Araştırma Makalesi

Dejenere Intervertebral Disk için Ağrı Skorlamasında İnflamatuar Prognostik İndeksin Tanısal Etkinliği

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3 22 Eylül 2022
PDF İndir
EN TR

Diagnostic Efficiency of Inflammatory Prognostic Index on Pain Scoring for Degenerated Intervertebral Disc

Abstract

Aim: Inflammatory Prognostic Index (IPI), calculated via Albumin, CRP and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), is used in the inflammation related diseases. The study focused the efficacy and predictive effect of the IPI in terms of Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for interpretation of back and leg pain. Materials and Methods: This multicenter retrospective clinical study was performed by the hospital records of the Degenerated Intervertebral Disc (DIVD) treated between January 2020 and February 2022. IPI value was calculated by the formula of “CRPxNLR/Albumin”. Results: There was a significant difference between VAS-B (2.38±1.74; p=0.0001) and VAS-L (7.09±1.44; p=0.00017) in the comparison of paired VAS values before and after the surgery. Similar change occurred within walking distance after surgery. According to the correlation analysis of the IPI index with DIVD pain scoring, VAS-B(r=0.391; p=0.00017) and delta VAS-B (r=0.422; p=0,00004) showed a positive correlation with the IPI. In the ROC analysis for the diagnostic value of the IPI, the cut-off value of VAS-L above 0.184 showed a diagnostic value as 78.9% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity (UAC:0.702; p:0.003; CI%95: 0.581-0.815). Conclusion: We showed a strong relationship between IPI and pain scoring of DIVD. The diagnostic value of IPI with VAS-L was very important and can be used by physicians for pain follow-up of DIVD.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Motta E, Boniotti V, Miserocchi L, Caudana R. Usefulness of gadolinium in MRI evaluation of non surgically treated herniated disk. La Radiologia medica. 2005;109(5-6):547-54.
  2. 2. Lee JH, Lee SH. Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis using Navicath for the management of chronic pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation. Pain physician. 2012;15(3): 213-21.
  3. 3. Hadžić E, Splavski B, Lakičević G. Comparison of early and delayed lumbar disc herniation surgery and the treatment outcome. Medicinski glasnik: official publication of the Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2021;18(2):456-62.
  4. 4. Ahsan K, Khan SI, Zaman N, Ahmed N, Montemurro N, Chaurasia B. Fusion versus nonfusion treatment for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. 2021;12(1):44-53.
  5. 5. Abdullah F, Bai A, Sahil F, Kataria D, Abbas M, Ullah F, et al. Lumbar Disc Herniation: Comparing Pain Relief After Medical and Surgical Intervention. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e15885.
  6. 6. Tascioglu T, Sahin O. The relationship between pain and herniation radiology in giant lumbar disc herniation causing severe sciatica: 15 cases. British journal of neurosurgery. 2020:1-4.
  7. 7. Zhao X, Zhu CZ, Yang H, Guo W. [Application of pain pressure threshold test in lumbar intervertebral disc herniation study]. Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology. 2020;33(5):435-9.
  8. 8. Wang Y, Teng HL, Zhu MY, Huang KL, Lin CW. [Clinical outcomes of spinal endoscopic surgery for tiny lumbar disc herniation with severe radiating pain of lower limb]. Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology. 2020;33(6):508-13.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Cerrahi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

22 Eylül 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

10 Nisan 2022

Kabul Tarihi

22 Haziran 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

AMA
1.Firidin MN, Akyüz ME. Diagnostic Efficiency of Inflammatory Prognostic Index on Pain Scoring for Degenerated Intervertebral Disc. Med Records. 2022;4(3):340-344. doi:10.37990/medr.1098908

Cited By