THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN’S ROLE AS A GUARDIAN OF GOOD ADMINISTRATION, THE RULE OF LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EU

Öz

Ombudsman is an important part of constitutional architecture of modern democracies. The Office of European Ombudsman was established by the Maastricht Treaty as part of the citizenship of the European Union. The aim of this study is to analyze role, aims and effectiveness of the Office of European Ombudsman. In this context, the procedures of complaints, legal sources, staff structure, budget and historical development of European Ombudsman are discussed. The European Ombudsman acts as an intermediary between the citizen and the EU institutions and investigates complaints about maladministration by institutions and bodies of the European Union. A citizen of a member state; person who reside legally in EU; business, associations or other bodies with a registered office in the Union may appeal the ombudsman to investigate an EU institution with the exception of the Court of Justice and the First Instance acting in their judicial role. But, European Ombudsman has no binding powers to compliance with his rulings. The Ombudsman primarily relies on the power of persuasion and publicity
and operates completely independently and impartially. European Ombudsman’s main objective is contribute to the ‘consolidation of an open, democratic and accountable administration’. He contributes to the goals of deepening the rules of law and enhancing the quality of democracy and human rights in the European Union. In this context, He proposes reforms to the EU institutions. European Ombudsman not only encourages transparency and promotes an administrative culture of service but also build trust through dialogue between citizens and the European Union’s institutions and to foster the highest standarts of behaviour in the Union’s institutions. Therefore, importance of the European Ombudsman is increasing day by day.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• European Ombudsman
• maladministration
• good administration right

AVRUPA OMBUDSMANI’NIN AB İÇİNDE İYİ YÖNETİM, HUKUKUN ÜSTÜNLÜĞÜ VE İNSAN HAKLARINI KORUYUCU ROLÜ

Öz

Ombudsman modern demokrasilerin anayasal mimarisinin önemli bir parçasıdır. Avrupa Ombudsmanı bürosu Maastricht Antlaşması ile Avrupa Birliği vatandaşlığının bir parçası olarak kuruldu. Bu çalışmanın amacı Avrupa Ombudsmanlığı Bürosu’nun rolünü, amaçlarını ve etkinliğini analiz etmektir. Bu kapsamda, Avrupa Ombudsmanı’nın tarihsel gelişimi, personel yapısı, bütçesi, şikayet prosedürü, hukuki kaynakları incelenmektedir. Avrupa Ombudsmanı AB kurumları ile vatandaşları arasında bir arabulucu gibi hareket eder ve Avrupa Birliği kurum ve organlarının kötü yönetimleri hakkındaki şikayetleri soruşturur. Bir üye devlet vatandaşı; AB’de yasal oturma hakkı olan gerçek kişiler ve bürosu Birlik içinde kayıtlı bulunan kurum, işyeri ya da diğer organlar, Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı ve İlk Derece Mahkemesi’nin yargısal rolü hariç, bir AB kurumunun soruşturulması için Avrupa Ombudsmanı’na başvurabilir. Fakat, Avrupa Ombudsmanı’nın kararları bağlayıcı güce sahip değildir. Ombudsman her şeyden önce kamuoyu ve ikna gücüne güvenir ve tam olarak bağımsız ve tarafsız olarak hareket eder. Avrupa Ombudsmanı Avrupa Birliği’nde demokrasi ve insan haklarının niteliğini geliştirme ve hukukun üstünlüğünü derinleştirme amaçlarına katkıda bulunmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, AB kurumlarına reformlar önerir. Onun temel amacı açık, demokratik ve sorumlu bir yönetimin güçlendirilmesine katkıda bulunmaktır. Avrupa Ombudsmanı yalnız şeffaflığı desteklemez ve yönetimin hizmet kültürünün gelişimine yardımcı olmaz aynı zamanda vatandaşlarla Avrupa Birliği kurumları arasında diyalog yoluyla güven inşa eder ve Birliğin kurumları içinde en yüksek davranış standartlarını teşvik eder. Bu yüzden, Avrupa Ombudsmanı’nın önemi giderek artmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Avrupa Ombudsmanı
• Kötü Yönetim
• İyi Yönetim hakkı

Kaynakça

1. Annual Report 2009 The European Ombudsman, Erişim: 01.04.2011, http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/activities/annualreports.faces
2. Annual Report 2010 The European Ombudsman, Erişim: 01.04.2011, http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/activities/annualreports.faces
3. Avrupa Birliği Temel Haklar Bildirgesi, Erişim: 07.01.2011, http://www.belgenet.com/ arsiv/sozlesme/ab_thb.html
4. Avrupa Doğru İdari Davranış Yasası, Avrupa Toplulukları (2005). Erişim:20.03.2011 http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/resources/code/faces/tr/3510/html.bookmark;jsessionid=F7993E50C701583EC7DC9059DEDD6262
5. Avrupa Ombudsmanı, (2011). Erişim: 28.03.2011, http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/ atyourservice/ataglance.faces/tr/25/html.bookmark.
6. Biering, Peter (2005). “The Danish Proposal to the Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union”, The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ss.38-51.
7. Clariana, Gregorio Garzon (2005). “Holding the Administration Accountable in Respect of its Discreationary Powers: the Roles and Approaches of the Court, the Parliament and the European Ombudsman”, The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ss.191-209.
8. Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union and Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, (2008). 2008/C 115/01, 9 May 2008, Erişim: 04.04.2011, http://eurlex.europa.eu/en/treaties/index.htm.

9. Council Decision of February 1994 approving the Decision of the European Parliament on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (94/114/ECSC, EC, Euratom) Erişim: 25.03.2011, http://www.ena.lu/council_decision_94_114_ecsc_ec_euratom_february_1994_2_4163.pdf.
10. Decision of the European Parliament of 18 June 2008 amending Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (2008/587/EC,Euratom) , Erişim: 10.03.2011, http://eurlex.eoropa.eu/
11. Diamandouros, P. Nikiforos (2005) “Reflections on the Future Role of the Ombudsman in a Changing Europe” The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ss.217-240
12. European Parliament Decision on the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties ( 9 March 1994) Revised Version (Decision of the European Parliament of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (94/262/ECSC,EC,Euratom) in Official Journal of the EC, 04.05.1994, No L113, p.15. )
13. Decision of the European Parliament of 14 March 2002 amending Decision 94/262/ECSC,EC, Euratom on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (2002/262/EC, ECSC, Euratom), in Official Journal of the European Communities (OJEC) 09.04.2002, No L 92, p.13, Erişim:13.03.2011, http://www.ena.lu/european_parliament_decision_performance_ ombudsman_duties_march_1994-2-4161.pdf
14. Fendoğlu, Hasan Tahsin, (2010). “Kamu Denetçiliği (Ombudsmanlık)”, Stratejik Düşünce Enstitüsü, Aralık 2010, Erişim: 10 Mart 2011, http://www.sde.org.tr/userfiles/file/Ombudsman.pdf.
15. Gonzales, Carlos Mareiro (2005). “The Spanish Proposal to the Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union”, The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ss.27-37
16. Gradın, Anita and Ranveig Jacopson, (2005). “Safeguarding the Rights of European Citizens: the European Commission Working with the European Ombudsman”, The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ss.162-166.
17. Hansen, Hans Gammeltoft- (2005). “Trends Leading to the Establishment of a European Ombudsman”, The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ss.13-26
18. Işıkay, Mahir (2001). Avrupa Birliği Ombudsmanı, Erişim: 21.03.2011, www.belgeler.com/ blg/7ch/Avrupa-birligi-ombudsmanı,
19. Karluk, Rıdvan (2007) Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye, Beta Yayınları ve Türkiye, 9. Baskı, İstanbul.
20. Kestane, Doğan, (2006). “Çağdaş Bir Denetim Organizasyonu Olarak Ombudsmanlık” (Kamu Denetçiliği), Maliye Dergisi, Sayı 151.
21. Köseoğlu, Özer (2010). Avrupa Ombudsmanı’nın Hukuki Statüsü, İşleyişi ve Kurumsal Etkinliği, Sayıştay Dergisi, Sayı: 79, ss.31-62
22. Magnette, Paul (2005). “The European Ombudsman Protecting Citizen’s Rights and Strengthening Parliamentary Scrutiny”, The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ss.106-125.
23. Magnette, Paul (2003). “Between parliamentary control and the rule of law: the political role of the Ombudsman in the European Union”, Journal of European Public Policy 10:5 October 2003, ss. 677-694
24. Mutta, Serdar (2005). İdarenin Denetlenmesi ve Ombudsman Sistemi, Kazancı, İstanbul.
25. Nikiforos Diamandouros re-elected as European Ombudsman, (20.01.2010) Erişim: 03.03.2011, http://www.europarl.cy.
26. Özden, Kemal (2010). Ombudsman Türkiye’deki Tartışmalar, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
27. Perillo, Ezio (2005). “The Process of Drafting the European Ombudsman’s Statute”, The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ss.52-82.
28. Powers and Responsibilities of the European Ombudsman. Erişim: 12.03.2011, http://www.ena.lu.
29. Press release No. 6/2011 Ombudsman: 72 % of European citizens do not feel well informed about the Charter of Fundamental Rights, (18 March 2011) Erişim:29.03.2011, http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/press/release.faces/en/10191/html.bookmark
30. Resolution on the Appointment of a Community Ombudsman by the European Parliament, (11 May 1979) (Official Journal 1979 C 140, p.153) Erişim:04.04.2011, http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/resources/historicaldocument.faces/en/4667/html.boo kmark
31. Song, Weiqing and Vincent Della Sala (2008). “Euroceptics and Europhiles in accord: the creation of the European Ombudsman as an institutional isomorphism”, Policy and Politics,Vol. 36, No: 4, 481-95 ss. 481-495.
32. Soderman, Jacop (2005). “The Early Years of the European Ombudsman”, The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ss.83-105
33. The Responsibilities and the election of the European Ombudsman, (2011). Erişim: 03.03.2011, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/election-ombudsman/view/en/index.html ,
34. The Work of the European Ombudsman, House of Lords European Committee 22nd Report of Session 6 March 2006, Erişim: 14.03.2011, http://www.statewatch.org/news/2006/mar/hol-rep-eu-ombuds.pdf
35. Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty of European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Communityi signed at Lisbon 13 December 2007, 2007/C 306/01 Official Journal of the European Union, Erişim: 05.04.2011, http://eurlex.europa.eu/en/treaties/index.htm
36. Valles, Juan Manuel Fabra (2005). “The European Ombudsman’s Resources-The Budget and Related Issues”, The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ss. 210 -216
37. Yiğit, Dilek (2004).“Avrupa Birliği Anayasası ve Kurumsal Yapı Reformu”, TC Başbakanlık Hazine Müsteşerlığı, Ekonomik Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Erişim: 23.03.2011, http://www.treasury.org.tr
38. What can the European Ombudsman do for you? An overview of the Ombudsman’s work and how he could help you, European Communities (2008). Erişim: 03.03.2011, http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/guide/endefault.htm