Measuring Universities’ Sustainability Performance with Using UI GreenMetric World Ranking: A Case Study of Düzce University

Yıl 2024, , 145 - 164, 30.07.2024

Pınar Gültekin Yaşar Selman Gültekin Nermin Başaran Melek Yılmaz Kaya

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1403115

Öz

The university campus is a dynamic system in which the concept of sustainability can be applied to all the needs of the university. Universities with the "green campus" approach provide effective use of their resources. As part of the study, the data of the main campus of the Düzce University for 2021 was evaluated based on the UI GreenMetric Ranking. Calculations and assessments were made for the campus land cover, structural and vegetative areas. A general assessment of the entire campus was carried out using the sustainability and green campus approach with dataset. As a result, Düzce University is progressing towards the realisation of a sustainable/green campus, facilitated by the discernible impact of the survey components. The creation of a sustainable/green campus will make a difference in the province of Düzce and accelerate local development actions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Climate change, green campus, nature-based solutions, resource efficiency, Türkiye.

Etik Beyan

There is no conflict of interest.

Üniversitelerin Sürdürülebilirlik Performansının UI GreenMetric Dünya Sıralaması Kullanılarak Ölçülmesi: Düzce Üniversitesi Örneği

Öz

Üniversite kampüsü, sürdürülebilirlik kavramının üniversitenin tüm ihtiyaçlarına uygulanabileceği dinamik bir sistemdir. "Yeşil kampüs" yaklaşımına sahip üniversiteler kaynaklarının etkin kullanımını sağlamaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında Düzce Üniversitesi ana kampüsünün 2021 yılı verileri UI GreenMetric Ranking'e göre değerlendirilmiştir. Kampüs arazi örtüsü, yapısal ve bitkisel alan hesaplamaları ve değerlendirmeleri yapılmıştır. Karbon ayak izi kampüs nüfus verileri kullanılarak hesaplanmıştır. Sürdürülebilirlik ve yeşil kampüs yaklaşımıyla veri setine dayalı tüm kampüsün genel bir değerlendirmesi yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, Düzce Üniversitesi, anket bileşenlerinin fark edilebilir etkisiyle kolaylaştırılan sürdürülebilir/yeşil bir kampüsün gerçekleştirilmesine doğru ilerlemektedir. Sürdürülebilir/yeşil bir kampüsün oluşturulması, Düzce ilinde fark yaratarak yerel kalkınma eylemlerini hızlandıracaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İklim değişikliği, yeşil kampüs, doğa tabanlı çözümler, kaynak verimliliği, Türkiye.

Kaynakça

• Abbas, J. & Dogan, E. (2022). The impacts of organizational green culture and corporate social responsibility on employees’ responsible behaviour towards the society. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-11.
• Abtahi, S. M. (2021). Isfahan University of Technology (IUT): Towards a green campus energy, climate and sustainable development ınitiatives at IUT. J. Sustain. Perspect. Spec, (2021), 424.
• Adeniran, A.E., Nubi, A.T. & Adelopo, A. O. (2017). Solid waste generation and characterization in the University of Lagos for a sustainable waste management. Waste Manag. 67, 3–10. Access Address (20.07.2021): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.002.
• Al-Khatib, I.A., Arafat, H.A., Basheer, T., Shawahneh, H., Salahat, A., Eid, J. & Ali, W. (2007). Trends and problems of solid waste management in developing countries: a case study in seven Palestinian districts. Waste Manag. 27 (12), 1910–1919. Access Address (15.08.2021): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.11.006.
• Alshuwaikhat, H. M. & Abubakar, I. (2008). An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. J. Clean. Prod. 16, 1777e1785. Access Address (08.01.2022): https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclepro.2007.12.002.
• Angelakis A., Marecos Do Monte M., Bontoux L. & Asano T. (1999) The status of wastewater reuse practices in the Mediterranean Basin: Need for Guidelines, Wat. Res, 33(10), 2201-2217.
• Angelakis, A. N., Bontoux, L. & Lazarova, V. (2003). Challenges and Prospectives for Water Recycling and Reuse in EU Countries. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2003, 3, 59–68.
• Berchin, I. I., dos Santos Grando, V., Marcon, G. A., Corseuil, L. & de Andrade, J. B. S. O. (2017). Strategies to promote sustainability in higher education institutions. Int. J. Sustain. High Educ. 18 (7), 1018–1038. Access Address (18.08.2021): https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2016-0102.
• Boiocchi, R., Ragazzi, M., Torretta, V. & Rada, E. C. (2023). Critical Analysis of the GreenMetric World University Ranking System: The Issue of Comparability. Sustainability. 2023; 15(2):1343. Access Address (12.10.2023): https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021343.
• Dağlıoğlu, S. T., Sertkaya, S., Kinal, A., Bor, M., & Ayaz, D. (2018). The Evoluation Of Green University Ranking-A Case Study Ege University, Greenmetric.
• Dahlawi, S. & El Sharkawy, M.F. (2021). Assessment of solid waste management practice in the university campus. Int. J. Sustain. High Educ. 22 (3), 561–575. Access Address (24.10.2023): https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05- 2020-0183.
• Dalbelo, T. S. (2021). Interacting The Urban Masterplan of Unicamp with the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Sustainability Perspectives: Special Issue, 270, 270.
• de Vega, C. A., Benítez, S. O. & Barreto, M. E. R. (2008). Solid waste characterization and recycling potential for a university campus. Waste Manag. 28, S21–S26. Access Address (15.09.2023): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.022
• Disterheft, A., Caeiro, S., Azeiteiro, U. M., & Leal, W. (2019), Sustainable universities a study of critical success factors for participatory approaches, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(5), 748–771.
• EEB. (2018). Recycling – Who Really Leads the World? European Environmental Bureau. Access Address (15.09.2023): https://eunomia.eco/reports/recycling-who-really-leads-the-world/
• Fader, M., Cranmer, C., Lawford, R. & Engel-Cox, J. (2018). Toward an understanding of synergies and trade-offs between water, energy, and food SDG targets. Front Environ Sci 6, 112.
• Fatta-Kassinos, D., Kalavrouziotis, I. K., Koukoulakis, P. H. & Vasquez M. I. (2011). The risks associated with wastewater reuse and xenobiotics in the agroecological environment, The Science of the Total Environment, 409, 3555-3563.
• Findler, F., Schönherr, N. & Lozano, R. (2019). Assessing the impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development—an analysis of tools and indicators, Sustainability, 11(1), 59.
• Freidenfelds, D., Kalnins, S. N. & Gusca J. (2018). What does environmentally sustainable higher education institution mean?," Energy Procedia, vol. 147, pp. 42-47.
• Fu, Q., Abdul Rahman, A. A., Jiang, H., Abbas, J. & Comite, U. (2022). Sustainable supply chain and business performance: the impact of strategy, network design, information systems, and organizational structure. Sustainability 14:1080. Access Address (09.02.2023): https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031080.
• García-Madurga, M. Á., Grilló-Méndez, A. J., Delgado-de Miguel, J. F. & Esteban-Navarro, M. Á. (2022). Circular economy and public policies in the face of the new normality. Global Nest Journal, 24(4), 576-589.
• GreenMetric. (2022). Rankings. Access Address (12.09.2023):https://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/rankings/overall- rankings-2021.
• GreenMetric. (2022a). UI GreenMetric Guidelines (2022). Access Address (12.09.2023): https://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/publications/questionnaire.
• GreenMetric. (2022b). Methodology (2022). Access Address (12.09.2023):https://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/about/methodology
• GreenMetric. (2023). UI GreenMetric Guidelines (2022). Access Address (12.09.2023): https://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/rankings/overall-rankings-2022.
• GreenMetric. (2023a). Access Address (12.09.2023): https://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/rankings/overall-rankings- 2022.
• Grindsted, T. S. (2011). Sustainable universities from declarations on sustainability in higher education to national law. Environ Econ, 2(2), 29–36.
• Grindsted, T. S. & Hol, T. (2012). Thematic development of declarations on sustainability in higher education. Journal of Environmental Economics, 3 (1), 32-40
• Haksevenler, B. H. G., Kavak, F. F. & Akpinar, A. (2022). Separate waste collection in higher education institutions with its technical and social aspects: A case study for a university campus. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367, 133022.
• Hao, L., Wang, P., Yu, J., & Ruan, H. (2022). An integrative analytical framework of water-energy-food security for sustainable development at the country scale: A case study of five Central Asian countries. Journal of Hydrology, 607, 127530.
• Haseeb, M., Tahir, Z., Batool, S. A., Majeed, A., Ahmad, S. R., & Kanwal, S. (2022). The carbon footprint of a public sector University before and during the COVID-19 lockdown. Global Nest Journal, 24(1), 29-36.
• Heinz, T. (1995). Blueprint for a Green Campus: the Campus Earth Summit Initiatives for Higher Education. A Project of the Heinz Family Foundation. pp. 1-46.
• Hooey, C., Mason, A. & Triplett, J. (2017).“Beyond greening: challenges to adopting sustainability in institutions of higher education”, Midwest Quarterly, Vol. 58 No. 3, pp. 280-291.
• Ikhlayel, M. (2018). Development of management systems for sustainable municipal solid waste in developing countries: a systematic life cycle thinking approach. J. Clean. Prod. 180, 571–586. Access Address (06.10.2023): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.057
• Iresha, F. M. & Prasojo, S. A. (2018). Evaluation of solid waste management at campus using the “Zero Waste Index”: the case on campus of Islamic University of Indonesia. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 154. EDP Sciences, 02004. Access Address (06.10.2023): https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815402004
• Kalayci Onac, A., Cetin, M., Sevik, H., Orman, P., Karci, A. & Sutcuoglu, H. H. (2021). Rethinking the campus transportation network in the scope of ecological design principles: case study of Izmir Katip Çelebi University Çiğli Campus. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 50847–50866. Access Address (25.10.2022): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14299-2.
• Kellis, M., Kalavrouziotis, I. K., & Gikas, P. (2013). Review of wastewater reuse in the Mediterranean countries, focusing on regulations and policies for municipal and industrial applications. Global NEST Journal, 15(3), 333- 350.
• Kiper, T., Uzun, O., & Ateş, O. (2022). Spatialization of ECOS method at micro-basin level in rural development- oriented ecotourism planning. Global Nest Journal, 24(2), 218-233.
• Kumar P., Debele, S. E., Sahani, J., Rawat, N., Marti-Cardona, B., Alfieri, S. M., … & Zieher, T. (2021). Nature-based solutions efficiency evaluation against natural hazards: modelling methods, advantages and limitations. Sci. Total Environ. 784:147058. Access Address (25.10.2022): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147058.
• Lai, C. S., Jia, Y., Dong, Z., Wang, D., Tao, Y., Lai, Q. H., Wong, R. T. K., Zobaa, A. F., Wu, R. & Lai, L. L. (2020). A Review of Technical Standards for Smart Cities. In Clean Technologies (Vol. 2, Issue 3). Access Address (25.10.2022): https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol2030019.
• Lambrechts, W., Ceulemans, K. (2013). Sustainability assessment in higher education: Evaluating the use of the auditing instrument for sustainability in higher education (AISHE) in Belgium. In: Caeiro, S., Filho, W.L., Jabbour, C., Azeiteiro, U.M. (Eds.), Sustainability Assessment Tools in Higher Education Institutions: Mapping Trends and Good Practices Around the World. Springer, Heidelberg and New York, pp. 157–174.
• Lauder, A., Sari, R. F., Suwartha, N. & Tjahjono, G. (2015). Critical Review of a Global Campus Sustainability Ranking: GreenMetric. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 852–863.
• Li, C., Fan, X., Hu, Y., Yan, Y., Shang, G. & Chen, Y. (2022). Spatial Spillover Effect of Green Finance on Economic Development, Environmental Pollution, and Clean Energy Production across China.
• Lukman, R., Kranjc, D. & Glavic, P. (2010). University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 619-628.
• Maçin, K. E., Arıkan, O. A. & Demir, İ. (2020). The UI GreenMetric ranking system: Analyzing impacts of categories on overall results. In 6th International Conference on sustainable Development, 4-06.
• Marsudi, H. R., Nugroho, B., Bawole, R., Raharjo, S., Sineri, A. & Mabuid, D. S. (2021). The Green Campus Concept Implementation Based on Environmental and Infrastructure Arrangements: A Case Study of Sports Center Facilities and Infrastructure University of Papua, Indonesia. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(14), 3438-3453.
• Mertens, E., Stiles, R. & Karadeniz, N. (2022). Green May Be Nice, but Infrastructure Is Necessary. Land, 11(1), 89.
• Moya, D., Ald´as, C., Jaramillo, D., J´ativa, E. & Kaparaju, P. (2017). Waste-To-Energy Technologies: an opportunity of energy recovery from Municipal Solid Waste, using Quito-Ecuador as case study. Energy Proc, 134, 327–336. Access Address (25.10.2022): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.537.
• Muñoz-Suárez M, Guadalajara N, Osca, J. M. (2020). A Comparative Analysis between Global University Rankings and Environmental Sustainability of Universities. Sustainability, 2020; 12(14):5759. Access Address (25.10.2023):https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145759.
• Mushtaha, E., Alsyouf, I., Bettayeb, M., Al Jaberi, B. H., & Al Mallahi, M. (2022). Managing University of Sharjah Setting and Infrastructure Towards a Sustainable and Livable Campus. Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, 2(2).
• Nanda, S., Berruti, F. (2020). Thermochemical conversion of plastic waste to fuels: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett., 19 (1), 123–148. Access Address (25.10.2023): https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01094-7.
• Pedrero F., Kalavrouziotis I.K., Alarcon J., Koukoulakis P. & Asano T. (2009) Use of treated municipal wastewater in irrigated agriculture- Review of the practices in Spain and Greece, Agricultural Water Management, 97(9), 1233-1241.
• Randal, E., Shaw, C., Woodward, A., Howden-Chapman, P., Macmillan, A., Hosking, J., … & Keall, M. (2020). “Fairness in transport policy: a new approach to applying distributive justice theories”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 23, p. 10102, doi: 10.3390/su122310102.
• Ribeiro, J. M. P., Hoeckesfeld, L., Dal Magro, C. B., Favretto, J., Barichello, R., Lenzi, F. C., ... & de Andrade, J. B. S. O. (2021). Green Campus Initiatives as sustainable development dissemination at higher education institutions: Students’ perceptions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127671.
• Rodríguez-Rodríguez, A., Mejías-Elizondo, R. & Vindas-Chacón, C. (2022). University environmental performance in the UI Green Metric Ranking: case of Costa Rican Institute of Technology, central technological campus. Revista Tecnología en Marcha, 35(1), 90-99.
• Romero-Infante, J. A., Ramírez, M. S. R., Luna, L. A., Leguizamon, S. & Verjel, E. (2022). Green economy metrics as a promoter of sustainable development in universities. Case study: El Bosque University. Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, 2, 439-448.
• Sahani, J., Kumar, P., Debele, S., Spyrou, C., Loupis, M., Aragão, L., ... & Di Sabatino, S. (2019). Hydro-meteorological risk assessment methods and management by nature-based solutions. Science of The Total Environment, 696, 133936.
• Sen, G., Chau, H. W., Tariq, M. A. U. R., Muttil, N. & Ng, A. W. M. (2022). Achieving sustainability and carbon neutrality in higher education institutions: A review. Sustainability, 2022, 14, 222.
• Setyowati, E., Harani, A. R. & Falah, Y. N. (2013). Green building design concepts of healthcare facilities on the orthopedic hospital in the tropics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 189-199.
• Shah, M. A. R., Renaud, F. G., Anderson, C. C., Wild, A., Domeneghetti, A., Polderman, A., ... & Zixuan, W. (2020). A review of hydro-meteorological hazard, vulnerability, and risk assessment frameworks and indicators in the context of nature-based solutions. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 50, 101728.
• Shi, H. & Lai, E. (2013). An alternative university sustainability rating framework with a structured criteria tree, Journal of Cleaner Production, 61, 59-69. Access Address (25.10.2022): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.006.
• Sterzer, L. (2017). “Does competition in the housing market cause transport poverty? Interrelations of residential location choice and mobility”, European Transport Research Review, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.1007/s12544- 017-0259-3.
• Sun, L., Kaufman, M. F., Sirk, E. A., Durga, S., Mahowald, N. M. & You, F. (2022). COVID-19 impact on an academic Institution's greenhouse gas inventory: The case of Cornell University. Journal of Cleaner Production, 363, 132440.
• Suwartha, N. & Berawi, M. A. (2019). The role of UI GreenMetric as a global sustainable ranking for Higher Education Institutions. Int. J. Technol, 10, 862-865.
• Suwartha, N., & Sari, R. F. (2013). Evaluating UI GreenMetric as a tool to support green universities development: assessment of the year 2011 ranking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61, 46-53.
• Tian, X. & You F. (2019). Carbon-neutral hybrid energy systems with deep water source cooling, biomass heating, and geothermal heat and power Appl. Energy, 250 (2019), pp. 413-432
• Turkish Statistical Institute. (2021). Waste Statistics. Access Address (17.06.2022): https://data.tuik.gov.tr/#:%E2%88%BC:text=Ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rma%20kapsam%C4%B1ndaki%20imalat%20san ayi%20i%C5%9Fyerleri,g%C3%B6re%20%10%2C5%20artt%C4%B1
• Turna, T. & Solmaz, A. (2023). Sürdürülebilir kent yönetimi ve yeşil altyapı kavramı kapsamında çevreci yaklaşımlar: İskenderun örneği. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, 13(4), 739-748.
• UF Sustainability Task Force, (2002). Final Report. UF Office of Sustainability. UF (University of Florida) Sustainability Task Force, USA. https://sustainable.ufl.edu/. (Accessed 10 October 2023).
• UNEP, (2023). About UN Environment Programme- Suistainability. Accessed date: 20 October 2023. https://www.unep.org/about-un-environment/sustainability#
• Wai, R. J. (2022). Systematic Design of Energy-Saving Action Plans for Taiwan Campus by Considering Economic Benefits and Actual Demands. Energies, 15(18), 6530.
• Wang, J., Cai, H. & Li, L. (2020). Energy demand and carbon emission peak forecasting of Beijing based on leap energy simulation method. Global Nest Journal, 22, 565-569.
• Weiss, M., Barth, M., Wiek, A. & von Wehrden, H. (2021). Drivers and Barriers of Implementing Sustainability Curricula in Higher Education-Assumptions and Evidence. Higher Education Studies, 11(2), 42-64.
• Yerli, O. & Ozdede, S. (2017). Design process of a campus plan: a case study of Duzce University Konuralp Campus. International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 7(4), 50-59.
• Yuan, M. H., Lo, F. C., Yu, C. P., Tung, H. H., Chang, Y. S., Chiueh, P. T., ... & Lo, S. L. (2022). Nature-based solutions for securing contributions of water, food, and energy in an urban environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(38), 58222-58230.
• Zhang, Z., Guan, D., Wang, R., Meng, J. Zheng, H., Zhu, K. & Du, H. (2020). Embodied carbon emissions in the supply chains of multinational enterprises. Nat. Clim. Change, 10 (12) (2020), pp. 1096-1101.