Klinik Araştırma

Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Applications in Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Analysis

Cilt: 5 Sayı: Supplement (1) 19 Ekim 2023
PDF İndir
EN

Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Applications in Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Analysis

Öz

Aim: This study aims to retrospectively investigate the results of continuous radiofrequency (CRF) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) applications to the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Material and Methods: Patients who experienced a significant reduction in pain symptoms after local anesthetic application to the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve were divided into two groups. The first group received PRF treatment and the second group received CRF treatment. Pain intensity scores of both groups at 1 and 3 months were compared. The results were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Among the participants, 10 received PRF treatment and another 10 received CRF treatment. At the 1st month follow-up, both groups demonstrated considerable reductions in pain levels. By the 3rd month, no substantial disparities were noted between the two groups in terms of pain-related disability and pain intensity. Conclusion: Both PRF and CRF interventions emerge as effective and secure techniques applicable to the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve. They should be contemplated as valuable options in cases where conventional medical treatments fall short in delivering adequate pain control.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Maarbjerg S, Di Stefano G, Bendtsen L, Cruccu G. Trigeminal neuralgia-diagnosis and treatment. Cephalalgia. 2017;37:648-57.
  2. Cruccu G, Di Stefano G, Truini A. Trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:754-62.
  3. Zakrzewska JM, Linskey ME. Trigeminal neuralgia. BMJ Clin Evid. 2014;2014:1207.
  4. Abd-Elsayed A, Martens JM, Fiala KJ, Izuogu A. Pulsed radiofrequency for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022;26:889-94.
  5. Eskandar E, Kumar H, Boini A, et al. The role of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a narrative review. Cureus. 2023;15:e36193.
  6. Abduhamid AS, Alomari MS, Ghaddaf AA, et al. Radiofrequency thermoablation of the peripheral branches of trigeminal nerve versus the Gasserian ganglion for treating idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2022;104:42-7.
  7. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1-211.
  8. Wray JK, Dixon B, Przkora R. Radiofrequency ablation. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482387/ acces date 22.04.2023

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ağrı

Bölüm

Klinik Araştırma

Yayımlanma Tarihi

19 Ekim 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

13 Ağustos 2023

Kabul Tarihi

14 Eylül 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 5 Sayı: Supplement (1)

Kaynak Göster

APA
Şentürk, İ. A., & Gönüllü, E. (2023). Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Applications in Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Analysis. Medical Records, 5(Supplement (1), 60-4. https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1342293
AMA
1.Şentürk İA, Gönüllü E. Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Applications in Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Analysis. Med Records. 2023;5(Supplement (1):60-4. doi:10.37990/medr.1342293
Chicago
Şentürk, İlteriş Ahmet, ve Edip Gönüllü. 2023. “Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Applications in Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Analysis”. Medical Records 5 (Supplement (1): 60-4. https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1342293.
EndNote
Şentürk İA, Gönüllü E (01 Ekim 2023) Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Applications in Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Analysis. Medical Records 5 Supplement (1) 60–4.
IEEE
[1]İ. A. Şentürk ve E. Gönüllü, “Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Applications in Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Analysis”, Med Records, c. 5, sy Supplement (1), ss. 60–4, Eki. 2023, doi: 10.37990/medr.1342293.
ISNAD
Şentürk, İlteriş Ahmet - Gönüllü, Edip. “Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Applications in Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Analysis”. Medical Records 5/Supplement (1) (01 Ekim 2023): 60-4. https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1342293.
JAMA
1.Şentürk İA, Gönüllü E. Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Applications in Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Analysis. Med Records. 2023;5:60–4.
MLA
Şentürk, İlteriş Ahmet, ve Edip Gönüllü. “Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Applications in Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Analysis”. Medical Records, c. 5, sy Supplement (1), Ekim 2023, ss. 60-4, doi:10.37990/medr.1342293.
Vancouver
1.İlteriş Ahmet Şentürk, Edip Gönüllü. Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Conventional and Pulse Radiofrequency Applications in Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Analysis. Med Records. 01 Ekim 2023;5(Supplement (1):60-4. doi:10.37990/medr.1342293