Araştırma Makalesi

Clinical Course and Prognostic Factors of Isolated Pubic Ramus Fractures in Geriatric Patients

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3 9 Eylül 2025
PDF İndir
EN

Clinical Course and Prognostic Factors of Isolated Pubic Ramus Fractures in Geriatric Patients

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of geriatric patients with pubic ramus fractures managed conservatively, assessing parameters such as length of hospitalization, blood loss, and accompanying comorbidities, and to investigate the impact of these factors on one-year mortality rates. Material and Method: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on patients aged 65 and older diagnosed with pubic ramus fractures and admitted to a tertiary care center between 2012 and 2024. Demographic data, existing systemic diseases, laboratory findings, hospitalization duration, and mortality outcomes within a one-year follow-up were examined in detail. Results: 60 patients were evaluated in the study, with a mean age of 78.00±7.32 years, and 71.7% of the participants were female. The mean hospitalization was calculated as 3.28±2.62 days. A statistically significant relationship was found between the burden of comorbidities and the duration of hospitalization (p<0.001). The change in hemoglobin data was 2.36±1.03 g/dL. The fractures of the pubic ramus were 85% unilateral. Among the comorbid conditions, heart failure was the most frequently observed, affecting 71% of the patients. Deep vein thrombosis was present in 9 patients. The mortality rate was 10 percent during the twelve-month follow-up period. Conclusion: Isolated pubic ramus fractures in older adults should be considered a significant clinical concern due to their association with increased morbidity and mortality. Prompt identification of risk factors influencing hospitalization duration and mortality underscores the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in patient management.

Keywords

Etik Beyan

Approval for the study was obtained from the Düzce University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Date: 21.04.2025, Number: 2024/115).

Kaynakça

  1. Dong J, Hao W, Wang B, et al. Management and outcome of pelvic fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective study of 40 cases. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127:2802-7.
  2. Forssten MP, Sarani B, Mohammad Ismail A, et al. Adverse outcomes following pelvic fracture: the critical role of frailty. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023;49:2623-31.
  3. Rommens PM, Hopf JC, Herteleer M, et al. Isolated pubic ramus fractures are serious adverse events for elderly persons: an observational study on 138 patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis type I (FFP Type I). J Clin Med. 2020;9:2498.
  4. Behanova M, Haschka J, Reichardt B, et al. Pelvic fractures-an underestimated problem? incidence and mortality risk after pelvic fracture in Austria, 2010-2018. J Clin Med. 2022;11:2834.
  5. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, et al. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465-75.
  6. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, et al. Epidemiology of osteoporotic pelvic fractures in elderly people in Finland: sharp increase in 1970-1997 and alarming projections for the new millennium. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:443-8.
  7. Loggers SAI, Joosse P, Jan Ponsen K. Outcome of pubic rami fractures with or without concomitant involvement of the posterior ring in elderly patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45:1021-9.
  8. Ramser M, Vach W, Strub N, et al. The impact of specific fracture characteristics of low-energy fractures of the pelvis on mortality. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22:669.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ortopedi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

9 Eylül 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

8 Mayıs 2025

Kabul Tarihi

3 Haziran 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

AMA
1.Sağlam S, Karaduman ZO, Arıcan M, Yücel MO, Bulum YE, Dalaslan RE. Clinical Course and Prognostic Factors of Isolated Pubic Ramus Fractures in Geriatric Patients. Med Records. 2025;7(3):591-5. https://izlik.org/JA29KB39JD