Afet Sonrası Geçici Konut Birimlerinin Konuşlanma Yönleri Açısından İncelenmesi

Year 2023, Volume: 8 Issue: Special Issue, 510 - 524, 26.12.2023

Çetin Süalp , Nilay Coşgun

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1322772

Abstract

Afetten birkaç hafta sonra ortaya çıkan ve kalıcı konutların kullanımına kadar geçen rehabilitasyon aşaması için geçici konutlara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Afet durumunun getirdiği zor koşullarda birkaç hafta gibi kısa bir zaman aralığında geçici konutların inşa edilmesi pratik anlamda zordur. Özellikle afet bölgelerine geçici konutların sevkiyatı ve kurulum hızı ile ilgili teknik problemler bulunmaktadır. Dolayısıyla süreci hızlandırabilecek olan konuşlanma özelliği bu bağlamda öne çıkmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında bir, iki ve dört yöne doğru açılabilen farklı konuşlanma yönlerine sahip üç örnek barındırabileceği kişi sayısı, depolama ve sevkiyata uygunluğu, kişi başına düşen yaşam alanı ve araziyi verimli kullanma performansları açısından incelenmiştir. Konuşlanma yönleri incelenirken literatürden seçilmiş örnekler tanımlanan performanslara göre birbiri ile kıyaslanmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda her örnek farklı performanslarda öne çıkmıştır. Bu sayede her bir sistemin avantajlı ve dezavantajlı olduğu noktalar gösterilmiştir.

Keywords

Afet yönetimi , deprem , konuşlandırılabilir yapılar , rehabilitasyon

Examination of Post-Disaster Temporary Housing Units in the Scope of Deployment Directions

Abstract

Temporary houses are needed for the rehabilitation phase, which emerges a few weeks after the disaster and lasts until the finish of permanent houses. It is practically difficult to construct temporary houses in a short period. In particular, there are technical problems related to the logistics and installation speed. Therefore, the deployability feature, which can speed up the process, comes to the fore in this context. In this study, three examples with different deployment directions, which could be deployed in one, two and four directions, were examined regarding their capacity, storage and transportation, area per user and effective land utilization. Selected examples from the literature were compared according to the performances. As a result of this study, each example came to the fore in different performances. In this way, the advantages and disadvantages of each system were shown.

Keywords

Disaster management , earthquake , deployable structures , rehabilitation

Thanks

The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics Committee approval was not required for the study.

References

• AFAD. (2015). Geçici Barınma Merkezlerinin Kurulması, Yönetimi ve İşletilmesi Hakkında Yönerge. Access Address (22.11.2023): https://www.aile.gov.tr/uploads/athgm/uploads/pages/goc-afet-ve-acil-durumlarda- psikososyal-destek/gecici-barinma-merkezlerinin-kurulmasi-yonetimi-ve-isletilmesi-hakkinda-yonerge.pdf
• Alibaba. (n.d.). 3 Bedroom Prefab Modular House. Access Address (27.06.2023): https://ranger- sh.en.alibaba.com/product/60553174339- 805054035/3_Bedroom_Prefab_Modular_House_Thailand_20ft_Container_Kit_Living_Modern_Container_H ouse.html
• Arslan, H. (2007). Re-design, re-use and recycle of temporary houses. Building and Environment, 42(1), 400– 406. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.032
• Arslan, H. & Cosgun, N. (2008). Reuse and recycle potentials of the temporary houses after occupancy: Example of Düzce, Turkey. Building and Environment, 43(5), 702–709. Doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.01.051
• Asfuroğlu, Z. M., Gökosmanoğulları, S. F., Colak, M., Yilmaz, C. & Eskandari, M. M. (2023). First 10 days after the 6th of February 2023 earthquake disaster: experience of an orthopedic clinic on the border of the disaster zone. Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 29(10), 1191-1198. Doi:10.14744/tjtes.2023.86479.
• Avlar, E., Limoncu, S. & Tızman, D. (2023). Deprem sonrası geçici barınma birimi: CLT E-BOX. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 471-482. Doi:10.17341/gazimmfd.1027894
• Barakat, S. (2003). Housing Reconstruction After Conflict and Disaster. Humanitarian Practice Network, 43. Access Address (27.06.2023): Humanitarian Library Database https://www.humanitarianlibrary.org/resource/housing-reconstruction-after-conflict-and-disaster-0
• Beatini, V. & Korkmaz, K. (2013). Shapes of Miura Mesh mechanism with mobility one. International Journal of Space Structures, 28(2), 101–114. doi:10.1260/0266-3511.28.2.101
• Bern, M. & Hayes, B. (1996). The complexity of flat origami. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (SODA '96). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (pp. 175-183). Atlanta Georgia, USA.
• Boxabl. (2020). Mena. Access Address (27.06.2023): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0Z40UakxZg
• Boxabl. (n.d.). The Boxabl Casita. Access Address (27.06.2023): https://www.boxabl.com/casita/
• De Temmerman, N., Mira, L. A., Vergauwen, A., Hendrickx, H. & De Wilde, W. P. (2012). Transformable structures in architectural engineering. In De Wilde, W. P. et al. (Ed.), WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, High Performance Structure and Materials VI, 124(12), 457-468. doi:10.2495/HPSM120
• Del Grosso, A. E. & Basso, P. (2012). Deployable Structures. Advances in Science and Technology, 83, 122–131. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/ast.83.122
• Dureisseix, D. (2012). An overview of mechanisms and patterns with origami. International Journal of Space Structures, 27(1), 1–14. doi:10.1260/0266-3511.27.1.1
• Enginöz, E. B. (2005). Afet Konutlarında Mimari Tasarım Sürecinin Kullanıcı Bağlamında İrdelenmesi (Ph.D. thesis). Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. Access Address (27.06.2023): http://hdl.handle.net/11527/10337
• Ergünay, O. (2007). Türkiye’nin Afet Profili. Proceedings of TMMOB Afet Symposium, TMMOB İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası (pp. 1-14). Ankara, Turkey.
• Félix, D., Branco, J. M. & Feio, A. (2013). Temporary housing after disasters: A state of the art survey. Habitat International, 40, 136–141. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.03.006
• Garofalo, L. & Hill, D. (2008). Prefabricated Recovery: Post-Disaster Housing Component Production and Delivery. Without a Hitch - New Directions in Prefabricated Architecture, The 2008 UMass Wood Structures Symposium (pp. 64-71). Amherst, USA.
• Grover, H., Islam, T. & Slick, J. (Ed.) (2022). Case Studies in Disaster Mitigation and Prevention (1st Ed.). Disaster and Emergency Management: Case Studies in Adaptation and Innovation series. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
• Hadafi, F. & Fallahi, A. (2010). Temporary housing respond to disasters in developing countries- Case Study: Iran-Ardabil and Lorestan Province earthquakes. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Open Science Index 42, International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(6), 1326 - 1332. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1074409
• Hanaor, A. & Levy, R. (2001). Evaluation of deployable structures for space enclosures. International Journal of Space Structures, 16(4), 211–229. doi:10.1260/026635101760832172
• Johnson, C. (2002). What’s the big deal about temporary housing? Planning considerations for temporary accommodation after disasters: Example of the 1999 Turkish earthquakes. TIEMS disaster management conference. Waterloo, Canada.
• Johnson, C. (2007a). Strategic planning for post-disaster temporary housing. Disasters, 31(4), 435–458. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01018.x
• Johnson, C. (2007b). Impacts of prefabricated temporary housing after disasters: 1999 earthquakes in Turkey. Habitat International, 31(1), 36–52. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.03.002
• Johnson, C. (2008). Strategies for the reuse of temporary housing. In Ruby, I.A. (Ed.), Urban transformation, 323- 331. Berlin, Germany: Ruby Press.
• Johnson, C. (2010). Planning for temporary housing. In Lizarralde, G., Johnson, C., Davidson, C. (Ed.), Rebuilding after Disasters (1st Ed.), 70-87. New York, USA: Spon Press.
• Kronenburg, R. (1995). Houses in Motion: The Genesis, History and Development of the Portable Building. London, UK: Academy Editions.
• Lebée, A. (2015). From folds to structures, a review. International Journal of Space Structures 30(2), 55-74. doi:10.1260/0266-3511.30.2.55
• Limoncu, S. & Bayülgen, C. (2005). Türkiye’de afet sonrası yaşanan barınma sorunları. Megaron YTU Arch. Fac. e-Journal, 1(1), 18–27. Access Address (27.06.2023): https://megaronjournal.com/tr/jvi.aspx? pdir=megaron&plng=tur&un=MEGARON-97720
• Mavrouli, M., Mavroulis, S., Lekkas, E. & Tsakris, A. (2023). An Emerging Health Crisis in Turkey and Syria after the Earthquake Disaster on 6 February 2023: Risk Factors, Prevention and Management of Infectious Diseases. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1022. doi:10.3390/healthcare11071022
• Moneybox Modular Housing. (n.d.). Expandable Container House. Access Address (27.06.2023): https://www.moneyboxhouse.com/modern-modular-expanding-container-homes-luxury-expandable- shipping-container-homes_p406.html
• Moore, T. (2008). Disaster and Emergency Management Systems. London, UK: British Standards Institution.
• Off-Grid World. (2016). Amazing Off Grid Expandable Portable Shipping Container Home. Access Address (27.06.2023): https://offgridworld.com/amazing-off-grid-expandable-portable-shipping-container-home/
• Osório, F., Paio, A. & Oliveira, S. (2014). KOS - Kinetic Origami Surface. Rethinking Comprehensive Design: Speculative Counterculture. Gu, N. et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA (pp. 201-210). Hong Kong, China. Doi:10.52842/conf.caadria.2014.201
• Pellegrino, S. (2001). Deployable structures. Vienna, Austria: Springer-Verlag.
• Pinkowski, J. (2008). Disaster Management Handbook. New York, USA: CRC Press.
• Potter, B. (2021, 4 June). Folding at home. Taking a look at foldable structures. Construction Physics. Access Address (27.06.2023): https://www.construction-physics.com/p/folding-at-home
• Quarantelli, E. L. (1995). Patterns of sheltering and housing in US disasters. Disaster prevention and management: An International Journal, 4(3), 43–53. doi:10.1108/09653569510088069
• Savaşır, K. (2008). Afet Sonrası Uygulanacak ve Geçiciden Kalıcıya Dönüştürülecek Konutlar İçin Türkiye Koşullarına Uygun Planların Geliştirilmesi ve Yapım Sistemlerinin Araştırılması (Ph.D. thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey. Access Address (27.06.2023): http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12397/9331
• Sphere Association. (2018). The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. Access Address (22.11.2023): https://spherestandards.org/wp- content/uploads/Sphere-Handbook-2018-EN.pdf
• Süalp, Ç. (2021). Kinetik mimarlık kapsamında dinamik origaminin incelenmesi (Master’s thesis). Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, İstanbul, Turkey. Access Address (27.06.2023): https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14124/1400
• Süalp, Ç. & Yapıcı, E. (2022). Evaluation of post-disaster temporary housing units in the context of COVID-19: The case of 1999 Marmara Earthquakes. International Journal of Digital Innovation in the Built Environment (IJDIBE), 11(3), 1-12. doi:10.4018/IJDIBE.306256
• Şener, S. M. & Altun, M. C. (2009). Design of a post disaster temporary shelter unit. A|Z ITU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 6(2), 58–72. Access Address (27.06.2023): https://www.az.itu.edu.tr/index.php/jfa/article/view/605
• Tafahomi, M. & Egyedi, T. M. (2008). Defining Flexible Standards for Post-Disaster Emergency Sheltering. EURAS 2008: 13th EURAS Workshop. Skövde, Sweden. Access Address (27.06.2023): TU Delft Database https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A5a6bfabd-4d7f-4e3a-867f-e7990c158637
• TTB. (2001). 17 Ağustos ve 12 Kasım 1999 depremleri sonrasında geçici yerleşim alanlarında yaşayanların sağlık hizmetlerini kullanımının değerlendirilmesi. Türk Tabipleri Birliği Merkez Konseyi. Ankara, Turkey.
• UNDRO. (1982). Shelter after disaster: Guidelines for assistance. NewYork, USA: Office of The United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator.
• Van Gassel, F. & Roders, M. (2006). A Modular Construction System. How to design its Production Process. Adaptables2006, TU/e, International Conference On Adaptable Building Structures, Volume 3. Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
• Zirbel, S. A., Lang, R. J., Thomson, M. W., Sigel, D. A., Walkemeyer, P. E., Trease, B. P., … Howell, L. L. (2013). Accommodating thickness in origami-based deployable arrays. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135(11), 111005. doi:10.1115/1.4025372