Dental Students' Perspectives on Anatomy Education in Dental Faculty

Öz

Aim: In dental faculties, Anatomy is taught as a basic science course in the first year of the education program. The effective delivery of this course plays a critical role in equipping students with fundamental anatomical knowledge and preparing them for professional practice. The purpose of this study is to gather feedback from dental students regarding the anatomy curriculum and teaching methods. Material and Method: This study was conducted with the participation of students enrolled in Dental Faculties during the 2021-2022 academic year. A total of 499 students from 29 different universities who had completed at least one term of anatomy education participated. The survey consisted of 20 questions covering topics such as the role of anatomy education in dental practice, anatomy learning models, the anatomy curriculum, and its relevance to professional requirements." Results: 63.8% of students reported feeling like doctors when they began their anatomy education, while 75.4% stated that becoming a doctor is impossible without anatomy education. 94% of students found that working on models during practical classes made it easier to understand theoretical anatomy lessons, and 92.5% found that working with 3D programs facilitated understanding of the theoretical lessons. 65.8% of students believed that the anatomy curriculum in dental education should focus solely on head and neck anatomy. Upon transitioning to professional practice, 61.8% of students stated knowing the anatomy of the entire body was unnecessary, yet 53.1% believed they would apply their anatomy knowledge in their careers. Conclusion: Evaluating dental students' attitudes toward anatomy courses and their learning experiences is important in understanding how they approach a fundamental area of knowledge critical for their profession. We believe that this study may be useful in curriculum planning and the development of teaching methods.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Anatomy
• dentistry
• education
• survey

Proje Numarası

2021/4319

Etik Beyan

This study was conducted with the ethical approval of the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Nuh Naci Yazgan University (NNYU) under approval number 2021/4319, date 05.10.2021.

Teşekkür

ı would like to thank the dentistry students who supported my study by answering the survey questions that formed the basis of my study

Kaynakça

1. Ocakoğlu Ö. Türkiye Üniversite Tarihi (5 cilt) Emre Dölen, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2009 (1.Cilt), ISBN: 9786053990994. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi. 2010;8:259-63.
2. Pamay A, Büyükertan M, Balcıoğlu HA. An investigation on the anatomy education at dental faculties in European and North American universities. Yeditepe Dental Journal. 2017;13:29-33.
3. Bati AH, Ozer MA, Govsa F, Pinar Y. Anxiety of first cadaver demonstration in medical, dentistry and pharmacy faculty students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;1;35:419-26.
4. Guttmann GD, Ma TP, MacPherson BR. Making gross anatomy relevant to dental students. Journal of Dental Education. 2003;67:355-8.
5. Arifoğlu Y. Her Yönüyle Anatomi. 1st edition. İstanbul Tıp Kitabevleri, İstanbul, 2021;2.
6. Balcıoğlu HA, Kökten G, Güven Y. Future perspectives of anatomy in dental education: quo vadis?. Int. J. Morphol. 2010;28:71-3.
7. Doğan Z, Uludağ Ö, Ateşoğlu S, et al. Opinions of students in dentistry faculty on interactive anatomy education. Sdü Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2018;9:48-53.
8. Öğetürk M, Kavakli A, Kuş İ, et al. Tıp öğrencileri nasıl bir anatomi eğitimi istiyor?. TED. 2003;10:7-14.

9. Tuygar Ş, Kuş İ, Saygılı Ö, et al. Evaluation of satisfaction levels and its associated variables for anatomy education in medical students. TED. 2015;14:5-14.
10. Turhan B, Çetkin M, Bahşi İ, Kervancıoğlu P. The opinions of medicine faculty students about anatomy education. European Journal of Therapeutics. 2016;22:82-8.
11. Güler H, Ömerli A, Yılmaz F, et al. Erciyes University term 3 medical students’ socio-demographic characteristic and opinions on anatomy education. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;28:9-13.
12. Uygur R, Çağlar V, Topçu B, et al. The assessment of the students’ opinions about anatomy education. Int J Basic Clin Med. 2013;1:94-106.
13. Arı İ, Şendemir E. Students' views on anatomy education. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2003;29:11-4.
14. Kamisli H. Özonur M. Evaluation a Course by interviews of academic staff and student: anatomy. Turkish Journal of Educational Studies. 2015;2:23-47.
15. Gülekon İ. The role of radiological and clinical anatomy in anatomy education: interview with students. Gazi Medical Journal. 2017;28:179-83.
16. Canbolat M. Evaluation of the knowledge of medical faculty students about the anatomical structures on radiological images. Med Records. 2020;2:87-92.
17. Davis CR, Bates AS, Ellis H, Roberts AM. Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:262-72.
18. Çılgın koşu sürüyor. Türk Dişhekimleri Birliği Dergisi 2021;185:30-4. https://www.tdb.org.tr/tdb/v2/yayinlar/TDB_e-dergi/185/TDBD185.html access date 08.01.2024.
19. Çan MA. Metaphors for anatomy lesson of students who received anatomy education in faculty of medicine and faculty of dentistry. Tip Egitimi Dunyasi. 2022;21:118-27.
20. Estai M, Stuart B. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat. 2016;208:151-7.
21. Redwood CJ, Townsend GC. The dead center of the dental curriculum: changing attitudes of dental students during dissection. Journal of Dental Education. 2011;75:1333-44.
22. Ostrin Z, Dushenkov V. The pedagogical value of mobile devices and content-specific application software in the A&P laboratory. Journal of the Human Anatomy and Physiology Society. 2016;20:97-103.
23. Hwang GJ, Wu PH. Applications, impacts and trends of mobile technology-enhanced learning: a review of 2008-2012 publications in selected SSCI journals. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation. 2014;8:83-95.
24. Mayfield CH, Ohara PT., O'Sullivan PS. Perceptions of a mobile technology on learning strategies in the anatomy laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6:81-9.
25. Demirtaş İ, Onay T, Günerigök F. Developed mobile applications for anatomy education. TED. 2019;18:41-9.
26. Kerby J, Shukur ZN, Shalhoub J. The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students. Clin Anat. 2011;24:489-97.
27. Biasutto SN, Caussa LI, Criado del Río LE. Teaching anatomy: cadavers vs. computers?. Ann Anat. 2006;188:187-90.