Readability Analysis of Web Pages Providing Information on the Relationship Between Gingival Diseases and Heart Health

Öz

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the readability of Turkish-language texts that provide information about the relationship between gingival diseases and heart health on the internet. Material and Method: The keywords “gingival diseases and heart health relationship” were entered into the Google search engine. As a result of the search, the first 60 pages with Turkish content that provided patient information on the subject and could be accessed directly without any membership requirement were included in the study. Repeated web pages, academic publications, images, video content, and sites for advertising commercial products were not included in the study. The texts obtained were evaluated according to the Ateşman Readability Index. Results: Forty-six of the first 60 sites found in the search met the inclusion criteria. When the texts included in the study were examined according to their sources, it was found that 43.5% were pages of dental clinics, 26.1% of private hospitals, 10.9% of university hospitals, 10.9% of media news pages, 4.3% of professional organizations, 2.2% of cardiology clinics and 2.2% of state hospitals. It was determined that 60.87% of the texts on the pages were at “medium” and 39.13% were at “difficult” readability level. Conclusion: According to the results of the study, it was determined that the informative texts about “The relationship between gingival disease and heart health” published on Turkish websites have medium and difficult readability levels. In order to make such informative texts easier and comprehensible to read, it would be useful to adjust the language level of the text by using readability tools by the author before publication.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Readability
• internet
• gingival diseases
• heart health
• heart diseases

Kaynakça

1. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Hane halkı bilişim teknolojileri (BT) kullanım araştırması 2023. data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2023-49407 access date 25.07.2024.
2. Deniz S. A study on the e-health literacy and cyberchondria levels of individuals. İnsan ve İnsan. 2020;7:84-96.
3. Lenhart A, Horrigan J, Rainie L, et al. The ever-shifting Internet population. a new look at Internet access and the digital divide. Washington, DC: Pew Internet&American Life Project. 2003 Apr 1. http://pewrsr.ch/1iQ8PW3 access date 25.07.2024.
4. Tolu S, Basım P. A new perspective on readability and content assessment of patient information texts published on the İnternet sites on lymphedema. J Curr Res Health Sector. 2018;8:303-14.
5. Çoban A. Okunabilirlik kavramına yönelik bir derleme çalışması. Dil ve Edebiyat Eğitimi Dergisi. 2014;1:96-111.
6. Bezirci B, Yilmaz AE. A software library for measurement of readability of texts and a new readability metric for Turkish. DEÜ Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2010;12:49-62.
7. Ateşman E. Measuring readability in Turkish. AU Tömer Language Journal. 1997;58:71-4.
8. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32:221-33.

9. Edmunds MR, Denniston AK, Boelaert K, et al. Patient information in Graves' disease and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: readability assessment of online resources. Thyroid. 2014;24:67-72.
10. Williams RC. Periodontal disease. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:373-82.
11. Grossi SG, Genco RJ. Periodontal disease and diabetes mellitus: a two-way relationship. Ann Periodontol. 1998;3:51-61.
12. Tonetti MS, Dyke TE. Periodontitis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: consensus report of the Joint EFP/AAP Workshop on Periodontitis and Systemic Diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;84:S24-9.
13. Scannapieco FA, Cantos A. Oral inflammation and infection, and chronic medical diseases: implications for the elderly. Periodontol 2000. 2016;72:153-75.
14. Schenkein HA, Loos BG. Inflammatory mechanisms linking periodontal diseases to cardiovascular diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:S51-69.
15. Luepker RV. Cardiovascular disease: rise, fall, and future prospects. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:1-3.
16. Nabel EG. Cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:60-72.
17. Mattila KJ, Nieminen MS, Valtonen VV, et al. Association between dental health and acute myocardial infarction. BMJ. 1989;298:779-81.
18. Simonka M, Skaleric U, Hojs D. Condition of teeth and periodontal tissue in patients who had suffered a heart attack. Zobozdrav Vestn. 1988;43:81-3.
19. Arbes Jr SJ, Slade G, Beck J. Association between extent of periodontal attachment loss and self-reported history of heart attack: an analysis of NHANES III data. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1777-82.
20. Janket S-J, Baird AE, Chuang S-K, Jones JA. Meta-analysis of periodontal disease and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95:559-69
21. Scannapieco FA, Gershovich E. The prevention of periodontal disease—An overview. Periodontology 2000. 2020;84:9-13.
22. Kanmaz B, Buduneli N. Evaluation of information quality on the internet for periodontal disease patients. Oral Diseases. 2021;27348-56.
23. Taşdemir İ. Readability analysis of information about gingival disease on the internet . Selcuk Dental Journal. 2023;10:89-93.
24. Badarudeen S, Sabharwal S. Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2572-80.
25. Akbulut AS. Readability Analysis of information on the internet about clear aligner treatment. NEU Dent J. 2022;4:7-11.
26. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Ulusal eğitim istatistikleri 2023. data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Ulusal-Egitim-Istatistikleri-2023-53444 access date 25.07.2024.