Çevreye Duyarlı Mimarlık Arayışında İnsan ve Doğa ile Uyumlu Yapı Üretme Süreci

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 538 - 554, 30.12.2021

Şeyda Emekci

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.935715

Cited By: 1

Öz

İnsan ve doğa sürekli etkileşim içerisindedir. Bu etkileşim ilk çağlarda, insanın yaşamını devam ettirebilme kaygısından ibaretken, insan nüfusunun hızla çoğalmasıyla ve sanayileşmeyle insanın doğa üzerinde kurmaya başladığı tek yönlü baskın ilişki sonucunda yerini çevre sorunlarına ve çevresel bozulmaya bırakmıştır. Doğaya zarar vermenin aslında kendisine zarar vermek olduğunu anlayan, insan birtakım arayışlara yönelmiştir. İnsan, bu arayışlar sonucunda ulaşılan, literatürde farklı başlıklar halinde bulunan ama özünde çevreye duyarlı bir mimari bulunan, birtakım kavramlar aracılığıyla bu ilişkiyi yeniden tesis yoluna gitmiştir. Teoride çok başarılı olan bu kavramlar, uygulamaya dönük olmadığından dolayı pratikte bu kadar başarılı uygulanamamışlardır. Bu makalenin amacı, literatürde ayrı başlıklar altında bulunan bu kavramlara ilişkin kriterleri toplulaştırıp, yapı üretim sürecine dahil edilebilecek somutlukta sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevreye duyarlı mimari, yapı üretme süreci, sürdürülebilir mimarlık kriterleri

Teşekkür

Makalede, ulusal ve uluslararası araştırma ve yayın etiğine uyulmuştur. Çalışmada etik kurul izni gerekmemiştir.

The Building Environment Process Compatible with Human and Nature in the Quest for Environment Friendly Architecture

Öz

It is in constant interaction with human and nature. While this interaction consisted of the anxiety of sustaining human life in the early ages; with the rapid proliferation of human population and industrialization, as a result of the one-sided dominant relationship that humans have begun to establish on nature, it has left its place to environmental problems and environmental degradation. Understanding that harming nature is actually harming themselves, humans turned to some pursuits as a result of this. Human beings have tried to re-establish this relationship by means of some concepts that are reached as a result of these pursuits, which are under different titles in the literature, but which have an environmentally sensitive architecture. These concepts, which are very successful in theory, have not been implemented so successfully in practice because they are not practical. The aim of this article is to consolidate the criteria related to these concepts, which are under separate titles in the literature, and to present them concretely that they can be included in the building production process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Environment friendly architecture, building environment process, sustainable architecture criteria

Kaynakça

• Abowitz, D. A. ve Toole, T. M. (2010). Mixed method research: fundamental ıssues of design, validity, and reliability in construction research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-Asce, 136, 108–116.
• Abrahamse, W. ve Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.006
• Addo, I. B., Thoms, M. C. ve Parsons, M. (2018). Household water use and conservation behavior: a meta-analysis. Water Resources Research, 20.
• Allen, L., Christian-Smith, J. ve Palaniappan, M. (2010). Overview of Greywater Reuse: The Potential of Greywater Systems to Aid Sustainable Water Management. Pacific Institute.
• Arnell, N. W. (2004). Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 14, 31–52.
• Aslani, A., Bakhtiar, A. ve Akbarzadeh, M. H. (2019). Energy-efficiency technologies in the building envelope: Life cycle and adaptation assessment. Journal of Building Engineering, 21, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.014
• Aytis, S. ve Ozcam, I. (2010). Sürdürülebilir tasarım kavramında temel ilkelerin yapı ve toplum ölçeğinde değerlendirilmesi. Presented at the Yapı Fiziği ve Sürdürülebilir Tasarım Kongresi, Istanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
• Bakke, J. V. ve Lindvall, T. (2000). For a better indoor climate: Economic, legal and user oriented decision base and procurement tools. Presented at the The Healthy Building Research Seminar Series.
• Başbakanlık. (2008). Binalarda Enerji Performans Yönetmeliği. Retrieved August 29, 2016, from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2008/12/20081205-9.htm
• Bayramoğlu, E., Ertek, A. ve Demirel, Ö. (2013). Su tasarrufu amacıyla peyzaj mimarlığı uygulamalarında kısıntılı sulama yaklaşımı. İnönü University Journal of Art and Design, 3(7), 45–53.
• Bodach, S., Lang, W. ve Hamhaber, J. (2014). Climate responsive building design strategies of vernacular architecture in Nepal. Energy and Buildings, 81, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.06.022
• Bölgesel Çevre Merkezi-REC Turkey. (2016). Ambalaj Atiklarinin Kontrolü Yönetmeliği. Retrieved from https://recturkey.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/ambalaj_atiklari_rehberi.pdf
• Bookchin, M. (1996). Toplumsal ekolojinin felsefesi: Diyalektik doğalcılık üzerine denemeler. İstanbul: Kabalcı Kitabevi.
• Burby, R. J. (1998). Cooperating with nature: confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities. Joseph Henry Press.
• Calì, D., Osterhage, T., Streblow, R. ve Müller, D. (2016). Energy performance gap in refurbished German dwellings: Lesson learned from a field test. Energy and Buildings, 127, 1146–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.020
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1998). Deaths resulting from residential fires and the prevalence of smoke alarms. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.
• Çepel, N. (2003). Ekolojik Sorunlar ve Çözümleri. Ankara: TÜBİTAK Yayınları.
• Danielski, I., Fröling, M. ve Joelsson, A. (2012). The ımpact of the shape factor on fınal energy demand ın resıdentıal buıldıngs ın nordıc clımates (pp. 4260–4264). Presented at the World Renewable Energy Forum, WREF 2012, Including World Renewable Energy Congress XII and Colorado Renewable Energy Society (CRES) Annual Conference.
• Delzendeh, E., Wu, S., Lee, A. ve Zhou, Y. (2017). The impact of occupants’ behaviours on building energy analysis: A research review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.264
• Demircan, R. K. ve Gültekin, A. B. (2017). Binalarda pasif ve aktif güneş sistemlerinin ıncelenmesi. TÜBAV Bilim, 1(10), 36–51.
• Dickson, D. (1992). Alternatif Teknoloji, Teknik Değişmenin Politik Boyutları. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
• Dincer, I. (2000). Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00011-8
• Ding, G. K. C. (2005). The development of a multi-criteria approach for the measurement of sustainable performance of housing projects. International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, 29, 57–69.
• Du Pisani, J. A. (2006). Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept. Environmental Sciences, 3(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430600688831
• Edum-Fotwe, F. T. ve Price, A. D. F. (2009). A social ontology for appraising sustainability of construction projects and developments. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.04.003
• Edwards, S. ve Bennett, P. (2003). Construction Products and Life – Cycle Thinking (pp. 57–59). UNEP Industry and Environment.
• Emekci, Ş. (2018). A Life cycle costing based decision support tool for cost-optimal energy efficient design and/or refurbishments. Middle East Technical University, 231.
• Emekci, S. ve Tanyer, A. M. (2016). New Perspective on More Sustainable and Affordable Housing for Lower Income Group in Turkey -Assessing Life Cycle Cost – (Vol. 1, pp. 555–564).
• Presented at the Sustaınable Housıng 2016 - International Conference on Sustainable Housing Planning, Management and Sustainability, Green Lines Institute for Sustainable Development.
• EPA. (2020). Black and grey water management | EPA. Retrieved December 2, 2020, from https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/environmental_info/water_quality/programs/grey_and_black_water_discharge
• Ewing, R. ve Rong, F. (2010). The impact of urban form on U.S. residential energy use. Housing Policy Debate, 19(1), 1–30.
• Fabrycky, W. J. ve Blanchard, B. S. (1991). Life-cycle cost and economic analysis. Prentice Hall.
• Farhat, R., Ghaddar, N. K. ve Ghali, K. (2014). Investing in PV Systems utilizing Savings from Building Envelop Replacement by Sustainable Local Material: A Case Study in Lebanese Inland Region, 4(4), 14.
• Farmer, J. (1996). Green shift: Changing attitudes in architecture to the natural world. Oxford: Architectural Press.
• Fielding, K., Spinks, A., Russell, S. ve Mankad, A. (2012). Water Demand Management Study: Baseline Survey of Household Water Use. Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report.
• Fisher, D. (2009). Sustainability, energy savings, and occupant comfort are not mutually exclusive objectives, 5.
• Froeschle, L. M. (1999). Environmental assessment and specification of green building materials. J. Constr. Specif., (53).
• Ghodrati, N., Samari, M. ve Shafiei, M. W. M. (2012). Green Buildings Impacts on Occupants’ Health and Productivity, 8.
• Ghose, A., Pizzol, M. ve McLaren, S. J. (2017). Consequential LCA modelling of building refurbishment in New Zealand- an evaluation of resource and waste management scenarios. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.099
• Gilchrist, A. ve Allouche, E. N. (2005). Quantification of social costs associated with construction projects: state-of-the-art review. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 20(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2004.04.003
• Gill, Z. M., Tierney, M. J., Pegg, I. M. ve Allan, N. (2010). Low-energy dwellings: the contribution of behaviours to actual performance. Building Research ve Information, 38(5), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2010.505371
• Giorgi, S., Lavagna, M. ve Campioli, A. (2018). Life Cycle Assessment of building end of life (p. 9). Presented at the Life Cyce Thinking in decision-making for sustainability: from public policies to private businesses, Messina.
• Gynther, L., Mikkonen, I. ve Smits, A. (2012). Evaluation of European energy behavioural change programmes. Energy Efficiency, 5(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-011-9115-9
• Haque, M. T., Tai, L., Ham, D., Clemson University ve Cooperative Extension Service. (2004). Landscape design for energy efficiency. Clemson, S.C.: Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service.
• Hatamipour, M. S., ve Abedi, A. (2008). Passive cooling systems in buildings: Some useful experiences from ancient architecture for natural cooling in a hot and humid region. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(8), 2317–2323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.01.018
• Hill, R. C. ve Bowen, P. A. (1997). Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment. Construction Management and Economics, 15(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997372971
• Holden, E. ve Norland, I. T. (2005). Three Challenges for the Compact City as a Sustainable Urban Form: Household Consumption of Energy and Transport in Eight Residential Areas in the Greater Oslo Region. Urban Studies, 42(12), 2145-2166.
• Hong, T., D’Oca, S., Taylor-Lange, S. C., Turner, W. J. N., Chen, Y. ve Corgnati, S. P. (2015). An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part II: Implementation of the DNAS framework using an XML schema. Building and Environment, 94, 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.08.006
• Hutchins, M. J. ve Sutherland, J. W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Sustainability and Supply Chain Management, 16(15), 1688–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.001
• İSKİ. (2015). İSKİ -Su Kayıpları Yıllık Raporları. Retrieved August 31, 2016, from http://www.iski.istanbul/web/tr-TR/kurumsal/su-kayiplari-yillik-raporu
• ISO. (1997). ISO 14040 Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. International Organisation for Standardization.
• Jafari, A., Valentin, V. ve Bogus, S. M. (2019). Identification of social sustainability criteria in building energy retrofit projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(2), 04018136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001610
• King, B. (2010). Toprak mimarisinin yeniden doğuşu, kil kökenli taze ve güncellenmiş bir bakış. Mimarlıkta Malzeme Dergisi, (17).
• Latha, P. K., Darshana, Y. ve Venugopal, V. (2015). Role of building material in thermal comfort in tropical climates – A review. Journal of Building Engineering, 3, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.06.003
• Liqun, G. ve Yanqun, G. (2011). Study on Building Materials and Indoor Pollution. 2011 International Conference on Green Buildings and Sustainable Cities, 21, 789–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2079
• Löfgren, I., Gylltoft, K. ve Kutti, T. (2001). In-situ concrete building - Innovations in Formwork, 10.
• Lützkendorf, T. ve Lorenz, D. P. (2006). Using an integrated performance approach in building assessment tools. Building Research ve Information, 34(4), 334–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210600672914
• Martinaitis, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Motuzienė, V. ve Vilutienė, T. (2015). Importance of occupancy information when simulating energy demand of energy efficient house: A case study. Energy and Buildings, 101, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.031
• Melby, P. (2002). Regenerative Design Techniques: Practical Applications in Landscape Design. New York: John Willey veSons.
• Mithraratne, N. ve Vale, B. (2004). Life cycle analysis model for New Zealand houses. Building and Environment, 39(4), 483–492.
• Mitterer, C., Künzel, H. M., Herkel, S. ve Holm, A. (2012). Optimizing energy efficiency and occupant comfort with climate specific design of the building. Frontiers of Architectural Research, (1), 229–235.
• Nasseri, C. (2009). ABD Enerji Bakanlığı’nın Enerji Politikaları. National Safety Council. (1998). Accident Facts. National Safety Council.
• Nielsen, A. N., Jensen, R. L., Larsen, T. S. ve Nissen, S. B. (2016). Early stage decision support for sustainable building renovation – A review. Building and Environment, 103, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.009
• OAI. (2007). Natural Water Treatment. Retrieved August 31, 2016, from http://www.oceanarks.org/
• Okeil, A. (2010). A holistic approach to energy efficient building forms. Energy and Buildings, 42(9), 1437–1444.
• Oregi, X., Hernandez, P., Gazulla, C. ve Isasa, M. (2015). Integrating Simplified and Full Life Cycle Approaches in Decision Making for Building Energy Refurbishment, 27.
• PAGÇEV. (2016). Atık Yönetimi Piramidi. Retrieved November 23, 2020, from http://www.pagcev.org/geri-donusum
• Paone, A. ve Bacher, J.-P. (2018). The Impact of building occupant behavior on energy efficiency and methods to ınfluence ıt: A Review of the State of the Art, 19.
• Patz, J. A., Gibbs, H. K., Foley, J. A., Rogers, J. V. ve Smith, K. R. (2007). Climate change and global health: quantifying a growing ethical crisis. EcoHealth, 4(4), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-007-0141-1
• Pellegrini‐Masini, G., Bowles, G., Peacock, A. D., Ahadzi, M. ve Banfill, P. F. G. (2010). Whole life costing of domestic energy demand reduction technologies: householder perspectives. Construction Management and Economics, 28(3), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903480027
• Polat, A. T., Önder, S. ve Güngör, S. (2009). Park ve bahçelerde su tüketiminin azaltılması için stratejiler. Presented at the 1. Ulusal Kuraklık ve Çölleşme Sempozyumu, Konya.
• Postel, S. (2000). Entering An Era Of Water Scarcity: The Challenges Ahead (10th ed.). Ecological Applications.
• Rattia, C., Bakerb, N. ve Steemers, K. (2005). Energy consumption and urban texture. Energy and Buildings, 37(7), 762–776.
• Rosemann, A. ve Kaase, H. (2005). Lightpipe applications for daylighting systems. Solar Energy, 78(6), 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2004.09.002
• Schakib-Ekbatan, K., Alıcı, F., Schweiker, M. ve Wagner, A. (2015). Does the occupant behavior match the energy concept of the building? - Analysis of a German naturally ventilated office building. Building and Environment, 84, 142–150.
• Schweiker, M. ve Shukuya, M. (2010). Comparative effects of building envelope improvements and occupant behavioural changes on the exergy consumption for heating and cooling. The Role of Trust in Managing Uncertainties in the Transition to a Sustainable Energy Economy, Special Section with Regular Papers, 38(6), 2976–2986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.035
• Sev, A. (2009). Sürdürülebilir Mimarlık (1st ed.). İstanbul: Yem Yayın.
• Sitarz, D. (Ed.). (1994). Agenda 21, The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet. Boulder, Colorado: The Earth Pres.
• Spiegel, R. ve Meadows, D. (2010). Green Building Materials: A Guide to Product Selection and Specification, 3rd Edition | Wiley (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-ai/Green+Building+Materials%3A+A+Guide+to+Product+Selection+and+Specification%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9780470538043
• Sundell, J. ve Nordling, E. (2003). Final report: European interdisciplinary networks on indoor environment and health. Sweden: National Institute of Public Health.
• Tanık, A., Öztürk, İ. ve Cüceloğlu, G. (2016). Arıtılmış Atık Suların Yeniden Kullanımı ve Yağmur Suyu Hasadı Sistemleri. Türkiye Belediyeler Birliği. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gokhan_Cuceloglu/publication/280599382_Aritilmis_Atiksularin_yeniden_Kullanimi_ve_Yagmur_Suyu_Hasadi_Sistemleri_El_Kitabi/links/5710ff9e08ae846f4ef05bbd/Aritilmis-Atiksularin-yeniden-Kullanimi-ve-Yagmur-Suyu-Hasadi-Sistemleri-El-Kitabi.pdf
• Thomas, M. ve Jacobs, D. (2000). Housing and health—current issues and implications for research and programs. Journal of Urban Health, 77(1), 7–25.
• Ülgen, K. (2015). Binaların pasif güneş enerjili sistemler yardımıyla ısıtılması, 9.
• Veziroğlu, V. (2010). Enerji Etkin Yapı Tasarım Ölçütleri, Sürdürülebilir Kaynakların Yapıda Kullanımı ve Mimari Örnekler. Haliç Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• WCED. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Retrieved July 28, 2016, from http://www.un-documents.net/A372BC4E-993E-4C10-B368-9E75816E59DB/FinalDownload/DownloadId-1990161B7AFC5CB358F7280210D7A48F/A372BC4E-993E-4C10-B368-9E75816E59DB/our-common-future.pdf
• Webber, C. A., Roberson, J. A., McWhinney, M. C., Brown, R. E., Pinckard, M. J. ve Busch, J. F. (2006). After-hours power status of office equipment in the USA. Energy, 31(14), 2823–2838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.11.007
• Willis, R. M., Stewart, R. A., Panuwatwanich, K., Jones, S. ve Kyriakides, A. (2010). Alarming visual display monitors affecting shower end use water and energy conservation in Australian residential households. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 54, 1117–1127.
• Wittmann, S. (1997). Architects’ perceptions regarding barriers to sustainable architecture: A survey among Australian architects. Wales: University of New South Wales.
• WMO. (2015), November 26). Water stress, water-related hazards. Retrieved May 31, 2021, from https://public.wmo.int/en/our-mandate/water
• Wong, I. L., Perera, S. ve Eames, P. C. (2010). Goal directed life cycle costing as a method to evaluate the economic feasibility of office buildings with conventional and TI‐façades. Construction Management and Economics, 28(7), 715–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446191003753867
• Yeang, K. (1994). Bioclimatic Skyscrapers. London: Ellipsis London Limited.
• Yang, J., Santamouris, M. ve Lee, S. E. (2016). Review of occupancy sensing systems and occupancy modeling methodologies for the application in institutional buildings. Energy and Buildings, 121, 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.12.019
• Yazıcı, M. (2002). Yenilenebilir Enerji. Mimarist Dergisi, (6), 77–78.
• Yu, W. ve Lo, S. (2005). Time‐dependent construction social costs model. Construction Management and Economics, 23(3), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500040281