SOSYAL BİLGİLERDE ÖĞRENCİLERİN OKUDUĞUNU ANLAMA BECERİLERİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİNDE METİN YAPISINA BAĞLI OLARAK KULLANILABİLECEK STRATEJİ VE TEKNİKLER

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 16, 137 - 154, 01.10.2006

Cengiz Dönmez Kubilay Yazıcı

Öz

Sosyal bilgiler derslerinde eğitim-öğretim faaliyetleri sırasında yazılı materyallerden sıkça faydalanılmaktadır. Bu sebeple okuduğunu anlama becerileri, yazılı materyallerin daha işlevsel olarak kullanılması boyutunda önem kazanmaktadır. Okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin etkinliğinin artırılması ise, çeşitli stratejilerin kullanılması ile mümkündür. Stratejilerin kullanılması, öğrenci ve öğretmenlere metnin işlenişi ve konunun anlaşılması sırasında kolaylık sağlamaktadır. Bu derslerde kullanılabilecek okuduğunu anlama stratejilerinden bazıları, metin yapısına bağlı olarak değişiklik arz etmektedir. Sosyal bilgilerde kullanılabilecek metin yapıları; genellikle, bilgi verici ve hikâye edici olmak üzere iki grupta sınıflandırılabilir. Hikâye edici metinlerde kullanılabilecek okuduğunu anlama stratejilerinden bazıları: hikâye haritası, hikâye piramidi ve hikâyenin yüzü stratejisi iken, bilgi verici metinlerde kullanılabilecek okuduğunu anlama stratejileri ise: kavram haritaları, bildiklerim-bilmek istediklerim-öğrendiklerim stratejisi, herringbone tekniği ve grafik düzenleyicilerdir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Bilgiler, Metin Yapısı, Okuduğunu Anlama Stratejileri

THE STRATEGIES AND TECHNIQUES THAT CAN BE USED ACCORDING TO TEXT STRUCTURE IN IMPROVEMENT OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION SKILLS IN SOCIAL STUDIES

Öz

It is benefited from written materials frequently are being used at the process of education and instruction in the social studies courses. Therefore, reading comprehension skills have an increasing importance in the dimension of effective usage of written materials. The improvement of reading comprehension skills can be possible only by using various strategies. Usage of these strategies makes it easier to understand the subject and processing of the reading for students and teachers. Some of the reading comprehension strategies that can be used in these courses vary according to the structure of the text. The text structures that can be used in social studies may be classified under usually two groups like: expository and narrative texts. Some of the reading comprehension strategies that can be used in narrative texts are: story map, story pyramid, story face and reading comprehension strategies that can be used in expository texts are: concept map, KWL strategies, herringbone technique and graphic organizers

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Studies, Text Structure, Reading Comprehension Strategies

Kaynakça

• ALVERMANN, D.E. and PHELPS, S.F. (2005). Content Reading and Literacy. USA
• Ally and Bacon Fourth Edition. BOULINEAU, T.; FORE , C.B.; HAGAN, S. and BURKE, M. D. (2004). Use of Story
• Mapping to Increase the Story-Gramer Text Comprehension of Elementary Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, Spring. 105- 121. BRAYN, J. (1998). K-W-W-L: Questioning the Known. The Reading Teacher. 51(7): 620.
• BROER, N.A. & AARNOUSTSE, C.A.J. & KIEVIET, F.K. and LEEUWE, J.F.J.V. (2002). The Effect of Instructing the Structural Aspect of Text. Educationals Studies, (3): 213-238.
• BROWN, M.J.M. (1981). What Does the Author Say, What Does the Author Mean?
• Reading in the Social Studies. Theory into Practice. XX (3): 199-205. CAMP, D. (2000). It takes two: Teaching with Twin Text of Fact and Fiction. The Reading Teacher, 53(5): 400-408.
• CIARDIELLO, A.V. (2002). Helping Adolescents Understand Cause / Effect Text
• Structure in Social Studies. The Social Studies. 31-36. COTE’, N. and GOLDMAN, S.R. & SAUL, E.U. (1998). Students Making Sense of
• Informational Text: Relations Between Processing and Representation. Discourse Processes, 25(1): 1-53. DARCH, C. and EAVES, R. (1986). Visual Displays to Increase Comprehension of High
• School Learning-Disabled Students. Journal of Special Education, 20: 309-318. DICKSON, S. V. & SIMMONS, D.C. and KAMEENUI, E. J. (1995). Text Organization
• Cirricular and Instructional Implications for Diverse Learners. Technical Report No.18, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators, University of Oregon. DIMINO, J.; GERSTEN, R.; CARNINE, D. and BLAKE, G. (1990). Story Gramer: An
• Approach for Promoting At-Risk Secondary Students Comprehension of Literature. The Elementary School Journal, 91(1), 19-32. DOBBS, O. (2003). Using Reading Strategies to Reduce the Failure Rate in the Content
• Area. Subject: Social Studies. Grade Level: 6-7-8. ERIC Document No: ED 479 208, 1-41. DOWNING, J.A., BAKKEN, J.P. and WHEDON, C.K. (2002). Teaching Text Structure to Improve Reading Comprehension. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37(4): 229-233.
• EGAN, M. (1999). Reflections on Effective Use of Graphic Organizers. Journal of
• Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(8): 641-645. FORDHAM, N.W. & WELLMAN, D. and SANDMANN, A. (2002). Taming the Text
• Engaging and Supporting in Students Social Studies Readings. The Social Studies. July/August. 151-158. GARCIA, Jesus and MICHAELIS, John U. (2001). Social Studies for Children (A Guide to Basic Instruction). USA: Allyn & Bacon A Person Education Company.
• GARDILL, M.C. and JITENDRA, A.K. (1999). Advanced Story Map Instruction
• Effects on the Reading Comprehension of Students with Learning Disabilities. The Journal of Special Education. 33(1): 2-17
• GARKINS, R. and JONES, D.L. (1992). Developing Proficient Readers. Kentucky
• University, Institute on Education Reform, Eric Document No: ED 412 526. GARNER, J.K. and BOCHNA, C.R. (2004). Transfer of a Listening Comprehension
• Strategy to Independent Reading in First-Grade Students. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(2): 69-74. GERSTEN, R. and CARINE, D. (1986). Direct Instruction in Reading Comprehension
• Educational Leadership, April, 70-78. GUASTELLO, E.F. & BEASLEY, T.M. and SINATRA, R.C. (2000). Concept Mapping
• Effects on Science Content Comprehension of Low-Achieving Inner-City Seventh Graders. Remedial and Special Education, 21(6): 356-365. HEADLEY, K.N. and DUNSTON, P.J. (2000). Teachers’ Choices Boks and Comprehension Strategies as Transactions Tools. The Reading Teacher, 54(3): 260-268.
• HILL, R.C. (1994). Concept Mapping, Graphic Organizing and Structuring: Visual
• Techniques for Functional Content-Centered Reading Comprehension. Education, (1): 26-30. HORIBA, Y. 2000. Reader Control in Reading: Effects of Language Competence, Text
• Type and Task, Discourse Processes, 29(3): 223-267. IDOL, L. (1987). Group Story Mapping: A Comprehension Strategy for Both Skilled and Unskilled Readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 20(4) 196-205.
• JOHNSON, A.P. (1998). What Exactly Are Comprehension Skills and How Do I Teach Them. Reading. Jully, 22-26.
• JONES, B.F. & PIERCE, J. and HUNTER, B. (1988/1989). Teaching Students to
• Construct Graphic Representations. Educational Leadership, December/ January, 20-25. LANGAN-FOX, J.; WAYCOTT, J.L. and ALBERT, K. (2000). Linear and Graphic
• Advance Organizers: Properties and Processing, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1): 19-34. MARTELLA, N.M.; MILLER, T.L. and MACQUEEN, C. (1998). Graphic Organizers. Teaching K8. 46-48.
• MARTORELLA, P.H.; BEAL, C.M. and BOLICK C.M. (2005). Teaching Social Studies in Middle and Secondary Schools. New Jersey, Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall.
• MERKLEY, Donna M. and JEFFERIES, Debra. (2000). Guidelines for Implementing a
• Graphic Organizer. The Reading Teacher. 54(4).350-357. MOSS, B. (2004). Teaching Expository Text Structures Through Information Trade
• Book Retellings. The Reading Teacher, 57(8): 710-717. MYERS, M. P. and SAVAGE, T. (2005). Enhancing Student Comprehension of Social
• Studies Material. The Social Studies. January/February. 18-23. NEUFELD, P. (2005). Comprehension Instruction in Content Area Classes. The Reading Teacher, 59(4). 302-312.
• NOWAK, J. D. and GOWIN, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. New York
• Cambridge University Press. PEREGOY, S.F. and BOYLE, O.F. (2000). English Learners Reading English: What We
• Know, What We Need to Know. Theory Into Practice, 39 (4): 237-247. PRESLEY, M.; SYNMONS, S.; McGOLDRICK, J.A. and SYNDER, B.L. (1995).
• Reading Comprehension Strategies, Cognitive Strategy Instruction. (Edit: Michael Presley & Vera Woloshyn), Cambridge, Massachusetts: Brookline Books. REID, E.R. (1981). Comprehension Skills Can Be Taught. Educational Leadership. March, 455-457.
• RHODER, C. (2002). Mindful Reading: Strategy Training That Facilitates Transfer.
• Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(6): 498-512. SÂENZ, M.L. and FUCHS, L.S. (2002). Examining the Reading Difficulty of Secondary
• Students with Learning Disabilities. (Expository Versus Narrative Text). Remedial and Special Education, 23 (1): 31-41. SMITH, C.B. and ELLIOT, P.G. (1986). Reading Activities for Middle and Secondary
• Schools: A Handbook for Teachers. New York: Teachers College Press. SPEAKER, K.; TAYLOR, D. and KAMEN, R. (2004). Storytelling: Enhancing
• Language Acquisition in Young Children. Education, 125(1): 3-14. STAAL, L.A. (2000). The Story Face: An Adaptation of Story Mapping that
• Incorporates Visualization and Discovery Learning to Enhance Reading and Writing. The Reading Teacher, 54(1): 26-31. TIERNEY, R.; READENCE, J.E. and DISHNER, E.K. (1985). Reading Strategies and Practices. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
• VAUGHN, S. and EDMONDS, M. (2006). Reading Comprehension for Older Readers.
• Intervention in School and Clinic. 41(3): 131-137. WALPOLE, S. (1998/1999). Changing Texts, Changing Thinking: Comprehension
• Demands of New Science Textbooks, The Reading Teacher, 52(4): 358-369. WILLIAMS, J.P. (2005). Instruction in Reading Comprehension for Primary-Grade
• Students: A Focus on Text Structure. The Journal of Special Education, 39(1): 6-18. WILLIAMS, J.P.& HALL, K.M. and LAUER, K.D. (2004). Teaching Expository Text
• Structure to Young At-Risk Learners: Building the Basics of Comprehension Instruction. Exceptionality, 12(3): 129-144. WILLSON, V.L. and RUPLEY, W. H. (1997). A Structural Equation Model for Reading
• Comprehension Based on Background, Phonemic, and Strategy Knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1): 45-63.