Konferans Bildirisi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

CASE C-138/13, NAIME DOGAN v. BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 123 - 126, 29.12.2014
https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.90

Öz

Naime Dogan is the wife of a Turkish national economically active in Germany, who was denied an entry visa by the German authorities on the ground, that her German language skills were insufficient. She had passed an oral test but because she was illiterate, she had guessed the answers to a written test and had been unlucky as to the results. On this ground she had been denied a visa for spousal reunion. The refusal of the visa meant that she could only visit her husband on short term tourist visas and she was not able to enjoy a right to reunion with her spouse of 13 years in Germany. She contested the refusal. This then gave rise to two issues of EU law referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter ‘the Court of Justice’) for a preliminary ruling, namely, whether there was a violation of Article 41(1) of the 1970 Additional Protocol to the 1963 Association Agreement between the EU and Turkey (hereinafter ‘Ankara Agreement’), and if not, whether there was a breach of Directive 2003/86 on family reunification, which allows Member States to require compliance with ‘integration measures’.

CASE C-138/13, NAIME DOGAN v. BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 123 - 126, 29.12.2014
https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.90

Öz

Naime Dogan is the wife of a Turkish national economically active in Germany, who was denied an entry visa by the German authorities on the ground, that her German language skills were insufficient. She had passed an oral test but because she was illiterate, she had guessed the answers to a written test and had been unlucky as to the results. On this ground she had been denied a visa for spousal reunion. The refusal of the visa meant that she could only visit her husband on short term tourist visas and she was not able to enjoy a right to reunion with her spouse of 13 years in Germany. She contested the refusal. This then gave rise to two issues of EU law referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter ‘the Court of Justice’) for a preliminary ruling, namely, whether there was a violation of Article 41(1) of the 1970 Additional Protocol to the 1963 Association Agreement between the EU and Turkey (hereinafter ‘Ankara Agreement’), and if not, whether there was a breach of Directive 2003/86 on family reunification, which allows Member States to require compliance with ‘integration measures’.

Toplam 0 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm MAK
Yazarlar

Mattia Filippin Bu kişi benim

Nanette Neuwahl Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Filippin, M., & Neuwahl, N. (2014). CASE C-138/13, NAIME DOGAN v. BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, 22(2), 123-126. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.90
AMA Filippin M, Neuwahl N. CASE C-138/13, NAIME DOGAN v. BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND. MJES. Aralık 2014;22(2):123-126. doi:10.29228/mjes.90
Chicago Filippin, Mattia, ve Nanette Neuwahl. “CASE C-138/13, NAIME DOGAN V. BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND”. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 22, sy. 2 (Aralık 2014): 123-26. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.90.
EndNote Filippin M, Neuwahl N (01 Aralık 2014) CASE C-138/13, NAIME DOGAN v. BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 22 2 123–126.
IEEE M. Filippin ve N. Neuwahl, “CASE C-138/13, NAIME DOGAN v. BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND”, MJES, c. 22, sy. 2, ss. 123–126, 2014, doi: 10.29228/mjes.90.
ISNAD Filippin, Mattia - Neuwahl, Nanette. “CASE C-138/13, NAIME DOGAN V. BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND”. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 22/2 (Aralık 2014), 123-126. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.90.
JAMA Filippin M, Neuwahl N. CASE C-138/13, NAIME DOGAN v. BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND. MJES. 2014;22:123–126.
MLA Filippin, Mattia ve Nanette Neuwahl. “CASE C-138/13, NAIME DOGAN V. BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND”. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 22, sy. 2, 2014, ss. 123-6, doi:10.29228/mjes.90.
Vancouver Filippin M, Neuwahl N. CASE C-138/13, NAIME DOGAN v. BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND. MJES. 2014;22(2):123-6.