strategic roles of sea routes and waterways in the global power struggle. Human-made canals such as the Suez, Panama, and Kiel, located in various parts of the world, have been crucial not only in shaping global trade but also in influencing military and geopolitical strategies. This article specifically explores the potential impact of the Canal Istanbul project on global power balances and how it may influence the strategic calculations of Turkey and international actors. The possibility of the Canal Istanbul Project bypassing the Montreux Convention raises discussions on how it could facilitate US and NATO access to the Black Sea, challenging Russia’s security strategies in the region. The project’s potential to provide easy access for US and NATO forces to the Black Sea is discussed as it may reshape the geopolitical balance in the area. Israel’s plans to build an alternative canal to the Suez Canal, Israel’s (Ben Gurion Project) along with the Panama Canal and Canal Istanbul projects, are analyzed in terms of their effects on the international system. In the context of increasing US influence in the Panama Canal, the potential for the Canal Istanbul and Israel’s canal projects to limit China and Russia’s strategic influence in the region is debated. Additionally, the study assesses how these projects may reshape trade and energy corridors between the Mediterranean, Red Sea, and Black Sea, increasing cooperation opportunities between Turkey, the US, NATO, and Israel. The paper comprehensively examines the transformation of regional and global power balances brought about by these projects and, based on that, explores the changing dynamics of political influence among the three countries; the US, Israel, and Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Keywords: Panama Canal
• Canal Istanbul Project
• Israel Canal Project ( Ben Gurion ) Waterways
• Global Power Struggle

Kaynakça

1. Akalın, D. (2011). Süveyş Kanalı (Açılışı ve Osmanlı Devleti’ne Etkisi 1854- 1882) (Doktora tezi). Pamukkale Üniversitesi.
2. Armaoğlu, F. (2003). 20. Yüzyıl siyasi tarihi. Remzi Kitabevi.
3. Atradius Collections. (2025). Impact of Red Sea Disruptions on Global Trade Credit Risk. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://atradiuscollections.com/global/
4. BBC News. (2025, February 6). Trump says Israel will hand over Gaza to US after fighting ends. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g9xgj2429o
5. Britannica. (n.d.). Panama Canal. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Panama-Canal
6. Britannica. (n.d.). Suez Canal. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Suez-Canal
7. Congress.gov. (2025). Briefing on the Security Situation in the Red Sea. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/2340
8. Council on Foreign Relations. (2025, January 29). Who Controls the Panama Canal? https://www.cfr.org/article/who-controls-panama-canal

9. Crisis Group. (2025). Yemen: Houthi Threats to Red Sea Shipping. International Crisis Group. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.crisisgroup.org/who-we-are/board-trustees
10. European Parliament. (2025). Resolution on the Situation in the Red Sea. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://tr.euronews.com/2021/05/19/avrupa-parlamentosu-ab-nin-turkiye-ile-tam-uyelik-muzakerelerini-ask-ya-almas-n-istedi
11. Kaplan, R.D. (2012). The revenge of geography: What the map tells us about coming conflicts and the battle against fate. Random House.
12. Kennedy, P. (1987). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. Random House.
13. Klein, M.A. (2017). A Line in the Sand: The Battle for the Sinai, from Six Days to Yom Kippur. Oxford University Press.
14. Louis, Wm. R. (Ed.), & Owen, R. (Ed.). (2011). Suez 1956: The Crisis and its Consequences. Oxford University Press.
15. Lutmar, C., & Rubinovitz, Z. (Eds.). (2023). Palgrave studies in maritime politics and security. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15670-0
16. Mahan, A.T. (1890). The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783. Little, Brown and Company.
17. Mendez, A., & Alden, C. (2019). China in Panama: From Peripheral Diplomacy to Grand Strategy. Geopolitics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1657413
18. Ortloff, C.R., & Crouch, D. P. (1998). Hydraulic analysis of a self-cleaning drainage outlet at the Hellenistic City of Priene. Journal of Archaeological Science, 25(12), 1211-1220.
19. Owens, L. (2021). About The Kafr Hassan Dawood Egypt Project. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://lawrenceowens.org/
20. Özçelik, S. (2011). Süveyş Kanalı (Açılışı ve Osmanlı Devleti’ne Etkisi 1854-1882). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 81-94.
21. Panama symbolises the Sino-American struggle for influence. (2025, February 13). The Economist. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.economist.com/china/2025/02/13/panama-symbolises-the-sino-american-struggle-for-influence
22. Pezzulli, B. (2024, February 26). The Ben Gurion Canal: Vision Amidst Upheaval. The Times of Israel. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-ben-gurion-canal-vision-amidst-upheaval/
23. Polat, Ü.G. (2021). I. Dünya Savaşı’nda Kanal Harekâtları (Hazırlık-Harekât-Netice). Selenge Yayınları.
24. Pole Star Global. (2025). Red Sea Maritime Security Report. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.polestarglobal.com/
25. Security Retrieved. (2025). Red Sea Maritime Security Report. Pole Star Global. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.polestarglobal.com/
26. Sumida, J.T. (1997). Inventing Grand Strategy and Teaching Command: The Classic Works of Alfred Thayer Mahan Reconsidered. Johns Hopkins University Press.
27. Supply Chain Digital. (2025). Red Sea Attacks Disrupt Global Shipping Routes. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.supplychaindigital.com/logistics/red-sea-attacks-disrupt-global-shipping-routes
28. Swank, N.J. (2022). United States National Security Policy Towards the Panama Canal in an Era of Great Power Conflict (Master’s thesis). Naval Postgraduate School. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.ksbw.com/article/monterey-naval-postgraduate-school-president-fired/1050660
29. This is Beirut. (n.d.). The Ben Gurion Canal Project: A Viable Alternative to the Suez Canal? https://thisisbeirut.com.lb/articles/1310246/the-ben-gurion-canal-project-a-viable-alternative-to-the-suez-canal
30. Till, G. (2009). Concept of Sea Power. In Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century (2nd ed., pp. 3-21). Routledge.
31. Tirpitz, A. von. (1919). My Memoirs. Hurst and Blackett.
32. Trumps-panama-canal-ambition-the-anatomy-of-power-sovereignty-and-global-infrastructure-politics. (2024, December 12). ISSF. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://issf.org.in/2024/12/trumps-panama-canal-ambition-the-anatomy-of-power-sovereignty-and-global-infrastructure-politics/
33. Tulun, T.E. (2025). Evolving Security Landscape in the Black Sea: Strategic Shifts, Regional Dynamics, and European Implications. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/47b6z
34. Walter, A.T. (2019). The Sinai Peninsula and the Golan Heights: Their Political, Geographic, and Security Value, and Cruciality to Israeli Security. Scripta Judaica Cracoviensia, 17, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.4467/20843925SJ.19.003.12226
35. Weiss, M., & Hassan, H. (2015). ISIS: Inside the army of terror. Regan Arts.
36. Wishnick, E. (2017). China’s Interest And Goals In The Arctic: Implications For The United States. Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College. http://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep11274