Research Article

A Comparitive Study of Space Syntax Analysis between Traditional Antakya Houses and Social Housing Complexes by TOKI

Volume: 7 Number: 1 July 8, 2022
TR EN

A Comparitive Study of Space Syntax Analysis between Traditional Antakya Houses and Social Housing Complexes by TOKI

Abstract

Space syntax analysis method is used to define the regions, cities, built environments, building groups, spatial models, and indoor organizations at different scales and to examine their interaction with social structure. This study aimed to analyse the spatial organization of traditional atria by using the space syntax method and to reveal the socio-cultural effect of atria. The spatial morphology and behavioural models regarding the traditional Antakya houses and social houses built by the Housing Development Administration of the Republic of Turkey, the institution that has the largest share in the construction of high-rise buildings in Turkey, were compared and analysed through the space syntax method As a result of the study, it has been determined that the privacy of family and women directly affects the design in traditional Antakya houses. On the other hand in TOKI buildings has been observed that individual privacy was given more importance and it has been determined that this was not created by building design decisions, but by the entrance doors of the rooms.

Keywords

Space syntax, traditional Antakya house, TOKI buildings, socio-cultural interaction

Thanks

The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics committee permission was not required for the study.

References

  1. Alitajer, S. & Nojoumi, G. M. (2016). Privacy at home: Analysis of behavioural patterns in the spatial configuration of traditional and modern houses in the city of Hamedan based on the notion of space syntax. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(3), 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2016.02.003
  2. Almhafdy, A., Ibrahim, N., Ahmad, S. S. & Yahya, J. (2013). Courtyard design variants and microclimate performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 170-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.190
  3. Arıman, B. (2002). Antakya kenti tarihi doku içinde tipolojik analiz çalışmaları (Typological Analysis in the Ancient Texture of the City of Antakya), (MsC Thesis). Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul.
  4. Ascensão, A., Costa, L., Fernandes, C., Morais, F. & Ruivo, C. (2019). 3D space syntax analysis: Attributes to be applied in landscape architecture projects. Urban Science, 3(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010020
  5. Asif, N., Utaberta, N., Sabil, A. B. & Ismail, S. (2018). Reflection of cultural practices on syntactical values: An introduction to the application of space syntax to vernacular Malay architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(4), 521-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2018.08.005
  6. Atak, Ö. (2009). Mekan Dizim ve Görünür Alan bağlamında Geleneksel Kayseri Evleri (Traditional Kayseri Houses in Contex Of Space Syntax And Visibility Graph Analysis), (MsC Thesis). Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul.
  7. Baç, S. (2012). Tarihi Kentlerde Koruma Kavramının Mekan-Dizim Yöntemi Üzerinden Araştırılması-Bergama Örneği (The Analysis of The Concept of Preservation in Historical Cities Using Space Syntax Method - The Case Of Bergama). (PhD Thesis). Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir.
  8. Bafna, S. (2003). Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238863
  9. Bekar, İ. & Koç Altuntaş, S. (2021). Kullanıcı gereksinmeleri özelinde geleneksel konutların mekânsal okumaları. International Journal of Mardin Studies, 2 (1), 83-103.
  10. Bekleyen, A. & Dalkılıç, N. (2011). The influence of climate and privacy on indigenous courtyard houses in Diyarbakır, Turkey. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(4), 908-922. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE10.958
APA
Ergün, R., Kutlu, İ., & Kılınç, C. (2022). A Comparitive Study of Space Syntax Analysis between Traditional Antakya Houses and Social Housing Complexes by TOKI. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7(1), 284-297. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1068659
AMA
1.Ergün R, Kutlu İ, Kılınç C. A Comparitive Study of Space Syntax Analysis between Traditional Antakya Houses and Social Housing Complexes by TOKI. JASA. 2022;7(1):284-297. doi:10.30785/mbud.1068659
Chicago
Ergün, Ruşen, İzzettin Kutlu, and Cemre Kılınç. 2022. “A Comparitive Study of Space Syntax Analysis Between Traditional Antakya Houses and Social Housing Complexes by TOKI”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 7 (1): 284-97. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1068659.
EndNote
Ergün R, Kutlu İ, Kılınç C (July 1, 2022) A Comparitive Study of Space Syntax Analysis between Traditional Antakya Houses and Social Housing Complexes by TOKI. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 7 1 284–297.
IEEE
[1]R. Ergün, İ. Kutlu, and C. Kılınç, “A Comparitive Study of Space Syntax Analysis between Traditional Antakya Houses and Social Housing Complexes by TOKI”, JASA, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 284–297, July 2022, doi: 10.30785/mbud.1068659.
ISNAD
Ergün, Ruşen - Kutlu, İzzettin - Kılınç, Cemre. “A Comparitive Study of Space Syntax Analysis Between Traditional Antakya Houses and Social Housing Complexes by TOKI”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 7/1 (July 1, 2022): 284-297. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1068659.
JAMA
1.Ergün R, Kutlu İ, Kılınç C. A Comparitive Study of Space Syntax Analysis between Traditional Antakya Houses and Social Housing Complexes by TOKI. JASA. 2022;7:284–297.
MLA
Ergün, Ruşen, et al. “A Comparitive Study of Space Syntax Analysis Between Traditional Antakya Houses and Social Housing Complexes by TOKI”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, vol. 7, no. 1, July 2022, pp. 284-97, doi:10.30785/mbud.1068659.
Vancouver
1.Ruşen Ergün, İzzettin Kutlu, Cemre Kılınç. A Comparitive Study of Space Syntax Analysis between Traditional Antakya Houses and Social Housing Complexes by TOKI. JASA. 2022 Jul. 1;7(1):284-97. doi:10.30785/mbud.1068659