Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 462 - 467, 24.09.2024
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1522378
https://izlik.org/JA68XD52TP

Öz

Kaynakça

  • IDF Facts & figures. https://idf.org/about-diabetes/diabetes-facts-figures/ access date 18.07.2024
  • TEMD Guideline for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of diabetes mellitus and ıts complications - 2024, https://file.temd.org.tr/Uploads/publications/guides/documents/diabetesmellitus2024.pdf access date 26.06.2024
  • Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2023;46:e151-99.
  • Ma R, Shao R, An X, et al. Recent advancements in noninvasive glucose monitoring and closed-loop management systems for diabetes. J Mater Chem B. 2022;10:5537-55.
  • Kubihal S, Goyal A, Gupta Y, et al. Glucose measurement in body fluids: a ready reckoner for clinicians. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;15:45-53.
  • Laha S, Rajput A, Laha SS, et al. A concise and systematic review on non-invasive glucose monitoring for potential diabetes management. Biosensors. 2022;12:965.
  • Arias-Rivera S, Raurell-Torredà M, Fernández-Castillo R-J, et al. Blood glucose monitoring in critically ill adult patients: type of sample and method of analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2024;35:45-72.
  • Duncanson E, Leu RKL, Shanahan L, et al. The prevalence and evidence-based management of needle fear in adults with chronic disease: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0253048.
  • Dağdelen M, Muz G, Çırpan R. The effect of the fear of finger punching and insulin injection on administration to the treatment in individuals with a diabetes diagnosis. Journal of Health Sciences. 2022;31:51-9.
  • Selen F. Kan glikoz düzeyinin izlenmesinde yenilikler. Sağlik hizmetlerinde yenilikler ve teknoloji sempozyumu. November 17-18, 2022:1.
  • Erdem N, Sağkal Midilli T. Comparison of blood glucose levels in blood samples taken in three different ways from patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Turkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci. 2020;12:536-43.
  • Snoek FJ, Mollema ED, Heine RJ, et al. Development and validation of the diabetes fear of injecting and self-testing questionnaire (D-FISQ): first findings. Diabet Med. 1997;14:871-6.
  • Celik S, Pinar R. Psychometric evaluation of a Turkish version of the diabetes fear of self-injecting and self-testing questionnaire (D-FISQ). Asian Nurs Res. 2016;10:195-200.
  • Bukhsh A, Goh BH, Zimbudzi E, et al. Type 2 diabetes patients' perspectives, experiences, and barriers toward diabetes-related self-care: a qualitative study from Pakistan. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:534873.
  • Ong WM, Chua SS, Ng CJ. Barriers and facilitators to self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes using insulin: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:237-46.
  • Duncanson E, Le Leu RK, Shanahan L, et al. The prevalence and evidence-based management of needle fear in adults with chronic disease: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0253048.

Comparison of Glucose Measurement Techniques Using Venous and Capillary Blood Samples in Diabetics Regarding Patient Satisfaction

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 462 - 467, 24.09.2024
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1522378
https://izlik.org/JA68XD52TP

Öz

Aim: This study was conducted to compare the satisfaction of patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus regarding blood glucose measurement based on the blood glucose measurement techniques (intravenous and capillary) used.
Material and Method: A randomized controlled study was conducted with 110 patients with diabetes mellitus. Patients were randomized into the experimental group (n=55) and control group (n=55). Patient Information Form, Diabetes Fear of Injecting and Self-testing Questionnaire (D-FISQ), and Blood Glucose Measurement Patient Satisfaction Form were used in the study. The control group patients had their blood sugar measured using capillary blood from a finger prick. The experimental group patients had their blood glucose measured intravenously using venous blood, followed by capillary blood glucose measurement from a finger prick. Data analysis was conducted using chi-square test and independent t-test.
Results: There were statistically significant differences in the satisfaction of diabetic patients with the blood glucose measurement technique between the use of venous blood and intravenous blood glucose measurement by finger prick (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The measurement of blood glucose using venous blood obtained by an intravenous catheter positively affects patient satisfaction compared to the finger prick technique of measuring capillary blood glucose in patients with diabetes.

Kaynakça

  • IDF Facts & figures. https://idf.org/about-diabetes/diabetes-facts-figures/ access date 18.07.2024
  • TEMD Guideline for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of diabetes mellitus and ıts complications - 2024, https://file.temd.org.tr/Uploads/publications/guides/documents/diabetesmellitus2024.pdf access date 26.06.2024
  • Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2023;46:e151-99.
  • Ma R, Shao R, An X, et al. Recent advancements in noninvasive glucose monitoring and closed-loop management systems for diabetes. J Mater Chem B. 2022;10:5537-55.
  • Kubihal S, Goyal A, Gupta Y, et al. Glucose measurement in body fluids: a ready reckoner for clinicians. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;15:45-53.
  • Laha S, Rajput A, Laha SS, et al. A concise and systematic review on non-invasive glucose monitoring for potential diabetes management. Biosensors. 2022;12:965.
  • Arias-Rivera S, Raurell-Torredà M, Fernández-Castillo R-J, et al. Blood glucose monitoring in critically ill adult patients: type of sample and method of analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2024;35:45-72.
  • Duncanson E, Leu RKL, Shanahan L, et al. The prevalence and evidence-based management of needle fear in adults with chronic disease: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0253048.
  • Dağdelen M, Muz G, Çırpan R. The effect of the fear of finger punching and insulin injection on administration to the treatment in individuals with a diabetes diagnosis. Journal of Health Sciences. 2022;31:51-9.
  • Selen F. Kan glikoz düzeyinin izlenmesinde yenilikler. Sağlik hizmetlerinde yenilikler ve teknoloji sempozyumu. November 17-18, 2022:1.
  • Erdem N, Sağkal Midilli T. Comparison of blood glucose levels in blood samples taken in three different ways from patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Turkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci. 2020;12:536-43.
  • Snoek FJ, Mollema ED, Heine RJ, et al. Development and validation of the diabetes fear of injecting and self-testing questionnaire (D-FISQ): first findings. Diabet Med. 1997;14:871-6.
  • Celik S, Pinar R. Psychometric evaluation of a Turkish version of the diabetes fear of self-injecting and self-testing questionnaire (D-FISQ). Asian Nurs Res. 2016;10:195-200.
  • Bukhsh A, Goh BH, Zimbudzi E, et al. Type 2 diabetes patients' perspectives, experiences, and barriers toward diabetes-related self-care: a qualitative study from Pakistan. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:534873.
  • Ong WM, Chua SS, Ng CJ. Barriers and facilitators to self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes using insulin: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:237-46.
  • Duncanson E, Le Leu RK, Shanahan L, et al. The prevalence and evidence-based management of needle fear in adults with chronic disease: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0253048.
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Dahili Hastalıklar Hemşireliği
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Ayşegül Özbakan 0009-0006-7609-6848

Arzu Erkoç 0000-0001-9077-1973

Gönderilme Tarihi 25 Temmuz 2024
Kabul Tarihi 3 Eylül 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 24 Eylül 2024
DOI https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1522378
IZ https://izlik.org/JA68XD52TP
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

AMA 1.Özbakan A, Erkoç A. Comparison of Glucose Measurement Techniques Using Venous and Capillary Blood Samples in Diabetics Regarding Patient Satisfaction. Med Records. 2024;6(3):462-467. doi:10.37990/medr.1522378

Chief Editors
Prof. Dr. Berkant Özpolat, MD
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ufuk University, Dr. Rıdvan Ege Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye

Editors
Prof. Dr. Sercan Okutucu, MD
Department of Cardiology, Ankara Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Türkiye

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Süleyman Cebeci, MD
Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

Field Editors
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Doğan Öztürk, MD
Department of General Surgery, Manisa Özel Sarıkız Hospital, Manisa, Türkiye

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Birsen Doğanay, MD
Department of Cardiology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sonay Aydın, MD
Department of Radiology, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan, Türkiye

Language Editors
PhD, Dr. Evin Mise
Department of Work Psychology, Ankara University, Ayaş Vocational School, Ankara, Türkiye

Dt. Çise Nazım
Department of Periodontology, Dr. Burhan Nalbantoğlu State Hospital, Lefkoşa, North Cyprus

Statistics Editor
Dr. Nurbanu Bursa, PhD
Department of Statistics, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Science, Ankara, Türkiye

Scientific Publication Coordinator
Kübra Toğlu
argistyayincilik@gmail.com

Franchise Owner
Argist Yayıncılık
argistyayincilik@gmail.com

Publisher: Argist Yayıncılık
E-mail: argistyayincilik@gmail.com

Phone: 0312 979 0235
GSM: 0533 320 3209

Address: Kızılırmak Mahallesi Dumlupınar Bulvarı No:3 C-1 160 Çankaya/Ankara, Türkiye
Web: www.argistyayin.com.tr