Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY

Yıl 2006, , 45 - 75, 29.12.2006
https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.199

Öz

Regional economic integration, which could take in different forms
ranging from a free trade agreement to an economic and monetary union,
could provide a number of opportunities to a member country and,
therefore, there has been an increasing interest in the regional economic
integration in the last half century among the developed and the developing
countries. The aim of this paper is to critically review and evaluate the
applied literature on the regional integration in the framework of the
gravity model. 

Kaynakça

  • Aitken, N.D. (1973). The Effect of the EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis. The American Economic Review, vo1.63,no.5,pp. 881-892.
  • Anderson, J. E. and van Wincoop, E. (2001). Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle, NBER Working Paper, No: w8079. Anderson, J.E. (1979). A theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. The American Economic Review, vol. 69 no.1, pp. 106-116.
  • Anderson, M. A. and Smith, S.L.S. (1999a). Canadian Provinces in World Trade: Engagement and Detachment, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 32, pp. 22-38.
  • Anderson, M.A. and Smith, S.L.S. (1999b). Do National Borders Really Matter? Canada-US Regional Trade Reconsidered, Review of International Economics, vo1.7, no.2, pp. 219-227.
  • Baldwin, R.E. and Venables, A. J. (1995). 'Regional Economic Integration'. G.Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds), Handbook of International Economics, vol. Ill, Northholland: Elsevier.
  • Baldwin, R. (1993). The Potential for trade between the countries of EFTA and Central and Eastern Europe, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 853.
  • Baldwin, R. (1994). Towards an Integrated Europe, CEPR. Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. (1997). 'Is regionalism simply a diversion? Evidence from the evolution of the EC and EFTA', T.lto and A.O. Krueger (eds), Regionalism Versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements, Chicago: University of Chicago press.
  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67, no.3, pp. 474-481.
  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and The Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 143-153. MARMARA JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES 71
  • Brabant, J.M. (2001). Transforming trade and Payments in Transition Economies: The Regional Dimension. Journal of Policy Modelling, vol. 23, pp. 99-126.
  • Breuss, F. and Egger, P. (1999). How Reliable Are Estimations of EastWest Trade Potentials Based on Cross-Section Gravity Analysis? Empirica, vol. 26, pp. 81-94.
  • Brulhart, M. and Kt<lly, M.J. (1999). Irland's Trading Potential with Central and Eastern European Countries: A Gravity Study. The Economic and Social Review, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 159-174.
  • Campos, N.F. and Coricelli, F. (2002). Growth in Transition: What We Know, What We Don't and What We Should, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XL, 793-836.
  • Ceglowski, J. (2000). Has the Border Narrowed? North American Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 11, pp. 61-75.
  • Chen, N. (2001). Intra-National Versus International Trade in The European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter?, CEPR/CEP workshop.
  • Cheng, I-Hui and Wall, H. J. (2001). Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade. Working Paper Series, No. 1999-0lOB, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
  • Dartan, M. and Akman, S. (1998). 'Geli~mekte Olan Ulkeler A91smdan Bolgesel Entegrasyon Stireci'. V. Serin (ed.), iktisat Politikasz, Se9me Konular, 665-683, istanbul: Alfa.
  • Davis, D. R. (1995). Intra-Industry Trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo Approach. Journal of International Economics, vol.39, pp. 201-206.
  • Deardorff, A. V. (1998). 'Determinants of bilateral trade: Does Gravity work in a neo-classical World?' Jeffry A. Frankel (ed), The Regionalization of the World Economy, pp.7-31, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Dura, C. and Atik, H. (2003). Avrupa Birligi Giimriik Birligi ve Tiirkiye. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. (1997). Technology and Bilateral Trade. NBER, Working Paper No. 6253.
  • El-Agraa, A. M. (ed), (1998). The European Union; History, Institutions, Economics and Policies. 5th edition, London: Prentice Hall 72 THE EMPRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
  • Endoh, M. (1999). Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the EEC, the LAFfA and the CMEA: 1960-1994. Applied Economics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 207-220.
  • Eren, E. and Bildirici, M. (200 1 ). Eski Sosyalist Ulkelerde Ekonomik Ba~an ve Ba~arlSlzhklar. jktisat, j~letme ve Finans, 16, March, 72-91.
  • Ertiirk, E., (1993). Ekonomik Entegrasyon Teorisi ve Tiirkiye'nin kinde Bulundugu Entegrasyonlar. Bursa:Ezgi Kitabevi.
  • Evans, C.L. (2001a). Border Effects and the Availability of Domestic Products Abroad. Mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • Evans, C.L. (2001b). Home Bias in Trade: Location or Foreign-ness? Mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • Evenett, S. J. and Keller, W. (1998). On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation. NBER working paper, no. 6529.
  • Facchini, G and Segnana, M.L. (2003). Growth at the EU Periphery: The Next Enlargement. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 43, 827-862.
  • Feenstra, R.C., Markusen, J.R.and Rose, A.K. (2001). Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate Among Alternative Theories of Trade. Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no.2, pp.430-447.
  • Frankel, J. A. (1998). The Regionalization of the World Economy, NBER: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Frankel, J. A. and Wei, S. J. (1998). 'Regionalisation of World Trade and Currencies: Economics and Politics'. Jeffry A. Frankel (ed), The Regionalization of the World Economy, pp.189-219, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Frankel, J., Stein, E. and Wei, S. (1995). Trading Blocs and The Americas: The Natural, The Unnatural, and The Super-Natural. Journal of Development Economics, vol. 47, pp. 61-95.
  • Frankel, J., Stein, E. and Wei, S. (1998). 'Continental Trading Blocs: Are They Natural or Supernatural?' Jeffry A. Frankel (ed), The Regionalization of the World Economy, pp. 91-113, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Gros, D. and Gonciarz, A. (1996). A Note on the Trade Potential of Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 12, pp. 709-721.
  • MARMARA JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES 73 Grossman, G. M. (1998). "Comment". In Jeffrey A. Frankel (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy, London: Chicago University Press, pp. 29-31.
  • Hamilton, C.B. and Winters, L.A. (1992). Opening Up International Trade With Eastern Europe. Economic Policy, vol. 14, pp. 77-116.
  • Hassan, M. K. (2001). Is SAARC A Viable Economic Block? Evidence From Gravity Model. Journal of Asian Economics, vol. 12, pp. 263-290.
  • Helliwell, J.F. (1996). Do National Borders Matter for Quebec's Trade? Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 29, no.3, pp. 507-522.
  • Helpman, E. (1987). Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries. Journal of Japanese and International Economics, vol. 1, pp. 62-81.
  • Hine, R. C. (1994). 'International Economic Integration'. D.Greenaway and L.A. Winters (eds), Surveys in International Trade, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Karakaya. E. and Cooke, A., (2002). Economic Integration: An Overview of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature. Nottingham Trent University, Discussion Paper in Applied Economics and Policy, No: 2002/02.
  • Keller, W. (1998). Bilateral Trade in a Multilateral World with Imperfect Specialisation, Mimeo, University of Texas, Austin.
  • Leamer, E. E. and Levinsohn, J. (1995). 'International Trade Theory: The evidence'. G. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds), Handbook of International Economics, vol. III. Northholland: Elsevier.
  • Linnemann, H. (1966). An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: Nort-Holland Publishing Company.
  • Lipsey, R.G. (1960). The Theory of Customs Unions: A General Survey. The Economic Journal, vol. 70, pp. 496-513.
  • Matyas, L.(1997). Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model. World Economy, vol. 20, no.3, pp. 363-368.
  • McCallum, J. (1995). National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns. The American Economic Review, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 615- 623.
  • Nitsch, V. (2000). National Borders and International Trade: Evidence from the European Union. Canadian Journal of Economics, vol.33, no.4, pp. 1091-1105.
  • 74 THE EMPRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION Pelzman, J. (1977). Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in The Council Of Mutual Economic Assistance: 1954-70. American Economic Review, vol. 67, pp. 713-22.
  • Polak, J.J. (1996). Is APEC a Natural Regional Trading Block? A critique of 'the Gravity Model' of International Trade. The World Economy, vol. 19(5), pp. 533-43.
  • Poyhonen, P ( 1963). A Tentative Model For The Volume Of Trade Between Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 90, pp.93-100. Primo-Braga, C.A., Sadafi, Rand Yeats, A. (1994). Regional Integration in the Americas: deja vu All Over Gain? World Economy, vol. 17, pp. 557- 601.
  • Sodersten, B. and Reed, G. (1994). International Economics. London: Macmillan Press.
  • Soloaga, I. and Winters, L. A. (2001). Regionalism in the Nineties: What Effect on Trade? North American Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 12 pp. 1-29.
  • Thursby, J. G. and Thursby, M.C. (1987). "Bilateral Trade Flows, the Linder Hypothesis,and Exchange Risk". The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 69, pp. 488-495.
  • Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2002). Undertaking Systematic Review: Developing and Evidence-Based Approach for Management Research. US Academy of Management Conference, Denver, Colorado 2002.
  • Viner, J. (1950). The Customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Wall, H. J. (1999). Using The Gravity Model to Estimate the Costs of Protection: Review. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Jan-Feb. 8111, pp. 33-40.
  • Wall, H. J. (2000). Gravity Model Specification and the Effects of the Canada-US Border. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series, no. 2000-024A.
  • Wang, Z.K. and Winters, L. A. (1992). The trading Potential of Eastern Europe. Journal of Economic Integration. vol. 7(2), pp. 113-136.
  • MARMARA JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES 75 Wei, Shang-Jin (1996). Intra-National Versus International Trade: How Stubborn Are Nations In Global Integration. NBER Working paper, no.5531.
  • Winters, L. A. and Chang, W. (2000). Regional Integration and Import Prices: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of International Economics, vol. 51, pp. 363-377.
  • Winters, L.A. (1987). Britain In Europe: A Survey of Quantitative Trade Studies. Journal of Common Market Studies. vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 315-335.
  • Winters, L.A. (1984). British Imports Of Manufactures and The Common Market. Oxford Economic Papers. vol. 36, pp. 103-118.

THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY

Yıl 2006, , 45 - 75, 29.12.2006
https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.199

Öz

Regional economic integration, which could take in different forms
ranging from a free trade agreement to an economic and monetary union,
could provide a number of opportunities to a member country and,
therefore, there has been an increasing interest in the regional economic
integration in the last half century among the developed and the developing
countries. The aim of this paper is to critically review and evaluate the
applied literature on the regional integration in the framework of the
gravity model. 

Kaynakça

  • Aitken, N.D. (1973). The Effect of the EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis. The American Economic Review, vo1.63,no.5,pp. 881-892.
  • Anderson, J. E. and van Wincoop, E. (2001). Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle, NBER Working Paper, No: w8079. Anderson, J.E. (1979). A theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. The American Economic Review, vol. 69 no.1, pp. 106-116.
  • Anderson, M. A. and Smith, S.L.S. (1999a). Canadian Provinces in World Trade: Engagement and Detachment, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 32, pp. 22-38.
  • Anderson, M.A. and Smith, S.L.S. (1999b). Do National Borders Really Matter? Canada-US Regional Trade Reconsidered, Review of International Economics, vo1.7, no.2, pp. 219-227.
  • Baldwin, R.E. and Venables, A. J. (1995). 'Regional Economic Integration'. G.Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds), Handbook of International Economics, vol. Ill, Northholland: Elsevier.
  • Baldwin, R. (1993). The Potential for trade between the countries of EFTA and Central and Eastern Europe, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 853.
  • Baldwin, R. (1994). Towards an Integrated Europe, CEPR. Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. (1997). 'Is regionalism simply a diversion? Evidence from the evolution of the EC and EFTA', T.lto and A.O. Krueger (eds), Regionalism Versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements, Chicago: University of Chicago press.
  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67, no.3, pp. 474-481.
  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and The Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 143-153. MARMARA JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES 71
  • Brabant, J.M. (2001). Transforming trade and Payments in Transition Economies: The Regional Dimension. Journal of Policy Modelling, vol. 23, pp. 99-126.
  • Breuss, F. and Egger, P. (1999). How Reliable Are Estimations of EastWest Trade Potentials Based on Cross-Section Gravity Analysis? Empirica, vol. 26, pp. 81-94.
  • Brulhart, M. and Kt<lly, M.J. (1999). Irland's Trading Potential with Central and Eastern European Countries: A Gravity Study. The Economic and Social Review, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 159-174.
  • Campos, N.F. and Coricelli, F. (2002). Growth in Transition: What We Know, What We Don't and What We Should, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XL, 793-836.
  • Ceglowski, J. (2000). Has the Border Narrowed? North American Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 11, pp. 61-75.
  • Chen, N. (2001). Intra-National Versus International Trade in The European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter?, CEPR/CEP workshop.
  • Cheng, I-Hui and Wall, H. J. (2001). Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade. Working Paper Series, No. 1999-0lOB, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
  • Dartan, M. and Akman, S. (1998). 'Geli~mekte Olan Ulkeler A91smdan Bolgesel Entegrasyon Stireci'. V. Serin (ed.), iktisat Politikasz, Se9me Konular, 665-683, istanbul: Alfa.
  • Davis, D. R. (1995). Intra-Industry Trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo Approach. Journal of International Economics, vol.39, pp. 201-206.
  • Deardorff, A. V. (1998). 'Determinants of bilateral trade: Does Gravity work in a neo-classical World?' Jeffry A. Frankel (ed), The Regionalization of the World Economy, pp.7-31, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Dura, C. and Atik, H. (2003). Avrupa Birligi Giimriik Birligi ve Tiirkiye. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. (1997). Technology and Bilateral Trade. NBER, Working Paper No. 6253.
  • El-Agraa, A. M. (ed), (1998). The European Union; History, Institutions, Economics and Policies. 5th edition, London: Prentice Hall 72 THE EMPRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
  • Endoh, M. (1999). Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the EEC, the LAFfA and the CMEA: 1960-1994. Applied Economics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 207-220.
  • Eren, E. and Bildirici, M. (200 1 ). Eski Sosyalist Ulkelerde Ekonomik Ba~an ve Ba~arlSlzhklar. jktisat, j~letme ve Finans, 16, March, 72-91.
  • Ertiirk, E., (1993). Ekonomik Entegrasyon Teorisi ve Tiirkiye'nin kinde Bulundugu Entegrasyonlar. Bursa:Ezgi Kitabevi.
  • Evans, C.L. (2001a). Border Effects and the Availability of Domestic Products Abroad. Mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • Evans, C.L. (2001b). Home Bias in Trade: Location or Foreign-ness? Mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • Evenett, S. J. and Keller, W. (1998). On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation. NBER working paper, no. 6529.
  • Facchini, G and Segnana, M.L. (2003). Growth at the EU Periphery: The Next Enlargement. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 43, 827-862.
  • Feenstra, R.C., Markusen, J.R.and Rose, A.K. (2001). Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate Among Alternative Theories of Trade. Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no.2, pp.430-447.
  • Frankel, J. A. (1998). The Regionalization of the World Economy, NBER: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Frankel, J. A. and Wei, S. J. (1998). 'Regionalisation of World Trade and Currencies: Economics and Politics'. Jeffry A. Frankel (ed), The Regionalization of the World Economy, pp.189-219, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Frankel, J., Stein, E. and Wei, S. (1995). Trading Blocs and The Americas: The Natural, The Unnatural, and The Super-Natural. Journal of Development Economics, vol. 47, pp. 61-95.
  • Frankel, J., Stein, E. and Wei, S. (1998). 'Continental Trading Blocs: Are They Natural or Supernatural?' Jeffry A. Frankel (ed), The Regionalization of the World Economy, pp. 91-113, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Gros, D. and Gonciarz, A. (1996). A Note on the Trade Potential of Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 12, pp. 709-721.
  • MARMARA JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES 73 Grossman, G. M. (1998). "Comment". In Jeffrey A. Frankel (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy, London: Chicago University Press, pp. 29-31.
  • Hamilton, C.B. and Winters, L.A. (1992). Opening Up International Trade With Eastern Europe. Economic Policy, vol. 14, pp. 77-116.
  • Hassan, M. K. (2001). Is SAARC A Viable Economic Block? Evidence From Gravity Model. Journal of Asian Economics, vol. 12, pp. 263-290.
  • Helliwell, J.F. (1996). Do National Borders Matter for Quebec's Trade? Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 29, no.3, pp. 507-522.
  • Helpman, E. (1987). Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries. Journal of Japanese and International Economics, vol. 1, pp. 62-81.
  • Hine, R. C. (1994). 'International Economic Integration'. D.Greenaway and L.A. Winters (eds), Surveys in International Trade, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Karakaya. E. and Cooke, A., (2002). Economic Integration: An Overview of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature. Nottingham Trent University, Discussion Paper in Applied Economics and Policy, No: 2002/02.
  • Keller, W. (1998). Bilateral Trade in a Multilateral World with Imperfect Specialisation, Mimeo, University of Texas, Austin.
  • Leamer, E. E. and Levinsohn, J. (1995). 'International Trade Theory: The evidence'. G. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds), Handbook of International Economics, vol. III. Northholland: Elsevier.
  • Linnemann, H. (1966). An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: Nort-Holland Publishing Company.
  • Lipsey, R.G. (1960). The Theory of Customs Unions: A General Survey. The Economic Journal, vol. 70, pp. 496-513.
  • Matyas, L.(1997). Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model. World Economy, vol. 20, no.3, pp. 363-368.
  • McCallum, J. (1995). National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns. The American Economic Review, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 615- 623.
  • Nitsch, V. (2000). National Borders and International Trade: Evidence from the European Union. Canadian Journal of Economics, vol.33, no.4, pp. 1091-1105.
  • 74 THE EMPRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION Pelzman, J. (1977). Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in The Council Of Mutual Economic Assistance: 1954-70. American Economic Review, vol. 67, pp. 713-22.
  • Polak, J.J. (1996). Is APEC a Natural Regional Trading Block? A critique of 'the Gravity Model' of International Trade. The World Economy, vol. 19(5), pp. 533-43.
  • Poyhonen, P ( 1963). A Tentative Model For The Volume Of Trade Between Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 90, pp.93-100. Primo-Braga, C.A., Sadafi, Rand Yeats, A. (1994). Regional Integration in the Americas: deja vu All Over Gain? World Economy, vol. 17, pp. 557- 601.
  • Sodersten, B. and Reed, G. (1994). International Economics. London: Macmillan Press.
  • Soloaga, I. and Winters, L. A. (2001). Regionalism in the Nineties: What Effect on Trade? North American Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 12 pp. 1-29.
  • Thursby, J. G. and Thursby, M.C. (1987). "Bilateral Trade Flows, the Linder Hypothesis,and Exchange Risk". The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 69, pp. 488-495.
  • Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2002). Undertaking Systematic Review: Developing and Evidence-Based Approach for Management Research. US Academy of Management Conference, Denver, Colorado 2002.
  • Viner, J. (1950). The Customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Wall, H. J. (1999). Using The Gravity Model to Estimate the Costs of Protection: Review. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Jan-Feb. 8111, pp. 33-40.
  • Wall, H. J. (2000). Gravity Model Specification and the Effects of the Canada-US Border. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series, no. 2000-024A.
  • Wang, Z.K. and Winters, L. A. (1992). The trading Potential of Eastern Europe. Journal of Economic Integration. vol. 7(2), pp. 113-136.
  • MARMARA JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES 75 Wei, Shang-Jin (1996). Intra-National Versus International Trade: How Stubborn Are Nations In Global Integration. NBER Working paper, no.5531.
  • Winters, L. A. and Chang, W. (2000). Regional Integration and Import Prices: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of International Economics, vol. 51, pp. 363-377.
  • Winters, L.A. (1987). Britain In Europe: A Survey of Quantitative Trade Studies. Journal of Common Market Studies. vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 315-335.
  • Winters, L.A. (1984). British Imports Of Manufactures and The Common Market. Oxford Economic Papers. vol. 36, pp. 103-118.
Toplam 65 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Muhittin Kaplan Bu kişi benim

Muhsin Kar Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2006
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2006

Kaynak Göster

APA Kaplan, M., & Kar, M. (2006). THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 45-75. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.199
AMA Kaplan M, Kar M. THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY. MJES. Aralık 2006;14(2):45-75. doi:10.29228/mjes.199
Chicago Kaplan, Muhittin, ve Muhsin Kar. “THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY”. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 14, sy. 2 (Aralık 2006): 45-75. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.199.
EndNote Kaplan M, Kar M (01 Aralık 2006) THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 14 2 45–75.
IEEE M. Kaplan ve M. Kar, “THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY”, MJES, c. 14, sy. 2, ss. 45–75, 2006, doi: 10.29228/mjes.199.
ISNAD Kaplan, Muhittin - Kar, Muhsin. “THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY”. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 14/2 (Aralık 2006), 45-75. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.199.
JAMA Kaplan M, Kar M. THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY. MJES. 2006;14:45–75.
MLA Kaplan, Muhittin ve Muhsin Kar. “THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY”. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 14, sy. 2, 2006, ss. 45-75, doi:10.29228/mjes.199.
Vancouver Kaplan M, Kar M. THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A LITERATURE SURVEY. MJES. 2006;14(2):45-7.