ON THE PRINCIPLES OF IJTIHAD ACCORDING TO THE RATIO LEGIS OR TELEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION IN ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE

Yıl 2002, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 25 - 51, 31.05.2002

Ahmet Yaman

Öz

Ijtihad and reason of law (ratio legis) are two crucial concepts of fiqh,
which requires each other. Development of law preserving its vitality in parallel to
progress and change of social conditions depends on ijtihad while this developments’
being in accordance with legislators intentions is due to compliance with
the reason of law. For the expected development and vitality of law, mujtahids
who makes law and judges who implements law should give central importance to
the finalist character, namely the reason of law (ratio legis), in their interpretations
and judgments. Because of its critical function, in legal doctrine, it has been
accepted for a mujtahid to know the intentions of law as crucial.
Although it is so important to determine the legislators intention (ratio
legis) and to establish the legal system according to this end, subjectivities emerging
from the content of the subject and subjective interpretations are seemed as
dangers to be challenged. Some principles and assumptions must be determined
in order to prevent the dominance of subjectivity in law, which can be the result
of an attempt to find out the intention of the legislator. This article tries to find
out these principles; therefore, it indicates the ways ofevaluating text and sense
of a law together.

İSLAM HUKUK İLMİ AÇISINDAN MAKÂSID İCTİHADININ YA DA TELEOLOJİK YORUM YÖNTEMİNİN İLKELERİ ÜZERİNE

Öz