A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies

Arda Ağırbaş; Seçkin Kutucu

doi:10.30785/mbud.1725651

TR EN

Ayrık Kabuk Tasarımı Çalışmaları için Form Bulma ve Çok Amaçlı Optimizasyon Yaklaşımı

Abstract

Bu çalışma, ayrık kabuk tasarımlarında form bulma, yapısal performans değerlendirmesi ve mimari form ile üretim maliyetinin eş zamanlı olarak optimize edilmesini amaçlayan uyarlanabilir bir hesaplamalı yöntem sunmaktadır. Önerilen yaklaşım, mekansal ve işlevsel gereksinimler dikkate alınarak mimari ve yapısal kısıtlar altında dengeli tasarım alternatifleri üretmektedir. Yöntem kapsamında çok amaçlı evrimsel bir optimizasyon iş akışı geliştirilmiştir. Gevşeme tabanlı form bulma süreci verilen bir başlangıç geometrisinden hareketle denge şekillerini elde ederek ahşap kaset elemanlardan oluşan bir ayrık kabuk tasarlamaktadır. Sonlu eleman analiz modeli ise deformasyon analizi ile düğüm noktalarındaki yer değiştirmeleri değerlendirmektedir. Mekansal kullanım ile ilgili ilgili mimari kısıtlar ve sistem stabilitesine ilişkin yapısal kısıtlar, karar değişkenleri ile birlikte optimizasyon sürecine entegre edilmektedir. Optimizasyon algoritması, üretim maliyetini en aza indirirken, sürekli bir mimari kabuk yüzeyinin geometrik özelliklerine yüksek benzerlik gösteren ayrık kabuk formlarını üretmeyi hedeflemektedir. Yöntemin uygulanabilirliği, iki farklı ayrık kabuk tasarım senaryosu üzerinden test edilerek uygun tasarım alternatifleri ortaya konmuştur.

Keywords

Ayrık kabuk yapılar, hesaplamalı tasarım, form bulma, evrimsel optimizasyon

A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies

Abstract

This study presents an adaptive computational technique that applies form-finding, assesses structural performance, and optimizes architectural form and production cost for discrete shell design. The approach generates design alternatives that balance objectives under architectural and structural constraints, considering spatial and functional needs. To realize the method, a multi-objective evolutionary optimization workflow is formulated. The relaxation-based design method explores equilibrium shapes corresponding to an input geometry to create a discrete shell consisting of timber cassette elements. The finite element analytical model evaluates nodal displacements through large deformation analysis. The architectural constraints related to spatial use and structural constraints regarding system stability are introduced to the optimization workflow alongside the decision variables. The optimization algorithm minimizes production cost while generating a resembling discrete approximation of a continuum architectural surface. The viability of the approach is demonstrated in two distinct cases of discrete shell design problems to create suitable design alternatives.

Keywords

Discrete shell structures, computational design, form-finding, evolutionary optimization

Ethical Statement

This article, Yasar University, Graduate School of Architecture, produced from ongoing doctoral thesis. The authors would like to express their gratitude to Yasar University for providing the academic environment and resources that supported the development of this work. The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics committee approval was not required for the study.

References

Adriaenssens, S., Block, P., Veenendaal, D. & Williams, C. (2014). Shell structures for architecture: Form finding and optimization. London: Routledge.
Agirbas, A., & Alakavuk, E. (2020). Facade optimization for an education building using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Light & Engineering, (03–2020), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.33383/2020-047
Aish, R., Fisher, A., Joyce, S. & Marsh, A. (2012). Progress towards multi-criteria design optimisation using DesignScript with SMART form, robot structural analysis and Ecotect building performance analysis. Proceedings of ACADIA, 47–56.
Augustynowicz, E. & Aigner, N. (2023). Building from Scrap: Computational Design and Robotic Fabrication Strategies for Spatial Reciprocal Structures from Plate-shaped Wooden Production Waste. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1244395
Bechert, S., Sonntag, D., Aldinger, L. & Knippers, J. (2021). Integrative structural design and engineering methods for segmented timber shells—BUGA Wood Pavilion. STRUCTURES, 34, 4814–4833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.032
Bletzinger, K. U., Wüchner, R., Daoud, F. & Camprubí, N. (2005). Computational methods for form finding and optimization of shells and membranes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 194(30– 31), 3438–3452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.12.026
Block, P. (2009). Thrust Network Analysis: Exploring Three-dimensional Equilibrium (PhD thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Access Address (15.07.2025): https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/49539
Block, P., Knippers, J., Mitra, N. J. & Wang, W. (2015). Advances in Architectural Geometry 2014. Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11418-7
Block, P., Van Mele, T., Liew, A., DeJong, M., Escobedo, D. & Ochsendorf, J. A. (2018). Structural design, fabrication and construction of the Armadillo vault. The Structural Engineer: Journal of the Institution of Structural Engineer, 96(5), 10–20. Online ISSN: 1466-5123. Access Address (15.07.2025): https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6529582
Brownlee, A. E. I., & Wright, J. A. (2015). Constrained, mixed-integer and multi-objective optimisation of building designs by NSGA-II with fitness approximation. Applied Soft Computing, 33, 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.04.010

Boylu, E. E. & Ekinci, S. (2024). Examination of Material Selection’s Effect on Lighweightness on Structures. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 9(2), 798–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1475316
Buelow, P. (2002). Using Evolutionary Algorithms to Aid Designer of Architectural Structures. In Creative Evolutionary Systems, 315–336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-155860673-9/50050-1
De Goes, F., Alliez, P., Owhadi, H. & Desbrun, M. (2013). On the equilibrium of simplicial masonry structures. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 32(4), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2461912.2461932
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA- II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
Echenagucia, T. M. & Block, P. (2015). Acoustic optimization of funicular shells. Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia, 2015(13), 1–13.
Ertaş, D. G. (2023). A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of The Relationship Between Design and Material in Terms of Sustainability. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8(2), 609–623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1309026
Gil-Ureta, F., Pietroni, N. & Zorin, D. (2020). Reinforcement of General Shell Structures. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 39(5), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3375677
Huijben, F., Van Herwijnen, F. & Nijsse, R. (2011). Concrete shell structures revisited: Introducing a new ‘low- tech’construction method using vacuumatics formwork. Textiles Composites and Inflatable Structures V: Proceedings of the V International Conference on Textile Composites and Inflatable Structures, Barcelona, Spain. 5-7 October, 2011, 409–420. CIMNE. Access Address (15.07.2025): https://hdl.handle.net/2117/186107
Kilian, A. & Ochsendorf, J. (2005). Particle-spring systems for structural form finding. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 46(2), 77–84
Krieg, O. D., Schwinn, T., Menges, A., Li, J.-M., Knippers, J., Schmitt, A. & Schwieger, V. (2015). Biomimetic Lightweight Timber Plate Shells: Computational Integration of Robotic Fabrication, Architectural Geometry and Structural Design. Advances in Architectural Geometry 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11418- 7_8
Liu, Y., Pan, H., Snyder, J., Wang, W. & Guo, B. (2013). Computing self-supporting surfaces by regular triangulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 32(4), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2461912.2461927
Lozano-Galant, J. A. & Payá-Zaforteza, I. (2011). Structural analysis of Eduardo Torroja’s Frontón de Recoletos’ roof. Engineering Structures. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.006
Ma, L., He, Y., Sun, Q., Zhou, Y., Zhang, C. & Wang, W. (2019). Constructing 3D Self-Supporting Surfaces with Isotropic Stress Using 4D Minimal Hypersurfaces of Revolution. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 38(5), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3188735
Maden, F. (2015). Novel Design Methodologies for Transfeormable Doubly-Ruled Surface Structures (PhD thesis) Izmir Institute of Technology. Access Address (15.07.2025): https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/AAI29205989
Miki, M., Adiels, E., Baker, W., Mitchell, T., Sehlström, A. & Williams, C. J. K. (2022). Form-finding of shells containing both tension and compression using the Airy stress function. International Journal of Space Structures, 37(4), 261–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09560599221102618
Miki, M., Mitani, J. & Igarashi, T. (2013). Development of a Grasshopper add-on for interactive exploration of shapes in equilibrium. Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia, 2013, 1–6. International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS).
Millar, C., Mitchell, T., Mazurek, A., Chhabra, A., Beghini, A., Clelland, J. N., McRobie, A. & Baker, W. F. (2023). On designing plane-faced funicular gridshells. International Journal of Space Structures, 38(1), 40–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09560599221126656
Mueller, C., Fivet, C. & Ochsendorf, J. (2015). Graphic statics and interactive optimization for engineering education. Structures Congress 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 Structures Congress. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479117.223
Otter, J. R. H., Cassell, A. C. & Hobbs, R. E. (1967). Dynamic Relaxation. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1967.8278
Panozzo, D., Block, P. & Sorkine-Hornung, O. (2013). Designing unreinforced masonry models. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 32(4), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2461912.2461958
Piker, D. (2013). Kangaroo: Form finding with computational physics. Architectural Design, 83(2), 136–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1569
Preisinger, C. & Heimrath, M. (2014). Karamba—A Toolkit for Parametric Structural Design. Structural Engineering International, 24(2), 217–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2749/101686614X13830790993483
Rippmann, M. (2016). Funicular Shell Design: Geometric approaches to form finding and fabrication of discrete funicular structures (PhD thesis) ETH Zurich. Access Address (15.07.2025): https://www.research- collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/handle/20.500.11850/116926/eth-49131-02.pdf
Robeller, C. & Von Haaren, N. (2020). Recycleshell: Wood-only shell structures made from cross-laminated timber (CLT) production waste. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 61(2), 125–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20898/j.iass.2020.204.045
Schek, H. J. (1974). The force density method for form finding and computation of general networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(74)90045-0
Svoboda, L., Novák, J., Kurilla, L. & Zeman, J. (2014). A framework for integrated design of algorithmic architectural forms. Advances in Engineering Software, 72, 109–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.05.006
Tang, C., Sun, X., Gomes, A., Wallner, J. & Pottmann, H. (2014). Form-finding with polyhedral meshes made simple. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 33(4), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2601097.2601213
TSE. (2022). Yapılar üzerindeki etkiler—Bölüm 1-4: Genel etkiler—Rüzgâr etkileri (eurocode 1) (CEN No. TS EN 1991-1-4/D2). Ankara.
Vatandoost, M., Ekhlassi, A., Golabchi, M., Rahbar, M. & von Buelow, P. (2024). Fabrication methods of shell structures. Automation in Construction, 165, 105570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105570
Vouga, E., Höbinger, M., Wallner, J. & Pottmann, H. (2012). Design of self-supporting surfaces. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 31(4), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2185520.2185583
Wang, Z., Song, P., Isvoranu, F. & Pauly, M. (2019). Design and structural optimization of topological interlocking assemblies. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 38(6), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3355089.3356489
Whiting, E., Ochsendorf, J. & Durand, F. (2009). Procedural modeling of structurally-sound masonry buildings. ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2009 Papers, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1661412.1618458
Whiting, E., Shin, H., Wang, R., Ochsendorf, J. & Durand, F. (2012). Structural optimization of 3D masonry buildings. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 31(6), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2366145.2366178
Zhang, Y., & Wang, R. (2025). Multi-objective optimization of construction based on genetic algorithm NSGA-II. International Journal of Architectural Computing. 2025;0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771251335107

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Architectural Design

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Arda Ağırbaş ^*
0000-0001-6330-7876
Türkiye

Seçkin Kutucu
0000-0002-7035-2656
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 27, 2025

Submission Date

June 24, 2025

Acceptance Date

October 1, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 10 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1725651

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA47NZ94AP

APA

Ağırbaş, A., & Kutucu, S. (2025). A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 10(2), 917-937. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1725651

AMA

1.Ağırbaş A, Kutucu S. A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies. JASA. 2025;10(2):917-937. doi:10.30785/mbud.1725651

Chicago

Ağırbaş, Arda, and Seçkin Kutucu. 2025. “A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 10 (2): 917-37. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1725651.

EndNote

Ağırbaş A, Kutucu S (December 1, 2025) A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 10 2 917–937.

IEEE

[1]A. Ağırbaş and S. Kutucu, “A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies”, JASA, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 917–937, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.30785/mbud.1725651.

ISNAD

Ağırbaş, Arda - Kutucu, Seçkin. “A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 10/2 (December 1, 2025): 917-937. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1725651.

JAMA

1.Ağırbaş A, Kutucu S. A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies. JASA. 2025;10:917–937.

MLA

Ağırbaş, Arda, and Seçkin Kutucu. “A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, vol. 10, no. 2, Dec. 2025, pp. 917-3, doi:10.30785/mbud.1725651.

Vancouver

1.Arda Ağırbaş, Seçkin Kutucu. A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies. JASA. 2025 Dec. 1;10(2):917-3. doi:10.30785/mbud.1725651

A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies

Ayrık Kabuk Tasarımı Çalışmaları için Form Bulma ve Çok Amaçlı Optimizasyon Yaklaşımı

Abstract

Keywords

A Form-Finding and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Discrete Shell Design Studies

Abstract

Keywords

Ethical Statement

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

JASA JOURNAL TAG / MBUD DERGİ KÜNYESİ