Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Debate on the Concept of Flexicurity at the European Union Level

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 237 - 257, 15.03.2016

Öz


















The aim of this
article is to focus on the concept of flexicurity, accepted as the new labour
market model balancing the needs of employers for greater flexibility in order
to adapt to market forces, and the need of employees for security, which has
recently been one of the most popular concepts of the debate on labour market
reforms in the European Union (EU). While doing so, this article discusses the
position of key European institutions, especially of the Commission of the
European Communities (CEC). The main argument is that the concept is still very
open to alternative interpretations at the EU level. Related to this openness
is the fact that the Commission has deliberately instrumentalized the concept’s
ambiguity in order to absorb all the main actors into the debate in line with
its own policy preferences.

Kaynakça

  • Ashiaghbor, D. (2005) The European Employment Strategy, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Barbier, J., C. (2007) “From political strategy to analytical research and back to politics, a sociological approach of ‘flexicurity’” in Jørgensen, H. And Madsen, P., K. (eds.), Flexicurity and Beyond: Finding a New Agenda for the European Social Model, Copenhagen, Denmark: DJOF Publishing 155-189.
  • Bekker, S. (2007) “Flexibility and security in the adaptability of the EES: A Study of Commission Guidelines and Recommendations and Countries’ Responses”, Paper for the 5th International Research Conference on Social Security: Social security and the labour market: A mismatch? International Social Security Association, Warsaw, 5-7 March 2007, 1-29.
  • Bercusson, B. (ed.) (2007) “Manifesto for a Social Constitution: 8 options for the European Union”, European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education and Health and Safety (ETUI-REHS), Brussels, p. 1-133, http://www.etui-rehs.org/en/content/search?SearchText=manifesto+social+constitution [July 10, 2008].
  • Bertola, G. (2006) “Social and labour market policies in a growing EU”, Swedish Economic Policy Review, vol.13: 189-231.
  • Bredgaard, T. and Larsen, F. (2007) “Comparing Flexicurity in Denmark and Japan”, Tokyo: Japan Instıtute for Labour Policy and Training (JILPT), JILPT Research Report, http://www.samf.aau.dk/~thomas/ JILPT%20report-final%5b1%5d.pdf [March 12, 2008].
  • Burroni, L. and Keune, M. (2011) “Flexicurity: A conceptual critique”, European Journal of Industrial Relations 17(1): 75-91.
  • BusinessEurope (2007a) “Philippe de Buck on flexicurity”, http://www.businesseurope.eu/content/default. asp?Pageid=526 [February 23, 2008].
  • BusinessEurope (2007b) “6 November 2007 Position Paper: Commission Communication towards Common Principles of Flexicurity”, http://www.businesseurope.eu/content/default.asp?pageid=426 [July 10, 2008].
  • BusinessEurope (2007c) “European Parliament vote shows support to flexicurity”, November 29, 2007, http:// www.businesseurope.eu/content/default.asp?pageid=426 [February 23, 2008].
  • Büchs, M. (2007) New Governance in European Social Policy: The Open Method of Coordination, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2006a) Employment in Europe 2006, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • CEC (2006b), Modernizing the Labour Law to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century, Green Paper, COM (2006) 708 final, Brussels.
  • CEC (2007), Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and Better Jobs through Flexibility and Security, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions, COM (2007) 357 final, Brussels, 27 June 2007.
  • Council of the European Union (2007) Council Conclusions: Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity, adopted on 5/6 December 2007.
  • Daguerre, A. (2007) Active Labour Market Policies and Welfare Reform: Europe and the US in Comparative Perspective, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Economist (2007) “In the Shadow of Prosperity”, vol. 382(8512), 20 January 2007.
  • ETUC (2007a) “Stakeholder conference on flexicurity”, http://www.etuc.org/a/3593 [August 26, 2007]. ETUC (2007b) “The Flexicurity Debate and the Challenges for the Trade Union Movement”, http://www. etuc.org/a/3588 [August 26, 2007].
  • ETUC (2007c) “ETUC’s position adopted by the ETUC Executive Committee of 17-18 October 2007”, http:// www.etuc.org/a/4233 [January 17, 2008].
  • EurActiv (2007a) “Social Partners on flexicurity and labour market reforms”, http://www.euractiv.com/ en/socialeurope/social-partners-flexicurity-labour-market-reforms/article-164260 [August 26, 2007].
  • EurActiv (2007b) “Trade Unions and employers clinch deal on flexicurity”, http://www.euractiv.com/en/ socialeurope/trade-unions-employers-clinch-deal-flexicurity/article-167750 [December 20, 2007].
  • European Expert Group on Flexicurity (2007) “Flexicurity Pathways: Turning hurdles into stepping stones”, Report by the European Expert Group on Flexicurity, June 2007, 1-41, http://ec.europa.eu/ employment_social/employment_strategy/pdf/flexi_pathways_en.pdf [July 10, 2008].
  • European Industrial Relations Review (2006) “Flexicurity in the spotlight”, Issue 395, December 2006, 27-32.
  • European Parliament (2007) European Parliament resolution of 29 November 2007 on Common Principles of Flexicurity, 2007/2209(INI), Brussels. Fitch, S. (2007) “Copenhagen Capitalism”, Forbes, vol.179(5), 12 March 2007.
  • Frederiksen, C. H. (2007) “Flexicurity”, Speech of the Danish Minister for Employment at a conference organized by European Commission on “Pathways towards a better combination of flexibility and security”, April 20, 2007, Brussels, http://www.bm.dk/sw19898.asp [September 20, 2007].
  • Jepsen, M. and Serrano Pascual, A. (2005) “The European Social Model: an exercise in deconstruction”, Journal of European Social Policy, vol.15(3): 231-245, http://esp.sagepub.com [May 11, 2007]
  • Jørgensen, H. and Madsen, P.; K. (2007) “Flexicurity and Beyond - Reflections on the Nature and Future of a Political Celebrity”, in Jørgensen, H. And Madsen, P., K. (eds.), Flexicurity and Beyond: Finding a New Agenda for the European Social Model, Copenhagen, Denmark: DJOF Publishing 7-35.
  • Keune, M. (2007) “Flexicurity as the new labour market model for the European Union?”, Paper presented at the conference ‘Are flexibility and security compatible in the labour market?’, Future of Work Conference Series, Caixa Sabadell’s Obra Social and Sabadell City Council, Sabadell, Spain, 12 November 2007.
  • Keune, M. (2008) “Flexicurity: A Contested Concept at the Core of the European Labour Market Debate”, Intereconomics, March/April 2008, 92-98.
  • Keune, M. & Jepsen, M. (2007) “Not balanced and hardly new: the European Commission’s quest for flexibility”, European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education and Health and Safety (ETUIREHS), Brussels, 1-24, http://www.etui-rehs.org/research/activities/Employment-and-socialpolicies/Reports-and-discussion-papers/WP-2007.01 [December 17, 2007].
  • Keune, M. and Serrano Pascual, A. (2014) “The Power to Name and Struggles over Meaning: The Concept of Flexicurity” in Maarten Keune and Amparo Serrano Pascual (eds.), Deconstructing Flexicurity and Developing Alternative Approaches: Towards New Concepts and Approaches for Employment and Social Policy, New York: Routledge.
  • Nardo, M. and Rossetti, F. (2013) “Flexicurity in Europe”, Report prepared for the use of the European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, 1-82. Rogowski, R. (2007) “Governance of EU Social and Employment Policies as Reflexive Coordination”, Paper presented at the Workshop on Multi-level Governance, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, May 17-19, 1-23. Rogowski, R. (2008) “Governance of the European Social Model: The Case of Flexicurity”, Intereconomics, March/April 2008, 82-91. Scharpf, F. (2002) “The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity”, MPIfG Working Paper 02/8, 1-24.
  • Seifert, H. (2008) “Flexicurity: between theory and empirical evidence”, Paper presented at the conference ‘Flexicurity and the Lisbon Strategy’, Lessius University College, Antwerpen, Belgium, 17 January 2008.
  • Serrano Pascual, A. (2009) “The battle of ideas in the European field: the combat to defeat unemployment and the struggle to give it a name”, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 15(1): 53-70.
  • Serrano Pascual, A. and Crespo Suárez, E. (2007) “The government of activation policies by EU institutions”, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, vol.27(9/10): 376-386.
  • USA Today (2007) “Denmark’s flexicurity blends welfare state, economic growth”, March 07, 2007.
  • Weiss, G. and Wodak, R. (2000) “Discussion: The EU Committee Regime and the Problem of Public Space” in Muntigl, P., Weiss, G and Wodak, R. (eds.), European Union Discourses on Un/employment: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Employment Policy-making and Organizational Change, Amsterdam/ The Netherlands: John Benjamin Publishing Company, 185-207.
  • Wilthagen, T. (2008) “Flexicurity: concepts, principles and pathways”, Paper presented at the conference ‘Flexicurity and the Lisbon Strategy’, Lessius University College, Antwerpen, Belgium, 17 January 2008.
  • Wilthagen, T. & Tros, F. (2004) “The concept of ‘flexicurity’: a new approach to regulating employment and labour markets”, Transfer 10(2): 166-186.

Avrupa Birliği Düzeyinde Güvenceli Esneklik Kavramı Üzerindeki Tartışmalar

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 237 - 257, 15.03.2016

Öz


















Bu çalışmanın
amacı, son zamanlarda Avrupa Birliği’ndeki işgücü piyasası reformları
üzerindeki tartışmalarda en gözde kavramlardan biri haline gelen; işverenlerin
piyasa koşullarına uyum sağlamak için daha çok esneklik ihtiyaçları ile,
işçilerin güvenlik ihtiyaçlarını dengelediği kabul edilen, güvenceli esneklik
kavramına yoğunlaşmaktır. Bu yapılırken, kilit Avrupa Birliği kurumlarının,
özellikle Avrupa Toplulukları Komisyonu’nun, kavram üzerinde benimsedikleri
tutumlar tartışılmaktadır. Kavramın Avrupa Birliği düzeyinde halen alternatif
yorumlamalara açık olduğu ve bununla alakalı olarak, Avrupa Toplulukları
Komisyonu’nun diğer tüm ana aktörleri tartışmaya çekebilmek için kavramı
kasıtlı olarak muğlak araçsallaştırmış olduğu, bu çalışmanın başlıca argümanı olacaktır.

Kaynakça

  • Ashiaghbor, D. (2005) The European Employment Strategy, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Barbier, J., C. (2007) “From political strategy to analytical research and back to politics, a sociological approach of ‘flexicurity’” in Jørgensen, H. And Madsen, P., K. (eds.), Flexicurity and Beyond: Finding a New Agenda for the European Social Model, Copenhagen, Denmark: DJOF Publishing 155-189.
  • Bekker, S. (2007) “Flexibility and security in the adaptability of the EES: A Study of Commission Guidelines and Recommendations and Countries’ Responses”, Paper for the 5th International Research Conference on Social Security: Social security and the labour market: A mismatch? International Social Security Association, Warsaw, 5-7 March 2007, 1-29.
  • Bercusson, B. (ed.) (2007) “Manifesto for a Social Constitution: 8 options for the European Union”, European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education and Health and Safety (ETUI-REHS), Brussels, p. 1-133, http://www.etui-rehs.org/en/content/search?SearchText=manifesto+social+constitution [July 10, 2008].
  • Bertola, G. (2006) “Social and labour market policies in a growing EU”, Swedish Economic Policy Review, vol.13: 189-231.
  • Bredgaard, T. and Larsen, F. (2007) “Comparing Flexicurity in Denmark and Japan”, Tokyo: Japan Instıtute for Labour Policy and Training (JILPT), JILPT Research Report, http://www.samf.aau.dk/~thomas/ JILPT%20report-final%5b1%5d.pdf [March 12, 2008].
  • Burroni, L. and Keune, M. (2011) “Flexicurity: A conceptual critique”, European Journal of Industrial Relations 17(1): 75-91.
  • BusinessEurope (2007a) “Philippe de Buck on flexicurity”, http://www.businesseurope.eu/content/default. asp?Pageid=526 [February 23, 2008].
  • BusinessEurope (2007b) “6 November 2007 Position Paper: Commission Communication towards Common Principles of Flexicurity”, http://www.businesseurope.eu/content/default.asp?pageid=426 [July 10, 2008].
  • BusinessEurope (2007c) “European Parliament vote shows support to flexicurity”, November 29, 2007, http:// www.businesseurope.eu/content/default.asp?pageid=426 [February 23, 2008].
  • Büchs, M. (2007) New Governance in European Social Policy: The Open Method of Coordination, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2006a) Employment in Europe 2006, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • CEC (2006b), Modernizing the Labour Law to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century, Green Paper, COM (2006) 708 final, Brussels.
  • CEC (2007), Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and Better Jobs through Flexibility and Security, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions, COM (2007) 357 final, Brussels, 27 June 2007.
  • Council of the European Union (2007) Council Conclusions: Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity, adopted on 5/6 December 2007.
  • Daguerre, A. (2007) Active Labour Market Policies and Welfare Reform: Europe and the US in Comparative Perspective, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Economist (2007) “In the Shadow of Prosperity”, vol. 382(8512), 20 January 2007.
  • ETUC (2007a) “Stakeholder conference on flexicurity”, http://www.etuc.org/a/3593 [August 26, 2007]. ETUC (2007b) “The Flexicurity Debate and the Challenges for the Trade Union Movement”, http://www. etuc.org/a/3588 [August 26, 2007].
  • ETUC (2007c) “ETUC’s position adopted by the ETUC Executive Committee of 17-18 October 2007”, http:// www.etuc.org/a/4233 [January 17, 2008].
  • EurActiv (2007a) “Social Partners on flexicurity and labour market reforms”, http://www.euractiv.com/ en/socialeurope/social-partners-flexicurity-labour-market-reforms/article-164260 [August 26, 2007].
  • EurActiv (2007b) “Trade Unions and employers clinch deal on flexicurity”, http://www.euractiv.com/en/ socialeurope/trade-unions-employers-clinch-deal-flexicurity/article-167750 [December 20, 2007].
  • European Expert Group on Flexicurity (2007) “Flexicurity Pathways: Turning hurdles into stepping stones”, Report by the European Expert Group on Flexicurity, June 2007, 1-41, http://ec.europa.eu/ employment_social/employment_strategy/pdf/flexi_pathways_en.pdf [July 10, 2008].
  • European Industrial Relations Review (2006) “Flexicurity in the spotlight”, Issue 395, December 2006, 27-32.
  • European Parliament (2007) European Parliament resolution of 29 November 2007 on Common Principles of Flexicurity, 2007/2209(INI), Brussels. Fitch, S. (2007) “Copenhagen Capitalism”, Forbes, vol.179(5), 12 March 2007.
  • Frederiksen, C. H. (2007) “Flexicurity”, Speech of the Danish Minister for Employment at a conference organized by European Commission on “Pathways towards a better combination of flexibility and security”, April 20, 2007, Brussels, http://www.bm.dk/sw19898.asp [September 20, 2007].
  • Jepsen, M. and Serrano Pascual, A. (2005) “The European Social Model: an exercise in deconstruction”, Journal of European Social Policy, vol.15(3): 231-245, http://esp.sagepub.com [May 11, 2007]
  • Jørgensen, H. and Madsen, P.; K. (2007) “Flexicurity and Beyond - Reflections on the Nature and Future of a Political Celebrity”, in Jørgensen, H. And Madsen, P., K. (eds.), Flexicurity and Beyond: Finding a New Agenda for the European Social Model, Copenhagen, Denmark: DJOF Publishing 7-35.
  • Keune, M. (2007) “Flexicurity as the new labour market model for the European Union?”, Paper presented at the conference ‘Are flexibility and security compatible in the labour market?’, Future of Work Conference Series, Caixa Sabadell’s Obra Social and Sabadell City Council, Sabadell, Spain, 12 November 2007.
  • Keune, M. (2008) “Flexicurity: A Contested Concept at the Core of the European Labour Market Debate”, Intereconomics, March/April 2008, 92-98.
  • Keune, M. & Jepsen, M. (2007) “Not balanced and hardly new: the European Commission’s quest for flexibility”, European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education and Health and Safety (ETUIREHS), Brussels, 1-24, http://www.etui-rehs.org/research/activities/Employment-and-socialpolicies/Reports-and-discussion-papers/WP-2007.01 [December 17, 2007].
  • Keune, M. and Serrano Pascual, A. (2014) “The Power to Name and Struggles over Meaning: The Concept of Flexicurity” in Maarten Keune and Amparo Serrano Pascual (eds.), Deconstructing Flexicurity and Developing Alternative Approaches: Towards New Concepts and Approaches for Employment and Social Policy, New York: Routledge.
  • Nardo, M. and Rossetti, F. (2013) “Flexicurity in Europe”, Report prepared for the use of the European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, 1-82. Rogowski, R. (2007) “Governance of EU Social and Employment Policies as Reflexive Coordination”, Paper presented at the Workshop on Multi-level Governance, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, May 17-19, 1-23. Rogowski, R. (2008) “Governance of the European Social Model: The Case of Flexicurity”, Intereconomics, March/April 2008, 82-91. Scharpf, F. (2002) “The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity”, MPIfG Working Paper 02/8, 1-24.
  • Seifert, H. (2008) “Flexicurity: between theory and empirical evidence”, Paper presented at the conference ‘Flexicurity and the Lisbon Strategy’, Lessius University College, Antwerpen, Belgium, 17 January 2008.
  • Serrano Pascual, A. (2009) “The battle of ideas in the European field: the combat to defeat unemployment and the struggle to give it a name”, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 15(1): 53-70.
  • Serrano Pascual, A. and Crespo Suárez, E. (2007) “The government of activation policies by EU institutions”, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, vol.27(9/10): 376-386.
  • USA Today (2007) “Denmark’s flexicurity blends welfare state, economic growth”, March 07, 2007.
  • Weiss, G. and Wodak, R. (2000) “Discussion: The EU Committee Regime and the Problem of Public Space” in Muntigl, P., Weiss, G and Wodak, R. (eds.), European Union Discourses on Un/employment: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Employment Policy-making and Organizational Change, Amsterdam/ The Netherlands: John Benjamin Publishing Company, 185-207.
  • Wilthagen, T. (2008) “Flexicurity: concepts, principles and pathways”, Paper presented at the conference ‘Flexicurity and the Lisbon Strategy’, Lessius University College, Antwerpen, Belgium, 17 January 2008.
  • Wilthagen, T. & Tros, F. (2004) “The concept of ‘flexicurity’: a new approach to regulating employment and labour markets”, Transfer 10(2): 166-186.
Toplam 37 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Hasan Faruk Uslu

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Mart 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Uslu, H. F. (2016). Avrupa Birliği Düzeyinde Güvenceli Esneklik Kavramı Üzerindeki Tartışmalar. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 237-257.
AMA Uslu HF. Avrupa Birliği Düzeyinde Güvenceli Esneklik Kavramı Üzerindeki Tartışmalar. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi. Mart 2016;4(1):237-257.
Chicago Uslu, Hasan Faruk. “Avrupa Birliği Düzeyinde Güvenceli Esneklik Kavramı Üzerindeki Tartışmalar”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 4, sy. 1 (Mart 2016): 237-57.
EndNote Uslu HF (01 Mart 2016) Avrupa Birliği Düzeyinde Güvenceli Esneklik Kavramı Üzerindeki Tartışmalar. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 4 1 237–257.
IEEE H. F. Uslu, “Avrupa Birliği Düzeyinde Güvenceli Esneklik Kavramı Üzerindeki Tartışmalar”, Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 4, sy. 1, ss. 237–257, 2016.
ISNAD Uslu, Hasan Faruk. “Avrupa Birliği Düzeyinde Güvenceli Esneklik Kavramı Üzerindeki Tartışmalar”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 4/1 (Mart 2016), 237-257.
JAMA Uslu HF. Avrupa Birliği Düzeyinde Güvenceli Esneklik Kavramı Üzerindeki Tartışmalar. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi. 2016;4:237–257.
MLA Uslu, Hasan Faruk. “Avrupa Birliği Düzeyinde Güvenceli Esneklik Kavramı Üzerindeki Tartışmalar”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 4, sy. 1, 2016, ss. 237-5.
Vancouver Uslu HF. Avrupa Birliği Düzeyinde Güvenceli Esneklik Kavramı Üzerindeki Tartışmalar. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi. 2016;4(1):237-5.

Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi’nin hakemli akademik yayınıdır. Altı ayda bir yayınlanır. Dergide yayınlanan makalelerdeki görüşler yazarlarına aittir. Yayın Kurulu tarafından benimsendiği anlamına gelmez. Yayın Kurulu, yazının özüne dokunmaksızın gerekli yazım ve cümle değişikliklerini yapma hakkını saklı tutar. Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, ulusal (TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Veri Tabanı) ve uluslararası (EBSCO, ULRICH) alan endekslerinde taranmaktadır.  

 

Journal of Political Science is a peer-reviewed academic journal of Marmara University Faculty of Political Science. The journal is a biannual publication. All the views and opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors and they do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editor, the editorial board, or the publisher. The editorial board reserves the right to make necessary changes in spelling and sentences without changing content. The journal is indexed by EBSCO International Index, ULRICH's and the ULAKBİM Social and Human Sciences Database.