SOSYAL BİLGİLERDE ÖĞRENCİLERİN OKUDUĞUNU ANLAMA BECERİLERİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİNDE METİN YAPISINA BAĞLI OLARAK KULLANILABİLECEK STRATEJİ VE TEKNİKLER

Öz

Sosyal bilgiler derslerinde eğitim-öğretim faaliyetleri sırasında yazılı materyallerden sıkça faydalanılmaktadır. Bu sebeple okuduğunu anlama becerileri, yazılı materyallerin daha işlevsel olarak kullanılması boyutunda önem kazanmaktadır. Okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin etkinliğinin artırılması ise, çeşitli stratejilerin kullanılması ile mümkündür. Stratejilerin kullanılması, öğrenci ve öğretmenlere metnin işlenişi ve konunun anlaşılması sırasında kolaylık sağlamaktadır. Bu derslerde kullanılabilecek okuduğunu anlama stratejilerinden bazıları, metin yapısına bağlı olarak değişiklik arz etmektedir. Sosyal bilgilerde kullanılabilecek metin yapıları; genellikle, bilgi verici ve hikâye edici olmak üzere iki grupta sınıflandırılabilir. Hikâye edici metinlerde kullanılabilecek okuduğunu anlama stratejilerinden bazıları: hikâye haritası, hikâye piramidi ve hikâyenin yüzü stratejisi iken, bilgi verici metinlerde kullanılabilecek okuduğunu anlama stratejileri ise: kavram haritaları, bildiklerim-bilmek istediklerim-öğrendiklerim stratejisi, herringbone tekniği ve grafik düzenleyicilerdir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal Bilgiler,Metin Yapısı,Okuduğunu Anlama Stratejileri

THE STRATEGIES AND TECHNIQUES THAT CAN BE USED ACCORDING TO TEXT STRUCTURE IN IMPROVEMENT OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION SKILLS IN SOCIAL STUDIES

Öz

It is benefited from written materials frequently are being used at the process of education and instruction in the social studies courses. Therefore, reading comprehension skills have an increasing importance in the dimension of effective usage of written materials. The improvement of reading comprehension skills can be possible only by using various strategies. Usage of these strategies makes it easier to understand the subject and processing of the reading for students and teachers. Some of the reading comprehension strategies that can be used in these courses vary according to the structure of the text. The text structures that can be used in social studies may be classified under usually two groups like: expository and narrative texts. Some of the reading comprehension strategies that can be used in narrative texts are: story map, story pyramid, story face and reading comprehension strategies that can be used in expository texts are: concept map, KWL strategies, herringbone technique and graphic organizers

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social Studies,Text Structure,Reading Comprehension Strategies

Kaynakça

1. ALVERMANN, D.E. and PHELPS, S.F. (2005). Content Reading and Literacy. USA
2. Ally and Bacon Fourth Edition. BOULINEAU, T.; FORE , C.B.; HAGAN, S. and BURKE, M. D. (2004). Use of Story
3. Mapping to Increase the Story-Gramer Text Comprehension of Elementary Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, Spring. 105- 121. BRAYN, J. (1998). K-W-W-L: Questioning the Known. The Reading Teacher. 51(7): 620.
4. BROER, N.A. & AARNOUSTSE, C.A.J. & KIEVIET, F.K. and LEEUWE, J.F.J.V. (2002). The Effect of Instructing the Structural Aspect of Text. Educationals Studies, (3): 213-238.
5. BROWN, M.J.M. (1981). What Does the Author Say, What Does the Author Mean?
6. Reading in the Social Studies. Theory into Practice. XX (3): 199-205. CAMP, D. (2000). It takes two: Teaching with Twin Text of Fact and Fiction. The Reading Teacher, 53(5): 400-408.
7. CIARDIELLO, A.V. (2002). Helping Adolescents Understand Cause / Effect Text
8. Structure in Social Studies. The Social Studies. 31-36. COTE’, N. and GOLDMAN, S.R. & SAUL, E.U. (1998). Students Making Sense of

9. Informational Text: Relations Between Processing and Representation. Discourse Processes, 25(1): 1-53. DARCH, C. and EAVES, R. (1986). Visual Displays to Increase Comprehension of High
10. School Learning-Disabled Students. Journal of Special Education, 20: 309-318. DICKSON, S. V. & SIMMONS, D.C. and KAMEENUI, E. J. (1995). Text Organization
11. Cirricular and Instructional Implications for Diverse Learners. Technical Report No.18, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators, University of Oregon. DIMINO, J.; GERSTEN, R.; CARNINE, D. and BLAKE, G. (1990). Story Gramer: An
12. Approach for Promoting At-Risk Secondary Students Comprehension of Literature. The Elementary School Journal, 91(1), 19-32. DOBBS, O. (2003). Using Reading Strategies to Reduce the Failure Rate in the Content
13. Area. Subject: Social Studies. Grade Level: 6-7-8. ERIC Document No: ED 479 208, 1-41. DOWNING, J.A., BAKKEN, J.P. and WHEDON, C.K. (2002). Teaching Text Structure to Improve Reading Comprehension. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37(4): 229-233.
14. EGAN, M. (1999). Reflections on Effective Use of Graphic Organizers. Journal of
15. Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(8): 641-645. FORDHAM, N.W. & WELLMAN, D. and SANDMANN, A. (2002). Taming the Text
16. Engaging and Supporting in Students Social Studies Readings. The Social Studies. July/August. 151-158. GARCIA, Jesus and MICHAELIS, John U. (2001). Social Studies for Children (A Guide to Basic Instruction). USA: Allyn & Bacon A Person Education Company.
17. GARDILL, M.C. and JITENDRA, A.K. (1999). Advanced Story Map Instruction
18. Effects on the Reading Comprehension of Students with Learning Disabilities. The Journal of Special Education. 33(1): 2-17
19. GARKINS, R. and JONES, D.L. (1992). Developing Proficient Readers. Kentucky
20. University, Institute on Education Reform, Eric Document No: ED 412 526. GARNER, J.K. and BOCHNA, C.R. (2004). Transfer of a Listening Comprehension
21. Strategy to Independent Reading in First-Grade Students. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(2): 69-74. GERSTEN, R. and CARINE, D. (1986). Direct Instruction in Reading Comprehension
22. Educational Leadership, April, 70-78. GUASTELLO, E.F. & BEASLEY, T.M. and SINATRA, R.C. (2000). Concept Mapping
23. Effects on Science Content Comprehension of Low-Achieving Inner-City Seventh Graders. Remedial and Special Education, 21(6): 356-365. HEADLEY, K.N. and DUNSTON, P.J. (2000). Teachers’ Choices Boks and Comprehension Strategies as Transactions Tools. The Reading Teacher, 54(3): 260-268.
24. HILL, R.C. (1994). Concept Mapping, Graphic Organizing and Structuring: Visual
25. Techniques for Functional Content-Centered Reading Comprehension. Education, (1): 26-30. HORIBA, Y. 2000. Reader Control in Reading: Effects of Language Competence, Text
26. Type and Task, Discourse Processes, 29(3): 223-267. IDOL, L. (1987). Group Story Mapping: A Comprehension Strategy for Both Skilled and Unskilled Readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 20(4) 196-205.
27. JOHNSON, A.P. (1998). What Exactly Are Comprehension Skills and How Do I Teach Them. Reading. Jully, 22-26.
28. JONES, B.F. & PIERCE, J. and HUNTER, B. (1988/1989). Teaching Students to
29. Construct Graphic Representations. Educational Leadership, December/ January, 20-25. LANGAN-FOX, J.; WAYCOTT, J.L. and ALBERT, K. (2000). Linear and Graphic
30. Advance Organizers: Properties and Processing, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1): 19-34. MARTELLA, N.M.; MILLER, T.L. and MACQUEEN, C. (1998). Graphic Organizers. Teaching K8. 46-48.
31. MARTORELLA, P.H.; BEAL, C.M. and BOLICK C.M. (2005). Teaching Social Studies in Middle and Secondary Schools. New Jersey, Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall.
32. MERKLEY, Donna M. and JEFFERIES, Debra. (2000). Guidelines for Implementing a
33. Graphic Organizer. The Reading Teacher. 54(4).350-357. MOSS, B. (2004). Teaching Expository Text Structures Through Information Trade
34. Book Retellings. The Reading Teacher, 57(8): 710-717. MYERS, M. P. and SAVAGE, T. (2005). Enhancing Student Comprehension of Social
35. Studies Material. The Social Studies. January/February. 18-23. NEUFELD, P. (2005). Comprehension Instruction in Content Area Classes. The Reading Teacher, 59(4). 302-312.
36. NOWAK, J. D. and GOWIN, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. New York
37. Cambridge University Press. PEREGOY, S.F. and BOYLE, O.F. (2000). English Learners Reading English: What We
38. Know, What We Need to Know. Theory Into Practice, 39 (4): 237-247. PRESLEY, M.; SYNMONS, S.; McGOLDRICK, J.A. and SYNDER, B.L. (1995).
39. Reading Comprehension Strategies, Cognitive Strategy Instruction. (Edit: Michael Presley & Vera Woloshyn), Cambridge, Massachusetts: Brookline Books. REID, E.R. (1981). Comprehension Skills Can Be Taught. Educational Leadership. March, 455-457.
40. RHODER, C. (2002). Mindful Reading: Strategy Training That Facilitates Transfer.
41. Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(6): 498-512. SÂENZ, M.L. and FUCHS, L.S. (2002). Examining the Reading Difficulty of Secondary
42. Students with Learning Disabilities. (Expository Versus Narrative Text). Remedial and Special Education, 23 (1): 31-41. SMITH, C.B. and ELLIOT, P.G. (1986). Reading Activities for Middle and Secondary
43. Schools: A Handbook for Teachers. New York: Teachers College Press. SPEAKER, K.; TAYLOR, D. and KAMEN, R. (2004). Storytelling: Enhancing
44. Language Acquisition in Young Children. Education, 125(1): 3-14. STAAL, L.A. (2000). The Story Face: An Adaptation of Story Mapping that
45. Incorporates Visualization and Discovery Learning to Enhance Reading and Writing. The Reading Teacher, 54(1): 26-31. TIERNEY, R.; READENCE, J.E. and DISHNER, E.K. (1985). Reading Strategies and Practices. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
46. VAUGHN, S. and EDMONDS, M. (2006). Reading Comprehension for Older Readers.
47. Intervention in School and Clinic. 41(3): 131-137. WALPOLE, S. (1998/1999). Changing Texts, Changing Thinking: Comprehension
48. Demands of New Science Textbooks, The Reading Teacher, 52(4): 358-369. WILLIAMS, J.P. (2005). Instruction in Reading Comprehension for Primary-Grade
49. Students: A Focus on Text Structure. The Journal of Special Education, 39(1): 6-18. WILLIAMS, J.P.& HALL, K.M. and LAUER, K.D. (2004). Teaching Expository Text
50. Structure to Young At-Risk Learners: Building the Basics of Comprehension Instruction. Exceptionality, 12(3): 129-144. WILLSON, V.L. and RUPLEY, W. H. (1997). A Structural Equation Model for Reading
51. Comprehension Based on Background, Phonemic, and Strategy Knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1): 45-63.