Economic Regionalization and Black Sea in a Comparative Perspective

Öz

Since the end of the Cold War, the study of regions has become a major preoccupation of political

scientists. And yet, regionalism still means many different things to many different peoples in too

many different contexts. Nonetheless, economic interdependences through trade and other intraregional

activities is one of the main pillar of regionalization in any given example. The driving impulse

of this paper is that there is a hypothetical relation with emerging regional economic relations and

regionalism. That is, regionalism and emerging regional economic activities self-enforcing phenomena

at least on theoretical front. In this sense, it is sensible to look at the some of the trade and economic

statistics to determine the state of regionalization in the Black Sea. Therefore, this paper first tries to

demarcate “Black Sea Region” and possible sub regions than will comparatively analyses the economic

regionalization process by comparing some other regions and sub regions. The main finding of the

paper suggests that fundamentally due to the fact that every member of Black Sea regions has been

engaging with other exclusive regionalization movements, regionalization in the wider Black Sea is

weak and underdeveloped.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Regionalism,Black Sea as a Region,Comparative Regionalism,Trade and Economy in Black Sea,BSEC.

Kaynakça

1. Astrov, Vasily, and Peter Havlik. (2008), “Economic Developments in the Wider Black Sea Region.” 349. Vienna: Vienna Isntitute for International Economic Studies. http://www.wiiw.ac.at/economicdevelopments- in-the-wider-black-sea-region-dlp-458.pdf.
2. Aydin, Mustafa, (2005), “Regional Cooperation in the Black Sea and the Role of Institutions.” Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs 10: 58–61.
3. Bolukbasi, Tolga, and Ebru Ertugral, (2008), “Regionalism and Regionalization in the Black Sea Region and Turkey.” 2012/2. Black Sea Discussion Papers. Istanbul: EDAM. http://bit.ly/2j0zxn0.
4. Börzel, Tanja A., and Thomas Risse, eds. (2016), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Celac, Sergiu, and Panagiota Manoli, (2006) “Towards a New Model of Comprehensive Regionalism in the Black Sea Area.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 6 (2): 193–205. doi:10.1080/14683850600694262.
6. David, Mitrany, (1933), The Progress of International Government. London: Unwin Brothers LTD., Woking. Fawcett, Louise, (2004), “Exploring Regional Domains: A Comparative History of Regionalism.” International Affairs 80 (3): 429–46. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00391.x.
7. Hajizada, Mukhtar, (2012), “Complex Regionalisation in the Wider Black Sea Area.” University of Leicester. https://lra.le.ac.uk/handle/2381/27769.
8. Hajizada, Mukhtar, and Florent Marciacq, (2013) “New Regionalism in Europe’s Black Sea Region: The EU, BSEC and Changing Practices of Regionalism.” East European Politics 29 (3): 305–27. doi:10.1080/ 21599165.2013.807800.

9. Lake, David A, and Patrick M. Morgan, (1997), Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
10. Lawrence, Robert Z, (1996), Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration. Washington DC.: Brookings Institution Press.
11. Manoli, Panagiota, (2013), The Dynamics of Black Sea Subregionalism. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
12. ———. 2014. “Regional Coopertaion in the Black Sea.” Commissioned Paper for the Black Sea Trade and Development Bank. http://bit.ly/2j0zR5a.
13. Mitrany, David, (1948), “The Functional Approach to World Organization.” International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 24 (3): 350–63. doi:10.2307/3018652.
14. Oatley, Thomas, (2012), International Political Economy. Pearson Longman.
15. Panagariya, Arvind, (1999), “The Regionalism Debate: An Overview.” World Economy 22 (4): 455–76. doi:10.1111/1467-9701.00214.
16. Ravenhill, John, (2014), Global Political Economy. 4 edition. Oxford ; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.